什么是 Polkadot 的平行链,它们是否让 DOT 更具实用性?

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-17Actualizado a 2026-08-17

Resumen

Polkadot的平行链(Parachain)允许项目运行专门的区块链,同时依赖中继链(Relay Chain)提供安全性和最终性。平行链拥有自己的规则、费用、治理系统和用例,为开发者提供了比在单一区块链(如以太坊)上运行智能合约更大的控制权。 对于DOT持有者而言,平行链生态如何创造DOT的效用是关键问题。平行链的增长可以增加对Polkadot区块链安全性、跨链服务及核心资源的需求。然而,平行链上的活动并不自动意味着需要购买DOT。DOT的效用主要体现在几个核心网络功能:质押以确保网络安全、参与链上治理以及购买核心时间(Coretime)。 Polkadot已将其资源分配模型从早期的平行链插槽拍卖升级为敏捷核心时间(Agile Coretime)模型。项目现在可以直接使用DOT购买批量(Bulk)或按需(On-demand)的计算资源,用于支付其平行链在中继链上的运行成本。这种为计算资源付费的模式,为核心代币DOT创造了直接的需求和使用场景。 平行链可以发行自己的原生代币并设定交易费用结构,因此用户可能与DOT没有直接交互。衡量平行链生态对DOT的实际效用,应更关注核心时间的购买与消耗、跨链消息(XCM)的活跃度,以及质押和治理的参与情况,而非单纯的链上交易量。Kusama网络及其代币KSM也遵循类似的结构。 总之,平行链通过增加对Polkadot底层基础设施(尤其是核心时间)的需求,从而提升了DOT的实用价值。这种价值与平行链应用的增长和计算资源消耗紧密相关。

Polkadot 的平行链允许项目启动专用的区块链,同时依赖中继链来保障安全性和最终确定性。Kraken 将它们描述为具有特定项目的链,拥有自己的规则、费用、治理系统和用例。该模型为开发者提供了比在另一个区块链执行层内运行的典型应用更多的控制权。

对于 $DOT 持有者而言,更重要的问题是这种结构如何创造代币的实用性。平行链的增长可能会增加对 Polkadot 区块链、安全性及跨链服务的需求。然而,平行链上的活动并不自动要求购买 $DOT。其关联性取决于核心时间购买、质押、治理以及每个网络自身的费用模型。Kusama 使用类似的架构,而 $KSM 在网络层面扮演类似角色。

Polkadot 平行链与普通应用有何不同

Polkadot 平行链是连接到中继链的独立区块链。它可以为自身用例设定交易规则、治理系统、区块时间和应用逻辑。Kraken 认为,平行链可以支持专用功能,同时利用更广泛的 Polkadot 网络中的服务。

这种设计与典型的以太坊应用不同。大多数以太坊应用通过以太坊共享执行环境内的智能合约运行。相比之下,平行链管理着整个区块链的执行过程,并且可以定制系统中更深层的部分。Polkadot 文档将平行链描述为专用链,它们从中继链获得共享安全性和互操作性。

该模型帮助项目根据具体负载调配资源。支付链可以专注于转账,而游戏网络可以采用不同的交易逻辑。每条平行链还可以设定自己的费用结构和运营规则。Kraken 指出,这种设计在某些情况下可以支持更快的交易并降低成本。

这些结果仍然取决于网络自身的具体设计和需求。专用链可以避免在单一执行环境中与不相关的应用共享资源。开发者还可以修改超出智能合约能力的执行逻辑。平行链还可以发行原生代币,而不取代 $DOT 网络的功能。

中继链将安全性与规模联系起来

中继链协调着 Polkadot 的共享安全性与核心调度。验证者在中继链上质押 $DOT 并验证来自相连平行链的候选区块。收集者收集平行链交易,维护本地状态,并为验证者准备候选区块。

这种方案意味着每条平行链无需建立完全独立的验证者经济。相连的链利用了 Polkadot 验证者集合的经济安全性。Polkadot 声称,访问核心资源的平行链共享着中继链的安全假设。该方案还将平行链的工作与网络的质押系统联系起来。

共享安全性并不意味着所有平行链具有相同的应用状态。每条链保持自己的状态和执行时间。Polkadot 将执行分散到多条链上,而不是将所有负载都放入一条链中。多个核心可以并行处理平行链,而中继链则协调着整个网络。

Parity 报告称,弹性扩展已于 2025 年底在 Polkadot 上线。这使得平行链在需要更大计算能力时可以使用额外的核心。因此,当某条链的负载增加时,系统可以为其分配更多资源。

互操作性为模型增添了另一部分。Polkadot 使用 XCM 在相连的系统之间传递消息、转移资产和进行跨链操作。这个框架允许平行链交换信息,而无需将每个应用都置于一个共享的执行环境中。当前的开发者文档也提供了直接的 XCM 工具,用于在平行链之间转移资产。

Agile CoreTime 取代了平行链的插槽拍卖

Kraken 的解释描述了更早的平行链拍卖系统,项目在其中竞争有限的中继链插槽数量。团队锁定 $DOT$KSM 以确保在固定租赁期内获得访问权。这种方法塑造了 Polkadot 和 Kusama 早期的平行链部署模型。

Polkadot 通过 Agile Coretime 改变了这个系统。平行链租赁拍卖于 2024 年 9 月 19 日停止,当时更新 1.2.0 生效。现有的有效租赁转换为 Coretime,未使用的未来租赁被取消并退还。

当前的 Polkadot 文档将批量核心时间和按需核心时间描述为主要访问选项。批量核心时间为特定时期提供中继链的计划资源。按需核心时间允许项目在需要时购买计算资源。目前批量核心时间区域覆盖 28 天。

Parity 声称,新模式消除了通过拍卖确保长期插槽的必要性。项目可以更精确地匹配其负载成本和开发阶段。密集用户可以购买批量容量,而较小的工作负载可以使用按需访问。这将平行链的经济模式从长期租赁转变为计量网络资源。

核心时间模型也为原生代币创造了直接作用。Polkadot 使用 $DOT 进行核心时间购买,而 Kusama 使用 $KSM。Polkadot 文档指出,网络会销毁用于购买核心时间的 $DOT$KSM。因此,对中继链计算资源的付费需求在基础设施层面创造了原生代币的使用。

平行链的采用在哪里与 $DOT 的实用性相关联

更多的平行链活动并不会导致对 $DOT 需求的同等增长。许多平行链可以发行自己的代币,并选择用户支付费用的方式。因此,用户可能无需为每笔交易持有 $DOT 就能访问某些平行链应用。

$DOT 仍然承担着多种网络功能。Polkadot 列举了其功能,包括质押、治理和核心时间购买。验证者依赖于质押 $DOT,项目则花费 $DOT 购买中继链资源。核心时间提供了平行链资源需求与 $DOT 使用之间最明确的直接联系。

仅凭交易数量无法体现这种关联。平行链可能处理更多交易,同时收取以另一种资产计价的费用。核心时间的购买和续订更直接地衡量了 Polkadot 的付费计算。按需订单也可以显示项目何时需要额外容量。

XCM 活动提供了另一个网络使用指标。跨链消息和资产转移显示了平行链是否在 Polkadot 生态系统内互动。核心时间使用的增加可能表明计算需求的增长,而活跃的应用则可以展示持续的用户需求。Kusama 上的 $KSM 遵循类似的结构。它支持质押、治理、费用和核心时间购买。平行链应用仍可使用独立的代币,因此网络活动并不会产生对 $KSM 的同比例需求。

$DOT 的价格与这些指标也没有固定的联系。当项目消耗核心时间或使用 $DOT 的其他功能时,平行链的采用创造了直接的效用。市场价格仍然反映了更广泛的买卖过程。

相关:美联储加息带来收益,因为哈马克称核心通胀仍高于目标水平

end-content

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

The article argues that as tokenization frameworks for Real-World Assets (RWA) mature, the ability to issue assets is becoming less of a competitive advantage. The focus is shifting to what happens *after* issuance: which RWA operations can build enduring trust, maintain stable operations, and remain integrated into the financial ecosystem over the long term. The piece introduces the concept of a **Reserve Layer**—infrastructure that connects tokenized assets to the necessary verification, liquidity, and operational systems for on-chain finance. For an asset to serve as a reliable reserve (e.g., short-term U.S. Treasuries, gold), it needs predictable value, standardized features, deep markets, and observable pricing. However, the true, hard-to-replicate advantage lies not just in the underlying asset but in the **operational track record** built over time. This includes consistent reserve management, independent audits, successful redemptions, maintained liquidity, and protocol integrations. Each successful operation adds evidence, creating a reinforcing cycle: more evidence builds stronger institutional confidence, leading to wider distribution, deeper liquidity, and more use cases as collateral. The article presents a framework combining two dimensions: an asset's suitability as a reserve and the issuer's operational capability. The most sustainable model combines **high-quality reserve assets with strong, long-term operational discipline**. A critical blind spot is an asset with high reserve suitability (like gold) issued by an entity with a limited operational track record; the quality of the infrastructure is separate from the quality of the asset itself. In conclusion, the next phase of RWA will be defined by participants who can pair appropriate reserve assets with the operational rigor to support them through market cycles, thereby transforming tokenized RWAs into durable financial infrastructure.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

Researchers have demonstrated a novel attack, dubbed ToolLeak, that can easily compromise AI coding assistants like Claude Code. The method exploits a "mode gap" by stealing the system prompts (instructions) not through direct chat queries, but by tricking the model into leaking them as parameters during tool calls. This extracted information is then used to craft a "two-channel prompt injection" attack. Attackers register a malicious tool with a description formatted to mimic legitimate instructions, prompting the AI agent to call it. The tool's return value then instructs the agent to execute a malicious command (e.g., `curl | bash`), achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE). In tests against six major AI programming tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Trae) using older versions, all were fully compromised, with attack success rates reaching up to 1.0. Notably, Claude Code's secondary guard model (Haiku) was overridden by the main model (Sonnet), which had been manipulated by the injected instructions. Newer versions show improved defenses. Claude Code and Cursor implemented mitigations like "progressive tool description exposure," reducing RCE success to 0 and 0.3 respectively in some configurations. However, tools like Cline, Windsurf, and Trae paired with certain models remained fully vulnerable. The research underscores that architectural isolation is crucial for defense, as long as tool return values can ambiguously function as both data and executable instructions, the threat of tool hijacking persists. The paper "TIPExploit: Tool-Invocation Prompt Extraction and Exploitation in AI Coding Agents" has been accepted at ISSTA 2026.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Bernstein Analysis: Samsung's HBM4 Accelerates Volume, Q3 Revenue May Overtake SK Hynix

South Korea’s July memory export data, serving as an early indicator for HBM business in Q3, shows overall HBM demand remains robust. While total exports to Taiwan and Malaysia declined 32% month-on-month from June’s peak—largely due to seasonality—they were still up 13% compared to April and rose 64% year-on-year. However, a divergence emerged between Samsung and SK Hynix. Samsung’s exports from Chungcheongnam-do (a proxy for its HBM shipments) surged, reaching $2.2 billion in July, up 122% from April. Based on regression analysis, Bernstein estimates Samsung’s Q3 HBM revenue could hit around $12 billion, roughly 30% above its prior forecast, driven by a rapid ramp in higher-value HBM4. The unit value of Samsung’s exports has doubled since April, signaling a shift toward HBM4, which carries a significantly higher price. In contrast, exports linked to SK Hynix from Chungcheongbuk-do and Icheon fell 28% month-on-month and 27% versus April. Bernstein’s base model suggests SK Hynix’s Q3 HBM revenue could drop to about $5.6 billion, though this could rebound to $12 billion if shipments concentrate later in the quarter as historically seen. The weakness may relate to potential delays in HBM4 shipments for Nvidia’s Rubin platform. Notably, HBM pricing is decoupling from general DRAM, with HBM4 mix driving average selling prices rather than broad-based hikes. Exports to Malaysia also surged, possibly linked to Intel’s EMIB packaging facilities, though the exact drivers remain unclear. While July data reinforces Samsung’s accelerating momentum in HBM4, it is insufficient to confirm a full-year market share reversal. Key factors to watch are Samsung’s August-September export performance, whether SK Hynix recovers lost ground, and upcoming 2027 HBM contract pricing negotiations.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Bernstein Analysis: Samsung's HBM4 Accelerates Volume, Q3 Revenue May Overtake SK Hynix

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The New Rules of the AI Race: Nvidia Shifts from Chips to Energy Resources and Construction Sites

Nvidia is providing a $105 billion financial guarantee for the construction of OpenAI's data center campus in Ohio, signaling a strategic shift in the AI industry from competing on chips to battling for physical infrastructure and energy resources. The guarantee, detailed in an SEC filing, acts as insurance against tenant default rather than direct construction funding. OpenAI must repay any sums drawn. Nvidia will also invest $1.5 billion in SB Energy for the project's power component. The planned campus has a capacity of 4.25 GW, with OpenAI's current commitments to Nvidia reaching 12 GW. This move underscores that leading AI development now requires securing space, power, and financial backing for massive, long-term projects. Tech giants are taking on roles akin to developers and financial institutions. Concurrently, AI firms are diversifying suppliers: OpenAI and Anthropic have signed major deals with AMD for GPU deployments. Nvidia is also scaling its financial model through partnerships with investment firms to mobilize over $500 billion in external capital. The paradigm in AI is shifting from hardware supremacy to building comprehensive ecosystems. Future industry growth will depend on balancing innovation with real-world infrastructure capabilities, turning abstract computations into tangible industrial projects. An AI analysis notes the deal's resemblance to vendor financing schemes from the telecom bubble of the late 1990s and questions the long-term viability of gas-dependent energy infrastructure for AI, should market growth slow.

cryptonews.ruHace 16 min(s)

The New Rules of the AI Race: Nvidia Shifts from Chips to Energy Resources and Construction Sites

cryptonews.ruHace 16 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar DOT

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Polkadot (DOT) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Polkadot (DOT) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Polkadot (DOT)Después de comprar tu Polkadot (DOT), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Polkadot (DOT)Tradear fácilmente con Polkadot (DOT) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

598 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar DOT

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de DOT (DOT).

活动图片