Transcending Cycles, Defining the Future: BIT Hosts Global Asset Strategy Sharing Session in Hong Kong, Exploring New Paradigms of Web3 and Traditional Markets

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-24Actualizado a 2026-04-24

Resumen

Amid a shifting global macroeconomic landscape, BIT, a global digital asset financial services group, hosted the "Global Asset Strategy Forum" in Hong Kong on April 22, 2026, under the theme "Transcending Cycles, Defining the Future." The event brought together industry leaders from financial institutions, crypto platforms, and professional service firms to explore new paradigms in Web3 and traditional markets. Key discussions centered on cross-market investment opportunities, regulatory pathways for compliant stablecoins, and the role of precious metals like gold and silver in the digital economy. BIT Founding Partner Cynthia Wu highlighted the institutionalization of the digital asset sector, noting its evolution from early retail-driven speculation to a phase marked by clearer regulation, the approval of spot ETFs, and the rise of Real-World Assets (RWA). She emphasized RWA’s role in bridging the gap between traditional finance and digital assets. Speakers observed a structural "reversal" between Web3 and traditional markets: Web3 is becoming more rational and profit-oriented, while traditional markets, especially U.S. equities driven by AI, are attracting concentrated capital and attention. The U.S. "Goldilocks" economic environment and AI commercialization were noted as key factors supporting risk assets. In stablecoin discussions, panelists emphasized the importance of regulatory compliance, asset-backed reserves, and transparency, noting that algorithmic stablecoins...

Against the backdrop of a persistently divergent global macroeconomic environment and the continuous reshaping of asset allocation logic, the global digital asset financial services group BIT hosted the "Global Asset Strategy Forum" in Central on April 22, 2026, under the theme "Transcending Cycles, Defining the Future." The event brought together numerous industry representatives from financial institutions, crypto platforms, and professional service agencies, including BIT Founding Partner & CCO Cynthia Wu, BIT CBO Wendy Sun, Cactus Custody CEO Daniel Lee, BIT Asset Management Head Daniel Yu, BIT Brokerage Head Elio Cui, and Matrixdock BD Head Josh Wu, who were present on-site; WuBlockchain Editor-in-Chief Colin Wu, renowned financial blogger Roger Lee, and guests from institutions such as OSL, JunHe LLP, Ondo Finance, and Uweb also participated.

Centering on core topics such as cross-market investment opportunities, the regulatory path for compliant stablecoins, and the role of gold and silver in the digital economy, multiple guests engaged in in-depth discussions from various professional perspectives, exploring new paradigms for asset allocation in the Web3 era, from macro trends to asset structures.

In her opening remarks, BIT Founding Partner & CCO Cynthia Wu reviewed the evolution of the blockchain financial market and pointed out that the industry is entering a new stage of comprehensive institutionalization. From the early stage driven by mining and retail speculation, to the expansion period propelled by DeFi and NFTs, and now to the current development stage against a backdrop of gradually clearer regulations, the approval of spot ETFs, and the rise of RWA, digital assets are accelerating their integration into the mainstream asset allocation system.

She emphasized that this transformation is reflected not only in the change of participants but also in the continuous improvement of infrastructure, risk management, and compliance systems. Compared to the traditional financial asset market, which is as large as $400 trillion, on-chain assets are still in their early stages, and RWA will become an important bridge connecting the two. In this context, building financial infrastructure and asset systems oriented towards institutions will be a key direction for the industry's next phase. Cynthia also shared the brand connotation of BIT, emphasizing a foundation of integrity and trust to connect traditional finance with digital assets and jointly build a future-oriented financial system.

In the first discussion on Web3 and traditional market trends, guests generally believed that a significant structural "reversal" is occurring between the two. On one hand, the Web3 market is gradually returning to rationality, shifting towards a profit and fundamentals-oriented approach, with the model solely reliant on token issuance continuing to cool down; on the other hand, the traditional stock market, driven by the AI boom, is experiencing simultaneous expansion in valuation and sentiment, with capital and attention increasingly concentrated on U.S. stocks. This trend reflects a phased reallocation of capital: some funds previously active in the crypto market are flowing towards traditional markets with stronger certainty and industrial narratives. Against this backdrop, the demand for cross-market allocation is rising, and traditional assets like U.S. stocks are gradually becoming an important focus for digital asset investors.

From a macro and industrial perspective, the current market environment also provides support for risk assets. The U.S. economy presents a "Goldilocks" environment, maintaining a relative balance between growth and inflation, while the commercialization progress of the AI industry is accelerating, driving rapid growth in corporate revenues and further strengthening market confidence. In contrast, the crypto market still exhibits high volatility, while the stock market emphasizes industrial chain logic and forward-looking layout capabilities, especially in the AI hardware and infrastructure sectors, where investment opportunities rely more on medium to long-term judgment. Overall, capital, narratives, and structural opportunities are being redistributed, pushing both types of markets into a new phase.

In the roundtable discussion on compliant stablecoins, guests engaged in an in-depth exploration of regulatory paths and trust mechanisms. As major jurisdictions such as the United States, Hong Kong, the European Union, and Singapore progressively advance relevant legislation, stablecoins are gradually being incorporated into clear regulatory frameworks. Participants generally agreed that "compliant stablecoins" need to obtain regulatory approval or hold licenses in the corresponding regions and be backed by fiat currency as underlying assets; in contrast, algorithmic stablecoins still face significant uncertainty in terms of compliance.

Regarding the trust mechanism, guests pointed out that the basis for stablecoin recognition is undergoing a transformation—from the so-called "stablecoin" in early regulatory contexts to now being formally incorporated into legal terminology, reflecting a change in regulatory attitude. Simultaneously, a consensus is gradually forming within the industry around core issues such as stability, reserve adequacy, and regulatory oversight: ensuring redemption capability through full reserves and enhancing transparency and regulatory visibility through technologies like on-chain tracking. Overall, the trust foundation of stablecoins is shifting from单一信用背书 (single credit endorsement) to a system supported by assets, structure, and regulation. Wendy Sun also stated that, at this stage, compliant stablecoins are beginning to gain a clearer institutional positioning.

In the RWA专题讨论 (RWA thematic discussion), guests analyzed the price logic and structural characteristics of precious metal assets like gold. Overall, gold, as a typical low-risk asset, has a price performance highly correlated with the U.S. dollar interest rate cycle and liquidity environment: during periods of declining interest rates, the opportunity cost of holding gold decreases, while a weakening dollar also drives its relative appreciation. Additionally, factors such as geopolitics, energy price volatility, and changes in monetary policy expectations can further amplify gold price fluctuations and upward momentum.

From a supply and demand structure perspective, the supply of precious metals has a certain rigidity and is difficult to significantly increase in the short term, while continued central bank gold purchases provide long-term support for prices, though this is not the dominant short-term factor. In general, the core pricing of assets like gold still lies in macro interest rate and liquidity expectations. Against this backdrop, precious metals possessing "low-risk attributes + macro hedging capabilities" are becoming one of the most representative underlying asset types within the RWA system.

This sharing session, from multiple dimensions including macro cycles, market structure, and institutional evolution, presented a clear path for the digital asset industry moving into its next phase: shifting from narrative-driven to structure-driven, from单一市场 (single market) to cross-market integration, and from experimental exploration to institutionalized and institutional development. In this process, whether it is compliant stablecoins, RWA asset systems, or institution-oriented infrastructure construction, they are essentially answering the same question: how to build a financial system with a stronger foundation of trust.

This is also the core direction emphasized by BIT: building long-term sustainable financial structures that transcend cyclical fluctuations, based on trust and connecting different markets, assets, and participants.

Disclaimer: This article is solely a summary of industry summit viewpoints and macro trend sharing and does not constitute any investment advice, financial product promotion, or trading invitation. The market contains uncertainties and various risks. The views involved in this article are for reference only.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main theme of the Global Asset Strategy Forum hosted by BIT in Hong Kong, and when did it take place?

AThe main theme was 'Transcending Cycles, Defining the Future'. It took place on April 22, 2026, in Central, Hong Kong.

QAccording to BIT's Cynthia Wu, what are the three key stages of evolution in the blockchain financial market?

AThe three stages are: 1) The early stage driven by mining and retail speculation, 2) The expansion period propelled by DeFi and NFTs, and 3) The current development stage characterized by clearer regulations, the approval of spot ETFs, and the rise of RWA, leading to digital assets integrating into the mainstream asset allocation system.

QWhat key structural 'reversal' trend was discussed regarding Web3 and traditional markets?

AThe trend is a two-way shift: Web3 markets are becoming more rational, focusing on profits and fundamentals, moving away from token-issuance-driven models. Conversely, traditional stock markets, fueled by the AI boom, are experiencing expanding valuations and sentiment, with capital and attention increasingly concentrating on U.S. stocks.

QWhat are the core requirements for a 'compliant stablecoin' as discussed in the panel?

AA 'compliant stablecoin' must be regulated or licensed in the relevant jurisdiction and have fiat currency as its underlying asset backing. Algorithmic stablecoins were noted as facing significant regulatory uncertainty.

QWhat are the primary macroeconomic factors that influence the price of gold, according to the RWA discussion?

AThe price of gold is highly correlated with the U.S. dollar interest rate cycle and liquidity environment. Prices tend to rise when interest rates fall (reducing the opportunity cost of holding gold) and when the U.S. dollar weakens. Geopolitical factors, energy price fluctuations, and monetary policy expectations can also amplify its price volatility and upward momentum.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片