Coinbase + Glassnode: Charting Crypto Q2 2026

insights.glassnodePublicado a 2026-05-01Actualizado a 2026-05-01

After a volatile start to the year, crypto markets have shifted into a more cautious regime. Risk appetite has cooled, sentiment has deteriorated, and macro developments now overshadow crypto-native drivers in shaping near-term price action.

Produced in collaboration with Coinbase Institutional, the latest Charting Crypto report distills the key market and on-chain trends impacting institutional crypto strategy this quarter. From investor sentiment and stablecoin liquidity to Bitcoin accumulation signals and Ethereum’s evolving market structure, the report offers a data-driven view of a market waiting for clearer direction.

Some of the many highlights in this edition:

  • Liquidity is rotating into stablecoins rather than exiting the asset class, as total crypto market cap (excluding stablecoins) fell by ~18% in Q1, while stablecoin supply increased from $308B to $318B
  • Past cycle analogues are becoming less useful for timing market inflection points as both Bitcoin and Ethereum cycles continue to diverge from historical patterns
  • Market structure shows signs of normalization, with BTC derivatives open interest recovering (particularly in perpetuals), indicating a rebuilding of risk appetite in leveraged markets
  • 82% of surveyed institutions now place the market in a bear or late-bear phase (up from 31% in December)
  • Ethereum’s ecosystem is becoming more differentiated: Capital concentrates in base-layer use cases as broader activity softens, highlighting a shift toward utility-driven demand over speculative flows.

Liquidity Remains Inside the System

Despite the broad risk-off move in Q1, liquidity dynamics tell a more nuanced story. Total crypto market capitalization (excluding stablecoins) declined by roughly 18%, yet stablecoin supply increased over the same period.

This divergence suggests that capital is not fully leaving crypto markets, but rather rotating into cash-like instruments while awaiting clearer signals. In effect, investors are de-risking without disengaging, preserving optionality for re-entry.

Bitcoin: Sentiment Reset, Supply Tightens

Bitcoin’s February drawdown was reflected in a deterioration in investor sentiment, with Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) moving from Anxiety into Fear for the rest of Q1. While sentiment has started to show early signs of improvement in April, it remains closely tied to external developments, suggesting conviction is still fragile.

At the same time, onchain supply dynamics indicate a transfer of coins away from more reactive participants. The contraction in recently active supply, alongside a modest increase in long-term held coins, implies that shorter-term, speculative capital has been reduced.

Ethereum: Capital Concentration at the Base Layer

Ethereum data points to a divergence between activity and capital allocation. Short-term participation declined throughout the first quarter, as reflected in a sharp drop in recently active supply and a prolonged period of depressed sentiment. However, capital flows have remained concentrated on the base layer.

Stablecoin supply on Ethereum continues to expand with positive momentum, and tokenized real-world assets have reached new highs, indicating sustained demand for settlement and collateral use cases. At the same time, ETH has outperformed major L2 tokens since late 2025, suggesting that capital is consolidating at the base layer rather than rotating further out on the risk curve.

To help you navigate the current challenging crypto environment, check out all insights and data from the Glassnode x Coinbase report: download the report here.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Trading Reflection: Why Does Trading Cryptocurrencies Become More Miserable the Longer You Do It? In Fact, Your Brain Has Been 'Damaged' by Stress.

Trading Reflection: Why Does Trading Cryptocurrency Become More Miserable Over Time? Your Brain Might Be Damaged by Stress This article explores the often-overlooked yet crucial psychological aspect of trading. It argues that long-term success depends less on intellect and more on the survival capacity of one's nervous system. The core issue is that sustained trading pressure disrupts normal brain chemistry. While initial hope and occasional wins provide dopamine-driven pleasure, repeated losses and constant market exposure trigger chronic cortisol release. This stress hormone, meant for short-term survival, keeps the trader in a perpetual "fight-or-flight" mode. Over time, this erodes sleep quality, depletes patience, and fuels emotional, impulsive decision-making. The author describes a dangerous cycle: fear of missing out leads to overtrading and lowered standards. As losses mount (30%, 50%), trading shifts from a pursuit of profit to a psychological battle for survival. The brain begins to associate prolonged stress with the occasional reward, trapping the trader in an addictive loop. Anxiety becomes a baseline state, and trading turns into a compulsive need to feel something—where green candles offer relief and red ones spark self-loathing. The most powerful move a trader can make, the article concludes, is sometimes to stop entirely—to avoid revenge trading, chasing losses, or seeking dopamine fixes. The key is to step back long enough to ask: is this still about passion, or is it a cage of stress hormones? The market and its opportunities will always return, but a trader who is mentally broken will have nothing left to capitalize on them. The best traders are not necessarily the smartest, but those who preserve their mental well-being long enough to stay in the game. Ultimately, the chase may not be for money, but for relief from the very pressure the game creates.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading Reflection: Why Does Trading Cryptocurrencies Become More Miserable the Longer You Do It? In Fact, Your Brain Has Been 'Damaged' by Stress.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Issued Two Work Badges to Unitree

At the keynote of his speech at the Taipei Music Center, Jensen Huang introduced a humanoid robot named Isaac GR00T. This robot, described as a 'reference design,' is a collaboration: its body comes from Unitree Robotics' H2 Plus, its hands from Singapore's Sharpa, and its 'brain'—the chip and full software stack—is from Nvidia, powered by the Jetson Thor. Huang positioned it as a turnkey solution for universities and researchers, aimed at drastically reducing setup time for experiments. On the same day as this reveal, Unitree Robotics passed its IPO review in Shanghai, seeking to raise 4.2 billion yuan, with a significant portion earmarked for developing its own embodied AI model—its own 'brain.' The article draws a parallel to the smartphone industry, where Qualcomm's 'reference design' led to homogenized hardware and concentrated profits in chips and software. It suggests Nvidia's GR00T initiative follows a similar playbook: by open-sourcing the model and framework, it aims to establish the industry standard, potentially relegating hardware makers to low-margin roles. While currently a body supplier for Nvidia's project, Unitree is actively pursuing its own AI brain, having open-sourced initial models and tested a more advanced one. The company faces a critical window to develop a competitive proprietary system before GR00T becomes the default. The article contrasts this with Tesla's vertically integrated approach for its Optimus robot, which uses in-house chips and benefits from its automotive data and manufacturing scale. It concludes that while the robot body still holds technical value and differentiation, the race for the 'brain' will ultimately define the industry's profit centers and power dynamics.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Issued Two Work Badges to Unitree

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片