Reasons Behind Stablecoins Losing Their Peg

u.todayPublicado a 2022-12-15Actualizado a 2022-12-15

Resumen

This year has been one of the toughest for the cryptocurrency market.

Contents

Why does this happen?
Mismanagement also contributes to stablecoin's downfall

This year has been one of the toughest for the cryptocurrency market. The bears managed to hit even the stablecoins that could not maintain their peg with the U.S. dollar.
USTC, formerly Terraform Labs' stablecoin, for example, lost its peg with the U.S. currency in May, putting heavy downward pressure on other blockchain assets.
Another algorithmic stablecoin that has been struggling to stay paired with the dollar is USDD, Tron's stablecoin. On June 19, 2022, the altcoin fell to $0.93, and since Nov. 27, it has failed to return to trading at $1.
Moreover, it is not just algorithmic stablecoins that are being negatively impacted this year. USDT, citing an analogous case, despite being the main stablecoin asset on the crypto market, has also had its down days in 2022, moving away from the $1 mark at times.
The trajectory of the giants USDC and BUSD has been no different. Even at the time of writing, Circle's stablecoin is trading at $0.99.
Why does this happen?
First, it is necessary to analyze the decline of algorithmic stablecoins. They are the most troublemakers on the crypto market. These stablecoins do not use an asset as collateral to maintain their parity with the dollar.
In this sense, they are controlled by algorithms. They are designed to expand or contract their total circulating supply, while maintaining their stability, according to market conditions.
The big problem is that sometimes the algorithm is faulty or misconfigured. This causes conditions other than what was planned to take away a stablecoin's parity with the dollar.
In the case of USTC, for example, the Terraform Labs ecosystem had flaws that allowed the exploitation of arbitrage opportunities due to the low liquidity of Curve (CRV) that underpinned the stablecoin's parity.
Also, in May, the DeFi Anchor project, a protocol that allowed users to deposit USTC to earn rewards, reduced its yield from 20% to just 4%. This took many investors by surprise, and they decided to take UST out of Anchor and sell it on the market.
As a result, in a brief time, USTC lost its peg, fell to pennies on the dollar, and took the economy of many people who believe in the stablecoin to zero.
Mismanagement also contributes to stablecoin's downfall
You read that right. Stablecoins like Dai, USDT, USDC and BUSD need to be professionally managed so that they do not lose their peg with the dollar.
Dai, MakerDAO's stablecoin, for example, has a particularly good proposition of being decentralized and having its parity guaranteed with cryptocurrencies.
However, in times of market crisis, with the price of cryptos falling, if Dai does not have a good reserve, it might lose its peg with the dollar. That is happening at the time of writing.
Centralized stablecoins, on the other hand, such as USDC and USDT, should have a calculated reserve, for times in which the crypto market may experience distrust and including stablecoins in uncertain market moments.
During the collapse of the Terra ecosystem and FTX, two major crypto scandals of 2022, USDT failed to hold steady, and the sale of the stablecoin on the market caused it to lose its parity with the dollar.
In theory, this should not happen at all, as stablecoins arose precisely to bring security in times of panic and no more fear to investors.
However, in practice, it is possible to observe that everything is completely different, and stable assets are only less volatile than Bitcoin (BTC) and do not fulfill their value proposition.

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Lecturas Relacionadas

Chip Stocks Lead U.S. Market Decline: Is AI Trading Being Hit by Both Interest Rates and Returns?

Chip stocks led a broad decline in US markets, with the Nasdaq dropping 2.2% and the S&P 500 falling 1.4%. This selloff reflects a dual challenge for the once-high-flying AI hardware trade: rising interest rate expectations and growing investor impatience for clear returns from massive AI capital expenditures. The pressure was most acute on hardware leaders. Nvidia fell about 4%, dipping below a $5 trillion market cap, while Micron plunged 13.2% ahead of its earnings report. Declines across memory, storage, AI, and mobile chips indicated a sector-wide retreat. The selloff spread globally, with South Korea's KOSPI index dropping nearly 10% as key suppliers SK Hynix and Samsung recorded double-digit losses. Investors appeared to be taking profits from the most crowded trades first. Macro headwinds intensified as market expectations shifted toward a more aggressive Federal Reserve. Forecasts for multiple rate hikes in 2026 pressured high-valuation tech stocks, which rely on long-term growth projections that become less attractive as discount rates rise. Concurrently, investors are scrutinizing the profit potential of the immense AI spending by cloud giants like Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta. While these expenditures drive demand for chips and hardware, the market is now questioning whether AI services will generate sufficient returns to justify the ongoing costs. This adjustment is not necessarily a bubble burst but a recalibration. AI demand fundamentals remain, but the narrative of endless growth can no longer fully offset concerns over higher interest rates and a longer path to profitability. Near-term direction may hinge on Micron's upcoming earnings guidance and incoming inflation data, which will influence both the AI demand outlook and the Fed's policy path. The market is transitioning from blindly buying growth to demanding clearer visibility on returns.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Chip Stocks Lead U.S. Market Decline: Is AI Trading Being Hit by Both Interest Rates and Returns?

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

OpenAI's New Paper: How to Train an AI that "Doesn't Deteriorate Under Pressure"?

OpenAI's new paper "Reinforcement Learning Towards Broadly and Persistently Beneficial Models" explores training AI to maintain safe, helpful, and honest behavior even under pressure, in unseen scenarios, or after being fine-tuned for harmful purposes. Moving beyond simple rule-based "don'ts," the research focuses on cultivating "beneficial traits" like honesty, risk-awareness, corrigibility, and transparency. It investigates if reinforcement learning (RL), often prone to "reward hacking" where models exploit loopholes, can instead be used to instill robust, generalized positive behaviors. Researchers created a multi-domain synthetic dialogue dataset covering areas like healthcare and law. They trained a model by replacing 5% of standard RL data with "beneficial trait" data. This model outperformed the baseline in 83% of 53 evaluations, showing average gains of 9.1% in alignment, safety, and helpfulness. Crucially, improvements generalized: a model trained only on healthcare "good behavior" data also performed better in 17 out of 19 non-healthcare alignment tests. The paper also tests "alignment persistence." When subjected to adversarial prompts or harmful fine-tuning, the beneficial trait model showed greater resilience, with smaller performance drops and less "spillover" of bad behavior to unrelated tasks. While not a complete solution, this work suggests a shift from post-hoc correction to proactively shaping robust, principled AI behavior, a critical step for deploying models in high-stakes, complex decision-making scenarios.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

OpenAI's New Paper: How to Train an AI that "Doesn't Deteriorate Under Pressure"?

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Goldman Sachs Revisits the State of the AI Boom: Strong Earnings Will Override Valuation Concerns Until the Investment Cycle Peaks, Volatility to Rise Further

Goldman Sachs discusses the current AI investment boom, arguing it is not a simple repeat of the 1999-2000 bubble. Unlike the dot-com era, current valuations are not wildly out of control because earnings expectations are rising in tandem with stock prices. The key issue is that market prices have already priced in substantial optimism, making them sensitive to any narrative shifts. The core risk has shifted from "valuation bubble" to "earnings bubble." While strong profits from companies in semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, and data centers currently outweigh valuation concerns, this is dependent on the ongoing capital expenditure cycle. The true test will be whether these robust earnings can be sustained after the investment cycle peaks. Current market prices imply optimistic assumptions, such as faster AI adoption, higher productivity gains, and a larger share of economic profits going to capital owners. The AI boom may also be masking relative weakness in the non-AI sectors of the economy. As a result, market volatility is expected to rise. Goldman recommends that investors consider maintaining exposure while adding downside protection, such as put options, to manage potential drawdowns.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Goldman Sachs Revisits the State of the AI Boom: Strong Earnings Will Override Valuation Concerns Until the Investment Cycle Peaks, Volatility to Rise Further

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Zuckerberg Enters the Prediction Market

Mark Zuckerberg's Meta has entered the predictive markets arena with a new app called "Arena." Currently in an early experimental phase, Arena will initially operate as a standalone app using a points-based system where users can predict outcomes on politics, sports, and world events without real money. Meta plans to leverage its vast daily active user base for growth. The move comes as the predictive market industry sees explosive growth, with platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi handling hundreds of billions in volume. While a points system avoids initial regulatory hurdles, Meta hasn't ruled out introducing real-money betting later. The strategy aligns with Meta's pattern of adopting popular trends, though challenges remain, including regulatory scrutiny and the historically mixed success of its standalone apps.

Foresight NewsHace 58 min(s)

Foresight NewsHace 58 min(s)

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

The core of recent semiconductor stock volatility is not about daily price swings, but rather the market questioning whether AI-driven semiconductor pricing has entered a new phase. Following a sharp sell-off in Korean stocks on June 23rd, led by Samsung and SK Hynix, a subsequent rebound is seen more as a technical positioning adjustment rather than a confirmed trend reversal. The key variable is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), essential for AI chips. Its supply-demand imbalance granted memory makers significant pricing power. The current market focus is on whether this dynamic remains strong enough to justify elevated valuations. All eyes are on Micron's upcoming earnings report. The critical factor is not whether results meet already high expectations, but whether the company's guidance confirms that AI memory pricing power, order visibility, and future margins are still expanding. Micron's outlook will serve as a crucial test for the broader AI semiconductor chain, including Samsung, SK Hynix, and other infrastructure players. The recent bounce appears to be a pre-earnings positioning repair. For it to evolve into a sustained uptrend, concrete evidence is needed that the AI infrastructure expansion cycle's fundamentals—particularly for high-end memory—remain robust and can continue to surpass elevated market expectations. The risk is that strong demand alone may not be sufficient if future guidance hints at peaking momentum or increasing supply-side pressures.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar CRV

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Curve DAO Token (CRV) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Curve DAO Token (CRV) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Curve DAO Token (CRV)Después de comprar tu Curve DAO Token (CRV), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Curve DAO Token (CRV)Tradear fácilmente con Curve DAO Token (CRV) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

495 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de CRV (CRV).