Lost the 75,000 Mark, Is Bitcoin About to Experience Its Final Drop?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-28Actualizado a 2026-05-28

Resumen

Bitcoin fell below the $75,000 support level on May 28th, trading near $74k amid a broader market correction. Major altcoins like ETH, NEAR, WLD, and ONDO also declined, with the market fear index dropping to 34. Over $470 million in liquidations occurred in 24 hours, mostly long positions. The downturn is linked to external pressures. Geopolitical tensions flared as the US conducted new strikes on an Iranian military base, impacting risk assets. Simultaneously, US spot Bitcoin ETFs shifted to consistent net outflows in May, indicating institutional profit-taking, with funds potentially rotating into outperforming AI and tech stocks. Analysts note BTC's long-term fundamentals remain sound. However, short-term price action depends on capital flows, which are currently negative. Key support is identified between $75k-$76k; a break below could lead to a test of $70k-$72k. On-chain data suggests short-term trading activity has plummeted to levels typical of bear market bottoms, signaling either a bottoming phase or a potential final decline before a reversal. Experts advise a diversified strategy as Bitcoin appears to be in a bottoming area.

Original Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 28, after repeated battles around the $75,000 mark, the price of Bitcoin finally lost its footing, now sliding to around $74,000. ETH is oscillating repeatedly around $2,000. Previously strong performers like NEAR, WLD, and ONDO have all seen pullbacks.

The market fear and greed index has currently fallen back to 34, indicating a state of panic.

Data from Coinglass shows that in the past 24 hours, $470 million worth of open interest contracts were liquidated across the network, with long positions accounting for $420 million of that.

Over the past several weeks, Bitcoin has been oscillating repeatedly between $75,000 and $80,000. It briefly attempted to break above $78,000 but failed to hold. In the past 30 days, BTC has fallen by 3.5%, ETH by about 12%, and stablecoins have also declined by 0.15%.

Regarding macro data, Brent crude oil rose slightly to $97 per barrel, silver fell slightly to $73, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 182.60 points (+0.36%) to a new record high. The S&P 500 index rose 1.24 points (+0.02%). The Nasdaq Composite Index stood at 26,674.73 points, up 18.55 points (+0.07%). Spot gold fell below $4,400 per ounce, the first time since March 27, losing over $50 intraday, a drop of 1.25%.

US-Iran Conflict "Reignites"

Geopolitical risks in the Middle East have become another significant external variable. Since 2026, tensions between the US, Iran, and related parties over issues like Iran's nuclear facilities and shipping security in the Strait of Hormuz have repeatedly escalated and eased. In recent months, the US has adopted a strategy combining military action with diplomatic pressure, accompanied by airstrikes, port blockade rumors, and repeated ceasefire negotiations.

Even during windows of ceasefire or diplomatic progress, market pricing for the risk of "reignition" has not completely subsided.

Early on May 28, US President Trump stated that the United States would continue to control Iran's assets. Iran has begun to provide us with what we want. If things don't go well, US Secretary of Defense Hagesse will finish the job. We can end the war with Iran very quickly, and perhaps we must do so. However, I don't think we need to.

Around 5:00 AM Beijing Time, according to reports from Iranian media Fars News, local residents said explosions were heard at Bandar Abbas port in southern Iran.

A US official told Reuters that the US military conducted new strikes on an Iranian military base posing a threat to US forces and commercial navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. US forces also intercepted and shot down multiple Iranian drones posing a threat to US forces and commercial maritime traffic.

Renewed tensions related to the Strait of Hormuz have come into focus, intensifying oil price volatility and putting pressure on global risk assets. In this environment, Bitcoin has exhibited more risk-asset characteristics rather than the traditional "digital gold" safe-haven function—geopolitical uncertainty boosts demand for the US dollar and US Treasuries while suppressing risk appetite, leading to capital outflows from the crypto market.

ETF Net Outflows Reveal Institutional Profit-Taking

Since their launch in early 2024, US spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen cumulative net inflows once exceeding $57 billion, becoming a major channel for institutional Bitcoin allocation. However, a clear reversal in flows has emerged since May 2026.

According to tracking data from SoSoValue, between May 5 and 26, US Bitcoin ETFs recorded consecutive net outflows, with daily outflow amounts ranging from tens of millions of dollars to a peak of $600 million, occurring twice.

The situation for spot Ethereum ETFs is similarly pessimistic, mirroring Bitcoin with substantial net outflows since early May.

This may not be simple "panic selling," but more likely systematic profit-taking by earlier gainers. ETF holders include traditional asset managers, family offices, and hedge funds, who have chosen to lock in profits via the redemption mechanism after Bitcoin's recovery from lows to the $75,000-$80,000 range. Some funds may have rotated into better-performing AI-related tech stocks—the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indices hitting new highs during the same period, while the crypto market underperformed overall, highlighting capital reallocation within risk assets.

Subsequent Trends

Wintermute published a post stating that BTC's consecutive two weeks of over $1 billion in ETF outflows (following six weeks of inflows) indicate institutions are capitalizing on strength to realize some recent positive returns. More noteworthy is AI. Nvidia delivered a textbook-level performance exceeding expectations, but there was almost no post-market movement. Incremental beats are no longer moving the needle. If the AI momentum fades, the macro picture (record-low consumer confidence, sticky inflation, a hawkish Fed under Governor Waller) will gain more weight, and cryptocurrencies will not be immune.

BTC's long-term structure remains sound (reserves at multi-year lows, long-term holders continue accumulating, CLARITY progressing, HYPE doing what major tokens should do early on). But short-term price is driven by capital flows, and currently, they are negative. The $75,000 to $76,000 range is a key line for BTC. Holding here, BTC will reattempt to assault $80,000; breaking below this range could lead to a quick slide towards $70,000 to $72,000.

glassnode tweeted that at a price of $76,000, approximately 7.75 million BTC are in a loss position. This supply overhang is a structural feature of bear markets and is typically only resolved when weak hands capitulate.

BIT tweeted that, regarding Bitcoin, the sustained rally over the past period largely depended on the interplay between institutional demand and market supply available for sale. Over the past year, Bitcoin spot ETFs and Strategy have been significant sources of such demand. When ETF inflows accelerated and Strategy continuously increased Bitcoin holdings, Bitcoin prices typically continued to rise.

BIT stated that the combined net purchases of ETFs and Strategy have now fallen to only $870 million, primarily due to significant ETF outflows, shifting from net buying to net selling. Before ETF inflows stabilize and rebound, Bitcoin may remain in a consolidation phase in the short term.

Analyst Murphy stated that using the on-chain indicator "Weight of Short-Term Capital Activity" (i.e., the USD value proportion represented by short-term coin turnover), one can observe the current state of the BTC market. This indicator reflects the latest short-term trading behaviors like speculation, arbitrage, profit-taking, or panic selling. Currently, this weight has fallen to historically extreme lows, only seen at the absolute bottom of bear markets in the past 15 years. This means short-term turnover has significantly cooled down, economic value is sedimenting towards long-term holdings, and the market is in a phase of low volatility, accumulation, or with pronounced bottoming characteristics.

Murphy's judgment, based on this, is that the current market might be in one of three phases: the bottom of a bear market; a sub-bottom, possibly with one last drop; or accumulation before a bull market launch. However, rational judgment can temporarily rule out pre-bull accumulation. It's currently not advisable to fully bet on a single scenario; a diversified portfolio strategy to cope with different outcomes is recommended. The relative position on the long-term macro direction indicates Bitcoin is near a bottom.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what happened to Bitcoin's price on May 28th and what is a key support level mentioned?

AOn May 28th, the Bitcoin price failed to hold above the $75,000 level and slipped to around $74,000. The article mentions that the $75,000 to $76,000 range is a critical line for Bitcoin; holding here could allow it to rechallenge $80,000, while breaking below could lead to a quick slide toward $70,000 to $72,000.

QWhat are the two main external factors cited in the article as contributing to the recent market pressure on cryptocurrencies?

AThe two main external factors are: 1) Renewed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, specifically between the US and Iran, which increases risk-off sentiment and strengthens the US dollar. 2) Sustained net outflows from US Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, indicating profit-taking by institutional investors.

QWhat does the analysis from Wintermute suggest about the relationship between the AI sector and cryptocurrency markets in the current context?

AWintermute suggests that the AI sector has been attracting capital. They note that if the momentum in AI stocks (exemplified by Nvidia) fades, the broader negative macro picture would gain more weight, and cryptocurrency markets would not be immune to the resulting pressure.

QAccording to analyst Murphy's on-chain indicator, what are the three possible market stages Bitcoin could currently be in?

ABased on the 'short-term fund activity weight on-chain' indicator, analyst Murphy suggests the current market could be in one of three stages: 1) The bottom of a bear market. 2) A secondary bottom, possibly before one final drop. 3) Accumulation before a bull market launch. However, he rationally excludes the bull market pre-accumulation scenario for now.

QWhat is the reported state of the market fear and greed index, and what does the data from Coinglass show about liquidations in the past 24 hours?

AThe market fear and greed index has fallen to 34, indicating a state of 'fear'. Coinglass data shows that over the past 24 hours, $470 million worth of contracts were liquidated across the network, with long positions accounting for $420 million of that total.

Lecturas Relacionadas

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

Base has officially launched Base MCP, allowing users to connect their Base Account to AI Agents to perform actions like swaps, transfers, portfolio tracking, and transaction history queries through conversational commands. This move aligns with Base's strategic focus on AI, driven by the broader competition in the emerging Agent-to-Agent payment sector. The evolution of Agent payments has accelerated. In late 2024, the primary method involved insecure browser automation. By 2025, solutions like Coinbase's x402 (providing crypto wallets for Agents), Google's AP2, and Visa's token-based system emerged. x402 has since processed 176 million transactions totaling over $70 million, with a median value between $0.01 and $0.10. Stablecoins, particularly USDC, dominate these settlements due to their negligible transaction costs compared to traditional payment fees, which are prohibitive for micro-payments. Coinbase faces competition from Stripe, which has built a comparable infrastructure for Agent payments with its Tempo blockchain, Privy wallets, Bridge routing (acquired for $1.1B), and the recently launched MPP protocol. Both companies are now competing at the application layer. The core reason AI is central to Base's strategy is to expand the scenarios for Agent payments, ensuring more transactions occur on its network. By securing a dominant position and scale advantage in this nascent field, Coinbase aims to capture the future commercial potential of Agent-driven payments. The launch of Base MCP is thus a strategic step in this larger ambition.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

In an interview with *Hurun Report*, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed the evolution of the Web3 industry as it moves from initial exploration to large-scale adoption. He emphasized that the core value of blockchain lies in building an open and inclusive internet of value, enabling anyone globally to transfer and use funds efficiently and at low cost, regardless of location or access to banking. Sun highlighted that projects with lasting impact are those built on genuine demand and real-world usage. He pointed to the stablecoin payment ecosystem as the most mature and scalable application currently, noting that TRON has rapidly become one of the world's largest stablecoin networks. The circulation of USDT on TRON has surpassed $86.3 billion, driven by actual use cases such as cross-border transfers and daily payments, demonstrating strong network effects. Regarding strategy, Sun outlined a methodology combining data-driven iteration, rapid execution, and user-centric focus. He cited the decision to partner with Tether to launch TRC-20 USDT as a key strategic move, based on an assessment of market trends and long-term potential, which has become a significant growth engine for the TRON ecosystem. On globalization, Sun stressed the importance of local compliance and cultural adaptation, noting that success in different markets depends on deep understanding and local partnerships. He also addressed the convergence of AI and blockchain, describing it as a transformative direction where blockchain provides decentralized infrastructure for AI, while AI enhances the intelligence and user experience of blockchain systems. For industry participants and young entrepreneurs, Sun advised continuous learning and adaptability in a fast-changing environment, focusing on building irreplaceable core strengths rather than spreading resources too thinly. Through infrastructure development, global strategy, and technological foresight, TRON aims to advance the practical implementation and evolution of the value internet.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory chip maker, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion, securing its position as one of the top three DRAM manufacturers alongside Samsung and SK Hynix. Its survival and growth story is marked by a unique combination of political maneuvering and hard-won manufacturing efficiency, but also strategic missteps that now challenge its future. Founded in 1978 in Boise without significant government or capital backing, Micron repeatedly turned to Washington for survival during critical junctures. In the 1980s, it filed anti-dumping complaints against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which Micron had earlier licensed its 64K DRAM technology to. In 2002, Micron avoided heavy fines in a price-fixing investigation by acting as a whistleblower against its competitors, cementing its reputation as a "political opportunist." A major strategic error occurred in 2013 with its $2.5 billion acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. This deal burdened Micron with integrating incompatible manufacturing processes just as the industry was pivoting toward HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), a critical technology for AI. SK Hynix had launched its first HBM chip that same year. By the time AI demand exploded with ChatGPT in 2022, SK Hynix commanded about 85% of the HBM3 market, while Micron, playing catch-up, held only around 3%. In 2017, Micron employed similar tactics against a new competitor, Chinese startup Fujian Jinhua, by alleging intellectual property theft, which led to U.S. sanctions effectively crippling the firm. However, this strategy backfired in 2023 when China banned Micron's products from its critical infrastructure, causing its revenue share from China to plummet from 14% in FY2023 to just 7.1% by FY2025. Today, Micron faces a triple squeeze: it lags in the high-margin HBM race, faces pricing pressure in low-end DRAM from Chinese manufacturers like CXMT, and has lost crucial access to the booming Chinese AI server market. Despite its political strategies, Micron's core strength is its exceptional manufacturing cost control, achieved through decades of engineering. Its DRAM chips have a smaller cell area than its rivals, yielding more chips per wafer. This efficiency has been vital for weathering industry downturns. However, this advantage cannot compensate for the decade lost in HBM development. Micron is now racing to ramp up production of its HBM3E, certified by NVIDIA, and develop HBM4. Its future hinges on whether it can close this technological "time debt" through relentless R&D and execution, in a marathon where its competitors, having started earlier, are not slowing down.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片