Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-17Actualizado a 2026-06-17

Resumen

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is tha...

Author: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer, Bitwise

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Over the past two weeks, three crypto research institutions I follow closely—other than Bitwise—have all published in-depth reports addressing the same question: Has the crypto market bottomed?

  • Galaxy Digital: Bitcoin Has Not Bottomed, Data Points to a Potential Bottom Range
  • NYDIG: What Factors Are Suppressing Bitcoin's Price Action
  • Standard Chartered: The Market Bottom Has Already Occurred

These three reports are comprehensive, containing vast amounts of data and complete logical reasoning, and are worth reading in full. However, if you are looking for a simple, unified answer, you might be disappointed: the judgments given by these three authoritative institutions are completely different.

Has the Market Bottomed?

  • Galaxy Digital: No
  • NYDIG: Possibly, but unlikely
  • Standard Chartered: Already bottomed

Let's now break down the core logic of each institution one by one.

Three Institutions, Three Views

Galaxy Digital

Galaxy Digital reviewed Bitcoin's complete 17-year price history and summarized 13 indicators that tend to appear simultaneously when the market truly bottoms out. These indicators cover six dimensions: valuation, profit-taking sell-offs, miner pressure, trend, bull/bear cycles, and market sentiment. Long-term Bitcoin investors will be familiar with these indicators, including the 200-week moving average, the Fear & Greed Index, and the Mayer Multiple.

Galaxy found that currently only 4 indicators are fully met, 2 are partially met, and the remaining 7 have not triggered bottom signals. The report concludes that Bitcoin's bottom range for this cycle is between $30,000 and $54,000, with a neutral baseline bottom between $40,000 and $46,000.

NYDIG

NYDIG also employs a multi-indicator comprehensive analysis framework, comparing the current market with historical cycles and evaluating the market state from dimensions such as the duration of the maximum drawdown and holder profit/loss (known to Bitcoin users as 'MVRV', the ratio of market capitalization to realized value).

NYDIG believes that current indicators are very close to the extreme ranges seen at historical major bottoms, but the hallmark comprehensive panic sell-off seen in previous major bear markets has not yet occurred. At the same time, the report introduces a variable: institutional capital inflows have fundamentally changed Bitcoin's cycle logic from the ground up. This cycle's correction might be shallower than historical bear markets. From this perspective, the bottom may have already occurred.

Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered is not uniformly bullish on Bitcoin. Back in February when Bitcoin was at $67,000, the bank lowered its full-year price forecast, warning that prices could fall to $50,000, citing weaker macroeconomics and continuous selling pressure from Bitcoin ETFs.

However, last Friday Standard Chartered updated its view, identifying $59,000 as the bottom for this price action. The two main logics supporting this view are: the potential for a U.S. diplomatic agreement with Iran; and the highly anticipated SpaceX IPO. Standard Chartered believes that a significant number of ETF holders sold Bitcoin earlier to raise funds for participating in SpaceX's listing, and this selling pressure will gradually subside. Standard Chartered's latest forecast is that Bitcoin will challenge $100,000 within the year.

The Consensus Among the Three Reports Far Outweighs the Divergence

You might wonder what effective information can be extracted from three reports with completely opposing views. In fact, the underlying consensus among the three reports far outweighs the surface divergence. For long-term investors, the conclusions on which they agree are far more valuable than their disagreements:

  • All three judge that the market bottom for this cycle will occur within this year;
  • All three believe the current price is closer to the bottom than to the previous highs;
  • All three are consistently optimistic that Bitcoin will experience another bull market in the future.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin's price is around $67,000. One report claims the $59,000 bottom has already occurred, one sees a potential drop to $50,000, and another gives a neutral baseline bottom of $43,000. But the core conclusion is highly unified: the bottom will definitely be reached this year.

This is the key point long-term investors should focus on most. Whether the bottom lands at $40,000, $50,000, or $60,000, the difference is actually limited; what truly matters is whether Bitcoin can subsequently surge to $100,000, $200,000, or even a million dollars. As long as it reaches those levels, entering a long-term position at current prices offers considerable profit potential.

A highly ironic phenomenon in the current market is that everyone is obsessing over whether the market has bottomed, while overlooking a more important question—whether the top has already appeared. In my view, as long as the peak has not yet arrived, Bitcoin holds value for long-term allocation.

The core logic supporting Bitcoin's long-term value not only remains intact but is continuously strengthening: government debt continues to accumulate worldwide with no effective solution in sight; inflation constantly erodes the real purchasing power of wealth; public trust in centralized institutions like governments and banks continues to decline; the global digitalization process keeps accelerating; Bitcoin's trading and investment channels are continuously improving; the early crypto-native generation is aging, with their assets and industry influence growing simultaneously.

Of course, potential risks remain in the market, including threats from quantum computing and tightening global regulation. But overall, the current situation is better than during any previous crypto winter.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three different views on whether the crypto market has bottomed, according to the research reports mentioned in the article?

AGalaxy Digital believes Bitcoin has not yet bottomed. NYDIG sees a possibility but thinks it's unlikely. Standard Chartered Bank states the market bottom has already occurred.

QWhat is the core logical framework Galaxy Digital uses to assess if the market has bottomed?

AGalaxy Digital uses a framework of 13 indicators across six dimensions: valuation, profit-taking sales, miner stress, price trends, bull/bear cycles, and market sentiment, such as the 200-week moving average, Fear & Greed Index, and Mayer Multiple.

QWhat specific price range does Galaxy Digital identify as the potential bottom for Bitcoin in this cycle?

AGalaxy Digital identifies the potential bottom range for Bitcoin as $30,000 to $54,000, with a neutral base case bottom of $40,000 to $46,000.

QWhat key reason does Standard Chartered Bank give for reversing its earlier bearish view and now claiming the bottom has been reached?

AStandard Chartered Bank's reversal is based on two key logics: the potential for a US diplomatic agreement with Iran, and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe caused selling pressure from ETF holders that is expected to subside.

QDespite their differing views on the exact bottom, what major consensus do all three research reports share?

AAll three reports agree that the market bottom will occur within the current year, that current prices are closer to the bottom than the previous highs, and that Bitcoin will experience a new bull market in the future.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

In this June 2026 podcast interview, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes explains his decision to sell his major crypto holdings (HYPE, NEAR, Worldcoin, Zcash). His rationale is based on a macro view linking oil prices, the Iran conflict, US politics, and an impending AI bubble burst. Hayes argues that high oil prices, driven by the ongoing war, will pressure domestic US inflation. To salvage the Republican Party's chances in the midterm elections, he believes Donald Trump may pivot to a populist, anti-AI stance—advocating for taxes and regulation—which would deflate the AI investment narrative. He sees the AI sector, particularly massive capital expenditure on data centers, as having absorbed nearly all excess market liquidity (around $1.5 trillion in debt issuance since 2025), starving other assets like Bitcoin. He highlights the upcoming SpaceX IPO at a ~$1.8 trillion valuation and 100x price-to-sales ratio as a potential tipping point. If these hyped IPOs underperform, it could shatter market confidence in AI. In such a scenario, all risk assets, including crypto, would fall together as correlations converge to 1 during a broad correction. Hayes has moved his portfolio into Treasuries and energy stocks (like ExxonMobil), predicting Bitcoin will be below $100k by year-end. He sees a potential crypto bull market only after the AI frenzy cools, liquidity stops flowing exclusively into AI, and possibly after a significant market downturn prompts new monetary stimulus.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片