El director de la OCC promete publicar las normas definitivas sobre GENIUS para noviembre

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-19Actualizado a 2026-08-19

Resumen

El controlador de la moneda de EE.UU., Jonathan Gould, anunció que la OCC publicará las reglas finales para implementar la ley de stablecoins de pago ($GENIUS) en noviembre. La ley, firmada en julio de 2025, establece un marco regulatorio y requiere que varias agencias, incluida la OCC, el Tesoro, la FDIC y la Fed, desarrollen normas. Tras publicar un borrador de 376 páginas en febrero y recopilar comentarios del sector, la OCC tiene como objetivo finalizar las reglas antes de que la ley entre en vigor en enero de 2027. Gould espera que la agencia pueda comenzar a procesar solicitudes de emisores de stablecoins ese mismo año.

El Contralor de la Moneda de EE. UU., Jonathan Gould, declaró que su agencia publicará las normas definitivas para implementar la ley de stablecoins de pago para noviembre.

Hablando el miércoles en el Simposio de Blockchain de Wyoming, el regulador informó que después de que la Oficina del Contralor de la Moneda (OCC) publique el borrador de las normas para implementar la ley sobre las pautas y el establecimiento de innovaciones nacionales para los stablecoins de EE. UU. ($GENIUS), la OCC publicará las normas definitivas antes de que la ley entre en vigor en enero de 2027.

Gould afirmó que la OCC "publicará la norma definitiva para noviembre", ya que la agencia ha estado revisando los comentarios de la industria cripto después de publicar las normas propuestas en febrero. Añadió que, según sus expectativas, el regulador podrá comenzar a procesar solicitudes de emisores de stablecoins en 2027.

La ley $GENIUS, firmada en julio de 2025, tiene como objetivo establecer un marco regulatorio para los stablecoins de pago en EE. UU. y requiere que las agencias gubernamentales que supervisan estos productos, incluida la OCC, el Departamento del Tesoro, la Corporación Federal de Seguros de Depósitos (FDIC) y la Junta de Gobernadores de la Reserva Federal, desarrollen las normas correspondientes.

En febrero, la OCC publicó un borrador de normas de 376 páginas para implementar la ley $GENIUS. Las agencias gubernamentales tienen tiempo solo hasta el 18 de enero, cuando la ley entre en vigor, para completar el desarrollo de las regulaciones. Varios reguladores ya han publicado borradores y recopilado comentarios públicos sobre la implementación de la ley $GENIUS, pero no han publicado las normas definitivas para julio, lo que genera incertidumbre regulatoria para los emisores de stablecoins.

Relacionado: La OCC aprueba la empresa cripto de la familia Trump para obtener una licencia fiduciaria

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Preguntas relacionadas

Q¿Cuándo prometió el jefe de la OCC publicar las reglas finales para la implementación de la ley GENIUS?

AEl controlador de la moneda de EE. UU., Jonathan Gould, prometió que la OCC publicaría las reglas finales para la implementación de la ley GENIUS en noviembre.

Q¿En qué evento hizo su anuncio el regulador Jonathan Gould?

AJonathan Gould hizo su anuncio durante el Simposio de Blockchain de Wyoming.

Q¿Cuándo, según lo planeado, empezará la OCC a procesar solicitudes de emisores de stablecoins bajo las nuevas reglas?

ASegún lo esperado por el regulador, la OCC podrá comenzar a procesar solicitudes de emisores de stablecoins en el año 2027.

Q¿Qué agencias gubernamentales, además de la OCC, están obligadas a elaborar reglas para stablecoins según la ley GENIUS?

ASegún la ley GENIUS, además de la OCC, deben desarrollar reglas el Departamento del Tesoro, la Corporación Federal de Seguros de Depósitos (FDIC) y la Junta de Gobernadores de la Reserva Federal.

Q¿Por qué la falta de reglas finales para julio genera incertidumbre para los emisores de stablecoins?

ALa falta de reglas finales para julio genera incertidumbre regulatoria para los emisores de stablecoins porque la ley entrará en vigor en enero de 2027 y las agencias tienen tiempo limitado para completar las regulaciones antes de esa fecha.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

Tsinghua and Wharton researchers have used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro to solve a 40-year-old open problem in optimization theory, proving a fundamental limit for gradient descent. They demonstrated that by adjusting only the step size sequence—without adding momentum or changing the algorithm's structure—the convergence rate of gradient descent cannot exceed Ω(T^{-1.9319}). This establishes a mathematical ceiling, showing that structural modifications are necessary to achieve the fastest possible convergence rates like O(1/T²). The core proof, involving a geometric construction based on "resisting oracles," was entirely generated through iterative interaction with the AI. The proof was then formally verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover, achieving zero "sorry" or "admit" statements, confirming its logical correctness without human intervention in the non-trivial mathematical steps. This result bridges the gap between the known O(T^{-1.2716}) rate achieved by the "silver stepsize" sequence and the newly proven impossibility bound. The work suggests a new paradigm where researchers can leverage general-purpose AI to explore and formally verify complex theoretical proofs.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

Anthropic publicly apologized after users discovered a hidden A/B test in Claude Code (versions 2.1.237+) that seemingly "dumbed down" the model. Developer argofowl found that selecting the "high" reasoning effort was being mapped internally to a value of "10," which previously corresponded to the "low" setting. While Anthropic engineers clarified this was only a change to the numerical mapping scale and assured it did not affect performance based on internal evaluations, the lack of communication about the test sparked widespread user backlash and self-tests on social media. Separately, significant complaints emerged about the flagship Opus 5 model, with users reporting it became "unstable," prone to lazy outputs, factual errors, and repetitive corrections. An Anthropic engineer acknowledged Opus 5's performance instability, calling its resolution a top priority. The incident highlights a growing industry-wide rift between improving benchmark scores and declining user-perceived quality and reliability. It underscores the lack of transparency in continuous model updates, where server-side changes, A/B tests, and configuration adjustments occur without clear user notification, eroding trust as AI models become critical infrastructure.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar GENIUS

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Genius (GENIUS) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Genius (GENIUS) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Genius (GENIUS)Después de comprar tu Genius (GENIUS), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Genius (GENIUS)Tradear fácilmente con Genius (GENIUS) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

634 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.04.29Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de GENIUS (GENIUS).