Stable首轮8.25亿美元预存款秒光,先放行7亿美元再发推?

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2025-10-27Actualizado a 2025-10-27

原创 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者 | Asher(@Asher_ 0210

近期社区热议的项目 Stable 今日上午在 X 平台宣布,其预存款活动第一阶段已达到 8.25 亿美元上限。

“什么?我都开了小铃铛,刚打开页面就没额度了?”——这是今早许多第一时间尝试参与的用户的真实写照。下面,Odaily星球日报带大家了解 Stable 项目,并回顾今日上午“8.25 亿美元预存款秒没”的全过程。

Stable:专为 USDT 设计的 Layer1 公链

Stable 是一条专为 USDT 打造的高性能 Layer1 公链,旨在提供高速、低成本、低延迟的稳定币交易网络。与通用型公链不同,Stable 聚焦于 USDT 的支付与结算功能,希望让 USDT 在链上具备类似现金的使用体验,适用于跨境支付、电商支付和企业清算等场景。

在技术设计上,Stable 采用独立公链架构,支持 EVM 兼容和子秒级交易确认,同时计划推出免 Gas 的 USDT0 转账模式,并为机构提供可申请的专属区块空间与合规隐私交易支持。这些特性旨在降低企业和终端用户使用区块链支付的门槛,提升稳定币交易效率。目前项目核心技术框架已基本完成,但测试网和主网上线时间尚未公布。

提的一提的是,Stable 获得了包括 Bitfinex、Hack VC、Franklin Templeton 在内的知名机构投资,并获得 Tether 官方背书,Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino 也公开支持该项目。这些资金主要用于网络基础设施建设和全球 USDT 的支付生态拓展。

Stable 预存款活动遭质疑

Stable 第一阶段 USDT 预存活动在开启后迅速引发巨大争议,被大量社区用户质疑存在严重的“老鼠仓”操作。按照官方时间线,Stable 于北京时间上午 9:10 才正式发推宣布开放预存,但链上数据显示,早在 8:48 就已经有人提前存入资金,与官方时间明显不符。

官宣预存款活动前已有多个地址大资金参与

链上数据显示,本次 8.25 亿美元的预存款额度,在公开消息前,7 亿美元就已被提前“包场”。其中,10 个巨鲸地址合计存入约 6 亿美元 USDT,且全部资金来自同一钱包地址,被拆分后在 10 秒内打满额度。进一步分析发现,这些资金均从 BTSE CEX(美国资本背景交易所,参投了 Stable)提出,再分散进入不同钱包参与预存,疑似由同一个资本集团统一操作。此外,这些地址的资金在活动开始前十几个小时就已完成准备和布局,进一步引发社区不满情绪。

预存款活动前,10 个资金来源相同的巨鲸地址合计存入 6 亿枚 USDT

此外,链上数据发现,@Cbb0fe 早于官方发推前存入 1600 万美元。

相对而言,普通用户几乎没有参与空间。大量用户反馈,在第一时间进入官网后要么授权失败,要么交易迟迟无法打包,等看到官方推文时页面仅剩 0.13 USDT 可存,看似仍有少量额度,实际上散户几乎无法参与。

社区反馈:官推公布后,第一时间存款页面仅剩 0.13 USDT 可存

根据 Dune 数据,本次总额 8.25 亿美元的预存活动实际仅有 273 个地址参与,普通用户的参与比例几乎可以忽略。更值得注意的是,在所有参与地址中,有近 40 个地址的存入金额低于 500 USDT,甚至出现了 1 USDT、3 USDT、5 USDT 或几十 USDT 的极小额存款,社区讽刺称这些小额地址只是用来充人数的道具,毫无真实参与感。

Stable 预存款数据

整体来看,Stable 第一阶段 8.25 亿美元的预存款活动很快满额结束,但社区情绪非常负面,被评价为 “史诗级老鼠仓”、“提前内定的预售”。

小结

“骂归骂,该赚还是要赚”。虽然 Stable 第一阶段预存活动因严重“老鼠仓”问题备受争议,但考虑到其背后有 Tether 官方背书与一线资本支持,该项目依然具备强大的市场影响力与持续追踪价值。

接下来更值得关注的,反而是中心化交易所相关的预存款活动,尤其是币安是否会推出 Stable 的存款或参与活动。此前,币安曾上线 Plasma(XPL)存款活动,首期个人存款额度上限高达 10 万美元,后续批次也能存到 5 万美元。由于是存入稳定币参与,无本金损耗,XPL 上线后第一时间卖出所得收益年化高达 79%,成为今年 CEX 上线收益率最高的项目之一。

从这个角度看,Stable 依旧是高优先级关注项目,链上活动也许已经被大资金吃完,但 CEX 阶段或许才是适合普通散户的参与窗口。

Lecturas Relacionadas

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

The countdown for the largest IPO in AI history, a potential $2 trillion listing for Anthropic, is underway for October. The staggering valuation, reportedly projected by several investors, contrasts with the company's own internal restraint on setting a public target. Founded five years ago by former OpenAI core members, Anthropic's growth has been meteoric. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) surged from ~$9B in late 2025 to $47B by May 2026, with Q2 2026 revenue of $11.5B marking a 14x year-over-year increase. Bank valuations are even based on internal 2028 revenue forecasts of $190-200B. A key growth driver is Claude Code, its AI coding assistant. Its ARR quintupled in five months to $2.5B by February 2026, now constituting nearly 20% of total revenue. Surveys indicate Anthropic commands roughly 40% of enterprise LLM spending, doubling OpenAI's share in programming-specific use. However, alongside this explosive growth, reports detail significant internal cultural strife. Critics describe a divisive "priesthood" of PhD executives, led by CEO Dario Amodei, who promote a "save humanity" narrative that some employees find cult-like and alienating. This has reportedly created a demoralized workforce and a covert "underground network" of dissent among engineers torn between lucrative pre-IPO equity and a toxic work environment. Anthropic now faces a pivotal paradox: pursuing its mission of "safe" AI requires immense capital for compute, yet that capital demands relentless commercial growth. As it approaches its historic IPO, the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny, soaring operational costs, and internal tensions—any of which could destabilize its post-listing trajectory, much like SpaceX's significant post-IPO stock drop. The stage is set for a defining moment in tech history.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

The United States is preparing to demand that European and other partners abandon Chinese artificial intelligence initiatives, threatening exclusion from the American-led "Pax Silica" coalition, according to a leaked U.S. State Department document. This ultimatum forces signatories of the "AI Opportunity Statement" to choose between the Western technological ecosystem and alternative frameworks, with China not explicitly named but clearly targeted. Pax Silica is a U.S. strategy for AI and semiconductor hegemony, launched in late 2025. Its European presence expanded significantly in mid-2026. Concurrently, China, Russia, and 27 other nations established the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July 2026 as an independent intergovernmental platform promoting AI governance based on UN principles. This situation creates a difficult choice, especially for European nations balancing strategic autonomy with dependence on U.S. tech and security. It also pressures Global South countries with pragmatic ties to both Washington and Beijing. The formation of competing blocks risks fragmenting the global tech landscape, forcing companies to split supply chains, increasing costs, and potentially leading to incompatible standards and protocols. The era of open globalization in AI may be ending, replaced by geopolitical confrontation where technological sovereignty trumps economic efficiency. The decisions made will shape the global digital economy for decades.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 hora(s)

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

cryptonews.ruHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片