罕见!以太坊收入被Uniswap等DApp超越,意味着什么?

白话区块链Publicado a 2022-08-08Actualizado a 2022-08-08

Resumen

最近出了个事儿,说大不大,说小也不小,那就是Uniswap前两周总流水超过了以太坊。

最近出了个事儿,说大不大,说小也不小,那就是Uniswap前两周总流水超过了以太坊。

说大不大,是因为这毕竟只是一个单周数据,属于“偶尔为之”;说小不小,是因为Uniswap毕竟是以太坊上面千千万万个DApp的其中一个而已,现在一个DApp收入暂时超过整条链,哪怕只是昙花一现,也够“吓人”的了!

下个周期,有没有可能诞生收入价值接近甚至超过底层公链的超级DApp?

我想可能性还是有的。

毕竟我们曾经以为OS才是王道,微软就是最大的大腿,结果发现Facebook,Google等超级应用完全不输下风。再后来很多程序,更是把这些超级应用当成了平台,比如现在各种流行的微信小程序,Chrome的各种插件,就是基于Wechat与Chrome这两个超级应用而打造的。

区块链的世界,我们也许会看到类似的场景。

01

Uniswap

Uniswap无疑是一个超级DApp的头号候选人。

这是一个熊市里,TVL和交换量都没有显著下跌的DApp,虽然价格跟着大盘同样下去许多。

超强的基本面,已经打下了超级DApp的良好根基。

剩下的就是往上添砖加瓦了。先是收购了Genie,又整合了Sudoswap,直接一只脚伸向了NFT领域。

然后Uni不是一直被诟病Token没有价值么?

费用开关提议走起!基本上满票通过。

当然,什么时候能实施就另说了,毕竟Sec还在那边盯着,这种社区治理投票打开的分红开关,到底算不算“证券”或是“违法”?我估计圈里圈外也没几个人能说清楚,根本就没有先例可循……

然而,这些都还不是最重要的,最重要的是,基于Uniswap开发的项目越来越多,这也就意味着,Uniswap真正意义上的成为了区块链最为重要的基础设施之一。

最早Uniswap V2时代,流动性挖矿大火特火,许多项目需要使用Uniswap的LP Token去做挖矿。(注:V2、V3指的是版本迭代,即version2、version3,下同。)

到了V3时代,LP管理出现需求,Visor,Charm等项目开始探索基于V3的LP管理,可视化,自动平衡策略等方向。

现在V3相对成熟,像是Perp V2,Rage Trade等直接使用Uniswap V3作为其协议的一部分,用来做衍生品LP池,还有像是Voltz这样的项目则是寻求授权分叉来使用V3的源代码。

未来1-2年,相信会看到越来越多基于Uniswap设计,或是使用Uniswap作为其底层协议一部分的项目,对于LP资金效率的探索也从未间断。非常好奇下一轮牛市,Uniswap TVL和手续费用的天花板会在哪里。

02

AAVE

第二个有这种feel的无疑是AAVE。

AAVE也有着同样良好的基本面:熊市里依旧不错的TVL和协议收入,多链部署,风险隔离等主要更新的V3。

然而,这些也不是最重要的。

与Uniswap一样,AAVE也开始被动或是主动的建立自己的“堆栈”。(一种数据结构存储器)

比如最近一个A16Z投资的Morpho借贷项目, 相对于其他自己重新建立借贷池与AAVE,Compound等直接竞争的做法不同,他更多是一个优化资金效率的借贷协议聚合器。

众所周知,AAVE的前身Ethlend是做点对点借贷的,没做起来,后来转型点对池之后一飞冲天。

然而点对点并非一无是处,其资金使用效率远高于点对池模型,利率在匹配成功的情况下也同样优于点对池,于是乎Morpho在Compound与AAVE的池子之上叠加了一层点对点的撮合与匹配,提供了更好的资金使用率与借贷利率。

这和上面提到的基于Uniswap V3的Perp V2与Rage Trade实在是异曲同工之妙。

更厉害的还在后面。

虽然Luna失败了,然而铸钞权这块肥肉实在是太诱人,依旧会有后来者前仆后继。

这不,最近关于稳定币GHO的提案在AAVE社区被几乎全票通过了!

AAVE未来要做稳定币几乎成了定局。

原本MakerDAO算是央行,负责稳定币DAI的发行,AAVE,Compound这些算是商业银行,给DAI提供借贷等应用场景。

现在商业银行摇身一变,央行职能我也想要!

有人说那跟DAI有什么区别呢?都是超额抵押。

看那个图便一清二楚,通过引入Facilitator,GHO有了多个场景的铸造,除了传统的超额抵押,还有RWA现实世界资产抵押,类似资管的Delta Netural中性交换策略,甚至有基于信用分数的无抵押贷款……

这是个比MakerDAO更加开放和复杂的“央行系统”。

而相信在GHO上线之初,AAVE肯定也会为其提供相对DAI与USDC更加优惠的利率等经济激励措施,感觉届时会与DAI来一场正面的硬碰硬。

03

其他?

说实话,暂时还没有在其他项目上看到超级应用的潜力。

Curve当然不错,有着良好的基本面+类似CVX这种配合性项目,然而其稳定币专精的领域使其基本面向的对象基本是To B+大户,用户基础远不如Uni和AAVE这么庞大,也许有一天外汇交易上链了,Curve成了外汇Token商贸的老大,届时倒是有可能成为一款换汇的超级应用,无论是To B还是To C。

又或许,某个Gamfi 2.0的项目,突破了一代的play 2 earn,在高可玩性的基础上叠加了良好的经济系统,圈内圈外裹挟进去无数玩家,做成了一个链上“魔兽世界”的feel。那距离超级应用,就是一步之遥的事儿了~

朋友们,你认为还有哪些赛道,可以诞生区块链世界的超级应用的呢?欢迎留言告诉我们。

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手Hace 26 min(s)

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手Hace 26 min(s)

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar UNI

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Uniswap (UNI) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Uniswap (UNI) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Uniswap (UNI)Después de comprar tu Uniswap (UNI), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Uniswap (UNI)Tradear fácilmente con Uniswap (UNI) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

449 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar UNI

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de UNI (UNI).

活动图片