EU Grants Regulatory Bodies Authority to Block Crypto Platforms from Third Countries

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-18Actualizado a 2026-08-18

Resumen

The European Union has expanded its sanctions targeting the use of cryptocurrencies to circumvent restrictions against Russia. The new measures, part of the 21st sanctions package, empower the EU to impose nationwide blocks on crypto platforms. A key provision allows the EU to blacklist entire third countries if their jurisdictions systematically fail to prevent sanctioned Russian and Belarusian individuals from using crypto asset services. This grants the sanctions an extraterritorial reach. The package also broadens existing prohibitions, banning Russians and Belarusians from holding positions or controlling crypto service providers within the EU, effective August 25. Experts note this shift represents a move toward secondary sanctions and could create legal conflicts in jurisdictions where local laws contradict EU measures.

The EU has taken steps to expand the scope of its cryptocurrency sanctions against Russia, introducing the possibility of nationwide blocks, which will facilitate the targeting of exchanges in countries that systematically allow Russian citizens to evade sanctions using crypto assets.

In the new 21st package of sanctions against Russia, approved on July 23, the EU added 4 entities related to the A7 "Ruble" network, which also became the target of sanctions by the UK government in May. The new EU provisions sever ties with African organizations, imposing a ban on transactions for 14 crypto services in Georgia, Panama, the UAE, the Marshall Islands, Kyrgyzstan, and Belarus.

These additions follow the radical measures introduced in the previous sanctions package, which targeted the entire Russian cryptocurrency industry.

However, beyond that, two new provisions aim to deprive Russians of the ability to use cryptocurrency to support military operations. The first, effective August 25, expands the ban on ownership, control, or holding positions by Russians and Belarusians in crypto services based in the EU.

These restrictions, first introduced on January 18, 2024, now extend to any other crypto-asset services described in the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, including advisory services, portfolio management, and services for transferring funds on behalf of clients, as stated in Article 5b of Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1848 of July 23, 2026, amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014.

The second provision establishes a ban on cryptocurrency transactions with entire countries if service providers do not comply with these sanctions, giving them an extraterritorial status.

Article 5bc of the amendment to Regulation 833/2014 states that "it shall be prohibited to directly or indirectly carry out any transactions with a legal person, organization, or body that is a crypto-asset service provider or a platform facilitating the exchange or transfer of crypto-assets and is registered in a third country."

Furthermore, the regulation clarifies that this list of countries, currently empty, "shall include only those third countries that have been identified by the Council as systematically and persistently failing to prevent the provision of crypto-asset services or to stop the activities of platforms facilitating the exchange or transfer of crypto-assets."

According to Nick Turner, an economic sanctions expert, this shift means the EU is leaning towards imposing secondary sanctions after a long history of opposing them. He also emphasized that this could lead to legal conflicts in jurisdictions where national regulation contradicts EU sanctions.

"Under the new Article 5bc, regulatory authorities of a country are responsible for failing to stop activities subject to EU sanctions, regardless of the country's own legislation," he stressed. Turner believes this measure will initially be used as a diplomatic lever, explaining that "it's hard to say" whether these measures will directly affect any country.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat new enforcement power has the EU granted its regulatory bodies regarding crypto-asset service providers?

AThe EU has granted its regulatory bodies the authority to block crypto-asset platforms and service providers registered in third countries. This is stipulated in the newly added Article 5bc of the sanctions regulation amendments, allowing for national-level bans against platforms that facilitate transactions enabling sanctions evasion.

QWhich countries had crypto services added to the EU's sanctions list in the latest package?

AIn the latest sanctions package, the EU added 14 crypto-asset service providers in Georgia, Panama, the United Arab Emirates, the Marshall Islands, Kyrgyzstan, and Belarus to its prohibited transactions list.

QWhat specific new restriction for Russians and Belarusians comes into force on August 25, according to the article?

AA restriction coming into force on August 25 expands the ban on Russians and Belarusians owning, controlling, or holding management positions in EU-based crypto-asset service providers. This ban now extends to other crypto-asset services defined under the MiCA regulation, including advisory, portfolio management, and crypto-asset transfer services for clients.

QAccording to sanctions expert Nick Turner, what significant policy shift does the new measure (Article 5bc) represent for the EU?

AAccording to sanctions expert Nick Turner, the new Article 5bc represents a significant policy shift where the EU is leaning towards implementing secondary sanctions, after a long history of opposing such measures. This could potentially create legal conflicts in jurisdictions where national regulation contradicts EU sanctions.

QWhat criterion must a third country meet to be included on the list for EU crypto-platform blocking measures under Article 5bc?

AUnder Article 5bc, a third country will be included on the list only if the EU Council determines it has been systematically and persistently failing to prevent the provision of crypto-asset services or the operation of platforms that facilitate the exchange or transfer of crypto-assets in a way that circumvents sanctions. The list is currently empty.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Volatility Halved Yet Extreme Days Exceed 2018: VaR Models May Underestimate Tail Risk

Bitcoin's volatility has significantly decreased in 2026, with annualized volatility dropping to approximately 46% from around 84% in 2018. However, it has already recorded 10 "3-sigma" trading days this year—days where price moves deviate by at least three standard deviations from recent norms—surpassing the 8 such days observed in the entirety of 2018. This indicates that while average daily price swings are calmer, extreme outlier movements remain frequent, even surpassing the frequency seen in a previous bear market. This paradox presents a challenge for standard risk models like Value-at-Risk (VaR), which often rely on recent volatility to gauge risk. Lower volatility can misleadingly signal reduced risk, potentially encouraging larger positions while failing to adequately capture persistent "tail risk"—the potential for rare but severe losses. Experts note the industry is shifting towards metrics like Expected Shortfall to better account for these extreme outcomes. Market participants attribute the continued occurrence of these sharp swings to unpredictable macroeconomic shocks and highly leveraged options positions, particularly strategies like shorting volatility or call overwriting. These strategies can amplify price moves when unexpected news triggers a market shift. Despite the persistent volatility spikes, the market demonstrates greater resilience in absorbing them, attributed to increased institutional participation, deeper liquidity from ETFs, and improved overall risk management. However, experts conclude that these extreme price movements are likely to remain a feature of the Bitcoin market due to enduring macro uncertainties and complex derivatives activity.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Bitcoin Volatility Halved Yet Extreme Days Exceed 2018: VaR Models May Underestimate Tail Risk

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Pearl: The 'AI Version of Bitcoin' Most Mentioned at Token2049

The article discusses Pearl, a cryptocurrency generating significant buzz at Token2049, often described as the "AI version of Bitcoin." At its core, Pearl employs a Proof-of-Useful-Work consensus mechanism where miners perform matrix multiplication, the foundational computation for AI model inference, rather than traditional hash calculations. This aims to make mining productive for AI while generating the PRL token. Proponents are excited by a three-layer narrative: 1) Pearl as a decentralized, AI-native store of value and potential payment rail, 2) its alignment with the energy migration from Bitcoin mining to AI compute, and 3) "2-for-1" unit economics where a single GPU computation earns both AI inference fees and mining rewards. However, a fundamental technical challenge is highlighted: the protocol cannot verify if miners are computing real AI tasks or simply cheap, random matrices—a known "job-binding failure." Academic analysis suggests current mining software lacks actual inference code, allowing "garbage mining." The team acknowledges this but argues future protocol upgrades and economic incentives will discourage it. A partnership with Together AI offers lower-cost inference, though skeptics question if it’s genuine compute usage or just token-subsidized marketing. With a fair launch, no VC backing, and a $2.8B FDV, Pearl capitalizes on powerful narratives of AI and decentralization. Ultimately, the article frames it as an option on a future where GPU mining and AI inference seamlessly merge, contingent on the protocol solving its core utility-verification problem.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Pearl: The 'AI Version of Bitcoin' Most Mentioned at Token2049

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片