Solana Takes Aim At Hyperliquid With Push For Fully Onchain Perps

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-06-02Actualizado a 2026-06-02

Resumen

The Solana Foundation has announced a new initiative to actively support teams building fully onchain perpetual futures (perps) on Solana. This move directly challenges the current market structure, exemplified by platforms like Hyperliquid, where much of the derivatives volume still relies on centralized exchanges or hybrid models with offchain components. Solana argues that its high-performance blockchain makes fully onchain perps viable without sacrificing speed or user experience, aiming to shift a lucrative trading segment entirely onchain. The Foundation seeks to back projects that prioritize onchain price discovery (like order books or RFQ systems) over pool-based models, require projects to be "Solana-first" with revenue routed back to the chain, and mandate open-source development. The support includes distribution, technical assistance, and capital for core perps protocols as well as complementary infrastructure.

Solana Foundation is moving to back teams building fully onchain perpetual futures, setting up a clear challenge to the market structure that has powered Hyperliquid’s rapid rise. The initiative targets one of crypto’s most lucrative trading segments: perps, where volume still sits largely on centralized exchanges or hybrid venues.

Solana Vs. Hyperliquid

The Foundation framed the push as a bid to move derivatives execution more fully onto Solana, without relying on the offchain components that still underpin much of the sector. “Perpetuals are one of the most important financial primitives in crypto,” the Foundation wrote on X. “Solana makes it viable to run them fully onchain, without sacrificing the performance real participants and institutions require.”

The timing is notable. Hyperliquid has become the reference point for onchain derivatives, turning perpetual futures into one of the strongest product-market-fit stories in crypto. While Solana did not name Hyperliquid in its announcement, the competitive subtext is hard to miss.

In its post, the Foundation argued that most perp volume still flows through centralized exchanges or through hybrid architectures that use offchain sequencers and matching engines. “We view that as a transitional state, not a permanent one,” the Foundation said. “We want to support teams building onchain perps, other derivatives, and the applications around them, that prioritize price discovery infrastructure. Our support takes several forms: distribution, technical assistance, and above all, capital.”

That language matters because it draws a line between merely settling crypto trades onchain and running the entire execution path onchain. The foundation said it wants to support systems where every order submission, oracle update, match, cancellation and settlement happens onchain. For a chain that has long marketed itself around high throughput and low latency, perps are an obvious stress test: the product requires fast updates, deep liquidity, competitive market making and credible settlement.

The Foundation also made clear that it is not looking for pool-based pricing models as the center of this effort. It said it is interested in “models where price is set based on two-sided flow, not pool-based or as a function of deposits,” including orderbooks, RFQ systems with genuinely competing makers, or alternative designs where active participants set bids and offers against each other.

That is where the Hyperliquid comparison becomes especially relevant. Hyperliquid’s success has shown that crypto traders will use onchain or semi-onchain derivatives venues when the trading experience is fast, liquid and expressive enough.

Solana Wants Revenue Back Onchain

The announcement also included a more ecosystem-specific requirement: teams should build “Solana-first.” The Foundation said it wants projects optimized for SOL’s design and culture, with application revenue structurally routed back to the chain, preferably at the protocol level from launch rather than left to future governance decisions.

That is a pointed detail. In the current perps market, the battle is not only over where traders execute, but where fees, order flow and liquidity incentives accrue. A successful Solana-native perps venue would not merely add another DeFi app; it could become a recurring source of transaction activity, MEV-adjacent flow, validator economics and ecosystem-level liquidity.

The Foundation also said it is open to teams that have already built offchain or hybrid perps products and want to migrate to a fully onchain model. “We’ll support existing teams with a live product that are willing to explore a fully onchain, on-Solana model,” it said.

Open source is another filter. “Onchain integrity means little if the code behind it can’t be inspected,” Solana Foundation wrote. “Contributing to Solana culturally means contributing in the open.”

The initiative is not limited to core perps protocols. Solana said it also wants complementary infrastructure, including frontend integrations, vaults, structured products, aggregators, advanced trading interfaces, market making operations and social trading applications. Grants may be available through Solana Foundation funding channels or local Superteam chapters.

At press time, SOL traded at $79.54.

SOL remains in sideways trend, 1-week chart | Source: SOLUSDT on TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the primary goal of the Solana Foundation's new initiative as described in the article?

AThe primary goal of the Solana Foundation's initiative is to support teams building fully onchain perpetual futures and other derivatives on Solana. It aims to move derivatives execution more fully onto the blockchain without relying on offchain components, capturing revenue for the Solana ecosystem, and supporting models based on two-sided flow for price discovery.

QAccording to the article, which platform is positioned as the main competitive reference point for Solana's onchain perps push?

AThe main competitive reference point is Hyperliquid. The article states that Hyperliquid has become the reference point for onchain derivatives, and Solana's initiative sets up a clear challenge to the market structure that powered Hyperliquid's rapid rise.

QWhat specific type of pricing models is the Solana Foundation NOT interested in supporting for this initiative?

AThe Solana Foundation is not looking for pool-based pricing models as the center of this effort. It is interested in models where price is set based on two-sided flow, such as orderbooks, RFQ systems with competing makers, or designs where active participants set bids and offers against each other.

QBesides the core perps protocols, what other types of complementary infrastructure does Solana want to support through this initiative?

ASolana also wants to support complementary infrastructure including frontend integrations, vaults, structured products, aggregators, advanced trading interfaces, market making operations, and social trading applications.

QWhat are the key requirements or filters mentioned for teams interested in the Solana Foundation's support?

AKey requirements include building 'Solana-first' (optimized for SOL's design and culture), structuring application revenue to route back to the chain, being open to teams migrating from offchain/hybrid models, and committing to open-source development ('contributing in the open').

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar PUSH

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Push Protocol (PUSH)Después de comprar tu Push Protocol (PUSH), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Push Protocol (PUSH)Tradear fácilmente con Push Protocol (PUSH) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

208 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar PUSH

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de PUSH (PUSH).

活动图片