NodeStrategy:第一个Ordinals DAT项目,把Strategy金库叙事搬到了NFT上

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-25Actualizado a 2026-05-25

Resumen

比特币上首个Ordinals DAT项目NodeStrategy,试图将金库叙事引入NFT领域。其核心机制是:通过交易NODESTRAT代币抽取10%费用,其中90%用于购买NodeMonkes NFT(非官方系列),卖出NFT所得再回购销毁NODESTRAT,形成“交易生费-买NFT-卖NFT-回购销毁”的闭环飞轮。 然而,该项目面临根本性设计矛盾。首先,由于比特币L1缺乏智能合约,10%交易费只能依赖特定交易平台radFi/Bound强制收取,一旦代币流向其他市场,费收机制即失效,导致流动性被单一平台锁死。其次,高达20%的买卖双边税费严重抑制投机需求与成交量,而飞轮运转恰恰依赖活跃交易。目前日均成交仅约9000美元,导致金库资金匮乏,NFT销售缓慢,回购销毁力度微弱。 尽管其净资产价值(NAV)约为市值的两倍,但因缺乏赎回机制,NAV无法有效支撑价格。项目陷入“税费抑制需求,低需求又导致飞轮停滞”的困境。目前代币深度折价交易,价格持续低迷。文章旨在剖析其机制缺陷,不评估未来涨跌。

作者:798.eth

比特币上号称第一个 Ordinals DAT 的项目,NodeStrategy。它把 MicroStrategy 那套金库叙事搬到了 NFT 上,金库买猴、回购销毁、number go up,听上去很顺。但它现在 0.46x 深度折价,价格趴着不动。问题出在设计本身。喂这台机器的燃料,和把这台机器锁死的牢笼,是同一样东西,那 10% 的交易费。下面一步步拆。

先说 NodeStrategy 是什么。一个比特币 Rune Token,叫 NODESTRAT,总量 10 亿。自称 The Perpetual Monke Machine,比特币 L1 上第一个 Ordinals 数字资产金库。金库的标的是 NodeMonkes,一个蓝筹 Ordinals NFT 系列,注意它跟官方 NodeMonkes 没关系。交易场所是 radFi,也就是现在的 Bound。

再说飞轮怎么转。它画的饼是个四步闭环。每笔买卖收 10% 费,90% 进金库,10% 给 radFi。金库拿这笔费去扫 NodeMonke 的地板。把扫来的猴挂成一个梯子,在 Satflow 上按不同利润目标卖。猴子卖出的 BTC,100% 拿去回购并销毁 NODESTRAT。供应减少,价格上涨,更多人来交易,又生出更多费。号称越转越值钱。剧本就这一个,听着自洽。可它转不动,下面是为什么。

第一点,为什么 NODESTRAT 只能圈在 radFi / Bound 上交易。

先认清命根子。整套飞轮,扫货、卖货、回购销毁,全靠那 10% 费喂。没有这笔费,金库没钱,机器当场停。

那这 10% 由谁收,收在哪一层。换成以太坊或者 Solana,这事很简单,Token 的合约自己就能收。ERC20 可以写 fee-on-transfer,Solana 的 Token-2022 有 TransferFee。每笔转账,Token 自己的代码把税扣掉,你在哪交易都一样,税跟着 Token 走。

但 NODESTRAT 是比特币上的一个 Rune。比特币 L1 没有智能合约。一个 Rune 就是 Runes 协议账本里的一条余额记录,etch 一下记个数,它没有代码,没有 transfer hook,没有任何能自己执行的逻辑。你造不出一个会自动收税的 Rune。转一个 Rune,就是一笔普通比特币交易把余额挪个位置,中间没有任何东西能拦下来抽走 10%。

所以这 10% 长不到币身上,只能长在交易场所身上。是 radFi / Bound 的池子,在你买卖 NODESTRAT 的那一刻,构造交易时把 10% 扣走。税收在平台层,Token 本身一分都扣不动。

推论就出来了。这 10% 只有在 radFi / Bound 上交易才存在。你把 NODESTRAT 当普通 Rune 点对点转给朋友,或者拿到别的 Ordinals 市场去卖,全都没有这 10%,因为 Bound 以外没有任何地方知道这条规则,更没法强制它。

于是项目只剩一条活路,把所有交易死死圈在 radFi / Bound 里。全世界只有这一个地方收得到这笔过路费。流动性一旦流到别处,费收入归零,金库停止扫货,飞轮立刻死。

这也解释了那 10% 里分给 radFi 的那一份。radFi 是收费站,NodeStrategy 负责把车都引到这条路上来。这个币几乎是字面意义上被 Bound 住了,名字起得实诚。它的整套价值机制,像人质一样押在一个平台上。这是写进设计里的脆弱。

第二点,为什么价格涨不起来,根子在哪。

它的剧本是 number go up,那为什么趴着。真正的问题是,这台机器的燃料本身在毒害它自己的需求。

机器先就没油。飞轮烧的是成交量,而成交量基本死了,一天 9K 美元。10% 抽成 900,90% 进金库 810,一天扫不到 0.01 BTC。没量就没费,没费就不扫货,不扫货梯子就没货卖,不卖就没回购,不回购就没销毁,落到价格上什么都没发生。整条链在空转。

更要命的一点。那 10% 不只是燃料,它同时是压在自己价格上的逆风。买进收 10%,卖出再收 10%,一个来回先亏 20%。这个币得先涨过 20%,交易者才回本。你等于请人来买一个进场扣 10%、出场再扣 10% 的东西,投机的速度直接被掐死。一边是回购销毁那点顺风,一边是 20% 来回税这股逆风,吹的是同一个币。它在跟自己打架。

回购那条管子本来就拧得很紧。回购只在一个 NodeMonke 真从梯子上卖出去时才触发,卖猴的钱才拿去回购。可 NFT 市场接盘薄,卖得慢,卖得不确定。它到现在总共才卖出 39 个,梯子上短桶 15 个,中桶长桶都是 0。回购的水龙头基本在滴。已经销毁掉的那 30.77%。

销毁本身不创造需求。减供应能推价,前提是需求还在。没量,进场还被收 10%。你把 30% 的供应烧掉,换来的只是一个更小、却照样没人出价的盘子。价格是边际上的供需,它在猛攻分母,分子那头的需求被税和死成交量锁着。

那个 0.46x 折价,是个自己锁死自己的陷阱。币价只有 NAV 的一半。正常的 DAT 在溢价的时候,可以增发 Token 去买更多资产,越买越增厚,这才是 number go up 真正的杠杆。剩下唯一能推价的杠杆是回购,又被前面那条饿着。溢价的路走不了,回购的路走不动,折价就一直挂在那,没有任何机制把它收回去。

最后,NAV 比市值高一倍,价格为什么还不往 NAV 靠。

持有 NODESTRAT 没有任何赎回通道,你不能把币换回它隐含的那 0.46 倍 NodeMonke。你唯一的出口,是在 radFi 上卖给下一个出价的人,还得再交 10%。那个 NAV 是个营销数字,不是地板价,市场当然不认,只按资金流给它定价。

那 10% 费本来要喂飞轮,结果它一手把飞轮最需要的需求和成交量收税收死,一手又只能靠把币锁在一个平台上才收得到,把流动性也限死。再加上 backing 不可赎回、不可变现,NAV 锚不住价格。这台机器的设计,是让燃料源去限制自己的需求。

不评估涨跌,只说机制。

有没有什么好办法,让这个其实质地很好的飞轮继续起飞?

Preguntas relacionadas

QNodeStrategy项目的核心飞轮机制是如何设计的?

ANodeStrategy的飞轮机制是一个四步闭环:1) 每笔NODESTRAT买卖交易收取10%的费用,其中90%进入金库,10%给平台。2) 金库用这笔费用去购买其标的资产NodeMonkes NFT。3) 将买来的NFT设置不同的利润目标,在Satflow上挂单出售。4) 卖出NFT所得的BTC,将100%用于回购并销毁NODESTRAT Token,通过减少供应来推高价格,从而吸引更多人交易,产生更多费用,让飞轮持续运转。

Q为什么NODESTRAT必须被限制在radFi/Bound平台上交易?

ANODESTRAT是基于比特币Runes协议的Token,而比特币L1不具备智能合约功能。Rune本身只是一条余额记录,无法内嵌代码以自动收取转账费用。因此,其10%的交易费只能在交易平台层面由radFi/Bound在构造交易时强制执行。如果Token流出到其他平台或进行点对点转账,将无法收取这笔费用。一旦费用枯竭,整个金库购资、回购销毁的飞轮机制将立即停止运作。因此,项目方必须将绝大部分流动性锁定在Bound平台内,这是其机制设计的根本性制约。

Q文章指出NodeStrategy价格“趴着不动”的主要原因是什么?

A主要原因有三点:1) 交易量极低(文章中提到一天仅9K美元),导致燃料(10%交易费)严重不足,无法有效驱动飞轮。2) 高达20%的买卖双向交易费(买入10%+卖出10%)严重抑制了投机需求和交易意愿,价格上涨必须首先克服这20%的成本压力,形成了巨大的天然卖压。3) 回购机制依赖于NFT梯子销售的实现,而NFT市场接盘薄、销售慢,导致回购销毁这一推升价格的关键动作效率低下、水量稀少。这三者共同作用,使得价格上涨缺乏动力。

QNodeStrategy的“NAV”(资产净值)远高于其市值,但价格为何不向NAV靠拢?

A因为持有NODESTRAT Token的投资者无法直接赎回其背后对应的那部分资产(NodeMonkes NFT)。NAV只是一个计算出的理论净值,而不是一个可以执行的赎回价格。投资者唯一的退出方式是在二级市场(radFi/Bound)上出售Token,并且要再次承担10%的卖出手续费。因此,市场价格主要反映的是二级市场的资金流动性和买卖盘博弈,而不是资产的内在理论价值。这种“不可赎回性”使得NAV无法成为有效的价格锚。

Q文章对NodeStrategy的机制设计做出了哪些关键性批评?

A文章的关键批评可以概括为“设计上的内在矛盾”:1) 燃料与枷锁的同一性:驱动飞轮的10%交易费,同时又是扼杀交易需求和流动性的枷锁(高达20%的买卖成本)。2) 平台依赖性:整个价值捕获机制完全依赖于单一平台(radFi/Bound),一旦流动性外流,机制即刻失效,风险高度集中。3) 激励错位:回购销毁(旨在减少供应)的正面效应,被高昂交易费(抑制需求)的负面效应严重抵消,甚至压倒。4) 无效的NAV锚:由于资产不可赎回,看似高的资产净值无法对二级市场价格形成有效支撑。这些设计缺陷使得该项目的飞轮理论虽自洽,但在实践中难以顺畅运转。

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitAyer 08:36

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitAyer 08:36

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitAyer 08:28

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitAyer 08:28

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitAyer 08:06

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitAyer 08:06

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitAyer 08:01

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitAyer 08:01

Trading

Spot
活动图片