StarkWare tests quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction on mainnet

cointelegraphPublicado a 2026-08-27Actualizado a 2026-08-27

Resumen

StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy has conducted the first test of an experimental quantum-resistant transaction on the Bitcoin mainnet. The transaction was confirmed in block 964,199, spending an output protected by Levy's Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme, which was mined by MARA Pool. QSB combines hash-based one-time signatures with computational searches to bind authorization to a specific transaction, aiming to prevent forgery even if a quantum computer breaks Bitcoin's current elliptic-curve cryptography. This test demonstrates that Bitcoin's existing rules can support this form of quantum-resistant spending without a protocol change. However, the method remains costly and impractical for regular use. Generating the test transaction required hours of GPU computation, costing an estimated $150 to $200. Levy and StarkWare position QSB as a last-resort safety net, not a replacement for future protocol-level upgrades. Currently, QSB transactions are nonstandard under Bitcoin Core's policies, requiring direct submission to mining services like MARA's Slipstream for confirmation. The development comes amid concerns that future quantum computers could theoretically derive Bitcoin private keys minutes after a public key is exposed. While QSB offers a transaction-level solution, StarkWare's CEO emphasized the need for a broader soft fork for network-wide protection. Bitcoin developers are separately evaluating proposals, such as BIP-360, to introduce quantum-resistant features at...

StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy has tested an experimental quantum-resistant transaction on the Bitcoin mainnet, in what the company described as the first transaction of its kind.

According to StarkWare, the transaction was confirmed Wednesday in Bitcoin block 964,199. Onchain data shows that it spent a 10,000-satoshi output protected by Levy’s Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme, with MARA Pool mining the block after receiving the transaction through its Slipstream service.

Levy’s paper and code repository said QSB combines hash-based one-time signatures with computational searches that bind an authorization to a specific transaction. The construction is intended to prevent forgery even if a quantum computer breaks the elliptic-curve cryptography Bitcoin uses.

The test moves Levy’s April proposal from theory to an onchain demonstration, showing that Bitcoin’s existing consensus rules can accommodate one form of quantum-resistant spending without a protocol change.

Quantum-resistant Bitcoin method remains costly

In March, Google researchers estimated that a sufficiently capable quantum computer could theoretically derive a Bitcoin private key nine to 12 minutes after its public key becomes visible. Google said that could allow an attacker to replace a pending transaction during Bitcoin’s confirmation window.

Levy then introduced QSB in April, estimating at the time that generating a transaction would require between $75 and $150 in GPU computation. He described it as a last-resort measure rather than a replacement for protocol-level protections.

StarkWare spokesperson Nathan Jeffay told Cointelegraph that the completed transaction cost “low hundreds of dollars,” estimating the expense at around $150 to $200. StarkWare’s release said the process took hours of computation.

Related: Banks, regulators join quantum-resistant crypto transfer pilot

Levy’s repository also classifies QSB transactions as nonstandard under Bitcoin Core’s default relay policies. StarkWare said ordinary nodes therefore would not propagate the transaction before confirmation, requiring it to be submitted directly through MARA’s Slipstream service.

QSB applies to individual Bitcoin transactions rather than upgrading cryptography across the network. “A soft fork should happen, and I believe it will,” StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson said, adding that QSB provides a safety net while protocol-level protections are developed.

Bitcoin developers are separately considering proposals including BIP-360, a proposed soft fork that would introduce a Pay-to-Merkle-Root output type while removing Taproot’s quantum-vulnerable key-path spend.

Magazine: Supply absorption ‘key question’ as Bitcoin fails to reclaim $80K: Analysis

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main achievement described in the article regarding quantum computing and Bitcoin?

AThe main achievement is that StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy successfully tested an experimental quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction on the mainnet, which is described as the first transaction of its kind.

QWhat problem does the Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme aim to solve?

AThe QSB scheme aims to prevent transaction forgery even if a quantum computer breaks the elliptic-curve cryptography that Bitcoin currently uses for securing transactions.

QAccording to the article, what is a significant drawback of the current QSB method?

AA significant drawback is its high cost. Generating a QSB transaction is estimated to cost between $150 and $200 and requires hours of GPU computation, making it a costly last-resort measure.

QWhy did the test transaction have to be submitted directly through MARA's Slipstream service?

ABecause QSB transactions are classified as nonstandard under Bitcoin Core's default relay policies, ordinary nodes would not propagate the transaction before confirmation, necessitating direct submission through a service like Slipstream.

QWhat is the relationship between QSB and potential future protocol-level changes for Bitcoin, as mentioned by StarkWare's CEO?

AQSB is seen as a safety net or interim solution. StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson stated that a soft fork should and will happen for broader protocol-level quantum protections, and QSB provides security while those long-term solutions are developed.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Stripe Helps Revolut Issue a Euro Stablecoin

On August 26th, Revolut announced the rollout of EURR, a new euro-pegged stablecoin, to select users in Denmark, Poland, and Portugal, with plans to expand across the European Economic Area. The stablecoin, issued 1:1 against the euro on Ethereum and Polygon, is not issued by Revolut itself. Instead, it is issued by Bridge Building S.A., a Stripe-owned, Luxembourg-based electronic money institution licensed under the MiCA framework. This structure positions Revolut as the distribution channel for its over 80 million users, while Stripe/Bridge provides the compliant issuance infrastructure and reserve management. EURR's launch is essentially a cold start, with a circulating supply of only 374 tokens. It enters a euro stablecoin market dominated by Circle's EURC and Société Générale's EURCV, which itself is a tiny fraction of the massive dollar stablecoin market led by USDT and USDC. EURR's primary advantage is Revolut's vast user base, aiming to onboard retail banking customers to on-chain finance. However, its utility for the average Revolut user, who already enjoys fast euro transfers, remains tied to specific crypto-native use cases like DeFi. The launch coincides with Revolut's MiCA-driven phasing out of USDT for European users, positioning EURR as a compliant replacement. More broadly, the partnership highlights Stripe's strategy through its Bridge acquisition: building a "stablecoin-as-a-service" or "issuance-as-a-service" platform. Stripe aims to provide the compliant backend infrastructure—issuance, reserves, redemption—allowing other companies like Revolut to launch branded stablecoins easily, potentially reshaping the industry's competitive landscape from direct token competition to infrastructure services.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Stripe Helps Revolut Issue a Euro Stablecoin

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

U.S. Financial Risks Benefit Gold and Bitcoin! Record Capital Inflow Over the Last Five Trading Days! Here's All the Data

Concerns over U.S. fiscal prospects and growing government debt are driving investors towards both gold and Bitcoin. Over the last five trading days, a record $7 billion flowed into gold and Bitcoin ETFs. Approximately $3.4 billion entered the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) fund, while BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) saw around $1.5 billion in inflows, placing both among the top ten U.S. ETFs by weekly capital inflow. Bloomberg notes the simultaneous strong inflows into both assets as particularly remarkable, a shift from past behavior where investors typically favored gold as a safe haven during market stress. Recent investor behavior has changed due to expectations of increased U.S. government borrowing, concerns about the dollar, and policies aimed at lowering long-term interest rates, boosting demand for assets with limited supply. The concurrent rise in the value of gold and Bitcoin indicates investors are turning to alternative assets to hedge against risks within the traditional financial system, especially amid heightened debates on U.S. debt sustainability. Experts suggest this strong ETF inflow may signal that institutional investors are increasingly viewing Bitcoin as a portfolio diversification tool similar to gold, though Bitcoin's high price volatility means the risk profiles of the two assets remain significantly different.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

U.S. Financial Risks Benefit Gold and Bitcoin! Record Capital Inflow Over the Last Five Trading Days! Here's All the Data

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Tokenized Deposits Could Raise US Lending Costs: Dallas Fed Economists

Tokenized deposits could increase U.S. lending costs and make bank funding less stable, according to an analysis by Dallas Fed economists. Rosy Leigh and Sreeni Ramaswamy note that instant settlement capabilities, programmable deposit tokens, and AI could allow depositors chasing higher yields to move funds faster between banks, reducing deposit tenures and increasing their sensitivity to interest rates. The economists estimate that a 10% increase in deposit rate sensitivity could reduce banks' capacity to hold long-term loans by around $700 billion over a ten‑year equivalent. A 10% reduction in deposit tenures could lower capacity by about $580 billion. These scenarios do not imply a direct, proportional cut in lending but highlight potential pressures. U.S. banks are developing blockchain networks for moving tokenized deposits around‑the‑clock while keeping funds within the regulated banking system. Thirty‑nine state banking associations recently formed the BankChain alliance to build a nationwide network, while The Clearing House is developing a separate network with major banks. Institutions like Standard Chartered and HSBC have also tested cross‑border tokenized deposit transactions via blockchain. Banks may respond to more volatile deposits by holding more liquid assets (like reserves and Treasuries) or relying more on wholesale debt—which would likely raise borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. The authors cite Brazil's Pix instant payment system as a comparative example, where increased use raised bank liquidity holdings and reduced credit intermediation.

cryptonews.ruHace 8 min(s)

Tokenized Deposits Could Raise US Lending Costs: Dallas Fed Economists

cryptonews.ruHace 8 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片