Justin Sun Declares War on Altcoin: 'It Freezes User Assets Through a Hidden Function'

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-22Actualizado a 2026-08-22

Resumen

Justin Sun has declared war on the altcoin $USD1, accusing World Liberty Financial (WLF) of embedding "backdoor functions" in its stablecoin that could allow the company to freeze or destroy user assets. In a statement via X, Sun detailed his ongoing legal battle with WLF. He claims his legal team successfully opposed WLF's attempt to move their dispute into private arbitration, keeping the case public in a California federal court. Through this process, Sun alleges he discovered $USD1 has similar hidden authorization mechanisms that grant WLF unilateral control over user funds, posing a significant counterparty risk. Sun also raised concerns about WLF's financial health. He questioned the company's ability to cover potential liabilities, including his own claims which could reach hundreds of millions of dollars. He emphasized that the roughly $4 billion in collateral backing $USD1 belongs to its users and cannot be used to satisfy company obligations. Sun urged investors to exercise "extreme caution." WLF has not yet issued an official response to these allegations. Sun's claims remain unproven at this stage.

Justin Sun claims that the stablecoin $USD1 from World Liberty Financial contains "backdoor functions" that could allow freezing or destroying user assets.

In a statement posted on X, Sun stated that his legal team successfully thwarted World Liberty Financial's attempt to move their dispute to private arbitration and close the related court cases from public view in a California federal court. According to Sun, the court ruled that all his personal lawsuits must still be handled in open court proceedings.

Sun claimed that during the process, he learned that World Liberty Financial's $USD1 stablecoin also has similar authorization mechanisms. Sun asserted that this technical structure gives World Liberty the ability to freeze or destroy user assets at any time.

In his statement, Sun also warned users of $USD1, claiming that such powers represent a significant counterparty risk, especially within centralized stablecoin structures. Sun also stated that World Liberty had previously been willing to use similar powers against WLFI token holders.

Another issue raised by Sun concerned the financial status of World Liberty Financial and $USD1. Sun emphasized that the collateral for $USD1's market capitalization, approximately $4 billion, belongs to the stablecoin's users, arguing that these reserves cannot be used to satisfy his potential claims, which could reach hundreds of millions of dollars, or other company obligations.

Sun stated that, apart from the $1 USD reserves, he saw no evidence that World Liberty Financial has sufficient capital to fulfill potential court judgments and other liabilities. Therefore, he urged investors to exercise "extreme caution."

World Liberty Financial has not yet issued an official statement regarding Justin Sun's recent accusations about the technical structure of $USD1 and the company's financial health. At this stage, Sun's statements remain merely accusations.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Justin Sun accusing World Liberty Financial's stablecoin $USD1 of containing?

AJustin Sun is accusing the stablecoin $USD1 of containing 'backdoor functions' that could allow the freezing or destruction of user assets.

QWhere did the court rule that Justin Sun's personal claims against World Liberty Financial should be handled?

AThe court ruled that Justin Sun's personal claims should still be handled in open court proceedings, not in private arbitration.

QAccording to Justin Sun, what significant risk do the alleged technical capabilities of $USD1 pose?

AAccording to Justin Sun, the alleged technical capabilities represent a significant counterparty risk, especially within the centralized structure of stablecoins, as they could allow the issuer to freeze or destroy assets at any time.

QWhat issue did Justin Sun raise regarding World Liberty Financial's financial position in relation to its $4 billion in reserves?

AJustin Sun argued that the approximately $4 billion in collateral backing $USD1 belongs to the stablecoin's users and therefore cannot be used to satisfy his potential claims, which could reach hundreds of millions of dollars, or other company obligations.

QWhat was Justin Sun's advice to investors following his accusations?

AJustin Sun urged investors to exercise 'extreme caution' when dealing with World Liberty Financial and its stablecoin $USD1.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

Based on a recent field research in Silicon Valley, Goldman Sachs highlights a key shift in the AI industry: moving from systems that "answer questions" to autonomous AI agents that "execute tasks." Commercial models are transitioning from per-seat subscriptions to usage- and outcome-based pricing. The competition is shifting from raw model capability to mastery over specific business workflows, with value accruing to proprietary data, domain context, and operational expertise. A major hurdle for enterprise Agent deployment is not technical ability but "controllability"—issues of accountability, auditability, and error correction, especially in regulated fields. Workflows with clear rules, verifiable outcomes, and reversible actions (e.g., invoice processing) are being automated first. The model landscape is evolving toward a division of labor. Frontier models (like GPT-4) are expected to handle high-value, high-reliability core tasks, while improving open-source models will likely capture the majority (~90%) of inference tokens for standardized, high-volume tasks due to cost advantages. Finally, attention is moving from Large Language Models (LLMs) to "World Models," which understand physical environments, causality, and dynamic interactions. This shift elevates the importance of proprietary, real-world data (from industrial, scientific, and robotic systems) and could drive a second wave of compute demand. Goldman Sachs projects compute needs could grow ~24x over five years, benefiting cloud and infrastructure providers.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

Fidelity Digital Assets cautions that the anticipated boom in AI agents does not automatically guarantee a corresponding surge in public blockchain adoption or token value. While AI agents that can autonomously perform tasks like payments and data calls could theoretically utilize blockchain for settlement, a significant gap exists between "can use" and "must use." The analysis highlights six key risks. First, many AI agents, especially in corporate settings, may prefer closed, permissioned systems over public blockchains due to needs for speed, cost, compliance, and control. Second, increased on-chain transactions from AI-driven micropayments may not benefit native tokens if fees remain low or if value is captured by stablecoins and payment service providers instead. Third, while AI lowers development costs and increases the number of projects, more code does not equal more economic value and can lead to market oversaturation. Fourth, AI commoditizes coding, making pure technological advantage less of a sustainable moat; competition may shift to brand, liquidity, and user networks. Fifth, AI can also lower the cost of attacks by making vulnerability discovery easier, potentially outpacing security auditing and increasing ecosystem risk. Sixth, institutions may require "controlled blockchain" systems with robust identity, permissioning, and audit trails, conflicting with the permissionless nature of public chains. Ultimately, Fidelity argues against simply equating AI growth with blockchain prosperity. The narrative requires moving from speculation to a concrete analysis of which infrastructures can convert real AI agent needs into sustainable economic value, critically examining each step of the assumed value chain.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

Telegram has introduced a new experimental WEB-Proxy technology designed to circumvent blocking by disguising messenger traffic as regular, secure website visits. Announced on August 21, 2026, the technology routes MTProxy data through an in-app WebView using HTTPS or WebSocket transport, making the data stream indistinguishable from legitimate web surfing. The core innovation is a multiplexed stream sent through a single WebView session. It uses special frame formats to pack multiple logical Telegram connections into one encrypted channel that externally resembles loading a web page. A server-side relay receives this stream, separates it into individual connections for the standard MTProxy, without decrypting content or knowing final destinations, thus preserving privacy. The WEB-Proxy operates on a standard HTTPS domain that also hosts a public website. The proxy bridge page is only activated by a specific URL parameter derived via HMAC-SHA256 from the proxy configuration; all other requests receive the normal site homepage. This provides reliable cover against automated detection systems. Currently a proof-of-concept, the system includes a desktop implementation, an experimental Android client, and plans for iOS support. The technology represents a shift towards more sophisticated integration with legitimate web infrastructure, complicating filtering systems that must choose between blocking HTTPS traffic entirely or allowing service access. Its long-term value will depend on resilience to adaptive traffic analysis and scalability without performance loss.

cryptonews.ruHace 20 min(s)

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

cryptonews.ruHace 20 min(s)

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

The European Commission is exploring whether to extend the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation to cover decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing, including lending vaults. These vaults, which channel billions into on-chain credit markets, present significant regulatory challenges because their decentralized structure doesn't map neatly onto existing financial frameworks. Their legal status is currently based on non-binding interpretations that they fall outside MiCA and EU fund rules. The article uses Morpho's decentralized lending protocol as an example, illustrating how responsibilities are divided among various participants (owner, curator, allocator, sentinel), making it difficult to identify a single "provider" to regulate. Experts warn that broadly categorizing "DeFi lending" could inadvertently capture vastly different structures. They argue that any regulatory approach should focus on the specific structure and control mechanisms of a vault, rather than using decentralization as a simple dividing line, and that DeFi lending may require a dedicated, carefully crafted framework distinct from traditional finance. The Commission's consultation closes on September 30, 2026. The core challenge for regulators is not just whether to regulate DeFi lending, but how to design rules that distinguish between different forms of on-chain lending and the entities that control them.

cointelegraphHace 2 hora(s)

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

cointelegraphHace 2 hora(s)

Coinbase, Criticized for Selling Ethereum, Responds to the Criticism!

Coinbase founder Jesse Pollak has responded to criticism over the company's sale of Ethereum ($ETH), arguing that Coinbase's contributions to the Ethereum ecosystem are undervalued. Pollak stated that Coinbase is one of the largest institutional holders of $ETH outside of Digital Asset Trusts (DATs). He highlighted Coinbase's role as a major client via the Base network, which has introduced millions of users to Ethereum, and its significant contributions to Ethereum's EVM development and roadmap. Pollak expressed confusion over the criticism, noting that Coinbase has held roughly 150,000 $ETH for years through market volatility. His comments follow support from chaskin.eth, an Ethereum Foundation member, who pointed out that Coinbase and related teams contribute to key ecosystem projects like Base, USDC, cbBTC, EIP-4844, ERC-4337 smart wallets, and x402. Pollak urged the Ethereum community to avoid constant criticism of the protocol and ecosystem companies, warning that a hostile approach could harm the ecosystem long-term. He emphasized the need to support, not exclude, companies building on Ethereum, suggesting ongoing criticism could drive large institutional users away from the community.

cryptonews.ruHace 3 hora(s)

Coinbase, Criticized for Selling Ethereum, Responds to the Criticism!

cryptonews.ruHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar SUN

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar SUN (SUN) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar SUN (SUN) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu SUN (SUN)Después de comprar tu SUN (SUN), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear SUN (SUN)Tradear fácilmente con SUN (SUN) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

725 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de SUN (SUN).