Replace Solana? What You Should Know about the Aptos Network?

TheTiePublicado a 2022-08-04Actualizado a 2022-08-04

Resumen

Learn about Aptos in one article: financing, technical architecture, Move language, and ecological applications

Introduction

After years of seeking regulatory compliance, Diem, a cryptocurrency payment project from Facebook/Meta, ended abruptly in 2022. Its assets were sold off, including the underlying blockchain network. Mo Shaikh and Avery Ching, two former Meta employees, were unwilling to accept the fate of the project they spent nearly three years on. Therefore, they decided to continue their work, only this time as CEO and CTO of the newly founded Aptos Labs.

Based on the knowledge its staff gained working on the Diem codebase, Aptos Labs sought to create a general-purpose blockchain network with the following goals in mind:

1.Revive Diem’s technology by utilizing its programming language, Move, to create a scalable, secure, and flexible infrastructure that could compete with existing blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

2.Ensure high throughput, low latency, and verifiable state synchronization in a decentralized network by leveraging Diem’s architecture along with a wide variety of novel techniques.

Aptos Devnet has been live since March of this year, enabling developers to begin building decentralized applications and immediately run/test them. Furthermore, in preparation for the public mainnet launch, which is anticipated to launch in the third quarter of 2022, there will be multiple incentivized testnet’s to generate community feedback through participation.

Funding

Despite launching four months prior, in March of 2022, Aptos reported raising $200 million at a valuation greater than $1 billion. The funding round was led by Andreessen Horowitz and included Tiger Global, FTX, Coinbase, 3AC, and other notable names. l. While there isn’t information on the funding round’s exact valuation, Aptos’ CEO, Mo Shaikh, has stated that they’ve reached unicorn status.

Aptos Company Profile – SigDev

This Monday, July 25th, Aptos Labs announced that it had concluded a Series A funding round led by FTX Ventures and Jump Crypto, including investments from Andreessen Horowitz, Multicoin Capital, and Circle Ventures, among others. According to Bloomberg, the most recent $150 million fundraising more than doubled Aptos Labs’ previous $1 billion valuation. In contrast, Ethereum raised around $18.4 million in 2014.

Read the complete publication on their most recent fundraising here.

Architecture

1.Aptos is running on the fourth iteration of their consensus protocol, Aptos BFT, which they claim is the lowest latency and most advanced iteration to date. The consensus protocol is a derivative of HotStuff, the underlying consensus protocol initially used at Diem. Recent additions to the system include:

2.An innovative reputation system that is particularly conformed for decentralized environments, examining the on-chain data and automatically changing leader rotations to account for unresponsive validators without requiring human intervention

Blocks are now committed in significantly shorter trips (down to 2), making sub-second finality the average occurrence.

While current TPS on testnet sits around 1,000TPS, Aptos Labs is following a roadmap that they believe will allow them to maximize the utilization of their engine, which they claim has a max TPS capability of 100k+. As per their roadmap, the process of achieving such a feat can be generalized into three milestones:

Milestone 1: Separating Consensus from Execution

The first architectural milestone is the complete detachment of the consensus mechanism from transaction execution. The consensus protocol accepts the proposed transaction ordering. Validators carry out the transactions in a different protocol, away from the critical path, and come to an agreement on the final transaction ordering and execution outcomes. By eliminating the co-dependencies that come with combining consensus and execution, higher throughput and latency are achieved. Aptos Labs is focusing its efforts on this decoupling for their next protocol iteration, which is on track to be integrated into testnet later this year.

Milestone 2: Transaction Execution Time

Generally speaking, when projects refer to how good their system performance is, they tend to emphasize finality and system throughput. Finality is the interval between the creation and submission of a transaction by a client and the confirmation of its commitment by a different party. Throughput is depicted as transactions per second (tps) which gauges how many transactions every node in the network can complete in a second. With that said, smart contract execution represents a significant throughput bottleneck.

Validators must execute the transactions in the ordered blocks after submitting blocks and agreeing on their order. The validators must then reach the same conclusion, consistent with the transactions being executed sequentially. This process of sequential execution impairs network performance, even more apparent during times of increased network activity. Unfortunately, current blockchain systems lack inherent scalability solutions to answer this problem; they function sequentially or utilize highly inefficient off-chain workloads.

Aptos Labs designed an in-memory smart contract parallel execution engine called Block-STM. STM stands for Software Transactional Memory, a new approach to engineering that supports flexible transactional programming of synchronization procedures. However, when applied generally, STM models suffer from performance limitations due to a conflict between bookkeeping and aborts. With that said, upon evaluation Aptos Labs has concluded that when applied to specific use-cases such as DLT along with a combination of innovative techniques, they were able to achieve 100k+ TPS with 32 cores within their execution-only benchmark. Furthermore, their experimental evaluation has also shown that Block-STM outperforms sequential execution by up to 20x on low-contention workloads, and up to 9x on high contention ones.

Milestone 3: Optimized Authenticating Data Structures

The final milestone is achieving an optimized authenticating data structure. To combat the scalability issues that come with writing Merkle-trees to persistent storage, Aptos is developing authenticated data structures with the aim of being a scalable, database-friendly solution. This will be achieved through the evaluation of higher branching factors, access pattern optimized caching, and careful versioning,

To read more about Block-STM, including the supplemental techniques applied to enhance the performance of STM, refer to the documentation here along with the GitHub implementation here.

To review the security audit, refer here.

Move Programming Language

The Move programming language was created to serve as a secure, programmable foundation for Aptos’ vision to create a financial infrastructure that empowers the masses. With this in mind, Move was designed to address the primary pain points of current blockchain languages. As a result, the proposed solutions by Aptos can be summarized in four key goals: first-class resources, flexibility, safety, and verifiability.

Move’s main feature is the ability to define custom resource types, which statistically ensures that a resource can only be moved between program storage places and never cloned or deleted. This implementation significantly improves security by effectively preventing issues such as the vulnerabilities described above. Resources are then governed by move modules, similar to smart contracts in that they control the procedures that encode the rules for creating, updating, and deleting declared resources. Move modules’ benefit over smart contracts is that they enforce data abstraction, meaning that a resource is transparent inside its declaring module and opaque outside of it. Furthermore, with the help of an expressive specification language, the Move prover can formally validate the characteristics of Move modules and is efficient enough to be used in continuous integration testing.

To read more about the Move programming language, refer to the documentation here.

Protocols on Aptos

While Aptos is relatively new, developer activity has increased exponentially since the incentivized test net was first launched earlier this year in March. With every new blockchain, the most important protocols to keep an eye out for are the ones that bring real value to the chain via infrastructure — Similar to how money markets like Compound and oracles like Chainlink enabled the growth of mainnet DeFi.

Thala Labs – Recently announced in June as a Stablecoin Protocol. Until protocol documents are published, there is very little information about Thala Labs. That said, stablecoins are essential to the growth of a nascent ecosystem as stablecoins create liquidity incentives for other projects, consequently driving up TVL.

Pontem Network – Pontem has recently put out a generalized roadmap iterating that they intend to build numerous products on Aptos, with the first product being a decentralized exchange. DEXs represent a sufficient liquidity structure that enables automated swaps between different tokens while encouraging liquidity growth through liquidity mining incentives. Other products on Pontem’s roadmap include a yield aggregator, an EVM layer for Aptos, a dApp-Integrated wallet, and a governance protocol.

Switchboard – A Solana-based general purpose oracle network with an emphasis on generalized price feeds. To learn more about oracles and the value that they bring, refer to my deep-dive report here.

Vial – Vial is a pooled interest rate protocol that enables users to lend and borrow assets on Aptos. Money markets bring value by enabling efficient methods for capital management and diversification along with enabling on-chain leverage, which in turn drives liquidity throughout the ecosystem.

Aptosphere – Aptosphere is an indexing protocol for querying data on Aptos. For insights on why indexing protocols are crucial to the success of a new blockchain, refer to my report on databases here.

Team & Traction

As mentioned, Aptos was founded by Mo Shaikh and Avery Ching, currently sitting as CEO and CTO at Aptos Labs.

Other members of the Aptos founding team include Alden Hu, Alin Tomescu, David Wolinsky, Greg Nazario, Jake Skinner, Josh Lind, Max Kaplan, Mo Ahmed, Neil Harounian, Rati Gelashivili, Rustie Lin, Sasha Spiegelman, Sherry Xiao, Sital Kedia and Zekun Li, all of who have admirable credentials with proven track records within their fields.

It’s also important to note that Aptos’ social growth has been massively on the rise lately, as the scalability solution narrative continues. According to data from The TIE’s Apefluencer tool, which helps institutions track what matters to key opinion leaders, 19 of the top 50 recent most followed accounts in crypto are part of the Aptos Ecosystem.

Final Thoughts & Considerations

This report introduced Aptos, a BFT general-purpose public blockchain created to be a scalable, secure, and flexible infrastructure that could compete with existing blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Scalability has been a common topic of conversation within the space over the past few years. It’s become apparent that many of the widely used blockchain systems aren’t inherently optimized to support blockchain technology’s continuous growth and adoption. Aptos addresses these pain points by implementing novel methodologies focusing on performance, scalability, and user operability. All of these aspects highlight the continuous value that Aptos proposes to bring to the space- along with the underlying goal of creating infrastructure that can rival existing blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock of MicroStrategy, is experiencing a persistent de-pegging from its target par value of $100, with the discount recently widening to over 11%. This de-anchoring challenges the core design of STRC, which was intended as a stable, income-oriented security operating near $100. As a crucial funding engine for MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, STRC's price reflects market confidence in the company's entire capital model. The company's "capital flywheel" relies on issuing STRC at or above $100 via an At-the-Market (ATM) program to raise cash for buying Bitcoin, thereby boosting company equity and theoretically supporting STRC's value. A monthly adjustable dividend mechanism was designed to maintain this peg. Despite raising the dividend to 11.5% and increasing payment frequency, the de-pegging persists. Market concerns extend beyond technical factors like leveraged arbitrage unwinding. Analysts point to MicroStrategy's limited cash reserves relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation for preferred shares. While the company counters that its vast Bitcoin holdings could cover decades of payments, this argument hinges on the potential need to sell Bitcoin—a shift from its longstanding "hodl" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of BTC, framed as a test, amplified these liquidity and strategy concerns. If STRC remains discounted, impairing MicroStrategy's ability to raise cheap capital, fears may grow that the company could sell more Bitcoin to meet obligations. This scenario could transform MicroStrategy from a major market buyer into a potential seller, posing significant downside risk for Bitcoin. The re-pegging of STRC is thus a key indicator for the health of MicroStrategy's capital structure and its market impact.

Odaily星球日报Hace 26 min(s)

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

Odaily星球日报Hace 26 min(s)

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

Silicon Valley's New Most Wanted Job: The Rise of the Forward Deployment Engineer The AI industry is witnessing a significant shift. The focus has moved from developing cutting-edge models to deploying them effectively within enterprises. This has made the "Forward Deployment Engineer" (FDE) a critical and highly sought-after role at major firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. For the past three years, the industry prioritized model scientists. However, companies are now facing a harsh reality: purchasing powerful AI tools does not guarantee productivity gains or organizational change. The biggest hurdle is not the technology itself, but integrating it into complex legacy systems, workflows, and corporate cultures. This includes challenges like data silos, compliance requirements, and internal resistance. The FDE role, pioneered by Palantir Technologies, addresses this "last-mile" problem. FDEs are deployed on-site with clients for extended periods. Their job is to deeply understand the client's specific organizational structure, processes, and pain points, then tailor and implement the AI solution accordingly. They combine skills in technology, project management, and organizational change. A clear signal of this trend emerged in May 2026 when three AI giants made major moves. Anthropic launched a $1.5B joint venture for enterprise deployment. OpenAI formed an independent deployment subsidiary, DeployCo, with over $4B in commitments and acquired a deployment consultancy. Google Cloud's CEO publicly announced a large-scale recruitment drive for FDEs. This shift represents a fundamental change in the software business model: from selling tools to selling guaranteed outcomes. FDEs are the agents of this change, responsible for delivering a working system within the production environment, not just a demo. Real-world cases, such as challenges at Goldman Sachs (compliance barriers) and Target (internal cultural resistance), illustrate that the primary obstacles to AI adoption are organizational, not technical. An FDE's value lies in navigating these human and procedural complexities to facilitate a successful "AI migration." In essence, as core AI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, the true premium is shifting to the human expertise required to understand organizations and drive change—making the FDE role pivotal for the next phase of the AI revolution.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片