Pons.family Becomes Leader in Trading Volume on Robinhood Chain Network

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-07-28Actualizado a 2026-07-28

Resumen

The article reports that pons.family has become the leading platform by trading volume on the Robinhood Chain network. According to data from Dune Analytics, pons.family leads in trading volume, number of transactions, and the count of active wallets on the network. Robinhood Chain, launched as an Arbitrum-based Layer 2 blockchain for tokenized assets and DeFi, is currently seeing the highest demand for launchpad-based tokens, with pons.family dominating this sector. In a 24-hour period, pons.family recorded a trading volume of $116.6 million across 1.68 million transactions, with nearly 98,000 wallets active on the network. This significantly outpaces competitors like Noxa ($8.7M) and Bankr ($4.4M). The platform has attracted over 2 million participant wallets across Launchpad platforms, attributed to its fast token generation, speculative opportunities, and simple trading tools. Major tokens by market cap on the network include Pons ($56.9M) and $CASHCAT ($37.9M). Furthermore, pons.family is expanding beyond one-time token sales, announcing planned upgrades, support for tokenized tokens, and the addition of new trading pairs with Uniswap V4.

Activity on the Robinhood Chain network has shifted towards the token creation and trading platform pons.family. According to Dune, pons.family leads in trading volume, number of transactions, and number of active wallets.

Recall that Robinhood Chain was launched as a Layer 2 blockchain built on Arbitrum for hosting tokenized assets, DeFi, and blockchain-based financial products.

Currently, instead of tokenized financial products from startups, tokens based on launchers are in highest demand, and pons.family dominates in this sector.

According to Robinhood Chain data, Pons.family is the most active launcher. Per Dune, the 24-hour trading volume was $116.6 million with 1.68 million transactions, and the network has nearly 98,000 wallets.

In terms of trading volume, pons.family significantly outperforms competing launchers. Over the same period, Noxa traded around $8.7 million, and Bankr traded around $4.4 million.

pons.family has amassed over 2 million participating wallets among Launchpad platforms, and this is quite understandable. Users who are first introduced to a new platform typically choose it for fast token generation, speculative opportunities, and simple trading tools.

Tokens with the highest market capitalization in the network include Pons, $CASHCAT, TENDIES, and What If. The market capitalization of Pons is $56.9 million, and $CASHCAT is around $37.9 million.

Note that pons.family is expanding its primary token sales beyond one-off events. The company announced a planned upgrade, support for tokenized tokens, and the emergence of other trading pairs with the addition of Uniswap V4.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich platform became the leader in trading volume on the Robinhood Chain according to the article?

AAccording to the article, pons.family has become the leader in trading volume on the Robinhood Chain.

QWhat is Robinhood Chain described as in the text?

ARobinhood Chain is described as a Layer 2 blockchain built on Arbitrum for hosting tokenized assets, DeFi, and blockchain-based financial products.

QWhat are the key metrics mentioned that highlight pons.family's dominance on Robinhood Chain?

AThe key metrics highlighting pons.family's dominance are a 24-hour trading volume of $116.6 million, 1.68 million transactions, and nearly 98,000 active wallets in the network.

QHow does the trading volume of pons.family compare to its competitors Noxa and Bankr over the same period?

AThe trading volume of pons.family ($116.6 million) significantly surpasses that of its competitors. Noxa had a trading volume of about $8.7 million, and Bankr had about $4.4 million.

QWhat is the market capitalization of the Pons token mentioned in the article?

AThe market capitalization of the Pons token mentioned in the article is $56.9 million.

Lecturas Relacionadas

What If the CLARITY Act Ultimately Fails to Pass?

This article examines the potential consequences if the CLARITY Act, a major US crypto market structure bill, fails to pass in the Senate. Having cleared the House in July 2025 and a key committee in May 2026, the bill's passage into law this year is now considered uncertain, with prediction markets showing its probability dropping from 82% in February to 35%. The article analyzes three main areas of impact should the bill fail. First, for the crypto market, analysts believe a negative reaction is limited and partially priced in already, with Bitcoin's recent weakness attributed more to macro factors. The specific details of the failed bill would matter more than its failure alone. Second, for US stocks, Coinbase (COIN) could see short-term pressure, with analysts citing a potential drop to the $140-$160 range, though its long-term thesis is not solely tied to the bill. For Circle, failure might be neutral or even positive long-term, as a passed bill could invite more stablecoin competition. Bitcoin-treasury firms like Strategy (MSTR) are seen as more directly tied to Bitcoin's price than the legislation. Third, in Washington, the failure is framed within a broader political struggle. Democratic resistance is partly linked to concerns over former President Trump's crypto holdings, making the bill a political tool. If it fails in 2026, the industry would likely rely on existing frameworks like the GENIUS Act and agency-level rules. Missing the August window likely pushes any significant progress to 2027, a period of political reshuffling after midterm elections, making consensus harder to achieve.

Odaily星球日报Hace 9 min(s)

What If the CLARITY Act Ultimately Fails to Pass?

Odaily星球日报Hace 9 min(s)

SK Hynix Q2 Profit Soars Sixfold, Still 'Misses Expectations'; Secures Long-Term Agreements with 10 Clients, HBM4 to Accelerate Volume Ramp in Second Half

SK Hynix reported record-breaking Q2 2026 financial results, with operating profit soaring 557% year-over-year to 60.5 trillion won and revenue increasing 257% to 79.3 trillion won, driven by strong demand for AI server memory, HBM, and enterprise SSDs. The operating profit margin reached 76.3%. However, both figures fell short of analyst expectations, leading to a drop in its share price. The company attributed the earnings miss to three factors: a high sales mix of HBM, which limited upside from surging prices of general-purpose DRAM; a deceleration in memory price increases compared to Q1; and long-term supply agreements (LTAs) with major customers that lock in prices, reducing sensitivity to spot market gains. SK Hynix has signed LTAs with about 10 clients, covering roughly half of its sales. Despite the miss, the company remains optimistic about AI-driven demand. Its net profit of 93.9 trillion won was significantly boosted by a one-time gain from the partial sale of its Kioxia stake. Financially, it strengthened its cash position, ending the quarter with a net cash position of 69.4 trillion won. Looking ahead, SK Hynix plans capital expenditures at the high end of its 40-50 trillion won range for 2026 to expand capacity for HBM and advanced NAND products, including accelerating the mass production of HBM4 in the second half of the year.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

SK Hynix Q2 Profit Soars Sixfold, Still 'Misses Expectations'; Secures Long-Term Agreements with 10 Clients, HBM4 to Accelerate Volume Ramp in Second Half

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Zcash says Ironwood proof rules out undetectable counterfeiting bugs

Zcash researchers have completed formal verification of Ironwood, a new shielded pool introduced via the NU6.3 upgrade. They published a machine-checked proof, written in Lean and comprising over 2,700 theorems, that establishes the pool's "balance integrity." This proof confirms that, under its cryptographic assumptions, Ironwood cannot contain undetectable counterfeiting bugs, ensuring it cannot pay out more value than has publicly entered it. The verification, which took multiple teams over a month, covers the zero-knowledge proof system, circuit rules, and ledger accounting but not Ironwood's separate privacy guarantees. Ironwood was created in response to a theoretical vulnerability in the older Orchard pool that could have allowed undetectable counterfeiting, though there's no evidence of exploitation. Funds migrating from Orchard must pass through a public "turnstile" checkpoint, designed to prevent any hypothetical excess coins from entering the new pool and to provide evidence on whether the old pool was exploited.

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

Zcash says Ironwood proof rules out undetectable counterfeiting bugs

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

The Truth About the Neobanking Industry: Out of 368 Operating, Only 127 Hold Licenses. Behind the Funding Rounds Lie Countless Silent Deaths.

"The Reality of Neobanking: Only 127 of 368 Operating Neobanks Have Full Licenses" by Francesco Andreoli, analyzed at neobankbeat.com, reveals the hidden structure and risks of the digital banking sector. While 368 verified neobanks serve ~1.46 billion users globally—with Asia (817M) and giants like WeBank (400M+) and Nubank (131M) leading—only 127 hold full banking licenses. This majority rely on rented infrastructure from BaaS providers, creating systemic risk where collapses (e.g., Wirecard, Synapse) leave customers unprotected compared to insured traditional banks. The industry's silent attrition is notable; firms disappear without notice. Geographically, momentum is shifting: 30% of post-2020 neobanks are web3-native (vs. 4% pre-2020). While AI is widely claimed, only 67 neobanks (18%) have verifiable, deployed AI models, with the most effective use often in emerging markets for credit scoring. The map shows 106 infrastructure providers supporting 368 consumer brands, indicating dangerous concentration. Two truths coexist: a revolutionary rise in financial access and a fragile foundation. Predictions include consolidation around licensing, potential AI lending failures in a downturn, and the next wave being infrastructure for AI agents, not humans.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Truth About the Neobanking Industry: Out of 368 Operating, Only 127 Hold Licenses. Behind the Funding Rounds Lie Countless Silent Deaths.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Behind the 67,000 Semiconductor Talent Shortage: U.S. Industrial Policy Game and Implications for China

The U.S. push to reshore semiconductor manufacturing faces a core challenge: a significant talent shortage. While over $770 billion in investments are planned across 160 projects, a key hurdle is finding enough people to run the new fabs. According to industry projections, the U.S. could face a shortage of approximately 67,000 technicians, engineers, and computer scientists by 2030. This shortage is multi-faceted. It includes not only high-level chip design engineers requiring advanced degrees but also a substantial need for technicians to operate and maintain fab equipment. Technician roles, while often requiring less formal education, are hard to fill due to factors like shift work, factory locations, and local community infrastructure. Conversely, for high-end engineers, the issue is less about salary—which is already competitive—and more about intense competition for specialized skills from other tech sectors and the long lead time to develop such expertise. The geographic dispersion of new investments complicates recruitment, as fabs need large numbers of local, stable employees. In response, U.S. policy emphasizes building workforce development as critical infrastructure. Strategies include expanding community college programs for technician training, fostering industry-education partnerships, and pursuing immigration reforms for high-skilled talent, aiming to balance immediate needs with long-term domestic pipeline development. For China, the key takeaway is the need to integrate talent supply planning with factory construction from the outset. This involves requiring companies to submit workforce plans, strengthening vocational education aligned with industry needs, and building supportive local ecosystems to retain talent. Ultimately, a sustainable semiconductor industry depends not just on building fabs, but on cultivating a continuous, local talent pipeline capable of keeping them running and advancing.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Behind the 67,000 Semiconductor Talent Shortage: U.S. Industrial Policy Game and Implications for China

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片