ViaBTC Outlined Criteria for Choosing a Mining Pool in a Bear Market

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-12Actualizado a 2026-08-12

Resumen

In a bear market where falling prices and high network difficulty squeeze profitability, ViaBTC emphasizes that choosing a reliable mining pool is more critical than chasing promised rewards. They outline key risks and selection criteria for miners. Risks with new/small pools include non-payment of rewards due to lacking reserve funds, hidden fees (like withdrawal charges or underreporting hash rate), and vulnerable infrastructure prone to DDoS attacks. Key selection criteria are: 1. **Operational History:** Pools surviving multiple market cycles demonstrate resilience. 2. **Payout Model:** PPS+ offers predictable income by paying for each share, while PPLNS ties payouts to block discovery, transferring volatility risk to the miner. 3. **Infrastructure Security:** Geographically distributed servers and DDoS protection ensure stable uptime. 4. **Financial Tools:** Integrated wallets, auto-conversion to stablecoins, and crypto-backed loans help manage revenue within the ecosystem without selling assets at market lows. ViaBTC, operating since 2016, cites its SOC 2 Type II audit and features like zero-fee transfers to CoinEx, auto-conversion, and lending services. The core message is that on a bear market, the security and stability of established pools are essential for business survival, outweighing minor fee savings from untested platforms.

A declining price amidst high network difficulty reduces equipment profitability, and a wrong choice of platform can turn even an energy-efficient farm into a loss-making one. During such times, the reliability of a pool is more important than promised benefits, according to the ViaBTC mining pool. The company named for ForkLog the criteria to rely on when connecting hashpower.

What Risks Does a Miner Face with a New Pool

Competition between platforms intensifies in a falling market. To attract clients, small and new services offer zero or very low fees and increased bonuses. ViaBTC highlights three risks of such conditions:

  1. Non-payment of rewards. A small platform may lack a reserve fund. In case of block delays or technical failures, it is unable to pay miners what they have earned.
  2. Hidden deductions. The advertised low rate is compensated by withdrawal fees. According to ViaBTC representatives, there are also cases of underreporting a user's hashpower in pool statistics.
  3. Vulnerable infrastructure. Small services save on security and more often become targets of DDoS attacks.

What to Look For When Choosing

Track record. Platforms that have survived several growth and decline cycles have already proven their resilience in practice.

Payout model. It determines who bears the risk of failure. With PPS+, the pool pays for every accepted share regardless of whether it finds a block and adds transaction fees to the reward. The miner's income becomes predictable, but the platform's fee is higher. With PPLNS, the payout depends on whether the pool finds a block, and the income variability falls on the miner.

Infrastructure security. Servers distributed across regions and protection against network attacks provide stable ping and uptime.

Financial tools. A built-in wallet, auto-conversion of mined coins into stablecoins, and loans backed by cryptocurrency allow managing revenue within a single ecosystem without withdrawing funds.

“ViaBTC has been operating since 2016 and has been through several prolonged bear markets. In November 2025, the company underwent a SOC 2 Type II audit, which checks the operation of protection mechanisms over the long term, not just at the moment of inspection”, comment pool representatives.

By default, the service calculates rewards using the PPS+ model. Transferring funds from the pool to the CoinEx exchange is free of charge. Auto-conversion exchanges mined coins for stablecoins, and loans backed by cryptocurrency cover electricity bills without selling assets at the market bottom.

Crypto loans backed by Bitcoin: how miners obtain liquidity without selling assets

Tariffs, a list of supported coins, and a profitability calculator are available on the ViaBTC website.

“Choosing a pool in a bear market is a matter of business survival. Saving fractions of a percent on the fee of a small pool does not justify the risk of losing all daily or weekly revenue. Large, time-tested platforms provide miners with the security, stability, and technological support necessary to overcome any market downturns”, conclude ViaBTC.

Recall that mining companies have intensified the struggle for power capacity amid growing demand for data centers.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main risks for miners when joining a new mining pool on a bear market according to ViaBTC?

AAccording to ViaBTC, the main risks are: 1) Non-payment of rewards: Small pools may lack a reserve fund and fail to pay miners during block delays or technical issues. 2) Hidden deductions: Advertised low fees may be compensated by withdrawal charges or underreporting of a user's hash rate. 3) Vulnerable infrastructure: Small services often save on security and are more frequently targeted by DDoS attacks.

QWhat key criteria does ViaBTC recommend considering when choosing a mining pool?

AViaBTC recommends considering the following criteria: 1) Operational history: Pools that have survived multiple market cycles have proven their resilience. 2) Payout model: This determines who bears the risk of failure (e.g., PPS+ vs PPLNS). 3) Infrastructure security: Look for servers distributed across regions and protection against network attacks. 4) Financial tools: Integrated wallet, auto-conversion to stablecoins, and crypto-backed loans for managing revenue within one ecosystem.

QHow does the PPS+ payout model differ from PPLNS according to the article?

AIn the PPS+ model, the pool pays for every accepted share regardless of whether it finds a block and adds transaction fees to the reward. This makes the miner's income predictable, but the pool's commission is higher. In the PPLNS model, the payout depends on whether the pool finds a block, shifting the income variability risk onto the miner.

QWhat specific financial tools does ViaBTC offer to miners to help them manage revenue?

AViaBTC offers an integrated wallet, auto-conversion of mined coins into stablecoins, and crypto-backed loans. These tools allow miners to manage their earnings within the ViaBTC ecosystem without withdrawing funds, enabling them to cover expenses like electricity bills without selling assets during a market downturn.

QWhat is ViaBTC's argument for choosing a large, established mining pool over a smaller one during a bear market?

AViaBTC argues that on a bear market, the choice of a mining pool is a matter of business survival. Saving a fraction of a percent on fees from a small pool does not justify the risk of losing all daily or weekly revenue. Large, time-tested platforms provide miners with the security, stability, and technological support necessary to weather any market downturn.

Lecturas Relacionadas

El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment turns 5: ‘It was for us, not them’

Five years after becoming the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, El Salvador's national experiment is widely viewed as a failure based on its original stated goals of banking the unbanked, slashing remittance costs, and attracting major foreign investment. Research indicates mass adoption by citizens never occurred; Bitcoin use remained concentrated among young, urban, educated, and already banked males. The government's Chivo wallet failed to address core barriers to financial inclusion, and Bitcoin accounted for barely 1% of remittances by 2024, offering little advantage as most funds arrive in US dollars. Following a 2024 IMF financing deal, El Salvador scaled back its involvement, making Bitcoin acceptance voluntary and limiting state use. However, the experiment undeniably changed the global conversation, turning nation-state Bitcoin adoption from theory into reality and positioning El Salvador at the center of the Bitcoin movement. It provided a proof of concept and a global platform, attracting prominent Bitcoin advocates. Success stories exist in localized economies like Bitcoin Beach, but analysts note the project's symbolic benefits were largely "for" the international Bitcoin community rather than "for" the economic transformation of most Salvadorans. The assessment is further complicated by President Nayib Bukele's popular, yet authoritarian, governance style, which delivered drastically improved security but raised concerns about centralized power and civil liberties. Ultimately, Bitcoin gave Bukele a global stage, and Bukele gave Bitcoin its first national adoption test.

cointelegraphHace 17 min(s)

El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment turns 5: ‘It was for us, not them’

cointelegraphHace 17 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片