Reviewing 8 'Cash Cow' Projects in the Bear Market: The Leader Repurchased $283 Million Worth This Year

marsbitPublicado a 2026-07-06Actualizado a 2026-07-06

Resumen

This article highlights eight cryptocurrency projects that have demonstrated strong cash-generating capabilities and implemented significant token buyback programs during the bear market of 2026. These projects, dubbed "cash cows," are repurchasing their own tokens, often reducing supply. According to data from Tokenomist, the projects with notable buyback activity from January 1st to June 30th are: Meteora (MET), Pump.fun (PUMP), GMX, Rollbit (RLB), Metaplex (MPLX), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Lighter (LIT), and Aave. Notably, MET's buybacks equaled 71% of its January token supply, while HYPE executed the largest buyback by value at $283 million. Key project summaries include: - **Hyperliquid (HYPE):** The leader by dollar value, its perpetual DEX protocol has repurchased and burned 44 million HYPE tokens (approx. 4.4% of supply) using a significant portion of trading fees, with total buybacks exceeding $1.1 billion since March 2025. - **Meteora (MET):** Its buyback of 336.2 million MET tokens had the greatest proportional impact on its circulating supply, equivalent to 71% of its supply at the start of the year. - **Pump.fun (PUMP):** The popular memecoin launchpad has cumulatively bought back over $400 million worth of PUMP since July 2025, using 50% of net revenue for buybacks and burns since April. - **Aave (AAVE):** Despite facing a major security incident earlier in the year, the lending protocol has continued its buyback program, repurchasing over 200,000 AAVE token...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser(@wenser 2010)

While global stock markets are undergoing a phase of adjustment, the crypto bear market persists. Amid the bleak market sentiment, some crypto projects continue to exhibit strong cash-generating capabilities.

According to Tokenomist statistics, since January this year, token repurchase volumes for 8 crypto projects, including Hyperliquid, Meteora, and Pump.fun, have far exceeded the growth in their token supply. Among them, HYPE's repurchase volume reached a staggering $283 million, accounting for 3% of its supply. Under the same market conditions, the survival landscape for crypto projects varies dramatically. Odaily Planet Daily will provide a brief overview of the above 8 'cash cow' projects that continue to generate stable cash flows, offering readers insight into the true 'repurchase champions' in the current crypto market.

The 'Big Eight' Cash Generators in the Bear Market: Perp DEX, DeFi, and Memecoin Launchpad Feature Prominently

According to Tokenomist data, as of June 30th, the 8 projects with year-to-date token repurchase volumes exceeding their circulating supply growth are:

  • MET: Repurchase ratio 71%; Supply growth +13%;
  • PUMP: Repurchase ratio 7%; Supply growth -24%;
  • GMX: Repurchase ratio 21%; Supply growth +1%;
  • RLB: Repurchase ratio 10%; Supply growth -8%;
  • MPLX: Repurchase ratio 8%; Supply growth -8%;
  • HYPE: Repurchase ratio 3% (value $283 million); Supply growth -11%;
  • LIT: Repurchase ratio 1%; Supply growth 0%;
  • AAVE: Repurchase ratio 1%; Supply growth +1%.

Among these, Meteora (MET) had the most significant impact on its circulating supply through repurchases. Its supply increased by only 13%, currently reported at 535.4 million tokens, while the repurchase volume reached 336.2 million tokens, equivalent to 71% of its January token supply. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid (HYPE) had the largest repurchase amount in dollar terms, at $283 million, accounting for 3% of its token supply, while its token supply decreased by 11% during the same period. The following are detailed introductions.

Hyperliquid: Year-to-Date Repurchase Amount Reaches $283 Million

According to CryptoBriefing statistics, since the beginning of 2026, Hyperliquid's token repurchase amount has reached $283 million, setting a record for the largest-scale token repurchase amount in the industry. As of July 3rd, its cumulative token repurchase amount has exceeded $1.1 billion.

On March 20th last year, Hyperliquid officially launched its token repurchase mechanism, stating that 97-99% of Hyperliquid's trading fees would be directly used to purchase and burn HYPE tokens. As of October last year, HYPE token repurchase funds had reached $645 million. Quarterly data shows a gradually increasing trend in repurchase scale: Q3 2025 was $316.76 million; Q4 2025 was $255.05 million; Q1 2026 was $192.25 million. Previously, the average monthly repurchase funds ranged between $65 million and $85 million.

Currently, the Hyperliquid platform has burned 44 million HYPE tokens through repurchases, representing approximately 4.4% of the total supply.

Currently, the HYPE token price is around $70. Additionally, according to DefiLlama data, as of July 5th, the Hyperliquid platform's cumulative fees are approximately $1.412 billion, and its total TVL is about $5.854 billion; annual fees are approximately $1.072 billion.

Pump.fun: Repurchased Over $71 Million Worth of PUMP Tokens This Year

In March 2024, the Meme coin frenzy ignited by the Solana ecosystem swept across the entire crypto market, and Pump.fun quickly became the hottest Meme coin launch platform at the time. Although the Meme coin hype later cooled down, Pump.fun has remained active in the crypto market, firmly positioning itself among the cash cow projects through mechanisms like token launches, product updates, and creator revenue sharing.

Data shows that Pump.fun has cumulatively repurchased over $400 million worth of PUMP tokens, covering approximately 145.5 billion PUMP. The repurchase plan started in July 2025 and has continued for 346 days cumulatively.

Since April this year, Pump.fun began using 50% of its net revenue for token repurchase and burn, with the remaining revenue allocated to operations, hiring, and acquisitions.

DefiLlama data shows that since its launch in January 2024, the platform has generated approximately $1.13 billion in fees and $1.05 billion in revenue, with fees in the last 30 days dropping to about $18.66 million.

Currently, the PUMP token price is around $0.0016.

Lighter: Repurchased Over 15.5 Million LIT Tokens This Year

As another on-chain Perp DEX platform following Hyperliquid, Lighter's answer is a combination of 'compliance + repurchase.'

Recently, Vladimir Novakovski, founder and CEO of Lighter, announced that he had joined the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Innovation Advisory Committee as a member. Previously, Lighter announced integration with Robinhood Wallet, allowing users to conduct perpetual contract trading directly through the wallet. Coupled with the token repurchase news, the LIT token price has also seen a nice rally recently.

According to an official announcement by Lighter on July 1st, since the first token repurchase began in January this year, approximately 15.5 million LIT tokens have been repurchased and burned, accounting for 6.3% of the total circulating supply.

According to DefiLlama data, Lighter's cumulative fee revenue is approximately $68 million, TVL is about $507 million, and protocol revenue over the past 30 days is approximately $2.38 million.

Currently, the LIT token price is around $2.59.

Aave: Year-to-Date Repurchase Amount Exceeds $13.7 Million

On April 9th, 2025, the Aave repurchase proposal passed with an overwhelming 99.63% support rate. According to the proposal, Aave would repurchase $1 million worth of tokens weekly for the following six months, with the first repurchase executed on April 10th.

By July last year, the protocol had cumulatively spent $10 million to repurchase 50,000 AAVE tokens, with an average cost of $199.74. Based on the market price of $264 at the time, this portion of treasury reserves had generated approximately $3 million in unrealized gains. (Supplementary reading: 'Aave's Major Economic Model Overhaul: Anti-GHO Mechanism + Token Repurchase, Boosting AAVE Price by 20%')

This year, after the massive $290+ million security incident involving KelpDAO, Aave faced a 'DeFi trust crisis' due to bad debt issues. In less than a week, outflows amounted to over $17 billion (TVL), and at one point, it faced a near $8.5 billion deposit run risk. Subsequently, through founder injections and fundraising from the DeFi United event, Aave successfully navigated the crisis, but the AAVE token and platform TVL inevitably suffered severe impacts.

Notably, by October last year, Aave's repurchased AAVE tokens had already exceeded 100,000, with a total cost of around $24 million. In March this year, Aave initiated and passed a proposal to reduce its annual repurchase budget from $50 million to $30 million. Currently, Aave's repurchased AAVE tokens exceed 200,000. At the end of last month, Aave CEO Stani stated that the team is designing Aavenomics 3.0, planning to introduce a new automated, non-discretionary repurchase mechanism, and emphasized that they 'would never sell AAVE at a 30% discount.'

According to DefiLlama data, as of July 6th, Aave protocol's cumulative fees reached $2.218 billion; TVL is currently reported at $13.4 billion.

Currently, the AAVE token price is around $89.

Meteora: Year-to-Date Cumulative Repurchase Amount Exceeds $45 Million

Last December, Meteora's official announcement stated that it had allocated 10 million USDC for repurchases in Q4 2025, recovering approximately 2.3% of MET. The total amount would continue to be autonomously executed from the same repurchase address in the future.

According to Tokenomist data, MET's circulating supply increased from 472.8 million on January 1st, 2026, to 535.4 million (total supply 1 billion tokens), a growth of 13.2%. Meanwhile, Meteora officially repurchased 336.2 million tokens, valued at $45.75 million, which accounts for 71% of its token supply at the beginning of the year.

This February, Meteora was embroiled in controversy after on-chain detective ZachXBT exposed employee insider trading. However, it ultimately weathered the storm due to its platform's deep integration within the Solana ecosystem and strong ties with the Jupiter ecosystem, remaining active in the crypto market. Recently, its second-season LP incentive event concluded, with related rewards to be distributed later.

According to DefiLlama data, its cumulative trading volume is around $322.2 billion; TVL is currently reported at $320 million; its protocol revenue over the past 30 days is $1.92 million.

Currently, the MET token price is around $0.17.

GMX: Year-to-Date Repurchase Amount Reaches $14.88 Million

As early as July 2024, GMX initiated a proposal to start repurchasing and distributing GMX tokens. In November last year, GMX proposed to increase the coverage of repurchase and distribution fees from 27% to 90%, and raise the allocation ratio for the GMX Treasury to 73% to support the token repurchase and airdrop mechanism. It was estimated that monthly GMX repurchases would increase to 345,534 tokens, with a repurchase value reaching $8.489 million.

As of October 23rd last year, GMX repurchases were approximately 1.33 million tokens. Subsequently, GMX continued its token repurchases. In March this year, the GMX DAO passed a governance plan to adjust repurchases and liquidity to restore price discovery.

According to an official GMX announcement on July 1st, between March 5th and June 30th this year, a total of $1.965 million was spent to repurchase 313,650 GMX tokens at an average price of $6.27, with Q2 repurchase funds amounting to $1.41 million. According to Tokenomist data, GMX's current repurchase ratio is approximately 41.22%.

According to DefiLlama data, GMX's cumulative trading volume is close to $330 billion; TVL is currently reported at $175 million; protocol revenue over the past 30 days is approximately $662,000.

Currently, the GMX token price is around $5.86.

Beyond the above platforms, the token repurchase mechanisms of Rollbit, an online gambling platform focusing on 'GambleFi,' and Metaplex, a Solana ecosystem asset issuance platform, are more niche.

Among them, the former's RLB token executes automatic hourly repurchases and burns, primarily using platform revenue (10% from casino, 20% from sports betting, 30% from 1000x futures, etc.) to purchase RLB on the open market. After purchase, 90% is permanently burned (reducing supply), and 10% is distributed to Rollbots NFT stakers (incentivizing holders). According to official website information, the cumulative token repurchase value over the last 6 months is approximately $12.5 million.

Currently, the RLB token price is around $0.065.

The latter uses 50% of protocol fees monthly to repurchase MPLX. The repurchased tokens are allocated to the Metaplex DAO treasury (held rather than immediately burned, but enhancing scarcity and governance value); the remaining 50% is used for foundation development. Currently, the MPLX token price is around $0.036.

Of course, token repurchase and burn do not necessarily guarantee price appreciation, as they are also influenced by factors such as market conditions, news events, product updates, and token unlocks. However, in the current lackluster market, crypto projects capable of consistently generating stable cash flow are already remarkable 'money-making machines.'

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich project has the largest token buyback amount in terms of USD value according to the article?

AHyperliquid (HYPE) has the largest token buyback amount, at $283 million USD.

QWhat are the primary business areas or categories of the 'cash cow' projects mentioned in the article?

AThe primary categories mentioned are Perpetual DEXs (e.g., Hyperliquid, Lighter), DeFi lending/borrowing (Aave), Memecoin launchpads (Pump.fun), and other DeFi/ecosystem platforms.

QAccording to the data, which project's buyback had the greatest proportional impact on its circulating supply?

AMeteora (MET) had the greatest proportional impact, with buybacks equivalent to 71% of its token supply from January 1st, despite its supply increasing by 13%.

QWhat mechanism does Hyperliquid primarily use to fund its HYPE token buybacks?

AHyperliquid uses 97-99% of its platform trading fees to buy back and burn HYPE tokens.

QWhat point does the article make about the relationship between token buybacks and price appreciation?

AThe article notes that token buybacks and burns do not necessarily guarantee price appreciation, as prices are also influenced by market conditions, news, product updates, and token unlock events.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手Hace 4 min(s)

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手Hace 4 min(s)

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

On July 6th, Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy announced the sale of 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million, incurring a realized loss of around $55.45 million compared to its average cost basis. This move, contradicting Saylor's long-standing "never sell" Bitcoin philosophy, was executed to pay dividends on its digital credit securities. The article traces this shift from a small "desensitization test" sale of 32 BTC in late May to the board's authorization on June 30th to sell up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin for corporate purposes like dividends and buybacks. Analysis reveals that MicroStrategy's previous growth "flywheel"—using stock premiums to fund more Bitcoin purchases—has stalled. With its stock trading near a critical threshold (1.22x its Bitcoin NAV), issuing new shares would dilute value. Simultaneously, its financing channels (preferred stock, common stock ATM, convertible notes) are constrained while facing rigid annual dividend/interest obligations of roughly $1.76 billion. Consequently, selling Bitcoin became the calculated "optimal solution" under its own financial model. This transforms MicroStrategy from crypto's most prominent steady buyer into a predictable seller, creating a potential overhead of ~2,400 BTC in monthly selling pressure if obligations are fully covered by sales. This shift challenges the valuation models of the entire Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) sector that emulated MicroStrategy. The company's path forward now hinges on Bitcoin's price recovery, which would allow its preferred stock to trade at par and reopen its financing flywheel, creating a cyclical dependency between the firm's financial model and the asset it holds.

链捕手Hace 32 min(s)

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

链捕手Hace 32 min(s)

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手Hace 35 min(s)

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手Hace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar COW

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar CoW Protocol (COW) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar CoW Protocol (COW) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu CoW Protocol (COW)Después de comprar tu CoW Protocol (COW), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear CoW Protocol (COW)Tradear fácilmente con CoW Protocol (COW) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

154 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.25Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar COW

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de COW (COW).

活动图片