软银:完了,我被FOMO了……

星空价值投资Publicado a 2022-11-16Actualizado a 2022-11-16

Resumen

机构有时候就是个韭菜。

FTX暴雷以后,各大顶级机构打开车门就开始裸跳。

首先是红杉资本把对FTX的两亿美金投资减记为0,随后软银对FTX近亿美金的投资也减记为0。比较有意思的地方是,软银的前首席运营官在社交媒体上的反思。

这哥们很实诚,说这次投资做得很失败。为什么失败?一方面是我们没搞明白自己投资的是啥玩意,一方面是被FOMO了。

华尔街老传统艺能了,没想到被小鬼鬼也学过去了。

讲一个故事,关于纳斯达克前主席麦道夫的故事。

大家听过旁兹么?没听过没关系,旁兹就是旁氏骗局的创始人。旁氏骗局就是利用高额利息吸引资金,然后拆东墙补西墙的一个金融骗局。

虽然旁氏骗局是旁兹首创,但把这玩意发扬光大的人是纳斯达克主席,麦道夫。

这哥们的路数就包装自己,混入上流社会。然后跟富豪朋友们说自己有个神秘的发财路子,兄弟们只要给钱就能赚。

相信他,给他投钱的朋友都赚了。越来越多的人都相信他能赚钱,纷纷把钱扔给他来打理。中间有一小撮人开始怀疑,有疑虑。但架不住那么多大佬为他背书,那这部分有疑虑的朋友看别人赚钱比自己亏钱还难受,一咬牙一跺脚也就打不过就加入了。

由于吸收了旁兹的经验,麦道夫比较好的控制了利息,所以这个旁氏骗局都在正常运转。直到金融危机到来,那些大佬们需要现金,找他挤兑发现给不出钱来的时候,这个骗局才被戳破了。

最后麦道夫获刑150年,按照70年的生命周期,他等于是要吃两辈子牢饭。

LTCM也有一个类似的故事。当时LTCM搞了一大堆数学家来设计了非常复杂的衍生品交易,并且拿到了很多银行的无垫头贷款(看不懂直接当成他可以开无限杠杆就好了)。

当时高盛的相关负责人也苦笑着说,我都搞不清楚他到底在干啥,但我还是答应了,因为他们真的能赚钱....

啰啰嗦嗦这么一大堆,我想说的是,不要觉得那些顶级机构就很神秘,很多时候他们一样的也是韭菜。

我简化一下华尔街投行的决策思路:

1.发现可以赚钱的路子、项目。

2.这个路子可以不可以我一个赚大头?

→可以。那全都要,一边投竞品,一边投本项目。

→不可以(错过)。哭着我都要冲进来分口汤。

软银,红杉对于FTX的态度,就是这种情况。首先Crypto这个他们不一定搞得懂,但看到很多人赚钱了,就一定想要去搞一搞,并且是想跟着最赚钱的人搞一搞。那时候风头正盛的可不就是FTX和SBF么。

所以,有时候也别太相信顶级机构了,可能他们也是韭菜。但机构跟散户不同的是,他们亏的钱不是自己的钱,但我们不思考跟着他们去搞,亏的可真就是自己的钱了。

....

顺着这个事,正好也跟大家聊聊机构投资的决策流程的缺点,来给大家提振一些信心。

机构之间的竞争,第一个是看谁的钱多。这个道理很简单,谁钱多谁能投的项目就多,按照概率学成功的几率就更大。

第二个是看谁的钱更长。这个条件其实比第一个更重要,很多机构的LP其实毛都不懂,他们只管出钱,只管要更高更快的投资回报。但投资本来就是周期性的东西,等待估值回归和验证投资决策是否正确,这就要经历过一个比较长的时间。

LP不愿意等,就会要求基金经理给解释,或是赎回或者是逼迫基金经理操作。所以,大家会发现,一个基金往往是他的资金规模很小的时候收益率很高,变大以后收益率就变得很低。

很典型的就是国内的公募基金。你看张坤、葛兰这些明星经理,过去收益最高的时候都是管理规模很小的时候。规模越大越闹腾,因为背后的LP是韭菜,他们想做的的事都是亏钱的事。

所以啊,基金经理即便是水平再高,被LP限制,他就很难办。他觉得牛市应该等待,但LP们又会逼着他去建仓;熊市应该建仓,但又募不到钱。

我们散户就不一样了,钱是自己的,能拿多久也是看自己。什么时候决定怎么样的操作全看自己。这就是个人对于机构的优势,也是我们凭借自己能力能赚到钱的地方。

今天就聊这么多了。市场平平淡淡,很多人觉得还有更大的雷,但我还是那个观点,能被预见的雷,那都没有风险。所以大概率这次FTX引发的连锁反应被排干净以后,就要走出新的行情。

财富都是这么转移的,老权贵不死,也没多少钱给后来者来分。所以一般过去赚大钱的大佬倒下了,市场才有钱赚。

以上。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Report Interpretation: J.P. Morgan Details Micron's Pre-Earnings Sentiment, Current Hardware Sector Dynamics

Morgan Stanley analyst Joshua Meyers' report (June 21, 2026) highlights key trends in the hardware and semiconductor sector ahead of Micron's earnings. The core takeaways are: 1. **Micron & Memory:** Memory remains a high-conviction long theme, driven by strong AI demand and rising ASPs. However, investor focus is shifting to the sustainability of Micron's >80% gross margins and the specifics of potential new long-term supply agreements (SCAs). 2. **Hardware Supply Chain:** AI-related demand for servers, networking, and storage remains robust, but company performance is diverging. Celestica (CLS) shows improved margin confidence, Western Digital and Seagate benefit from pricing, Fabrinet (FN) sees predictable AI optics growth, and Teradyne (TER) anticipates a new Google customer. 3. **AI Capex & WFE Forecasts:** JPMorgan increased its Wafer Fab Equipment (WFE) market growth forecasts to 28% in 2026 and 29% in 2027. AI infrastructure financing is evolving, with higher project-level debt reducing constraints on capex expansion. The report signals that while the AI-driven hardware cycle is strong, the market is entering a phase focused on execution verification (e.g., Micron's SCA details, Fabrinet's ramp with Amazon) and valuation sustainability. Key near-term signals include Micron's guidance, Arista Networks' outlook, and the pace of demand normalization post potential tariff-related pull-ins.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Report Interpretation: J.P. Morgan Details Micron's Pre-Earnings Sentiment, Current Hardware Sector Dynamics

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Research Report Analysis: The Fed's New Chair's Debut – New Leader, But Same Script?

Report Analysis: Federal Reserve's New Chair Debut – A New Captain, But the Same Script? Morgan Stanley's chief global economist Seth B. Carpenter analyzes the first FOMC meeting under new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh in a June 21 report. Warsh deliberately avoided providing forward guidance on interest rates, aligning with his philosophy. However, market expectations for a rate hike this year were reinforced. Key signals lie elsewhere: inflation may fall more than expected, and quantitative tightening (QT) could be more aggressive than anticipated. The FOMC's "dot plot" suggests only one rate hike in 2026. Carpenter argues that if inflation undershoots forecasts, the logic for even a single hike weakens, especially as projections indicate potential rate cuts in 2027. On QT, Warsh's stance is clear. Carpenter notes that measures like halving the Treasury's account balance could shrink the Fed's balance sheet by around $500 billion with minimal market impact. Combined with adjustments to reserve interest and liquidity rules, the ultimate QT scale may exceed expectations, though its market effect might be less disruptive unless the Fed actively sells Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS). While Warsh initiated a review of the Fed's policy framework, the 2% inflation target remains intact for now. The report concludes that the market may be overestimating the significance of reduced forward guidance and the near-term rate hike risk, while potentially underestimating the scope and manageable nature of the coming balance sheet reduction. The key debates will hinge on upcoming core PCE data, the specifics of the QT path, and the framework review's findings.

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Research Report Analysis: The Fed's New Chair's Debut – New Leader, But Same Script?

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

This weekly analysis outlines a critical juncture for BTC and HYPE markets, focusing on key price level confirmations. **BTC Analysis:** BTC is at a pivotal point after a five-wave rally from the June 5th low of $59,100. The price has broken below a short-term rising channel's lower boundary, with the current move seen as a pullback to test this breakdown. Failure to reclaim this level could lead to a retest of the $59,000-$60,000 support zone. The core scenario hinges on this channel retest outcome. * **Key Levels:** Resistance at $64,500-$65,000 (channel boundary) and $69,500-$70,500. Support at $59,000-$60,000 and $55,000. * **Strategy:** A core bearish stance is maintained (20% short from last week), with short-term plans for tactical trades. Three detailed contingency plans (A/B/C) are provided for short positions on resistance tests or breakdowns, emphasizing strict stop-loss discipline. **HYPE Analysis:** HYPE shows strong momentum but is currently in a corrective phase after hitting a new high of $76.94. The price is retesting the crucial $64-$66 support area. * **Key Levels:** Resistance near $77 and $80-$82. Support at $64-$66 and $52-$54. * **Strategy:** The short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A long position is considered only if clear stabilization signals appear at the $64-$66 or deeper $52-$54 support zones, with tight risk controls. **General Risk Management:** A standardized trailing stop-loss protocol is emphasized: set initial stop, breakeven at +1% profit, then trail stops upward to lock in gains. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as a personal trading framework, not investment advice. Market conditions are complex and require dynamic adjustment.*

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片