Polymarket, a Decentralized Prediction Platform, Announces Launch of Its Futures Trading Platform with 20x Leverage!

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-09-04Actualizado a 2026-09-04

Resumen

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, has launched a new service called "Polymarket Perps" for trading perpetual futures contracts. The platform supports nine asset classes, including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, as well as traditional assets such as gold, silver, WTI crude oil, and the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices. A notable feature is the inclusion of SpaceX stock among its offerings. Polymarket Perps allows users to take leveraged positions of up to 20x on price movements. The company views this launch as an expansion beyond its core prediction markets into the broader financial derivatives space.

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, has launched a service for trading perpetual futures on cryptocurrencies and traditional financial assets. According to Crypto Briefing, the new platform will operate under the name 'Polymarket Perps'.

Polymarket Perps allows users to open positions on the price movements of various assets using futures contracts with no set expiration date. The platform supports nine different assets, ranging from cryptocurrencies and commodities to stock indices and shares of private companies.

Supported assets include Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL). Additionally, the platform allows trading of precious metals like gold and silver, as well as WTI crude oil. Users can also open positions on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices.

One of the distinguishing features of Polymarket Perps is the ability to use leverage. The platform allows for leverage of up to 20x in trades. This feature enables investors to open larger positions with smaller amounts of capital but can also lead to rapid losses if the price moves against them.

The platform also includes shares of SpaceX among its supported assets. In this way, Polymarket aims to offer various asset classes under one roof, rather than being solely a crypto-focused derivatives trading platform.

Polymarket views its new service as a step towards expanding its business into the financial derivatives space beyond prediction markets. Perpetual futures contracts are products that attract significant investor interest, especially in crypto markets, due to their high trading volume and leverage.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the new perpetual futures trading platform launched by Polymarket?

AThe new platform is called "Polymarket Perps".

QWhat is the maximum leverage offered on the Polymarket Perps platform?

AThe Polymarket Perps platform allows users to utilize leverage of up to 20x.

QBeyond cryptocurrencies, what types of assets are supported for trading on Polymarket Perps?

ABesides cryptocurrencies, Polymarket Perps supports trading assets including precious metals like gold and silver, WTI crude oil, stock indices such as S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, and shares of private companies like SpaceX.

QWhat is a key characteristic of perpetual futures contracts mentioned in the article?

AA key characteristic of perpetual futures contracts is that they do not have a set expiration date.

QAccording to the article, what does the launch of Polymarket Perps represent for the company?

AThe launch of Polymarket Perps represents a step for Polymarket to expand its business beyond prediction markets into the broader financial derivatives sector.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

"Valuation Game in Trillions: The 'Digital Metrics Play' Behind OpenAI and Anthropic's Incomparable Revenues" Investors face significant uncertainty as core financial metrics from the two AI giants, OpenAI and Anthropic, cannot be compared directly due to differing accounting methods. OpenAI projects its annualized revenue run rate (ARR) to reach or exceed $70 billion by year-end, while Anthropic announced in July that its ARR had hit $65 billion. However, a key discrepancy renders these figures incomparable: Anthropic records the total sales value generated through cloud partners like Amazon as revenue, whereas OpenAI only counts its net share from partners like Microsoft. This reporting difference has tangible market impact. A recent tech stock downturn was partly attributed to investor attempts to adjust OpenAI's numbers for a direct comparison, leading to lower estimates and concerns about its growth pace. Currently, OpenAI's ARR is reportedly around $50 billion, with expectations to approach $70 billion by December. The issue highlights broader concerns about ARR as a non-standardized, often manipulated metric used to showcase growth and justify high private valuations. It is calculated by extrapolating short-term performance or summing contract values, offering companies considerable discretion. A significant gap exists between ARR and actual recognized annual revenue: OpenAI expects 2026 revenue of roughly $35 billion (half its year-end ARR projection), and internal documents show Anthropic's 2025 revenue was about $4.6 billion against a published ARR exceeding $9 billion. Experts warn that the opacity surrounding these key players creates a "black box" effect, complicating investment decisions and amplifying market volatility. As their performance is a bellwether for the AI investment narrative, any signs of slowing sales growth could ripple through the broader market, affecting chipmakers and other beneficiaries of the AI boom. The reliance on ARR sidesteps a fundamental question: the scale of real sales needed to justify trillion-dollar valuations and cover massive expenditures. The situation may improve with greater transparency, particularly if Anthropic proceeds with its anticipated Wall Street debut, which would subject the company to standardized GAAP financial reporting.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Brutal Truth of the VC Industry: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned the Principal After 9 Years?

**VC's Harsh Reality: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned Capital After 9 Years** This article uses hard data to dissect key trends in venture capital and AI spending. It reveals that large, established VC firms are heavily clustered in similar AI investments, while emerging managers are more likely to back unconventional companies. Data shows that of scored seed deals, emerging funds invested 24.7% in "outlier" startups versus only 11.5% for giant funds, largely due to specialized funds with different mandates. A critical finding from Carta data exposes that most VC funds fail to return investors' capital even after nine years. Median funds from 2017 have only returned $0.37 for every dollar invested. This creates pressure for funds nearing their lifecycle end, which can influence their advice to portfolio companies regarding exits or follow-on funding—a dynamic founders must understand. The analysis of AI spending identifies a crucial, often overlooked market: the middle layer between basic and frontier models, which accounts for ~40% of enterprise AI spend. Price wars are intense here due to lab competition, open-source models, and fine-tuning. The article advises startups to categorize AI spending into three lines—salary replacement (benchmarked against labor costs), productivity tools (evaluated by usage), and product-integrated costs (focused on margins)—to spend effectively. Finally, it highlights a decline in rigorous due diligence for deep tech (e.g., quantum computing), where large deal sizes, reliance on lead investor reputations, and herd behavior often replace independent technical validation, risking a repeat of historical investment bubbles.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The Brutal Truth of the VC Industry: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned the Principal After 9 Years?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片