Prediction Market Traders Increase Odds of Fed Rate Hike

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-07-28Actualizado a 2026-07-28

Resumen

Prediction market traders have raised the odds of a US Federal Reserve interest rate hike at its July meeting. On Polymarket, the probability of rates remaining unchanged dropped to 73.8%, while chances for a 25 basis point increase rose to 26.4%, with total trading volume reaching $109 million. Kalshi showed a similar split: 72.9% for no change and 27.6% for a hike, with $46.2 million in volume. The Fed's FOMC meeting is scheduled for July 28-29, with the current target rate at 3.5–3.75%. While a majority still expects no change, about a third of market participants anticipate an increase to 3.75-4%. This shift in expectations is attributed not only to persistent inflation but also to rising oil prices and tensions in the Persian Gulf. Oil prices briefly surged above $100 per barrel last week before retreating. However, June's Consumer Price Index data, showing a monthly decline of 0.4% and a yearly inflation slowdown to 3.5%, provides an argument for the Fed to pause. Analysts note that the Fed's upcoming decision is being viewed as less predictable than usual.

Traders on prediction markets have raised the probability of an interest rate increase by the US Federal Reserve (Fed) at its July meeting.

On Polymarket, the probability of keeping rates unchanged has dropped to 73.8% over the past day. The chances of a 25 basis point hike have increased to 26.4%. At the time of writing, the total trading volume on this market has reached $109 million.

The breakdown is similar on Kalshi: 72.9% for keeping rates steady and 27.6% for a hike. The total trading volume on this market was $46.2 million at the time of writing.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting will take place on July 28-29. The current target range for the federal funds rate is 3.5–3.75% annually. At the time of writing, 66.3% of traders do not anticipate any change. However, one-third of market participants expect a hike to 3.75-4%.

Markets React to Oil and the Middle East

The rise in the probability of a rate hike is not solely linked to persistent inflation. According to Reuters, some major brokerages have started to view the July Fed decision as having a less obvious outcome than usual.

The agency reports that BofA Global Research linked the revision of expectations to rising oil prices. Most brokers, including Deutsche Bank, still expected rates to remain unchanged but acknowledged a higher risk of a hike amid tensions in the Persian Gulf and limited signals from Fed Chair Kevin Warsh.

The Strait of Hormuz Paradox: Why the Oil Shock Didn't Break Bitcoin

Brent crude briefly rose above $100 per barrel last week for the first time since May 26. According to S&P Global, the September futures contract closed at $100.69 on July 23. By July 27, oil had retreated from its peak, down 9% to $87.84 per barrel.

At the same time, June data provided an argument for a pause. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell 0.4% month-on-month last month, while annual inflation slowed to 3.5% from 4.2% in May.

Recall that in July, Grayscale analysts linked Bitcoin's potential bottom to the future policy of the Fed.

How Does the Fed Rate Affect Cryptocurrency Prices?

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the prediction markets data, what are the odds for a US Federal Reserve rate hike at the July meeting?

AAs of the article's writing, traders on the Polymarket prediction platform have increased the odds of a 25 basis point rate hike to 26.4%, while the probability of rates remaining unchanged stands at 73.8%. On Kalshi, similar figures show a 27.6% probability for a hike and 72.9% for no change. The CME FedWatch tool indicated 66.3% of traders did not expect changes, but a third anticipated a hike to 3.75-4%.

QWhat are the two main reasons cited for the increased market expectations of a Fed rate hike in July?

AThe increased expectations are attributed not only to persistent inflation but also to external factors. Specifically, they are linked to rising oil prices and heightened geopolitical tensions in the Persian Gulf region, particularly the Strait of Hormuz.

QWhat is the current target range for the Federal Reserve's interest rate, and when is the July FOMC meeting scheduled?

AThe current target range for the Federal Reserve's interest rate is 3.5–3.75% per annum. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting is scheduled for July 28-29.

QWhat recent economic data provided an argument for the Fed to pause its rate hikes instead of increasing them?

AJune's Consumer Price Index (CPI) data provided an argument for a pause. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the CPI fell 0.4% month-over-month in June, and annual inflation slowed to 3.5% from 4.2% in May.

QWhich specific brokerage firm is mentioned as linking its revised rate expectations to the surge in oil prices?

ABofA Global Research is mentioned as having linked its revised interest rate expectations to the rise in oil prices. Most other brokerages, including Deutsche Bank, still expected rates to remain unchanged but acknowledged a higher risk of a hike.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Charles Schwab Calculated and Revealed the Fair Value of Bitcoin (BTC)! Here's What It Should Be!

The article discusses a recent analysis by Charles Schwab's head of crypto research, Jim Ferraroli, on Bitcoin's fair value. Despite Bitcoin's price dropping to around $63,000 due to market sell-offs and Federal Reserve interest rate concerns, Ferraroli asserts its fair value is approximately $95,000. This valuation is based on Bitcoin mining economics, specifically production costs, rather than short-term market sentiment. He notes that while efficient miners produce one BTC for about $60,000, the cost can rise to $95,000 for less efficient operations. Ferraroli compares this to traditional commodities, where production costs are a key valuation metric. He emphasizes that the $95,000 figure is an economic estimate, not a price target. Additionally, he identifies the ~$60,000 mining cost level as a crucial fundamental support zone for Bitcoin, aligning with its 200-week moving average. Ferraroli concludes that it's uncertain whether Bitcoin will reach $95,000 within the next six months. The piece includes a standard disclaimer that this is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

Charles Schwab Calculated and Revealed the Fair Value of Bitcoin (BTC)! Here's What It Should Be!

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Tokyo Stock Exchange Urges 270 Companies to Lower Entry for Retail Investors

On July 28th, the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) urged 270 listed companies to consider conducting stock splits. This initiative aims to lower the high minimum investment cost, which was at least 500,000 yen (about $3,050) per lot of 100 shares as of late June, thereby making it easier for retail investors to participate. The TSE's call responds to investor demand for more affordable lots around 100,000 yen, as highlighted by the exchange in April. To further this goal, the TSE has established a working group focused on promoting small-lot investments, with meetings starting in October. Recent data shows progress: of the 276 companies that split their stocks in the 12 months to June 30, about 70% targeted post-split prices in the hundreds of thousands of yen. Before the splits, 45% of these companies had lots priced at 500,000 yen or more; after the splits, that figure dropped to just 2%. Overall, 762 companies have executed stock splits since the TSE's previous request in October 2022. Notable examples include Tokyo Electron and Organo, which plan significant splits effective October 1st.

cryptonews.ruHace 33 min(s)

Tokyo Stock Exchange Urges 270 Companies to Lower Entry for Retail Investors

cryptonews.ruHace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot