67% of Binance traders are long on Chainlink – Is LINK ready to reclaim $14.15?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-25Actualizado a 2026-01-25

Resumen

Chainlink (LINK) is trading near a key support level of $11.90, with 67% of Binance traders holding long positions, indicating a strong bullish bias. Despite a 35% drop in trading volume suggesting market hesitancy, derivatives data shows traders are positioning for a potential rebound. Key liquidation risk zones are identified at $11.85 and $12.45. If the $11.90 support holds, analysts project a possible 16% rise toward the $14.15 resistance level. A break below this support, however, could lead to further downside. The Average Directional Index (ADX) reading of 25.42 confirms a strong directional trend is in play.

Chainlink [LINK] traded near a key support zone as derivatives data showed a heavy long bias among Binance traders.

On the 25th of January, CoinGlass showed that the Binance LINK/USDT Long/Short Ratio was at 2.06, favoring bullish positioning. Long accounts made up 67.34%, while short accounts stood at 32.66%.

That imbalance suggested traders were positioning for a rebound despite broader market weakness.

However, leverage concentrations hinted at near-term volatility. The LINK Exchange Liquidation Map showed overleveraged clusters around $11.85 and $12.45, marking short-term risk zones.

Price stalls at key demand zone

As of press time, Chainlink [LINK] hovered at $12.06, down 1% over the past 24 hours. However, the broader market remains hesitant to participate in the token, as reflected in trading volume, which has fallen 35% to $181.35 million.

This decline in 24-hour trading volume indicated that traders and investors were not interested in the altcoin or its current price trend.

Chainlink (LINK) price action hints at a potential reversal

On the daily chart, LINK retested the $11.90 region, a level that previously acted as a demand zone.

Price moved sideways around that area for several sessions, signaling consolidation rather than aggressive selling pressure.

If LINK held above $11.90, the historical structure suggested a potential rebound toward the $14.15 resistance zone. That move would imply a roughly 16% upside from current levels.

By contrast, a sustained break below $11.90 could invalidate the reversal setup and expose deeper downside levels.

In addition to price action, the Average Directional Index (ADX) stood at 25.42, above the key threshold of 25, indicating a strong directional trend.

Adding to the bullish narrative, crypto analyst Marzell described Chainlink as an “institutional sleeping giant” in a recent X post.

The analyst highlighted $16.13, $20.09, and $24.52 as key resistance levels if momentum returned.

That view aligned with a higher-timeframe structure, where LINK previously rebounded sharply after defending similar base ranges.


Final Thoughts

  • LINK’s Long/Short Ratio hit 2.06, with 67.34% of accounts positioned long.
  • Holding $11.90 supports a move toward $14.15, while $11.85–$12.45 remains a liquidation risk zone.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of Binance traders are long on Chainlink according to the data from CoinGlass on January 25th?

A67.34% of Binance traders were long on Chainlink.

QWhat is the key support level that LINK needs to hold above for a potential rebound to $14.15?

ALINK needs to hold above the key support level of $11.90.

QWhat does the Average Directional Index (ADX) value of 25.42 indicate about the current market trend for LINK?

AAn ADX value of 25.42, which is above the key threshold of 25, indicates a strong directional trend.

QAccording to the article, what is the significance of the price zones around $11.85 and $12.45 on the liquidation map?

AThe price zones around $11.85 and $12.45 are overleveraged clusters that mark short-term risk zones for liquidations.

QWhich crypto analyst described Chainlink as an 'institutional sleeping giant' and what key resistance levels did they highlight?

ACrypto analyst Marzell described Chainlink as an 'institutional sleeping giant' and highlighted $16.13, $20.09, and $24.52 as key resistance levels.

Lecturas Relacionadas

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight NewsHace 36 min(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight NewsHace 36 min(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar LINK

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar ChainLink (LINK) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar ChainLink (LINK) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu ChainLink (LINK)Después de comprar tu ChainLink (LINK), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear ChainLink (LINK)Tradear fácilmente con ChainLink (LINK) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.1k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar LINK

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de LINK (LINK).

活动图片