美国在经济施压行动中没收近10亿美元伊朗加密货币

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-05-30Actualizado a 2026-05-30

Resumen

美国财政部部长斯科特·贝森特近日宣布,在一次针对伊朗的经济施压行动中,美方已扣押价值近10亿美元的伊朗加密货币。此次行动是“经济怒火行动”的一部分,该行动自2025年3月启动,旨在通过扣押加密货币、冻结银行账户以及与欧洲伙伴合作没收资产等多重手段,对伊朗施加全面的金融压力。 贝森特透露,部分被扣押加密钱包的持有者可能尚未意识到资金已被没收。美方此次披露的10亿美元金额,远高于4月24日因制裁伊朗相关钱包而冻结的3.44亿美元加密货币,也大约是4月下旬财政部宣布扣押的5亿美元伊朗加密资产的两倍。 贝森特在讲话中描述了伊朗面临的经济困境,包括分发食品券、互联网中断以及40%至50%的军方人员未获薪酬。他还指出,由于美以对伊朗关键政权成员的袭击,其领导层结构分裂,使得当前与伊朗的谈判难以进行。

周五,财政部长斯科特·贝森特表示,美国已没收了价值约10亿美元的伊朗加密货币。他还提到,一些钱包所有者可能甚至不知道他们的资金已被没收。"我认为我们已经没收了他们大约10亿美元的加密货币,"贝森特在里根国家经济论坛的演讲中说。

据贝森特称,此次没收是"经济怒火行动"的一部分,这是美国向伊朗施加金融压力的战略。该行动始于2025年3月,迄今为止已没收加密货币、冻结银行账户,并与欧洲伙伴合作没收了财产,从多个方面打击了伊朗资产。

加剧金融压力

据这位财政部长称,在美国介入之前,该政权据称每月窃取4至5亿美元,并将这些钱分发给大约80名左右的精英人士。

据他称,伊朗经济一团糟,正在发放食品券,互联网中断,40%到50%的伊朗军人领不到薪水。关于目前与伊朗的谈判,贝森特表示,由于美国和以色列对关键政权成员的攻击,与一个分裂的领导层结构合作很困难。

新披露的10亿美元数字远高于美国外国资产控制办公室在4月24日制裁与伊朗相关的钱包后冻结的3.44亿美元加密货币。它也大约是财政部在4月底宣布没收的5亿美元伊朗加密货币资产的两倍。

今日加密新闻摘要:

随着大型交易枯竭,2026年第一季度加密风险投资资金大幅下滑

标签比特币区块链

Preguntas relacionadas

Q美国财政部长斯科特·贝森特宣布没收了价值约多少美元的伊朗加密货币?

A斯科特·贝森特宣布美国没收了价值约10亿美元的伊朗加密货币。

Q此次加密货币没收行动属于美国针对伊朗的哪个战略行动的一部分?

A此次行动属于美国对伊朗施加金融压力的战略行动“经济怒火行动”的一部分。

Q根据报道,在美国干预前,伊朗政权每月窃取并分配给精英阶层的资金大约是多少?

A据报道,在美国干预前,伊朗政权每月窃取并分配给约80名精英的资金大约在4亿至5亿美元。

Q美国财政部在今年4月底曾宣布没收了价值多少的伊朗加密货币资产?

A美国财政部在今年4月底曾宣布没收了价值约5亿美元的伊朗加密货币资产。

Q此次披露的10亿美元没收金额,与4月24日因OFAC制裁而冻结的加密货币金额相比有何变化?

A此次披露的10亿美元金额,远高于4月24日因美国外国资产控制办公室制裁而冻结的3.44亿美元伊朗相关加密货币金额。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock of MicroStrategy, is experiencing a persistent de-pegging from its target par value of $100, with the discount recently widening to over 11%. This de-anchoring challenges the core design of STRC, which was intended as a stable, income-oriented security operating near $100. As a crucial funding engine for MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, STRC's price reflects market confidence in the company's entire capital model. The company's "capital flywheel" relies on issuing STRC at or above $100 via an At-the-Market (ATM) program to raise cash for buying Bitcoin, thereby boosting company equity and theoretically supporting STRC's value. A monthly adjustable dividend mechanism was designed to maintain this peg. Despite raising the dividend to 11.5% and increasing payment frequency, the de-pegging persists. Market concerns extend beyond technical factors like leveraged arbitrage unwinding. Analysts point to MicroStrategy's limited cash reserves relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation for preferred shares. While the company counters that its vast Bitcoin holdings could cover decades of payments, this argument hinges on the potential need to sell Bitcoin—a shift from its longstanding "hodl" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of BTC, framed as a test, amplified these liquidity and strategy concerns. If STRC remains discounted, impairing MicroStrategy's ability to raise cheap capital, fears may grow that the company could sell more Bitcoin to meet obligations. This scenario could transform MicroStrategy from a major market buyer into a potential seller, posing significant downside risk for Bitcoin. The re-pegging of STRC is thus a key indicator for the health of MicroStrategy's capital structure and its market impact.

Odaily星球日报Hace 29 min(s)

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

Odaily星球日报Hace 29 min(s)

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

Silicon Valley's New Most Wanted Job: The Rise of the Forward Deployment Engineer The AI industry is witnessing a significant shift. The focus has moved from developing cutting-edge models to deploying them effectively within enterprises. This has made the "Forward Deployment Engineer" (FDE) a critical and highly sought-after role at major firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. For the past three years, the industry prioritized model scientists. However, companies are now facing a harsh reality: purchasing powerful AI tools does not guarantee productivity gains or organizational change. The biggest hurdle is not the technology itself, but integrating it into complex legacy systems, workflows, and corporate cultures. This includes challenges like data silos, compliance requirements, and internal resistance. The FDE role, pioneered by Palantir Technologies, addresses this "last-mile" problem. FDEs are deployed on-site with clients for extended periods. Their job is to deeply understand the client's specific organizational structure, processes, and pain points, then tailor and implement the AI solution accordingly. They combine skills in technology, project management, and organizational change. A clear signal of this trend emerged in May 2026 when three AI giants made major moves. Anthropic launched a $1.5B joint venture for enterprise deployment. OpenAI formed an independent deployment subsidiary, DeployCo, with over $4B in commitments and acquired a deployment consultancy. Google Cloud's CEO publicly announced a large-scale recruitment drive for FDEs. This shift represents a fundamental change in the software business model: from selling tools to selling guaranteed outcomes. FDEs are the agents of this change, responsible for delivering a working system within the production environment, not just a demo. Real-world cases, such as challenges at Goldman Sachs (compliance barriers) and Target (internal cultural resistance), illustrate that the primary obstacles to AI adoption are organizational, not technical. An FDE's value lies in navigating these human and procedural complexities to facilitate a successful "AI migration." In essence, as core AI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, the true premium is shifting to the human expertise required to understand organizations and drive change—making the FDE role pivotal for the next phase of the AI revolution.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片