【重磅解读】 从110万枚ETH的成本价判断反弹空间,BTC试探压力位

火币资讯Publicado a 2022-09-09Actualizado a 2022-09-13

Resumen

BTC和ETH相继反弹,提前预判涨幅潜力。

1、BTC放量反弹

BTC价格依然处在1年内最低值附近,因此近期持续增长的交易量表明,有更多的投资者参与到交易中来。因此,BTC会在价格出现收盘价低点18790美元以后开始反弹。短线反弹强度提升以后,价格达到了布林线中轨对应的20249美元上方。据此判断,行情处在了技术性反弹的节点位置。考虑到成本集中度较高的因此,反弹可关注BTC相对近期投资者交易成本价的表现。

2、BTC转移数量反弹

BTC的转移数量在6月15日达到了1768万枚以后,近期BTC的转移数量维持稳定。9月6日BTC转移数量增长到了643万枚,是数值较高的一个交易日。从转移数量的分布来看,BTC重要的成本价,可关注6月15日对应的收盘价22555美元以外。近期BTC的价格波动基本围绕22555美元展开,该价格能否被顺利突破,是确认涨幅潜力的关键之一。

3、 BTC未确认的亏损较大

随着BTC价格在低位运行时间越长,未确认亏损的规模并未回落,而且持续了较大的反弹空间。数值上看,NUL指标代表的BTC未确认的亏损规模占比可达0.48,数值上看虽然低于前期峰值0.56,但是绝对数值依然较高。因此,BTC技术反弹阶段的涨幅难度较大。套牢盘较多,目前BTC现货方面持续积累的交易量对减少抛压有利。随着交易量维持高位运行,更高的成交量将可能推动BTC价格上涨。

4、ETH价格小幅反弹

随着交易量维持稳定,ETH价格目前已经达到布林线上轨附近,进一步上涨的空间有望进一步释放。目前来看,ETH若能在1607美元上方维持强势,其短线反弹空间有望增长。压力位方面,迹象关注斐波那契61.8%对应的1910美元,该点位的抛压较大,不仅是前期反弹确认的压力位,同时也是本次涨幅必须要突破的点位。

5、ETH换手率提升

随着ETH短期内转移的数量增长,变盘前的换手率也在提升。从ETH的平均转移的ETH数量上判断,7月26日和8月4日数值分别达到了109.9万和88.9万的峰值。从单日数值规模来看,显然超过了2021年曾经出现的峰值。因此,在确认主力换手后的持币持币方面,7月26日对应的ETH收盘价1449美元是重要的成本价。同时,8月4日ETH的收盘价1607美元也非常重要。在判断近期ETH价格走向的时候,这两个成本价对行情影响较大。

短期内ETH的转移数量小幅反弹,对持币成本的影响有限。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

The AI infrastructure (AI Infra) industry chain is facing unprecedented systemic bottlenecks, despite the rapid emergence of applications like DeepSeek and Seedance 2.0. The surge in global computing demand has exposed critical constraints across multiple layers of the supply chain—from core manufacturing equipment and data center cabling to specialty materials and cleanroom facilities. Key challenges include four major "walls": - **Memory Wall**: High-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM face structural shortages as AI inference demand outpaces training, with new capacity not expected until 2027. - **Bandwidth Wall**: Data transfer speeds lag behind computing power, causing multi-level bottlenecks in-chip, between chips, and across data centers. - **Compute Wall**: Advanced chip manufacturing, reliant on EUV lithography and monopolized by ASML, remains the fundamental constraint, with supply chain fragility affecting production. - **Power Wall**: While energy demand from data centers is rising, power supply is a solvable near-term challenge through diversified energy infrastructure. Expansion is further hindered by shortages in testing equipment, IC substrates (critical for GPUs and seeing price hikes over 30%), specialty materials like low-CTE glass fiber, and high-end cleanroom facilities. Connection technologies are evolving, with copper cables resurging for short-range links due to cost and latency advantages, while optical solutions dominate long-range scenarios. Innovations like hollow-core fiber and advanced PCB technologies (e.g., glass substrates, mSAP) are emerging to meet bandwidth needs. In summary, AI Infra bottlenecks are multidimensional, spanning compute, memory, bandwidth, power, and supply chain logistics. Advanced chip manufacturing remains the core constraint, while substrate, material, and equipment shortages present immediate challenges. The industry is moving toward hybrid copper-optical solutions and accelerated domestic supply chain development.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4's repeated delay in early 2026 has sparked global discussions on "de-CUDA-ization" in AI. The highly anticipated trillion-parameter open-source model is undergoing deep adaptation to Huawei’s Ascend chips using the CANN framework, representing China’s first systematic attempt to run a core AI model outside the CUDA ecosystem. This shift, however, comes with significant engineering challenges. While the model uses a MoE architecture to reduce computational load, it places extreme demands on memory bandwidth, chip interconnects, and system scheduling—areas where NVIDIA’s mature CUDA ecosystem currently excels. Migrating to Ascend introduces complexities in hardware topology, communication latency, and software optimization due to CANN’s relative immaturity compared to CUDA. The move highlights a broader strategic dilemma: short-term compatibility with CUDA offers practical benefits and faster adoption, as seen in CANN’s efforts to emulate CUDA interfaces. Yet, long-term over-reliance on compatibility risks inheriting CUDA’s limitations and stifling native innovation. If global AI shifts away from transformer-based architectures, strict compatibility could lead to technological obsolescence. Despite these challenges, DeepSeek V4’s eventual release could demonstrate the viability of a full domestic AI stack and accelerate CANN’s ecosystem growth. However, true technological independence will require building an original software-hardware paradigm beyond compatibility—a critical task for China’s AI ambitions in the next 3-5 years.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

AI Agents are rapidly evolving into autonomous economic participants, but they face critical gaps in identity, payment, and trust infrastructure. They currently lack standardized ways to prove who they are, what they are authorized to do, and how they should be compensated across different environments. Blockchain technology is emerging as a solution to these challenges by providing a neutral coordination layer. Public ledgers offer auditable credentials, wallets enable portable identities, and stablecoins serve as a programmable settlement layer. A key bottleneck is the absence of a universal identity standard for non-human entities—akin to "Know Your Agent" (KYA)—which would allow Agents to operate with verifiable, cryptographically signed credentials. Without this, Agents remain fragmented and face barriers to interoperability. Additionally, as AI systems take on governance roles, there is a risk that centralized control over models could undermine decentralized governance in practice. Cryptographic guarantees on training data, prompts, and behavior logs are essential to ensure Agents act in users' interests. Stablecoins and crypto-native payment rails are becoming the default for Agent-to-Agent commerce, enabling seamless, low-cost transactions for AI-native services. These systems support permissionless, programmable payments without traditional merchant onboarding. Finally, as AI scales, human oversight becomes impractical. Trust must be built into system architecture through verifiable provenance, on-chain attestations, and decentralized identity systems. The future of Agent economies depends on cryptographically enforced accountability, allowing users to delegate tasks with clearly defined constraints and transparent operation logs.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片