Decline In Bitcoin Miner Revenues Suggests More Sell-Offs May Follow

newsbtcPublicado a 2022-07-08Actualizado a 2022-07-08

Resumen

Bitcoin miner revenues have been in decline since the bear trend began and this has led a good number of miners to sell their BTC holdings in order to keep...

Bitcoin miner revenues have been in decline since the bear trend began and this has led a good number of miners to sell their BTC holdings in order to keep their operations afloat. However, the expectation that the bear market would soon resolve and miners would once again be in the green has since gone out the window. With miner revenues continuing to plummet, miners may have to resume selling off their holdings to keep up with the market.
Miner Revenues Fall
For the past week, there has been no change in the downtrend in miner revenues. On-chain metrics show that it was down 0.59% from the prior seven days bringing the total daily miner revenues to $18.62 million. Mostly, it has remained flat during this time and other metrics have dived further into the red during this time.
An example is the fees per day culled by miners. It was down 10.55% in the same time period, one of the highest declines recorded in this time period. With fees per day being so low, the percentage of the daily miner revenues which it makes up is also down, now sitting at 1.50%.
Additionally, the daily transaction volumes are also down, which explains the decline in fees per day realized. This was down 9.75%, although transactions per day had seen some growth. It rose 1.96% in the same time period and is now at 248,071 per day.
Average transaction volume has also followed the decline in network activity with an 11.46% decline. This now stands at $16,333.
Bitcoin Miners Selling Bitcoin?
Over the course of the last several months, miners have seen their cash flow plummet. These miners still have outstanding debts from machine orders that they had made during the bull market of 2021 but have not been profitable enough to keep their mining activities going. What had resulted from this was a sell-off among bitcoin miners.
Most prominent of these have been the sell-offs from top public bitcoin miners such as Marathon Digital and Riot Blockchain. In June, it was reported that these public miners had had to sell off more BTC than they had produced in the space of a month.
BTC close to test $21,000 | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView.com
Most recently, the news of another bitcoin miner dumping its holdings emerged. This time around, Core Scientific had announced that it had sold the majority of its BTC in a monthly update post. It realized a total of $167 million from the sale of 7,202 BTC. Following this, the miner’s bitcoin holdings now sit at 1,959 BTC.
This trend was expected as soon as the price had begun to drop. However, with no recovery in sight, it is expected that more miners will come forward to sell their BTC. What’s more, these are reports from public miners and there’s no way to tell how much BTC private miners have had to dump.

Lecturas Relacionadas

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手Hace 15 min(s)

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手Hace 15 min(s)

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片