Making a Fortune of $10.32 Million: The World Cup Money-Printing Tactic of a Polymarket Whale

Foresight NewsPublicado a 2026-07-13Actualizado a 2026-07-13

Resumen

**Earning $10.32 Million: A Polymarket Whale's World Cup Profit Strategy** While teams battle for the World Cup trophy, a hidden whale nicknamed "swisstony" has been quietly making a fortune on the prediction market Polymarket. This account, created around July 2025, boasts total profits of $18.62 million, with $10.33 million earned in the past month alone. With a 52.9% win rate, it has placed over 139,600 predictions, averaging about 380 trades per day—indicating it is likely a high-frequency quantitative bot. The account's signature "trash panda" aptly describes its strategy: sifting through vast market data and tiny price discrepancies to build wealth. Its current holdings are heavily concentrated on the France vs. Spain semi-final, including a roughly $160,000 bet against France. Analysis shows two core tactics driving its success: 1. **High-Volume "Anti-Favorite" Bets:** Placing large wagers (often $400k-$1M) against overvalued favorites like Germany or England, buying "No" shares at favorable prices when market-implied win probability is 46%-64%. It has recorded over 17 individual profits exceeding $1 million using this method. 2. **"Lottery-Ticket" Bets on Extreme Long Shots:** Allocating small amounts (thousands of dollars) to buy shares priced as low as 0.2¢-1.2¢ on outcomes deemed nearly impossible. While most of these bets lose, the occasional win—like those with payouts over 100x—generates significant profits (over $100,000 per hit) that boost overall returns...


Written by: Ma He, Foresight News


On the World Cup field, while teams fiercely compete for the championship trophy, a hidden whale has been quietly making a fortune on the prediction market.


An account on Polymarket with the nickname swisstony has a total historical profit of $18.62 million, with nearly $10.33 million earned in the last month alone. The account was first registered around July 2025, a relatively short time ago, but due to its astonishing profits, its profile page views have surged to 922,200.




As of July 13, the account has made a total of 139,617 predictions, with its current portfolio valued at approximately $606,100. Notably, its current holdings are almost entirely concentrated on the FIFA World Cup semi-final match between France and Spain on July 14, 2026. This includes a bet of around $160,000 on France losing the match. Additionally, it has placed numerous bets, primarily "NO" positions, on specific score details, aiming for 5%-10% returns.




The account's win rate is maintained around 52.9%, with total trading positions exceeding 245,000 and trading volume reaching hundreds of millions of dollars. These figures place it in the top tier within the overall Polymarket ecosystem. Public research indicates that most retail addresses incur long-term losses, while a few high-frequency, systematic accounts achieve significant positive returns through scaled execution. swisstony's data win rate is not extremely high, but combined with extremely high trading frequency and position management, it amplifies its positive EV (Expected Value) edge.


Since creating the account about a year ago, this address has completed 139,617 prediction operations. On average, this translates to about 380 trades per day, 16 per hour, operating 24/7 without rest. It is highly likely an API-driven, ultra-high-frequency quantitative trading bot.


Its profile description reads "trash panda." In North American culture, raccoons are survival experts known for rummaging through trash bins. This signature perfectly summarizes its core strategy: making money from the vast data garbage and tiny price discrepancies on Polymarket, ultimately building a multi-million dollar empire.


Over 17 Profits Exceeding $1 Million


Looking through the account's profit history, its astonishing aspect is that it has recorded over 17 instances where profits exceeded $1 million. The largest single profit came from a bet on Germany's match on June 25. The whale bet "NO," earning $2,221,241 with a return of 111.67%.



The ROI shown in the screenshot is generally very high, with clear advantages in entry prices. The investment scale is substantial, with single bets often in the $400,000 to $1 million range.


This whale favors placing large "NO" bets (against winning) on strong teams perceived as overvalued by the market: Germany, Paraguay (multiple appearances), England, and Japan. Entry prices mostly ranged from 35.8¢ to 53.7¢, implying market-implied win probabilities for these strong teams between 46% and 64% at the time, but the actual result was that they lost or did not win. This is a classic anti-favorite strategy.


100x Returns


On prediction markets, when events deemed impossible by the market actually occur, the profit returns can be extremely exaggerated. This whale excels not only at winning big with big bets but also demonstrates high skill in winning big with small bets.


Taking the matches in the image as examples, the entry prices were extremely low: 0.2¢ to 1.2¢ (market-implied probability only 0.2% to 1.2%). The invested capital per bet was mostly only a few thousand dollars, yet each contributed profits exceeding $100,000.



These events, originally considered nearly impossible by the market, actually happened. The account captured high returns with minimal cost.


Deploying small capital on extremely low-probability events is akin to a systematic "lottery ticket" approach. When it hits, it can contribute profits of $100,000+ with very low cost, serving as an excellent supplement to overall profitability. Although the risk capital per trade in such high-multiple trades is low, the win rate is extremely low. Most similar bets would lose all capital.


Even though most such bets will lose (because the probabilities are indeed very low), as long as a few hit occasionally, they can significantly boost total profit without costing too much principal.


Overall, it's highly likely that the account's automated system covers a large number of niche, low-liquidity markets where severe mispricing is more likely to occur. It then executes a dual-track strategy for profitability.


Large capital bets against popular strong teams, and small capital bets on extreme underdogs. The combination of both ensures stable, substantial profits while also enhancing overall returns through high-multiple trades.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the total profit and recent one-month profit of the Polymarket account 'swisstony'?

AThe total historical profit of the Polymarket account 'swisstony' is 18.62 million USD, with a recent one-month profit of 10.33 million USD.

QWhat are the key characteristics of 'swisstony's' trading strategy on Polymarket?

A'swisstony' likely uses an API-driven, ultra-high-frequency quantitative trading bot. The strategy is characterized by high transaction frequency (approximately 380 trades per day), a focus on anti-favorite bets against overestimated strong teams, and a dual-track approach combining large, steady bets with small, high-multiplier 'lottery-style' bets on extreme longshots.

QHow many trades has the 'swisstony' account completed, and what does this imply about its operation?

AThe 'swisstony' account has completed 139,617 prediction trades. This implies the operation is highly automated, averaging about 380 trades per day or 16 trades per hour, running continuously.

QWhat is the significance of the 'trash panda' signature in the account's profile?

AIn North American culture, a 'trash panda' (raccoon) is a survival expert that forages in garbage bins. This signature metaphorically summarizes the account's core strategy: profiting from the vast amount of data 'trash' and tiny price discrepancies on Polymarket to build a multi-million dollar empire.

QDescribe the dual-track betting strategy mentioned in the article for generating profits.

AThe dual-track strategy involves two parallel approaches: 1) Using large amounts of capital to place 'No' bets (betting against victory) on overvalued favorite teams, securing stable, substantial profits. 2) Allocating small amounts of capital to place bets on extremely low-probability, high-odds outcomes (like specific match scores), aiming for massive, lottery-like returns when these longshots hit, thereby boosting the overall return rate.

Lecturas Relacionadas

US Nonfarm Payrolls Unexpectedly Strong, Probability of September Rate Hike Rises to About 60%, Market Eyes Next Week's CPI

U.S. August non-farm payrolls came in significantly stronger than expected, adding 162k jobs—nearly triple economists' forecasts. This robust employment data signals ongoing economic resilience and has sharply increased market expectations for a Federal Reserve rate hike at the September meeting, with fed funds futures now pricing in roughly a 60% probability of an increase. The data prompted immediate market adjustments: U.S. equities closed lower on Friday, and Treasury yields climbed, with the policy-sensitive 2-year yield rising to its highest level since January 2025. However, broader market impact remained contained for now, as major stock indexes still posted weekly gains and credit spreads stayed relatively low. Analysts note that despite higher rates, financial conditions remain accommodative, corporate earnings are strong, and the AI investment boom—evident in job gains in sectors like construction and manufacturing—is providing economic support. While the non-farm payrolls report tilts the policy debate toward a more hawkish stance, it does not conclusively determine the Fed's next move. Market focus is now firmly shifting to the upcoming Consumer Price Index (CPI) report. Analysts warn that if inflation data remains elevated and further pushes up rate expectations, it could force investors to more aggressively reduce risk exposure, potentially increasing market volatility. The CPI release, alongside political considerations around the midterm elections, is seen as the next critical variable for the Fed's decision.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

US Nonfarm Payrolls Unexpectedly Strong, Probability of September Rate Hike Rises to About 60%, Market Eyes Next Week's CPI

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

The Era of Large Model Distillation is Over: Fable 5.1 Rewrites API, Cutting Off the Path of Distillation for Good

The era of large model distillation is ending. On September 2nd, Anthropic delivered a decisive blow by updating its API rules with Claude Fable 5.1, effectively cutting off the path for shell models and distillers. Previously, companies bypassed immense compute costs and lengthy training times by using API calls to extract the reasoning process of top-tier models like Claude, then using this data to train their own smaller "distilled" models. A key vulnerability was the "thinking blocks"—the model's internal Chain-of-Thought reasoning steps returned via API. Distillers exploited this by modifying the surrounding context (like system prompts or earlier messages) in multi-turn conversations, tricking Claude into revealing its hidden underlying logic. Fable 5.1 introduces a stringent "context consistency verification" mechanism. The API now strictly validates that the "thinking blocks" sent back by the client match the original system prompts, tools, and message history that produced them. Any modification causes the API to return an error. A "non-strict mode" is offered for legitimate developers who need to modify context (e.g., for compression), but it silently deletes all thinking blocks, forcing the model to answer without its prior reasoning. This crackdown was deemed necessary due to industrial-scale abuse. "Distillation hackers" used thousands of fake accounts and automated scripts to exploit the API, extracting high-intelligence reasoning capabilities while completely bypassing the costly safety and alignment training (like RLHF) built into models like Claude. This created a critical risk: "capability-safety decoupling," where distilled models gain advanced abilities but lack the ethical guardrails, potentially making them dangerous. The new rules are being rolled out in phases, initially targeting new API accounts created after August 31, 2026, UTC. Existing API accounts and consumer users (e.g., Claude.ai) are unaffected for now, giving legitimate developers time to adapt. Anthropic states the "thinking retention" mechanism will eventually apply to all accounts. An unexpected benefit for compliant developers is potential cost reduction and speed improvements. Enforcing context consistency allows for highly efficient prompt caching on API servers, slashing latency and compute overhead. This move marks a watershed for the AI industry, challenging the narrative of small models outperforming large ones through distillation and forcing a reckoning on innovation versus imitation.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

The Era of Large Model Distillation is Over: Fable 5.1 Rewrites API, Cutting Off the Path of Distillation for Good

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

South Korea Announces Securities Tokenization Timeline: First Batch of Tokenized Assets to Include Bonds, Funds, and Unlisted Stocks

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) has unveiled a three-phase roadmap for tokenizing securities, positioning itself as a potential first-mover with dedicated legislation. Following the formal enactment of amended laws in February 2027, Phase 1 will begin with tokenized private market assets, including bonds, institutional money market funds, and unlisted stocks (via trust beneficiary certificates). Existing licensed securities firms can operate without new permits, with specific rules for non-financial platform operators and investor limits. Phase 2 will expand to publicly issued securities, contingent on the stability of initial systems and market readiness. The final Phase 3 aims to enable on-chain settlement using stablecoins, pending separate stablecoin legislation. The announcement contrasts sharply with rapid, decentralized approaches like Robinhood's recent tokenization of stocks, which sparked controversy. South Korea's path prioritizes legal clarity and infrastructure, starting with controlled, institutional markets before broadening access. While this methodical approach may sacrifice speed, it seeks to establish a clear regulatory foundation. The global race for tokenization is highlighting divergent strategies between regulated, incremental models and faster, more open but less certain alternatives.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

South Korea Announces Securities Tokenization Timeline: First Batch of Tokenized Assets to Include Bonds, Funds, and Unlisted Stocks

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Just Now, Claude Proves Fermat's Last Theorem for the First Time, Led by Tsinghua Yao Class Prodigy

In a groundbreaking development, Claude has autonomously generated the first machine-verified proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in just 11 days. The project was led by Tianyi Peng, a researcher from Anthropic with a background from Tsinghua University's prestigious Yao Class. This achievement required Claude to write 13 million lines of Lean code, proving over 29,500 intermediate theorems and consuming 60 billion tokens—a volume exceeding the largest existing mathematical theorem library by fivefold. The process involved formalizing the 350-year-old theorem, which states that no three positive integers a, b, c satisfy a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer n > 2. While Andrew Wiles provided a human proof in 1995, its complexity made verification a years-long task for experts. Claude's formal proof builds from foundational axioms, autonomously constructing the entire logical chain and verifying it through the Lean compiler. Key to the success was the development of the "Prove2Me" platform, which managed dozens of Claude agents by organizing tasks into a theorem DAG (directed acyclic graph), separating statements from proofs, and maintaining natural language indexes. This addressed early collaboration inefficiencies and "hallucination" issues. The result is the largest Lean proof ever created. The accomplishment has stirred significant discussion in the mathematical community, highlighting AI's potential to automate the formalization and verification of complex proofs. While not replacing mathematicians, such technology could fundamentally change mathematical practice by providing absolute verification, checking human-generated mathematics, and enabling broader access to formal verification tools.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Just Now, Claude Proves Fermat's Last Theorem for the First Time, Led by Tsinghua Yao Class Prodigy

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Raoul Pal: Why Has the Traditional Investment Portfolio Become Obsolete?

Raoul Pal argues that traditional investment portfolios (bonds, gold, real estate, index funds) are no longer effective for building real wealth. He posits that due to persistent currency devaluation from money printing (global liquidity expanding ~8% annually plus regular inflation), an investor needs an 11% annual return just to preserve purchasing power. He evaluates traditional assets: bonds fail as interest doesn't cover currency devaluation; real estate's historic wealth-creation window from falling rates is over; gold preserves purchasing power but doesn't create new wealth; and the S&P 500 barely meets the 11% threshold, relying on a historic bull market. The only assets consistently exceeding this benchmark, based on decade-long data, are technology stocks (NASDAQ 100: ~20% annualized) and crypto assets (Bitcoin: 58-70% annualized). Their outperformance stems from user adoption S-curves (Metcalfe's Law), not speculation. Pal explains that post-2008, traditional diversification lost its protective power because bonds, gold, real estate, and stocks are all now primarily driven by the same macro factor: liquidity. Thus, a diversified portfolio of underperforming assets offers false security. For crypto, he favors underlying protocols/L1 blockchains over applications, as they capture value from the entire ecosystem. A key, underappreciated future driver is AI agents, which will require programmable money and 24/7 settlement, a natural fit for blockchain. Key investment principles include: avoid leverage (it removes the ability to weather severe drawdowns), allocate a meaningful portion (not all) of capital to high-growth assets, and practice patience—"doing nothing" is a valid long-term strategy. The core opportunity cost is freedom. Returns below 11% annually mean your labor buys less freedom over time. The goal is to use this framework to audit your holdings, moving capital from assets that erode purchasing power to those with genuine compounding potential.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Raoul Pal: Why Has the Traditional Investment Portfolio Become Obsolete?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片