Key Data: Total National Debt ~$39 Trillion · Debt-to-GDP Ratio 100.2%, First Time Since WWII · FY2026 Interest Expense $1.039 Trillion · Annual Deficit ~$2 Trillion · CBO Projects Debt to Reach 175% of GDP by 2056 · Debt Increases by $5 to $8 Billion Daily
Section 1 — A Historic Milestone with No Celebration
In March 2026, the United States crossed a threshold not breached in peacetime since World War II. The government's debt to external creditors—known as "debt held by the public," excluding what it owes to government trust funds like Social Security—reached $31.27 trillion. Meanwhile, the U.S. nominal GDP over the past twelve months was $31.22 trillion. The debt-to-GDP ratio officially surpassed 100%.
"It happened—U.S. national debt has now exceeded the size of the U.S. economy, roughly double the historical average," stated Maya MacGuineas, President of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, with blunt candor.
According to U.S. Treasury data, as of May 18, 2026, the total U.S. national debt stood precisely at $39,008,999,901,378.68. This figure increases by approximately $5 to $8 billion daily, with an average daily growth rate of about $7.5 billion over the past year. The debt surpassed $1 trillion in 1981, $10 trillion in 2008, and $20 trillion in 2017, nearly doubling over the past eight years.
In February 2026, Phillip Swagel, Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), issued a stark warning: "Our budget projections continue to show the current fiscal trajectory is unsustainable." Under current law, federal debt is projected to surpass its WWII peak of 106% of GDP by 2030. It would reach 120% of GDP by 2036 and a staggering 175% by 2056. Unlike the post-WWII period when strong growth and fiscal discipline gradually reduced the debt burden, there are no signs of the current massive debt stock contracting naturally.
Educational Note: National debt is typically discussed in two measures. "Gross debt" covers all federal government liabilities, including those owed to government trust funds like Social Security. "Debt held by the public" is the debt owed to external creditors—investors, foreign governments, and financial institutions who buy U.S. Treasury securities. The latter is economically more significant as it represents actual borrowing from the market. Both measures are currently at peacetime historical highs.
Section 2 — Why the Debt Has Become So Intractable
The U.S. debt problem is not a sudden outbreak but the result of decades of accumulated structural choices—rounds of tax cuts without corresponding spending cuts, rising spending without matching revenue sources, compounded by the compounding effect of interest. Understanding this history helps explain why solving this problem is so difficult.
The structural gap between government spending and revenue. Since 1970, the U.S. federal government has achieved a budget surplus in only four years, running deficits all other years. Whenever government spending exceeds tax revenue, the shortfall is financed by issuing Treasury bonds. These bonds accumulate into debt, with the annual deficit further exacerbated by interest payments on the growing debt pile. This is a compounding spiral.
The three major drivers of spending growth. Three dominant and perpetually expanding spending centers dominate the federal budget. Social Security spending in the first seven months of FY2026 reached $953 billion; Medicare spending during the same period was $588 billion; and net public debt interest payments in these seven months reached $628 billion, exceeding the combined spending on Medicare and Medicaid. These three categories are structural, driven by an aging population, healthcare costs, and debt accumulation—not annual political decisions. Cutting any requires politically painful choices, something successive administrations have long avoided.
The interest trap. This is the most concerning dynamic in the entire debt dilemma. In 2015, the U.S. paid $223 billion in net interest; $345 billion in 2020; $881 billion in 2024; and an estimated $1.039 trillion in FY2026—nearly tripling in six years. Interest payments are now the third-largest expenditure in the federal budget, behind only Social Security and Medicare, and surpassing defense spending. The CBO projects that by 2028, interest payments will exceed Medicare spending, and by 2048 will become the federal government's single largest expenditure—at which point the government will spend more on servicing past debt than on all future investments combined.
The CBO projects that over the next 30 years, U.S. government interest payments alone will total nearly $100 trillion. For perspective, that number exceeds the sum of all spending on major federal programs.
The "One Big Beautiful Bill"—The Latest Accelerator. Signed into law in 2025, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" (OBBB) made permanent the Trump-era 2017 tax cuts and added tax exemptions for tips and overtime pay. The CBO estimates the bill will increase deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade. If all temporary provisions are made permanent, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates the cost could climb to $4-5 trillion. The cumulative deficit forecast for 2026-2035 has been revised upward to $23.1 trillion, $1.4 trillion higher than the CBO's projection a year earlier.
The pandemic legacy. The two largest annual fiscal deficits in U.S. history occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic: $3.1 trillion in FY2020 and nearly $2.8 trillion in FY2021. This borrowed money remains on the balance sheet, accruing interest at rates far above the near-zero rates when it was issued.
Educational Note: A fiscal deficit is the annual gap between government spending and tax revenue. National debt is the accumulated sum of all past deficits, plus accrued interest. A simple analogy: If you spend $5,000 more than you earn each month and cover the difference with your credit card, your monthly deficit is $5,000. Your total debt is the credit card balance—each month's overspending stacked together, plus accumulating interest. The U.S. government is in exactly the same position, just with many more zeros.
Section 3 — Will the United States Actually Go Bankrupt?
This is a question every retail investor eventually asks, and it deserves a careful, honest answer, not a simple yes or no.
The short answer is: The United States will not go bankrupt like a business or household. The U.S. government issues its own currency—the U.S. dollar—and can theoretically always create more dollars to repay its debt. Historically, no country that borrows in its own currency and controls its own central bank has ever been forced into an involuntary default. The only U.S. default in history occurred in 1979, and that was a brief technical error.
But this does not mean there are no consequences. The ability to print money brings another risk: inflation. If the U.S. government creates large amounts of money to pay its debts, the real purchasing power of each dollar in circulation is diluted—essentially imposing an implicit tax on everyone holding dollars and dollar-denominated assets. This is why the question "Will the U.S. go bankrupt?" is far less important than "What are the consequences of the current trajectory?"
Insights from Reinhart and Rogoff. In their landmark study of over 800 years of financial crises, "This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly," Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff found that debt crises often arrive not gradually and predictably but suddenly with a collapse in confidence. Countries seemingly managing their debt comfortably may suddenly find investors stop buying their bonds or demand sharply higher yields, making the debt unserviceable. The shift from sustainable to unsustainable can happen in months, not years.
The Cato Institute's framework—Gradually, then suddenly. The Cato Institute uses Hemingway's famous description of bankruptcy to describe the U.S. fiscal trajectory: gradually, then suddenly. Rational market participants can see the unsustainability of the U.S. fiscal path from far away, and they continue buying U.S. Treasuries—until one day they don't. The tipping point cannot be precisely predicted in advance, but the underlying conditions for it are steadily accumulating.
What a real fiscal crisis would look like. A U.S. fiscal crisis would not resemble a business filing for bankruptcy. It would more likely manifest as a sharp, sudden spike in long-term Treasury yields—investors demanding much higher compensation to keep lending. This would simultaneously push up borrowing costs across the economy—mortgages, corporate bonds, consumer credit would all rise. Banks, pension funds, and insurance companies holding large amounts of Treasuries would face significant losses, potentially threatening their own solvency. As the U.S. House Budget Committee notes, given the dollar's status as the global reserve currency, such a crisis "would almost certainly trigger irreversible international chain reactions."
The dollar's reserve currency status is both a buffer and a risk. Over half of global foreign exchange reserves are held in U.S. dollars, creating structural global demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets (including U.S. Treasuries). This reserve status is the core reason the U.S. can run large deficits at lower interest rates than any other country—an advantage economists call the "exorbitant privilege." But reserve status is not permanent; it depends on global confidence in U.S. economic strength and institutional stability. If that confidence erodes—as indicated by IMF warnings about a diminishing "safety premium" on Treasuries—this buffer narrows.
Educational Note: A reserve currency is a currency widely held by central banks and international institutions as a store of value and medium for settling global trade. The U.S. dollar constitutes about 58% of global foreign exchange reserves. This means that even when trading parties are not American, trade between countries is often settled in dollars. This creates constant global demand for dollars, underpinning America's ability to finance itself at below-market interest rates.
Section 4 — What This Means for Investors
The U.S. debt problem is not a distant theoretical risk. It is already affecting financial markets and investor portfolios in tangible ways, and this impact is more likely to deepen than recede.
Direct link to rising yields. In Q2 2026 alone, the U.S. Treasury needs to borrow $189 billion, $79 billion more than expected just months ago. Actual borrowing in Q1 2026 was $577 billion, with Q3 projected at $671 billion. Such massive and growing Treasury supply flooding the market can only be absorbed by offering higher yields. The 30-year Treasury yield has risen to 5.2%, the highest since 2007; the 10-year yield reached 4.687% on May 19. These are not coincidences; they are the bond market's direct reflection of a supply-demand imbalance driven by government borrowing needs.
Crowding out private investment. When the government borrows massively, it competes with businesses and households for available capital. Larger government borrowing pushes up borrowing costs for everyone—mortgages, corporate bonds, auto loans, credit card rates all rise. This dampens private investment, slows economic growth, and squeezes consumer spending. Money that could have gone to roads, research, education, and defense instead flows to creditors as payment for past debt.
Self-reinforcing compounding dynamics. The most dangerous feature of the current trajectory is its self-reinforcing nature: the larger the debt, the higher the interest payments; the higher the interest, the larger the deficit; the larger the deficit, the more borrowing needed; the more borrowing, the higher the yields; the higher the yields, the heavier the interest burden on new debt. This cycle can appear stable for a surprisingly long time—until a tipping point.
Moody's downgrade and its signal. In May 2025, Moody's downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit rating from Aaa to Aa1, becoming the last of the three major rating agencies to do so. S&P downgraded in 2011, Fitch in 2023. The actions of all three agencies over 14 years send a consistent message: the current fiscal trajectory is incompatible with the highest credit rating; the gap between government commitments and revenues is structural, not cyclical.
Social Security solvency—The 2032 deadline. The CBO projects the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will be depleted in 2032, one year earlier than previously projected. If Congress takes no action by then, all beneficiaries would face an automatic benefit cut of approximately 28%, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget based on CBO projections. Already in the first seven months of FY2026, Social Security has cost $953 billion. Any legislative fix will involve politically agonizing choices that have been deferred for decades.
Section 5 — If U.S. Debt Is Soaring, Why Isn't Anyone 'Defusing the Bomb'?
Solving the U.S. debt problem is mathematically simple but politically almost impossible. The math solution is some combination of higher revenues and lower spending. The political difficulty is that any action requires elected officials to ask voters to accept higher taxes or lower benefits—neither wins votes.
The revenue-side dilemma. Federal tax revenues have consistently fallen below spending levels. Closing the deficit gap through tax increases would require higher income tax rates, a broader tax base, or new tax sources. The direction of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" is exactly the opposite—cutting taxes and expanding exemptions.
The spending-side dilemma. Meaningful deficit reduction must address the three major spending categories: Social Security, Medicare, and debt interest. Interest payments cannot be directly cut—they are legal obligations on existing debt. Cutting Social Security and Medicare is politically explosive, directly affecting the nation's largest and most politically active voting bloc—retirees and near-retirees.
The growth argument. Some economists argue that robust economic growth is the most realistic path to reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio without explicit fiscal tightening. If the economy grows faster than debt consistently, the ratio will eventually stabilize. This is what happened for decades after WWII. The counterargument is that the current debt trajectory is too steep and interest costs are rising too fast for growth alone to solve the problem.
Consensus among fiscal watchdogs. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates stabilizing the debt requires about $10 trillion in deficit reduction. There are currently no prospects for bipartisan cooperation to achieve anything close to that. CBO Director Swagel's summary judgment—"fiscal trajectory is unsustainable"—represents the consensus of nearly every nonpartisan fiscal agency in the nation.
Educational Note: The "debt-to-GDP ratio" is the standard tool economists use to assess a country's debt burden. It compares total debt to the size of the economy, rather than looking at absolute numbers alone, because sustainability hinges on whether the economy has sufficient capacity to service the debt. The U.S. ratio exceeding 100% means the debt stock is larger than the entire economy's annual total output—a level previously seen only during World War II.
Section 6 — Implications for Different Types of Investors
Equity Investors: A debt crisis environment fosters a structurally higher interest rate regime than the near-zero-rate era of 2009-2022. This structurally pressures high-valuation growth stocks reliant on low discount rates. Beneficiaries include the financial sector—wider spreads boost net interest income for banks and insurers—and companies with robust current earnings and low debt levels.
Bond Investors: The U.S. debt trajectory is a medium-term headwind for long-term Treasuries. More bond supply implies price pressure and rising yields over time. For investors seeking stable income, the current yield environment is the most attractive in nearly fifteen years—but the risk is yields could still move higher. Investment-grade corporate bonds and intermediate-term Treasuries offer a more favorable risk-reward balance than long-term Treasuries in this environment.
Gold & Physical Asset Investors: Historically, persistent fiscal deficits and currency devaluation fears have been key drivers of gold demand. Gold's significant appreciation over the past two years partly reflects market judgment on the U.S. fiscal path. Physical assets—real estate, commodities, inflation-protected bonds—historically provide some hedge against the purchasing power erosion caused by fiscal excess.
Singapore & Asian Investors: A U.S. debt crisis affects Asia through multiple channels. Rising U.S. yields attract capital outflows from emerging markets, pressuring Asian currencies and stock markets. If loss of confidence in U.S. fiscal management weakens the dollar, the purchasing power of dollar-denominated assets held by Asian investors would erode. Singapore, as an international financial center, is particularly sensitive to any global capital market turmoil triggered by U.S. fiscal stress.
All Investors: The most important practical implication of the current debt situation is this: the ultra-low interest rate era prevalent from 2009 to 2022 is not coming back. The structural forces sustaining a high-rate environment—the need for massive Treasury issuance to fund persistent deficits—are not transitory. Investment strategies built on the assumption of permanently low interest rates need reevaluation and adjustment.
Section 7 — An Honest Assessment: Crisis, Slow Burn, or Manageable Decline
Looking ahead over the next decade, the U.S. debt situation could evolve along three broad scenario paths.
Scenario 1: Gradual Stabilization. Congress eventually enacts meaningful fiscal reform—combining revenue increases and spending control to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio. There are precedents in other countries: both the UK and Canada undertook painful but successful fiscal consolidations in the 1990s. Under this scenario, long-term yields would eventually stabilize or even decline, and financial markets would adjust without a crisis.
Scenario 2: Slow-Burn Agony. Debt continues growing, interest rates stay elevated, and the economy's potential growth is persistently weighed down by government borrowing crowding out private investment. Inflation hovers above the Federal Reserve's target. Improvements in living standards slow. The U.S. retains its reserve currency status, but with a narrower premium. Most fiscal economists view this as the most likely baseline scenario—not a crisis, but a persistent drag on economic performance and asset returns. This scenario is arguably already underway.
Scenario 3: Sudden Collapse of Confidence. At some point, enough bond market participants simultaneously conclude "the trajectory is unsustainable," demanding sharply higher yields or simply ceasing to buy. This would trigger a sudden spike in borrowing costs, which would in turn widen the deficit via higher interest payments, further eroding confidence. Reinhart and Rogoff's research, spanning 800 years of sovereign debt crises, documents this pattern. The U.S. possesses structural advantages—reserve currency status, economic size and diversity, deep capital markets—making this scenario less probable than for other nations. But the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, CBO, IMF, and Moody's have all stated clearly: if the current trajectory persists, some form of crisis is inevitable.
The honest conclusion for investors: The probability of an acute crisis within the next 1-2 years is low but not negligible; the probability of a slow-burn scenario over the next 5-10 years is considerably higher. The corresponding portfolio implications—favoring current earnings over distant growth, shortening fixed-income duration, partially hedging inflation risk with physical assets, and promoting geographical diversification to reduce concentration in pure dollar assets—are adjustments worth making now, without needing to pinpoint when a more severe scenario might unfold.
Section 8 — Key Developments Worth Monitoring Closely
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report updates. The CBO releases Budget and Economic Outlook reports multiple times annually, providing the most reliable nonpartisan data on fiscal trajectory. Any significant upward revisions in deficit or debt projections are important data signals to watch closely.
U.S. Treasury debt auction demand. The primary signal of whether the bond market is comfortably absorbing U.S. Treasury supply or feeling strain is the strength of demand at Treasury auctions—measured by the bid-to-cover ratio. A low bid-to-cover ratio suggests the government is struggling to find enough buyers at current yields.
Social Security Trust Fund projections. The annual Trustees Report provides updated projections for the fund's depletion date. The current projection for the OASI fund depletion is 2032. Any further acceleration of this timeline would be a significant negative signal.
30-year Treasury yield trends. Currently at 5.2%, the highest since 2007. A sustained move above 5.5% would indicate a significant market reassessment of U.S. fiscal risk.
Bipartisan fiscal cooperation—or its absence. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's estimated $10 trillion deficit reduction target is the benchmark against which to measure any legislative action. Bipartisan movement toward this goal would be a notable positive signal; the absence of such cooperation—the current baseline—would keep the slow-burn scenario steadily advancing.
Debt at $39 trillion, increasing by $5 to $8 billion daily. Interest expense this year breaks $1 trillion for the first time. The debt-to-GDP ratio surpasses 100% for the first time since WWII. The CBO says the fiscal trajectory is unsustainable. The bond market is signaling the same through rising yields. For investors, the question is not whether this matters. The question is: How to position one's portfolio in a world where U.S. government borrowing demand is a persistent and growing long-term feature, and the era of cheap government debt is over.
About BIT (formerly Matrixport)
BIT's U.S. equities business connects directly with licensed broker-dealers, covering the full spectrum of U.S. exchange-listed stocks and ETFs. Benefiting from over seven years of institutional service expertise and compliance licensing, BIT successfully bridges the boundary between digital assets and traditional finance, helping investors quickly capture investment opportunities.
Data Sources
Hoover Institution, U.S. National Debt and Deficits, May 2026. Fox Business, FY2026 Federal Deficit Projected at $2 Trillion, May 2026. Fox Business, U.S. National Debt Breaches $39 Trillion Milestone for First Time, March 2026. Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2026 to 2036, February 2026. Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, CBO February 2026 Budget and Economic Outlook, February 2026. Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Debt Held by Public Exceeds GDP, May 2026. BigGo Finance, U.S. Debt Exceeds Size of Economy for First Time Since WWII, May 2026. Independent Institute, Yet Another Grim Milestone for National Debt, May 2026. CBS News, U.S. Debt Now Exceeds GDP, May 2026. Fortune, U.S. National Debt Officially Tops $39 Trillion, May 2026. Fortune, U.S. Treasury Pays $3 Billion Daily in Interest, May 2026. Fortune, $38 Trillion National Debt Fiscal Path Unsustainable CBO, February 2026. American Action Forum, National Debt Interest Payments: Recent and Long-Term Outlook, April 2026. Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Debt Interest to Exceed $1 Trillion, February 2025. Peter G. Peterson Foundation, The Cost of National Debt, March 2026. Bipartisan Policy Center, CBO Latest Ten-Year Baseline Fiscal Outlook, February 2026. Bipartisan Policy Center, Deficit Tracker, May 2026. 24/7 Wall St., Social Security OASI Fund Depletion Date 2032, March 2026. Fox Business, Social Security Trust Fund Solvency Crisis 2032, February 2026. U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee, Monthly Debt Update, April 2026. Council on Foreign Relations, What Happens When the U.S. Hits the Debt Ceiling, 2023. Cato Institute, Bankruptcy: Gradually, Then Suddenly, 2023. U.S. House Budget Committee, The Consequences of Debt, 2025. Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly.
Data as of May 2026.
This report is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. It should not be construed as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or financial instrument. All investments involve risk. Readers should conduct their own thorough research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Risk Disclosure and Disclaimer
- The views expressed in this report reflect market analysis as of the report date. Market conditions can change rapidly, and relevant views may be adjusted without further notice.
- Data cited in this report is sourced from public channels. BIT does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. This report is intended for financial education and market information purposes only, reflecting market conditions and the research team's views at the time of writing. All content does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation for any financial product. Third-party forecasts and market views cited do not represent BIT's position and have not been independently verified.
- Market forecasts mentioned in the report (including, but not limited to, specific figures such as "30-year yield at 6%") are results of market surveys at a single point in time and do not constitute a forecast or guarantee of future market performance.
- Investing involves multiple risks: market risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, exchange rate risk, liquidity risk, etc. Investors may lose part or all of their principal.
- Past performance and market results are not indicative of future returns.
- This report does not constitute investment advice for any specific investor. Investors should make independent investment decisions based on their own financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, consulting a licensed professional advisor when necessary.
- This report is intended for qualified investors only and is not provided to residents of other jurisdictions where prohibited by law.
