Bitcoin Falls into Extreme Greed as Worrisome Signals Accumulate

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-26Actualizado a 2026-08-26

Resumen

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has surged to 81, entering "Extreme Greed" territory for the first time since December 2024, marking a dramatic shift from a "Fear" reading of 41 just a week ago. This sentiment spike followed a 24% weekly surge in Bitcoin, its best performance since 2024, largely triggered by a US Treasury announcement to double long-term bond buybacks. The move sparked a bond rally and caught leveraged short sellers off guard, leading to approximately $3 billion in short liquidations. While indicators like CryptoQuant's Bull Score have turned strongly positive, suggesting an early new bull market phase, rapid warnings are accumulating. Leverage is high, with funding rates hitting a 20-month peak, and large holders are taking profits. Short-term Bitcoin holders realized around $1.2 billion in profits recently, and exchange inflows spiked to a multi-month high. Analysts note that such high levels of unrealized profit have preceded significant corrections in the past. The market now watches key resistance near $83,000 for confirmation of a sustained uptrend.

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has hit 81, entering the 'Extreme Greed' zone for the first time since December 17, 2024 — a span of 616 days. Bitcoin has surged over 22% in the past 7 days. This reading is significant for crypto holders today, as it emerges after a period of sharp sentiment swings that have preceded underlying data and historically has occurred just before corrections.

From February's Low of 5 to Sunday's High of 81

This figure reflects how rapidly sentiment has shifted. A month ago, the same reading was 36, and a week ago it was 41, both driven by fear. On Sunday, it hit 81 and has held there since, representing a 45-point jump over three decades, which CoinMarketCap called the fastest sentiment shift this year—from one extreme to the other.

Looking at earlier periods, the contrast in this trajectory becomes obvious. The index bottomed at 5 on February 5th, the lowest point in 2026 and arguably the capitulation limit for this gauge. Moving from that level to 81 on Sunday marks a complete journey from panic selling to greed in six months.

Not all trackers assign the same rating. Alternative.me, which has tracked crypto longer, still rates the sentiment as 'Greed' rather than 'Extreme Greed' (about 6% lower than the 81 mark). But both are moving in the same direction.

Price Jump Triggered by Unexpected Treasury Announcement, Not ETF Headline

The mood shift followed Bitcoin's price surge, which began with a policy decision few in crypto trading circles had heard of. On Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent doubled the size of the department's long-term bond buyback operations, raising each of the large operations to $2-4 billion. The next day, he told CNBC the final amount could be raised further.

The catch, however, is that none of this cash has moved yet. They are part of a larger program that will only begin on September 9th and run until November 4th. The tone changed, not the structure. Long-term bond yields, which had approached near two-decade highs amid weak demand for 30-year bonds, plunged within minutes as traders caught the signal of likely market support.

Crypto did not give back those gains as bond yields gradually rose on Thursday. Traders who had shorted Bitcoin, betting on tighter market conditions, were caught offside by their long positions. The next day, around $3 billion worth of shorts were liquidated, driving the market price higher with each forced purchase.

Bitcoin's 24% Weekly Surge Leaves Rest of Market Behind

Bitcoin jumped roughly 24% for the week, posting its best weekly leap since 2024, and the entire market failed to keep pace, ceding more ground to Bitcoin dominance. In a recent report, CryptoQuant says the rally has flipped the firm's gauge readings: the Bull Score rose from 30 to 80 over the week, hitting its highest since October 2025, and eight out of ten underlying signals are now pointing bullish.

CryptoQuant stated the market has entered an early stage of a new bull market but refrained from an official announcement. The firm's target is a weekly close above Bitcoin's 365-day moving average, currently near $83,000. LMAX Group strategist Joel Kruger pointed to the May 2026 high of $82,820 as a threshold, saying a break above would confirm for some that the cycle low is in and the path to $100,000 is open.

Why This Frenzy Worries Skeptics

Such a rapid ascent energizes both bulls and bears. Funding rates, the fee leveraged traders pay to hold long positions, hit a 20-month high this week, which has characterized most of Bitcoin's sharper correction periods over the past two years, as it suggests the rally is built on borrowed money.

Large investors have already begun offloading holdings amid the surge. According to CryptoQuant, short-term Bitcoin holders realized profits of roughly $1.2 billion between August 20 and 22, including a record $614 million on August 20th. Exchange inflows spiked to around 53,000 BTC, the highest since June, and there are more coins in a fitting spot for them to sell. Traders' unrealized profit has reached 20.5%, and CryptoQuant noted that the last time this metric hit 19%, in early May, Bitcoin fell roughly 30%.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did the Crypto Fear and Greed Index reach, and why is it significant?

AThe Crypto Fear and Greed Index reached a score of 81, entering the 'Extreme Greed' zone for the first time since December 17, 2024. This is significant because historically, such rapid sentiment shifts from one extreme to another have often preceded market corrections.

QWhat event triggered the recent price surge in Bitcoin according to the article?

AThe recent Bitcoin price surge was triggered by an unexpected announcement from the US Treasury, not ETF-related news. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent doubled the size of the department's long-term bond buyback operations. This signaled potential market support, causing long-term bond yields to drop and catching many short-positioned traders off guard.

QHow did Bitcoin's weekly performance compare to the rest of the crypto market?

ABitcoin significantly outperformed the rest of the crypto market, jumping about 24% in a week for its best weekly surge since 2024. The article states that 'the entire market failed to keep up with it,' leaving other cryptocurrencies behind.

QWhat are some of the concerning signals that worry skeptics despite the rally?

ASeveral concerning signals worry skeptics: funding rates for leveraged long positions hit a 20-month high, indicating the rally is fueled by leverage; large investors (short-term holders) began profit-taking, realizing around $1.2 billion; exchange inflows spiked to about 53,000 BTC; and traders' unrealized profit reached 20.5%, a level that preceded a ~30% drop in Bitcoin in early May.

QWhat key price level do analysts mention as a threshold for confirming a new bull market?

AAnalysts mention two key price thresholds. CryptoQuant's condition is a weekly close above Bitcoin's 365-day moving average, currently near $83,000. LMAX Group strategist Joel Kruger pointed to the May 2026 high of $82,820 as a level whose breach would confirm to some that the cycle low is past and the path to $100,000 is open.

Lecturas Relacionadas

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片