Unable to Retain with a $100 Million Annual Salary, Yu Jiahui Departs Meta to Start His Own Venture

marsbitPublicado a 2026-08-14Actualizado a 2026-08-14

Resumen

Despite a reported compensation package rumored to be worth up to $100 million over four years, AI researcher Jiahui Yu has announced his departure from Meta after just over a year to start his own company. Yu joined Meta in June 2025 as a founding member and multimodal lead of the TBD Lab within Meta's Superintelligence Labs (MSL). During his tenure, he was instrumental in developing and launching key products like the Muse Spark foundational model and its subsequent versions, Muse Image, Muse Video, and Voice Mode. In his departure statement, Yu expressed gratitude for his time at Meta but cited being drawn to an "important yet underexplored problem for humanity's future" as his reason for leaving. While details of his new venture remain undisclosed, his exit adds to a notable trend of high-profile AI researchers departing Meta, with one platform listing nearly 930 former Meta researchers. The move raises questions about the long-term effectiveness of Meta's high-cost talent acquisition strategy in the competitive AI landscape.

$100 million couldn't keep him!

Just now, Yu Jiahui officially announced his departure from Meta to start a business.

From joining at the end of June 2025 to announcing his departure on August 14, 2026, it's exactly one year and a little over one month.

His personal website has also been updated with his resume.

Just a few days before his departure, Meta had just launched Muse Spark 1.2.

Over the past few months, Yu Jiahui's multimodal team had also successively delivered Muse Spark, Voice Mode, Muse Image, and Muse Video.

In his announcement, Yu Jiahui stated that the experience of building TBD Lab together with Zuckerberg and Meta's Chief AI Officer Alexander Wang was "extremely inspiring and fulfilling."

He specifically highlighted several achievements made by the team over the past year and mentioned that he has been increasingly drawn to a question that is "crucial for humanity's future but remains insufficiently explored."

Now, this question will receive his undivided attention.

As for the name of the new company, its specific research focus, and who the partners are, he didn't say a word:

More to share as the work takes shape.

More information will be shared as things gradually take shape.

Just Finished Delivering the Muse Suite, and the Person Is Gone

This past year, Yu Jiahui certainly didn't slack off.

At the end of June 2025, it was exposed that Yu Jiahui, along with researchers like Zhao Shengjia, Bi Shuchao, and Ren Hongyu from OpenAI, had collectively joined Meta's newly formed superintelligence team.

Zuckerberg personally stepped in to recruit him, with rumors of a "$100 million annual salary" setting a new record in the AI talent market.

Within a few days, Zuckerberg officially announced the establishment of the Meta Superintelligence Labs, or MSL.

The lab was led by Alexander Wang. For this, Meta invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI and aggressively poached talent from companies like OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Apple.

TBD Lab was one of the core model research teams under MSL, responsible for developing Meta's next-generation frontier models. Yu Jiahui was a founding member and the head of the multimodal direction.

In April this year, this team delivered its first major report card: Muse Spark.

This was the first foundation model released after MSL's establishment, also marking the official shift of Meta's frontier models from the Llama series to the Muse series.

Subsequently, Yu Jiahui's team continued to release Voice Mode, Muse Image, and Muse Video, covering speech, image, and video generation.

The recent update, Muse Spark 1.2, further pushed the focus towards programming, long-horizon Agent tasks, and multimodal capabilities.

During his year at Meta, Yu Jiahui essentially built a team from scratch, re-architected the technology stack, and served up the Muse suite dish by dish.

Meta researcher Zhiqing Sun revealed that Yu Jiahui was also one of the people who recruited him into Meta.

He recalled having a meal with Yu Jiahui at a Daeho restaurant in San Francisco, where Yu persuaded him to join TBD Lab. Later, they worked together on multimodal capabilities and Computer Use.

A year later, it was the turn of someone Yu Jiahui himself recruited to see him off.

Oh Zuck, oh Zuck... was this $100 million annual salary ultimately all for naught?

Rumored $100 Million: Why Did Zuck Specifically Fight for Him?

Exactly how much money Yu Jiahui received still lacks an authoritative answer.

But in last year's Silicon Valley talent war, he was undoubtedly one of the most talked-about names.

At that time, Altman had publicly stated that Meta offered some OpenAI employees $100 million in signing bonuses and even higher annual compensation.

Subsequently, WIRED reported that Meta's offers to a few top AI talents could reach up to $300 million over four years, with total first-year compensation potentially exceeding $100 million.

However, Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth later clarified that the widely circulated $100 million figure was not for everyone, nor was it a signing bonus paid upon joining. It likely referred to a total compensation package including stock, bonuses, tenure, and performance conditions.

So, whether Yu Jiahui personally received the "$100 million annual salary" remains unknown to us.

(Shrugs)

Even so, Yu Jiahui was still placed within the story of the "hundred-million-dollar man."

His resume also seems to have hit nearly every hot keyword in the large model field over the past few years.

Yu Jiahui completed his undergraduate studies at the School of the Gifted Young, University of Science and Technology of China, before pursuing his Ph.D. at UIUC under the supervision of computer vision scholar Thomas S. Huang.

During his Ph.D., he contributed to the development of DeepFill. Simply put, it allowed AI to erase unwanted objects from photos and automatically fill in the background.

Later, after joining Google Brain, he progressed from computer vision to multimodal large models, participating in and co-leading the Gemini multimodal direction.

After moving to OpenAI at the end of 2023, he led the Perception team, contributing to GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, and a series of o-series models.

Meta was precisely in need of someone like him at that time.

With Llama 4's performance falling short of expectations, Meta urgently needed a team to rebuild its frontier model capabilities.

Compared to researchers who only made breakthroughs in a single paper, Yu Jiahui had experience in low-level vision research, had participated in large model development at both Google and OpenAI, and possessed the experience of pushing multimodal capabilities into real products.

A year ago, people might have debated:

Was Yu Jiahui really worth the rumored nine-figure compensation package?

But now, the question has become:

What exactly does someone, whom even this level of compensation, computing power, and product opportunities cannot retain, want to do by leaving?

Indeed, for researchers who have reached Yu Jiahui's level, the conditions offered by big tech companies may be nearing the ceiling for employment.

Moving further up, the remaining path seems to be becoming a founder themselves~

Meta, Just How Many People Have You Lost?!

With Yu Jiahui's departure, netizens casually started checking Meta's household register.

One look, and the numbers were startling:

929.

The research paper platform alphaXiv pulled out a list of departed Meta researchers, claiming that before Yu Jiahui, over 200 well-known researchers had already left Meta.

Its search page shows that a total of 929 researchers meet the criteria of "previously worked at Meta, currently not at Meta."

At the top of the list is Yu Jiahui.

Following closely are researchers who recently joined Google, became chief scientists at startups, or joined stealth startup projects.

alphaXiv didn't miss the chance to use the ready-made TBD pun, directly stating:

The future of Meta AI is also TBD (To Be Determined).

Whoa, at first glance, this Meta lab looks more like an AI talent transit hub...

Last year, when Meta was waving checks to poach talent, Altman stated:

The missionaries will ultimately defeat the mercenaries.

Now, even Yu Jiahui, whom Meta poached with heavy money, has left.

Is Zuck's talent acquisition strategy, which was mocked as employing "mercenaries," ultimately successful?

The answer is similarly TBD.

Reference Links:

[1]https://x.com/jiahuiyu/status/2087936732939616299?s=20

[2]https://x.com/askalphaxiv/status/2087973800952623416?s=20

This article is from the WeChat public account "QbitAI," author: Ting Yu

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho is the main subject of the article and what major career move did they announce?

AThe main subject is Jiahui Yu. He announced his departure from Meta to start his own company.

QWhat is the name of the core model research team Jiahui Yu was a part of at Meta, and what was its purpose?

AHe was a founding member of the TBD Lab, which was part of Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL). Its purpose was to develop Meta's next-generation frontier models, with Yu leading the multimodal direction.

QAccording to the article, what significant product series did Jiahui Yu's team release at Meta, and what was the first major model called?

AHis team released the 'Muse' product series, which included Muse Spark, Voice Mode, Muse Image, and Muse Video. The first major foundational model was Muse Spark.

QWhat was the rumored compensation package offered to Jiahui Yu to join Meta, and how was it clarified by a Meta executive?

AIt was rumored to be a '1亿美元年薪' (a $100 million annual salary). Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth clarified that such figures were not a signing bonus for everyone but a total compensation package potentially including stock, bonuses, tenure, and performance conditions.

QWhat does the article suggest is a broader trend at Meta regarding AI researchers, based on data from alphaXiv?

AThe article suggests a significant trend of researchers leaving Meta. According to alphaXiv, over 200 known researchers had left before Jiahui Yu, with a total of 929 researchers meeting the criteria of having previously worked at Meta but no longer being there.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5 Also Has Tip-of-the-Tongue Moments, Google Tested 4.5 Million Times: The Keys Are Lost

Google researchers have discovered that advanced AI models like GPT-5 and Gemini 3 experience a phenomenon akin to the human "tip-of-the-tongue" state, where they possess knowledge but fail to retrieve it. Their study, "Empty Shelves or Lost Keys?" (ICML 2026), introduces the "Knowledge Portrait" framework to analyze factual knowledge in models, distinguishing between failure to encode a fact versus failure to recall it. Testing on 13 models across 2.15 million queries from the WikiProfile benchmark revealed that state-of-the-art models successfully encode 95-98% of facts into their parameters. However, when asked directly, they fail to recall 26-34% of these known facts. Enabling chain-of-thought ("thinking") reasoning reduces this recall failure to 11-12%, recovering 40-65% of the previously unrecalled but encoded facts. The research identifies two key bottlenecks: recalling obscure ("long-tail") facts and answering reversed queries (e.g., "Who is Tom Cruise's mother?" vs. "Whose son is Tom Cruise?"). While scaling model size effectively reduces encoding failures, it does little to improve recall rates. In larger models, recall failure becomes the dominant source of factual errors, accounting for over 70% of mistakes in GPT-5.2. The findings suggest that for top models, the primary challenge is no longer storing knowledge but accessing it efficiently. Future accuracy gains may depend more on improved inference-time methods and "meta-cognitive" abilities, enabling models to recognize when they need to engage in deeper reasoning to retrieve information they already know.

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

GPT-5 Also Has Tip-of-the-Tongue Moments, Google Tested 4.5 Million Times: The Keys Are Lost

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

The Dollar is a Technology: Stablecoins Are Exporting U.S. Institutions to the World

This article argues that stablecoins and blockchain infrastructure are becoming a vehicle for exporting American financial systems globally. The core thesis is that the U.S. dollar, as a "technology," is increasingly embedded in blockchain rails, moving beyond a reserve currency to represent the institutional stability of the United States itself. The piece highlights three key areas where this is happening: 1. **Cross-border payments and trade finance:** Companies like Keyrails use stablecoins and blockchain to streamline and secure trade finance for emerging markets (e.g., Nigeria-China trade), offering faster, often cheaper dollar liquidity than traditional systems. 2. **Programmable collateral and credit:** Platforms like SemiLiquid allow institutions to use tokenized assets (e.g., treasuries, stocks) as "programmable collateral" for loans without moving them from custody, unlocking capital efficiency and improving transparency in institutional lending. 3. **Financing real-world assets:** Protocols like USD.AI create lending markets for productive, hard-to-finance assets like AI GPUs, connecting global stablecoin liquidity to physical capital. The author concludes that the true value of these new blockchain-based financial platforms lies not just in transaction volume, but in the deep, hard-to-replicate "context" (data, trust, operational knowledge) they build around specific economic activities like trade and asset finance. This represents crypto's evolution into an operating system for real-world capital formation, moving beyond speculation.

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

The Dollar is a Technology: Stablecoins Are Exporting U.S. Institutions to the World

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

Ethereum Glamsterdam Upgrade: Largest-Scale Underlying Restructuring Yet, Mainnet Date Still Undecided

The upcoming Ethereum "Glamsterdam" upgrade is viewed by core developers as the most significant protocol-level refactoring since The Merge, fundamentally altering how the network processes transactions and manages its state to advance L1 scaling. Its core goals are: accelerating processing via parallelization, increasing capacity, and enhancing sustainability through adjusted fees that better reflect long-term data storage costs. The upgrade features two headline proposals. First, **ePBS (EIP-7732)** on the consensus layer aims to formalize proposer-builder separation directly within the protocol, eliminating reliance on off-chain relayers. This built-in mechanism is designed to provide a more secure and efficient block production pipeline, extending the critical validation window to allow the network to handle more data, particularly for Layer2s. Second, **BALs (EIP-7928)** on the execution layer introduces block-level access lists. These lists specify the data each transaction will access beforehand, allowing the network to identify and safely execute non-conflicting transactions in parallel, rather than strictly sequentially. This also speeds up new node synchronization. Glamsterdam also includes配套 proposals to reprice storage costs (aiming for a predictable ~120 GiB annual state growth) and the cost of data-reading operations to better align with modern hardware costs and prevent spam. Regarding the timeline, the initial schedule targeting a mainnet activation on September 16, 2026, has likely been delayed. Following the launch of a new dedicated testnet (Plataberget), the deployments on the Sepolia and Holesky testnets are now expected in September, with the mainnet launch potentially pushed to Q4 2026 or later, as developers prioritize correctness over a fixed date.

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

Ethereum Glamsterdam Upgrade: Largest-Scale Underlying Restructuring Yet, Mainnet Date Still Undecided

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片