Bitcoin price could drop below $12,000 as bears gain technical advantage

FinboldPublicado a 2022-11-10Actualizado a 2022-11-10

Resumen

Bitcoin’s (BTC) push to exit the bear market suffered a blow after the crypto sector was hit with a high-profile liquidity crisis affecting the FTX exchange. Consequently, the flagship cryptocurrency has corrected almost to a two-year low, with bulls appearing helpless.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) push to exit the bear market suffered a blow after the crypto sector was hit with a high-profile liquidity crisis affecting the FTX exchange. Consequently, the flagship cryptocurrency has corrected almost to a two-year low, with bulls appearing helpless.

""

In this line, Kitco News analysts Jim Wyckoff on November 9 suggested that bears have a technical advantage translating to a possible sustained Bitcoin price correction.

""

According to Wyckoff, the FTX crisis has generally eroded investor confidence noting that the market should expect a ‘severe liquidity crunch.’
""

“Bears have quickly gained technical power to suggest more downside price pressure in the near term. The marketplace is still buzzing about the turmoil in the cryptocurrency markets on Tuesday that spilled over into safe-haven buying in gold and sharply boosted the yellow metal’s and silver’s prices,” he said. 
""

Bitcoin potential to retest $12,000
""

Additionally, crypto analyst with the pseudonym AltcoinSherpa in a tweet on November 9, suggested that amid the current market conditions, the next Bitcoin’s price action can emulate historical trends.
""

According to the expert, the asset can correct to $12,000, a value that would form ‘strong resistance for Bitcoin’. He also acknowledged the $20,000 position was ‘soundly broken’.

""

Notably, the analyst stated in case the $12,000 position is attained, Bitcoin would likely attract increased buying pressure.

Bitcoin price chart. Source: TradingView

""

Elsewhere, crypto trading expert Michaël van de Poppe pointed out that correcting to $10,000 is still in play, but it will depend on how the market reacts to the crisis.

""

“Could the markets fall towards $10K for Bitcoin? Definitely, that’s a likely possibility, or $12-14K, too, all depending on how things are going to develop from here. However, I wouldn’t dare to start shorting Bitcoin here. Rather DCA & invest,” he said. 
""

As reported by Finbold, commodity strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence Mike McGlone pointed out that Bitcoin can find a support level at $10,000 while warning that the FTX situation could trigger a ‘macroeconomic dominoes.’
""

Bitcoin technical analysis
""

The bearish outlook has also extended to Bitcoin technicals. In particular, a summary of the one-day technicals points to a ‘strong sell’ at 16, similar to moving averages at 14. Elsewhere, oscillators are also to ‘sell’ at two.


Bitcoin technical analysis. Source: TradingView

""

In the meantime, Bitcoin continues with the free fall trading at $17,200 by press time, losing its value by 11% in the last 24 hours. 

Lecturas Relacionadas

OpenAI Partners with PE Firms, Investing $4 Billion. Let's Talk About Silicon Valley's Hottest New Role: FDE.

The hottest new role in Silicon Valley is the Forward Deployment Engineer (FDE), a hybrid of engineer and business consultant whose core mission is to transform AI demos into native, practical workflows within client organizations. The recent surge in demand is driven by a strategic shift from leading AI companies. OpenAI, partnering with 19 private equity firms in a $4 billion investment, formed a Deployment Company and acquired Tomoro along with its 150 FDEs. Anthropic also announced a $1.5 billion joint venture with financial institutions like Blackstone. The article, based on interviews with industry experts Jove (FDE lead at Cresta) and Oliver (VP at Invisible Technologies, ex-McKinsey), explores the FDE role and the rise of deployment-focused companies. Key insights include: **The FDE Role:** Jove describes an FDE as a "Forward Deployed CTO"—a technically strong engineer who works intimately with clients to implement AI solutions, learn from the process, and feed those insights back to improve the core product. They require expertise in AI agents, client-facing experience, resilience, and the ability to handle complex, imperfect systems. While AI tools enhance their efficiency, the role's complexity makes full automation a distant prospect. **Industry Shift:** Model companies are moving beyond selling tools to ensuring real-world adoption. This blurs the line between model and application companies. Collaborations with private equity (PE) firms are key, providing access to large portfolios of traditional businesses needing AI transformation. For PE firms, these partnerships offer signal value to LPs, create tangible value in portfolio companies, and provide exposure to high-growth AI assets. **Consulting & Transformation:** AI deployment involves deep, customized workflow redesign, moving beyond simple tool augmentation. Companies like Invisible Technologies build modular platforms to create bespoke, AI-native workflows for clients. While traditional consulting will see growth in helping businesses rethink their models for AI, the real value is captured by firms that leave behind transformed, operational systems. Critical success factors include building robust data foundations and strategically deciding which workflow steps should be deterministic versus AI-driven. The ultimate goal shifts from pure cost-cutting to unlocking new revenue opportunities previously impossible without AI-scale capabilities.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

OpenAI Partners with PE Firms, Investing $4 Billion. Let's Talk About Silicon Valley's Hottest New Role: FDE.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Why Is DeFi Insurance Unpopular?

The article explores the core reasons why DeFi insurance remains largely unutilized despite its potential to eliminate traditional insurance inefficiencies and malicious claim denials through automated smart contracts. Key points include: 1. **Low Adoption & Minimal Payouts:** Leading provider Nexus Mutual has paid only ~$18M in claims since 2019, dwarfed by single hack losses (e.g., Kelp DAO's $292M loss). 2. **High Correlation Risk:** Unlike traditional insurance (e.g., house fires), DeFi risks (oracle failures, bridge hacks) are systemic and can simultaneously impact multiple protocols, threatening to drain entire insurance pools. 3. **Prohibitive Cost vs. Reward:** For many protocols (Aave, Morpho, Compound), insurance premiums (1.5%-6%) consume a significant portion or even all of the native yield (3%-4%), leaving investors with meager returns. In some cases (Maple Finance, Ethena), premiums can even result in net-negative yields. 4. **Inadequate Capacity:** The total DeFi insurance pool (e.g., Nexus Mutual's $81.56M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive supply-demand gap. 5. **Structural Flaws:** The claims assessment model (e.g., Nexus Mutual's member voting) creates a conflict of interest, as voters bear the loss if a claim is paid. There is also no regulatory mandate forcing DeFi protocols to obtain insurance. The industry is adapting by focusing on preventative measures (e.g., bug bounty coverage) and seeking external capital via reinsurance. However, the fundamental issues of small pool size, correlated risk, and misaligned economic incentives persist. The article concludes that DeFi insurance, like a public lighthouse, provides shared security benefits, but if everyone relies on others to pay for it, no one will, leaving the ecosystem vulnerable.

Foresight NewsHace 21 min(s)

Why Is DeFi Insurance Unpopular?

Foresight NewsHace 21 min(s)

Ethlabs Founded, Treasury Companies to Fund Ethereum Post-EF

Former Ethereum Foundation (EF) core researchers Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit R&D lab focused on Ethereum core protocol research and institutional-grade infrastructure. The initiative, backed by over 50 community participants including ETH treasury companies BitMine and Sharplink, Joseph Lubin, Hayden Adams, and Jesse Pollak, aims to make Ethereum the global economic settlement layer. This move comes amidst significant pressure on the EF, which has seen key departures and a strategic narrowing of its focus. A critical funding gap of approximately $30 million annually for core client development, following the expiration of the client incentive program, poses a near-term risk to the network's development. The context includes the evolution of ETH's value narrative. While mechanisms like EIP-1559 and the Merge previously supported the "ultrasound money" thesis, the success of L2 scaling via EIP-4844 has drastically reduced L1 fee revenue, leading to net ETH issuance and challenging that narrative. Ethlabs has listed ETH monetary economics as a primary research focus. Backing from corporate ETH treasuries like BitMine and Sharplink represents a strategic alignment, as these entities' asset values are directly tied to Ethereum's health and adoption. Their support is an investment rather than a pure donation. Ethereum's governance is shifting from a centralized EF model to a distributed network of specialized "manager nodes," including Ethlabs and a streamlined EF. While this promotes efficiency and reduces single-point failure risk, it introduces new challenges in coordination, priority alignment, and filling critical funding gaps across the decentralized ecosystem.

Foresight NewsHace 45 min(s)

Ethlabs Founded, Treasury Companies to Fund Ethereum Post-EF

Foresight NewsHace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片