Bitwise Chief Investment Officer: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Start in Autumn

marsbitPublicado a 2026-07-02Actualizado a 2026-07-02

Resumen

Bitwise CIO: STRC's Plunge Signals Market Bottom, Bull Run Likely This Fall Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan analyzes the recent sharp decline of Strategy's perpetual preferred shares (STRC) and its implications for the bitcoin market. STRC, a product designed for stable, high-yield income, fell dramatically from its $100 target to $75 amid concerns about Strategy's ability to maintain dividends as bitcoin prices dropped. While Strategy's overall balance sheet remains strong, with ample assets to cover liabilities, market panic stemmed from its right to suspend STRC dividends. In response, Strategy introduced a new framework, committing to sell bitcoin as needed to fund dividends and allowing STRC to float freely, abandoning the $100 peg mechanism. This shift marks a change in Strategy's role from a consistent net buyer to a more dynamic participant in the bitcoin market. Hougan views the STRC volatility and related sell-off in MicroStrategy (MSTR) stock as classic late-cycle behavior, where mismatched leverage is being purged from the system. He draws parallels to the GBTC premium unwind after the 2021 bull market. This necessary deleveraging, he argues, is a precursor to finding a market bottom. Key bottoming signals to watch include MSTR trading at a discount to its net asset value (NAV), crypto fear & greed indices hitting extreme lows, and sustained negative bitcoin funding rates. Hougan concludes that as excess leverage is cleared, the market is nearing its bottom, setting t...

Author: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Last week, the price of Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a new low for 2024. There were many reasons for this decline, but the core trigger was the perpetual preferred shares STRC issued by Strategy.

I have received many questions from clients about STRC and MSTR. Given that they reflect the current stage of the cycle we are in, I would like to address them here.

What is STRC?

STRC is a preferred stock product launched by Strategy last year, designed to provide investors with high yields while maintaining a stable price close to its $100 par value.

Initially, STRC offered an annual dividend yield of 9%. To maintain the $100 target price, the company stated that if the market price fell below $100, it would increase the dividend by 0.25%–0.5%. Higher yields would attract buyers, pushing the price back to the $100 par value.

This mechanism worked well initially. Strategy gradually raised the dividend to 11.5%, and the STRC share price hovered around $100 for a long time. This high-yield, seemingly risk-free product gained popularity, with investors pouring a total of $10.5 billion into STRC. The company used all the funds raised to buy more Bitcoin.

Over the past few weeks, as Bitcoin and MSTR's share price weakened simultaneously, concerns arose about Strategy's ability and willingness to pay STRC dividends. Consequently, the price of STRC plummeted, dropping as low as $75.

Is Investor Panic Justified?

Yes and no.

Looking at the overall balance sheet, the company's fundamentals are solid: it holds $49.6 billion worth of Bitcoin, $2.6 billion in cash, with total liabilities of $6.8 billion and preferred shares totaling $15.5 billion. If all Bitcoin were sold today, the proceeds would be sufficient to cover dividend payments for the next 28 years.

However, the core disagreement lies in whether the company will choose to suspend dividends. Strategy has the right to pause STRC dividend payments; dividends are only accrued and there is no mandatory requirement for immediate payment. With Bitcoin continuing to fall, market concerns about the company's cash flow pressure and the possibility of suspending dividends at any time fueled panic.

Did the Company Ultimately Suspend Dividends?

No.

This Monday, Strategy announced a new operational framework: the company will opportunistically sell some Bitcoin specifically to pay dividends. At the same time, the official policy of raising dividends to maintain the $100 par price is abandoned, allowing STRC to float freely. Additionally, the company may repurchase STRC in the secondary market.

Following the announcement, both MSTR and STRC share prices rebounded significantly.

Why Didn't Strategy Simply Raise Dividends to Support the Price?

The required dividend increase to pull the price back to $100 would have been too high to sustain.

The company's initial plan was to make small adjustments to stabilize the share price, but when STRC fell to $75, the market's implied yield had already reached 15.4%. To restore the price to par through rate hikes, the nominal dividend rate would need to be increased significantly by nearly 4 percentage points from 11.5% to 15.4%.

Even with such an increase, the effect might not be ideal. A substantial hike in dividends could heighten market doubts: how can the company sustain such high payments? This could potentially trigger a new round of selling.

The $75 price was too far from the $100 par value to be corrected short-term through dividend hikes.

Under the New Framework, Can STRC Return to $100?

Not necessarily. The company is no longer relying on mechanistic measures to peg the share price at $100; although the official dividend has been raised to 12%, STRC can only return to $100 if the Bitcoin price rises substantially.

What Do These Changes Mean?

Market opinions vary greatly, but in my view, Strategy's role in the Bitcoin market has fundamentally changed.

For many years, it was the world's largest buyer of Bitcoin, consistently providing one-way buying pressure. That phase is most likely over. Moving forward, the company will buy and sell Bitcoin dynamically based on market conditions, rather than only buying.

It is important to note: I do not believe Strategy will engage in large-scale selling. There is no mandatory clause forcing the company to liquidate tens of billions of dollars in Bitcoin annually; once Bitcoin enters a bull market, Strategy is likely to become a net buyer again.

However, in the next cycle, Strategy's influence on Bitcoin's price action will be far less than in the previous one.

Who Will Replace Strategy as the Largest Incremental Buyer of Bitcoin?

Institutional capital.

Throughout Bitcoin's development, the dominant buyers have continuously evolved: cypherpunks, Asian retail investors, US retail investors, the GBTC Grayscale Trust, and MSTR each took the lead. I predict the core incremental buyers in the next market phase will be various institutional funds—global banks, asset managers, pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and independent financial advisors—who control the world's largest pools of capital.

Many signals already confirm this trend. Morgan Stanley recently launched its own Bitcoin ETF; Wells Fargo included Bitcoin in its standard asset allocation model; last year, Texas became the first US state to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve; several sovereign wealth funds and national banks have already allocated to Bitcoin or initiated related research projects. While Bitcoin ETFs saw outflows in 2026, they have recorded cumulative net inflows exceeding $50 billion since their launch in 2024, and all major investment platforms now offer related products.

Is There a Risk of Strategy Being Liquidated or Forced to Sell?

Based on current data, it is entirely non-existent; all theories about liquidation and collapse do not align with financial logic. As mentioned earlier, the company's total liquid assets amount to $52 billion, with total debt only $7 billion. Bitcoin would need to plummet by over 70% and remain at such low levels for the company to face a survival crisis.

Skeptics point to the long-term pressure of servicing over $15 billion in preferred shares, but in extreme scenarios, the company can choose to suspend preferred dividend payments, keeping the risk manageable.

What Stage of the Market Cycle Does This Reflect?

The violent volatility of STRC coupled with the correction in MSTR's share price is a classic late-cycle characteristic. All financial markets, including crypto, follow a highly consistent boom-and-bust cycle logic: a bull market emerges first; then investor greed leads to increased leverage, spawning numerous financial derivative products; a risk point triggers a market reversal; only after the market clears out and squeezes out all excess leverage does the true bottom form.

STRC is a typical financial leverage product of this cycle: funds seeking stable high yields flowed into STRC, and the company used that money to buy Bitcoin. Simply put, a batch of capital seeking low-volatility, stable returns ultimately flowed into the highly volatile Bitcoin asset.

This type of capital is inherently mismatched with Bitcoin's asset properties and must exit the market for a bottom to be established. We are currently going through this process.

The crypto market has seen identical scenarios in history. During the 2019–2021 bull market, the GBTC Trust traded at a significant premium to its underlying Bitcoin Net Asset Value (NAV) for an extended period. Institutions could subscribe to GBTC at NAV, lock it up for six months, and then sell it on the secondary market at a 20%–50% premium. Massive capital flowed into Bitcoin through this, spawning various complex financial instruments. Starting in 2021, the GBTC premium quickly disappeared, various leverage tools withdrew, and the market subsequently bottomed.

This cycle is highly likely to follow the same path.

When Will the Market Bottom Arrive?

I cannot give an exact date; no one can accurately predict the bottom, which can only be clearly confirmed in hindsight.

However, we can focus on several leading indicators of a bottom: First, MSTR's share price falling below its Net Asset Value (NAV) and trading at a discount signifies market sentiment shifting completely from greed to extreme panic, a clear signal of an approaching bottom. Second, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index falling to historical extremes, entering the extreme fear zone, indicates value for positioning. Third, Bitcoin futures funding rates remaining persistently negative, showing retail shorting sentiment far exceeding longing, reflects total market pessimism.

In simple terms: the reversal opportunity appears only when the market falls to a point of extreme pessimism.

The market is currently in the process of clearing out. The chain reaction triggered by STRC is a necessary part of the cycle. Every crypto cycle goes through this painful but essential deleveraging phase.

As the market continues to adjust and clear out, I firmly believe the bottom is near, and a new bull market will begin this autumn.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is STRC and what triggered its recent price crash according to the article?

ASTRC is a perpetual preferred stock issued by Strategy. It was designed to provide high dividends and maintain a stable price near its $100 face value. The recent crash was primarily triggered by market concerns over Strategy's ability and willingness to pay STRC dividends as Bitcoin and MSTR stock prices fell simultaneously in recent weeks.

QHow has Strategy's role in the Bitcoin market changed according to the Bitwise CIO?

AStrategy's role has fundamentally shifted. For years, it was the world's largest buyer of Bitcoin, providing consistent one-way buy-side pressure. Now, under a new operational framework, it will dynamically buy and sell Bitcoin based on market conditions (e.g., selling some to fund dividends). It is no longer a 'buy-only' entity, and its influence on Bitcoin's price in the next cycle will be significantly reduced compared to the previous one.

QWho does Matt Hougan believe will become the next major source of incremental buying power for Bitcoin?

AMatt Hougan believes institutional capital will be the next major incremental buyer. This includes global banks, asset managers, pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and independent financial advisors, who collectively control the world's largest pools of capital.

QWhat does the STRC event signify about the current stage of the market cycle?

AThe STRC volatility and MSTR price correction are typical late-cycle characteristics. They represent the process of market clearing and de-leveraging. STRC is a prime example of financial leverage created this cycle, where capital seeking stable, high yields flowed into a highly volatile asset (Bitcoin). This mismatch must be resolved, and such excess leverage must be flushed out for the market to find a true bottom.

QWhat are some potential bottom signals mentioned in the article that investors can watch for?

AThree potential bottom signals mentioned are: 1) MSTR stock trading at a discount to its Net Asset Value (NAV), indicating a shift from greed to extreme fear. 2) The Crypto Fear & Greed Index falling to historical lows (extreme fear zone). 3) Bitcoin futures funding rates remaining persistently negative, showing strong retail bearish sentiment and overall market pessimism.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From Pump.fun to Collector Crypt: Has Solana's Revenue Throne Changed Hands?

From Pump.fun to Collector Crypt: Is Solana’s Revenue Throne Changing Hands? Solana’s on-chain narrative is expanding from meme coins to tokenized trading cards. Previously, Pump.fun dominated consumer revenue on Solana. However, starting in Q2 2026, Pump.fun's quarterly revenue growth slowed, while Collector Crypt shows a stronger recent growth trajectory. Data indicates Pump.fun's Q1 revenue was $108.3M, dropping 36.1% to $69.2M in Q2 so far. Conversely, Collector Crypt's revenue grew 108.8%, from $12.3M in Q1 to $25.8M in Q2 to date, with recent weekly revenue hitting $5.1M. While Pump.fun remains larger in scale, Collector Crypt demonstrates stronger short-term momentum. Collector Crypt's model involves custodying graded physical trading cards, minting corresponding NFTs on Solana, and selling randomized packs. Revenue comes from pack sales, secondary market fees, and royalties. Its profitability, estimated around 4-5%, stems from bulk card purchases at a discount and a buyback system for users. However, a full-scale reversal in rankings hasn't occurred. Year-to-date, Pump.fun's revenue is ~$177.5M (with its ecosystem at ~$466.5M), vastly exceeding Collector Crypt's ~$38.1M. The shift is more about narrative and recent growth dynamics than total historical volume. Pump.fun relies on speculative token launches, while Collector Crypt focuses on collectibility, scarcity, and real-world asset backing. This highlights a broadening of Solana's consumer revenue sources beyond meme coins. The sustainability of Collector Crypt's growth depends on maintaining demand for randomized packs, expanding beyond Pokémon cards (currently dominant) into sports cards, and navigating potential regulatory scrutiny on "loot box" mechanics. In conclusion, Pump.fun remains the larger revenue engine, but Collector Crypt's rise signifies a diversification of Solana's consumer application revenue into tangible, collection-based scenarios alongside speculative meme coin activity.

链捕手Hace 2 min(s)

From Pump.fun to Collector Crypt: Has Solana's Revenue Throne Changed Hands?

链捕手Hace 2 min(s)

EF: Ethereum Is Becoming the Most Needed Neutral Infrastructure for Governments and Institutions

Ethereum Foundation's Global Policy Strategy team released a report titled "Ethereum for Governments and Institutions," positioning Ethereum as critical, neutral public infrastructure. It argues that current digital systems, controlled by centralized intermediaries, create single points of failure and trust risks. In contrast, Ethereum’s decentralized architecture offers a credible, neutral alternative for applications like digital identity, public records, and asset tokenization. The report highlights Ethereum's resilience, noting it has never experienced downtime since 2015. It is secured by approximately $76 billion in staked ETH, features a geographically diverse validator network, and maintains multiple independent client implementations. This design eliminates counterparty risk, as no single entity can alter rules or shut down the network. Compared to other blockchains assessed in a referenced OpenZeppelin report, Ethereum demonstrates superior economic security, lower validator participation barriers promoting decentralization, and a mature ecosystem with over 11,000 developers. Real-world implementations, such as decentralized identity projects in Bhutan and Buenos Aires and land registry systems in India, are cited as evidence of its practical utility for public sectors. The guide serves as a non-technical primer for policymakers, emphasizing the need for infrastructure that preserves sovereignty and enables coordination without reliance on centralized intermediaries.

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

EF: Ethereum Is Becoming the Most Needed Neutral Infrastructure for Governments and Institutions

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

After Snagging a Nobel Laureate, Anthropic Poaches Berkeley CS Department Head, Recruiting Four Top Talents in Two Weeks

In a stunning move, Anthropic has recruited Jelani Nelson, the chair of UC Berkeley's prestigious EECS Computer Science Division and a leading theoretical computer scientist, on a leave of absence. This follows a two-week hiring spree where Anthropic also secured Nobel laureate John Jumper and two key Gemini researchers from Google. Nelson's expertise in streaming algorithms, dimensionality reduction, and randomized algorithms—fundamentally about processing vast data with minimal resources—directly addresses core challenges in large language models: training efficiency, data compression, and computational complexity. His work on the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma underpins modern vector search and embedding compression. Anthropic's recruitment signals a strategic shift in the AI race from merely scaling models to optimizing foundational algorithms for efficiency. This "leave of absence" model, exemplified by figures like Fei-Fei Li, is becoming a mainstream talent pipeline, allowing scholars to retain academic positions while gaining industry access to unprecedented compute and real-world problems. The recent talent war has escalated from poaching between AI firms to raiding top university departments, with Berkeley being a prime target. As OpenAI and Anthropic near potential IPOs, offering pre-IPO equity, they are effectively becoming parallel research institutions. The competition's focus is now descending to the theoretical bedrock of algorithms.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

After Snagging a Nobel Laureate, Anthropic Poaches Berkeley CS Department Head, Recruiting Four Top Talents in Two Weeks

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

A Year Consumes a Solid-State Drive: Codex Log Bug Slammed as 'Slopware'

OpenAI's flagship AI coding tool, Codex, was found to have a critical bug causing its feedback logging system to silently and rapidly wear out users' SSDs. A developer reported that Codex was writing approximately 640 TB of data per year to a local SQLite database (`logs_2.sqlite`) through a constant cycle of inserting and immediately deleting log entries, primarily at the verbose TRACE level. While the database file itself remained around 1 GB, the underlying write-amplification from SQLite's WAL mechanism meant the physical SSD endured the full write load. This was enough to exceed the typical 600 TBW endurance rating of a consumer SSD within a year. The root cause was a hardcoded default logging level (`Level::TRACE`) in the configuration, which overrode any user attempts to reduce logging via environment variables. Analysis showed that over 96% of the logged data—including noisy WebSocket packet dumps and repeated system file events—was useless debug information. The issue, which had at least nine related bug reports in the Codex repository, remained latent because it didn't visibly consume disk space, only silently accumulated write cycles. After the report gained traction on Hacker News, OpenAI merged fixes estimated to reduce writes by about 85%. However, even post-fix, the tool would still write an estimated 96 TB annually. The incident sparked broader criticism of "slopware" in AI-assisted development tools, highlighting a lack of resource budgeting for disk, CPU, and memory in always-on agent software, and a reliance on modern hardware to mask inefficient code. Competing tools like Claude Code were noted to have similar issues.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

A Year Consumes a Solid-State Drive: Codex Log Bug Slammed as 'Slopware'

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar F

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Synfutures (F) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Synfutures (F) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Synfutures (F)Después de comprar tu Synfutures (F), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Synfutures (F)Tradear fácilmente con Synfutures (F) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

223 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.21Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar F

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de F (F).

活动图片