Bernstein: Failure of CLARITY Act Could Accelerate Crypto Regulation Development by SEC and CFTC

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-03Actualizado a 2026-08-03

Resumen

Analysts at Bernstein state that the likelihood of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 is diminishing. They argue that its potential failure could, however, accelerate the SEC and CFTC's work on crypto-specific regulations under the Project Crypto initiative, as time for Senate approval before the congressional recess is nearly exhausted. While a short-term negative market reaction is possible, Bernstein believes regulatory reform will not halt. Instead, the SEC and CFTC may expedite guidance on token classification, DeFi, self-custody rules, and potentially introduce a temporary "innovation exemption" for certain token offerings. The firm also expects U.S. regulators to continue supporting tokenized real-world assets (RWA), perpetual futures for RWAs, and prediction markets, regardless of the bill's fate. Nevertheless, analysts view the potential failure as a disappointment, as the CLARITY Act would have provided long-term regulatory clarity and encouraged greater institutional investment. The push for a vote before Congress's August recess, supported by Grayscale Investments, faces opposition from figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James, who argues the bill would hinder state-level law enforcement efforts against crypto fraud and advocates for stricter regulations.

Analysts at Bernstein stated that the likelihood of the CLARITY Act bill passing in 2026 is decreasing. At the same time, they expect that in case of its failure, the SEC and CFTC will intensify their work on rules for the crypto industry under the Project Crypto initiative.

The Bill is Under Threat

According to Bernstein's assessment, there is almost no time left to pass the bill before the Senate's parliamentary recess begins. The analysts noted that the failure of the CLARITY Act could trigger a short-term negative market reaction but would not mean a halt to regulatory reforms.

However, Bernstein believes that in the absence of new legislation, the SEC and CFTC will accelerate the implementation of Project Crypto. Specifically, the regulators may publish clarifications regarding token classification, rules for DeFi and self-custody of assets, and introduce a so-called "innovation exemption," which would temporarily allow the issuance of certain tokens without them being recognized as securities.

Furthermore, Bernstein expects that even without the CLARITY Act, U.S. regulators will continue to support the development of tokenized real-world assets (RWA), perpetual futures on such assets, and prediction markets.

At the same time, the analysts called a possible failure of the bill a "disappointment," as it could have provided long-term regulatory certainty and encouraged banks, brokers, and exchanges to invest more actively in the digital assets sector.

Recall that earlier, Grayscale Investments appealed to U.S. Senate leadership to bring the CLARITY bill to a vote before Congress's August recess begins.

However, New York State Attorney General Letitia James stated that the CLARITY Act would limit the activities of state-level law enforcement, complicating the fight against fraud in the crypto sphere. In this regard, she called on Congress to introduce stricter rules for regulating this sector.

end-content

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Bernstein, what is the expected impact of the CLARITY Act failing to pass in 2026?

AAccording to Bernstein, the failure of the CLARITY Act could trigger a short-term negative market reaction but would not mean a halt to regulatory reform. In fact, they expect the SEC and CFTC to accelerate their work on crypto industry rules under Project Crypto.

QWhat specific actions might the SEC and CFTC take if the CLARITY Act fails, as suggested by Bernstein's analysts?

AIf the CLARITY Act fails, Bernstein suggests the SEC and CFTC could accelerate Project Crypto by publishing clarifications on token classification, rules for DeFi and self-custody, and introducing a so-called 'innovation exception' allowing certain tokens to be issued without being classified as securities.

QWhich entities would benefit from the long-term regulatory clarity provided by the CLARITY Act, according to Bernstein?

AAccording to Bernstein, the long-term regulatory certainty from the CLARITY Act would benefit and encourage banks, brokers, and exchanges to invest more actively in the digital asset sector.

QWhat was the main argument made by New York Attorney General Letitia James against the CLARITY Act?

ANew York Attorney General Letitia James argued that the CLARITY Act would limit the ability of state-level law enforcement agencies, complicating the fight against fraud in the crypto space. She instead called on Congress to implement stricter regulations for the sector.

QWhat specific crypto-related developments did Bernstein expect US regulators to continue supporting even without the CLARITY Act?

ABernstein expected US regulators to continue supporting the development of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), perpetual futures on such assets, and prediction markets even without the CLARITY Act.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Investors Begin 'Switching Tables'

Investors Begin to “Change Tables” A notable shift is occurring in China's venture capital landscape. While the hard tech sector, especially AI, experiences a funding frenzy with record-breaking investment rounds, many investors are opting to leave traditional investment firms to join portfolio companies. This movement, termed "changing tables," marks a departure from past downturns where such moves were often a last resort. Currently, the trend is driven by proactive choice. Seasoned investors, including partners and managing directors, are being lured by attractive salaries, equity incentives, and core roles like VP, General Manager, or even co-founder at fast-growing startups in hot sectors like AI, embodied intelligence, and aerospace. This "going ashore" to companies is seen as a strategic career move. The shift is a two-way street. Booming fundraising and feverish investment activity have created intense competition among VCs for a narrow set of "star projects." Simultaneously, these high-flying tech companies, engaged in rapid, multi-round financing, urgently need talent with deep capital market expertise and institutional connections to manage their complex funding needs. Companies like Zhiyuan Robot, MoonDark AI, and MiniMax are actively recruiting from investment firms. For investors, the move also reflects concerns about the sustainability of the current market. Risks like valuation inversion between primary and secondary markets, high IPO破发 rates, increased regulatory scrutiny, and the uncertainty of eventual exits are prompting a reevaluation of the traditional VC path. While this transition offers new opportunities, it is not without challenges. Success requires adapting from evaluating companies to operating within one, focusing on execution over analysis. Nevertheless, this trend underscores the expanding career boundaries and fluidity within China's innovation ecosystem.

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Investors Begin 'Switching Tables'

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Ethereum Community in Uproar! Whose Cake is EIP-8363 Cutting Into?

**Ethereum Community Debates Controversial Staking Proposal EIP-8363** A new Ethereum proposal, EIP-8363, dubbed "Tapered Issuance Burn," has ignited heated debate within the community. The core idea is to reduce and eventually eliminate new issuance rewards for validators as the total amount of staked ETH approaches 50% of the total supply (around 60.25 million ETH). The authors, including EthCC founder Jérôme de Tychey and Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, argue the current system perpetually incentivizes more staking, potentially leading to centralization as stake flows to large custodians and liquid staking tokens (LSTs). They also aim to reduce dilution pressure on non-staking ETH holders. Under the proposal, validator rewards from consensus-layer issuance would be partially burned based on a formula tied to the total staked amount. Net rewards would gradually approach zero as staking nears the 50% threshold. Notably, execution-layer rewards (tips, MEV) are unaffected. A proposed 18-month transition period would soften the initial impact. The community reaction has been predominantly critical. Key concerns include: * **Centralization Risk:** Critics like Obol's Oisín Kyne argue very low rewards could drive out solo stakers and smaller operators, leaving only large, cost-insensitive institutions, thus increasing validator centralization. * **Ecosystem Impact:** Aave's Stani Kulechov warns it could hurt ETH's predictable yield appeal for institutions and compress yields for LST-based DeFi strategies (e.g., recursive lending). * **Process & Timing:** Some, like ether.fi's Mike Silagadze, criticize the proposal's late submission ahead of a key upgrade deadline, limiting discussion time. Supporters believe the change is necessary to maintain ETH as a neutral reserve asset and avoid excessive security costs and holder dilution. If implemented, solo stakers would face higher relative operational costs and longer recovery times from penalties. LST yields would converge with native ETH, challenging their value proposition. The entire DeFi interest rate ecosystem, built around staking yield, could be pressured. While all ETH holders would benefit from reduced dilution, the net effect on ETH's price and adoption remains uncertain due to potential demand-side impacts from lower yields. The proposal is currently an early-stage draft and has not been officially slated for inclusion in any upcoming network upgrade.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Ethereum Community in Uproar! Whose Cake is EIP-8363 Cutting Into?

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BILL

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Billions Network (BILL) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Billions Network (BILL) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Billions Network (BILL)Después de comprar tu Billions Network (BILL), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Billions Network (BILL)Tradear fácilmente con Billions Network (BILL) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

392 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.05.07Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar BILL

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BILL (BILL).

活动图片