主网上线在即,Monad 生态发展如何?

marsbitPublicado a 2025-11-12Actualizado a 2025-11-13

DeFi

都在传 Monad 和 Coinbase的联合发射机会?别猜了,来一起看看,主网上线在即 @monad 都给大家准备了多么精彩的早期生态大惊喜:


📈 DeFi + Perp Dex

  • @KuruExchange:完全链上订单簿DEX,Paradigm领投1160万美元A轮。看看CLOB模式在Monad上运转起来会有何不同?
  • @DrakeExchange:永续合约DEX,50x杠杆,CLOB+vAMM混合模式。Perps这种高频交易配上专为高频而生的性能链,会突破Perp Dex的天花板吗?
  • @MondayTrade_:综合DeFi枢纽,现货、LP、Perps都做,定位“CEX速度+DeFi透明”。链上全栈交易中心的概念会很时髦;
  • @seertrade:链上交易终端,“一屏全能,集成研究、决策、执行”。想做DeFi版Bloomberg,思路不错但能不能做成另说。


📊 预测市场 + 游戏

  • @kizzymobile:对influencers社交媒体表现下注,把注意力经济直接作金融化转换。主打一个高频投注+实时结算;
  • @Levr_Bet: 去中心化杠杆体育投注平台,5x杠杆。要知道,体育链上化的痛点就是Oracle延迟,Monad正好要解决这个;
  • @RareBetSports: 体育预测平台,全链上设计:智能合约自动验证比赛结果、分配奖励。核心玩法有组合投注,预测球员表现等,100x 乘数回报;


🎮 GameFi游戏

  • @LumiterraGame:MMO游戏,主打“开放经济+AI Agent”。AI在游戏里自主交易,每个动作都是链上tx,直接检验链底层性能;
  • @ExploreOmnia:宠物对战游戏,Sappy Seals团队做的,定位“Pokémon杀手”。P2E+NFT老套路,会接上宝可梦上链的叙事吗?
  • @TeleMafia:Telegram黑帮游戏,slap、fight互动,Play to Earn。轻度游戏+链上资产;
  • @fluffleworld: 游戏化养生App,奖励你放下手机“Touch Grass”。Focus离线时长孵化龙蛋,挺有意思的反手机成瘾设计。


🤖 AI Agent

  • @symphonyio: AI Agent执行层,让Agent跨协议跨链做DeFi策略。挑战让AI Agent实现自主交易;
  • @KINETK_AI:AI驱动的内容保护平台,帮创作者监控全网IP盗用,内容哈希上链。创作者经济刚需场景。


💬 社交任务类

  • @bro_dot_fun:社交任务奖励平台,完成X/Twitter任务赚积分。MEME风格的社交互动,攀排行榜拿空投。


🔍 附加:一点我的洞察和思考

  1. @monad 一定会切入 Perp DEX 战场,毕竟Hyperliquid的标杆效应一直在,穷追不舍项目有很多,但目前还没有能撼动的的新秀出现。Monad 能不能在乱烘烘大家都散场后,给出一鸣惊人的战绩,值得期待。这个毛值得撸一下。
  2. 预测市场+游戏会是Crypto未来最大的落地场景,Monad自然不会错过这个集聚“注意力+资金+日活”的高频应用落地场景。如果Monad早推出几年,有理由相信 @Polymarket 牵手的就不会是Polygon了。何况Monad要在游戏上搞事情应该手拿把掐吧;
  3. AI Agent + x402,这是几乎所有链都会拼争的一个长期叙事,做“高频交易+碎片化支付+游戏类重度消费类场景”,这个x402支付协议,太适合Monad了。Super。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

When users complained that Claude was "getting dumber," the root cause wasn't the AI model itself. In an official blog post, Anthropic clarified the critical difference between two key settings in Claude Code: Model and Effort. Model refers to the core "brain"—the fixed, trained weights of a specific AI (like Sonnet, Opus, or Fable). Changing the Model addresses *capability* ("can it do this?"), but its knowledge is static post-training. Effort, however, controls the AI's *approach and thoroughness* for a specific task. A higher Effort level instructs Claude to read more files, run tests, perform verification, and complete multi-step reasoning before responding, significantly increasing its "work output" for that job. Conversely, low Effort leads to quicker, less thorough replies. This distinction explains the March 2024 uproar where users experienced a sudden drop in Claude's performance. The cause was not a model change but Anthropic quietly lowering the *default* Effort setting from "high" to "medium" to reduce latency, which was later reverted. The key insight is that a smaller, capable model (like Sonnet) on high Effort can often outperform a larger, more powerful model (like Opus) on low Effort for many tasks. The article provides a practical troubleshooting framework: if Claude makes an error, first check the context and instructions. If it seems to skip necessary steps or validations, increase Effort. If it diligently attempts the task but fails conceptually or makes consistent factual errors despite good context, then consider switching to a more capable Model. The takeaway is a shift in focus: effective AI programming is less about always choosing the "strongest" model and more about intelligently *orchestrating* models and effort levels—acting like a project manager to assign the right "brain" with the right level of diligence for each job, optimizing both results and cost.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is undergoing significant internal turmoil and functional erosion. Following its largest-ever layoff of 54 staff (20% of its workforce) and a major organizational restructuring announced in June, its Protocol Support Team has been officially dissolved. This comes alongside the high-profile resignation of key figures like co-executive director Xiaowei Wang, bringing senior departures this year to at least eight. Criticism of EF's rigid structure, opaque decision-making, and perceived lack of a clear value narrative for ETH has intensified within the community. The layoffs have catalyzed the emergence of independent, non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers and members. These entities are now taking on core functions such as protocol research/development and institutional adoption, effectively fragmenting the EF's traditional leadership role. Concurrently, EF's security team is adapting to technological change, deploying specialized AI agents to audit Ethereum's codebase, which successfully discovered a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-34219). While EF states AI complements rather than replaces researchers, it signals a potential future shift in its operational model. Faced with these challenges—internal restructuring, talent drain, the rise of competing organizations, and AI integration—the Ethereum Foundation appears to be stepping back from a central commanding role. Analysts and community observers speculate it may increasingly transition towards a symbolic "ecosystem mascot" function, while decentralized initiatives drive Ethereum's future growth and institutional adoption.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片