21Shares’ 2x HYPE ETF could reshape DeFi – Here’s how

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-10-17Actualizado a 2025-10-18

Key Takeaways

Who is this ETF suitable for?

Tactical traders seeking high-beta exposure, not long-term holders, due to volatility and leverage drag.

What are the key risks?

Market volatility, liquidity limits, basis management, and potential NAV swings from rebalance mechanics.

In a recent turn of events, 21Shares is making a bold move in the crypto ETF space by filing for a 2x leveraged Hyperliquid [HYPE] ETF with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

HYPE ETF details

According to the filing, the proposed ETF aims to provide investors with 2x daily exposure to the HYPE Index, a decentralized platform gaining momentum in the crypto space.

Designed as a high-beta investment tool, the ETF allows traders to benefit from HYPE’s increasing on-chain activity and market volatility.

With this product, 21Shares intends to offer a strategic vehicle for navigating the fast-changing world of decentralized finance.

Crypto community reacts

Remarking on the same, Senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg Eric Balchunas noted,

“21Shares filing for a 2x HYPE ETF. This is the kind of filing where you’re like man, that is SO niche, idk.. but then you could look up in 3-4yrs it’s got a few billion. Just a total land rush right now, just like with themes, curr hedging and smart beta in eras past.”

Echoing similar sentiments, Shanaka Anslem Perera added,

“21Shares 2x HYPE ETF isn’t “just another levered ETF.” … It’s the first serious attempt to wrap a live on-chain cash-flow machine (Hyperliquid perps via $HYPE) into a 40-Act-style, daily-reset product.”

HYPE price action and more

Beyond HYPE itself, the ETF represents a broader opportunity to monetize DeFi revenue streams.

At press time, Hyperliquid traded at $34.39, down 10.87% in 24 hours, reflecting market sensitivity amid these developments.

Meanwhile, investor caution is intensifying as HYPE faces multiple headwinds.

The upcoming $11.9 billion token unlock in November has heightened fears of value dilution, prompting early profit-taking by whales.

High-profile sales, including Arthur Hayes reportedly liquidating part of his HYPE holdings, have amplified market panic.

Adding to the pressure, rising competition from Aster [ASTER] is diverting trading volume away from Hyperliquid, challenging HYPE’s dominance in the perpetual DEX space.

Combined, these factors are creating a cautious trading environment, leaving HYPE vulnerable to further short-term downside.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Tether's Two-Token Strategy: USAT Compliance Is Just a Smokescreen, and USDT's Permanent Non-Compliance Is the Truth?

In 2026, Tether launched USAT, a stablecoin compliant with the U.S. GENIUS Act. However, this article argues USAT is a "firewall" designed to allow Tether's core product, the massive offshore USDT ($1830B+), to remain permanently outside U.S. regulation. USAT, issued by a U.S.-chartered bank, serves as Tether's compliant face for the American market. In contrast, USDT is an offshore product whose reserves include non-compliant, high-yield assets like gold and Bitcoin. Bringing USDT into GENIUS compliance would require dismantling this profitable structure. The dual-coin strategy anticipates the 2028 U.S. deadline for listing only GENIUS-approved stable币. USAT will take over the compliant U.S. market, while USDT retains its vast offshore user base in emerging economies. This structure intentionally places the systemically important USDT beyond U.S. regulatory reach. The article concludes that framing USAT as "Tether going compliant" is misleading. Instead, USAT's true function is to provide a legal rationale for keeping the larger, globally significant USDT operation unregulated by the very country whose currency it represents.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Tether's Two-Token Strategy: USAT Compliance Is Just a Smokescreen, and USDT's Permanent Non-Compliance Is the Truth?

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

End of the 'Gray Era' for Hong Kong and US Stock Trading Accounts: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

Hong Kong and US stock “grey account opening era” ends, where can your money go? In a coordinated regulatory crackdown starting May 22nd, Hong Kong's SFC and China's securities regulator have targeted the previously common but legally ambiguous practice of mainland Chinese investors opening accounts with Hong Kong brokers to trade Hong Kong and US stocks. The SFC issued a stern circular after a review of 12 brokerages, citing major deficiencies including inadequate due diligence, acceptance of suspicious or forged documents, and weak management of cross-border relationships. New requirements mandate mainland clients to submit a written declaration confirming their investment funds originate from *outside* mainland China, the account has never been closed for using suspicious documents, and agreeing to information disclosure. Brokers must immediately close accounts opened with suspicious documents and dormant accounts. Simultaneously, Chinese authorities launched a two-year campaign to rectify illegal cross-border securities activities. Key internet brokers like Futu, Tiger Brokers, and Longbridge are facing penalties, with existing accounts allowed only to sell/withdraw funds, not add new ones. The impact is immediate. Reports from social media and financial news outlets confirm that individuals traveling to Hong Kong to open accounts are now required to sign the new declaration. However, even after signing, applications are frequently rejected. The declaration shifts compliance responsibility to the client and acts as a filter, as most mainland investors' funds do not legally meet the "from outside China" criterion. Major brokers like Futu and Tiger have stopped accepting new mainland clients. A few, such as uSmart Securities, Fosun Wealth, and Cheerful Investment, still offer limited channels, but approvals have tightened significantly. Crucially, funding must now come exclusively from the investor's own bank account in Hong Kong or a qualified jurisdiction, blocking previous workarounds like using money changers or stablecoins. For mainland investors, compliant pathways still exist but are narrower. Individuals with overseas status (students, work visa holders) and verifiable offshore funds may still qualify. Official channels like Stock Connect, QDII, and the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect remain fully compliant options, albeit with product and quota limitations. On-chain alternatives exist but carry their own regulatory uncertainties and often exclude mainland users. The crackdown signals the end of the lax expansion period for Hong Kong brokers targeting mainland clients. While investment opportunities persist, the era of easy, low-compliance access is over. Investors must now carefully assess their eligibility and understand that signing the new declaration carries personal legal liability.

Odaily星球日报Hace 20 min(s)

End of the 'Gray Era' for Hong Kong and US Stock Trading Accounts: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

Odaily星球日报Hace 20 min(s)

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: A Quick Guide to 17 Related Stocks

**Title: SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: Analysis of 17 Related Stocks** SpaceX is set to IPO on Nasdaq with a $1.75 trillion valuation. The real value driver is Starlink, contributing 61% of Q1 revenue with high margins. Its valuation heavily depends on future execution, including user growth despite falling ARPU. Key stocks have already surged pre-IPO. Tesla (TSLA, +10%) is a primary beneficiary due to deep integration with SpaceX in chip design and AI. Rocket Lab (RKLB, +89%) is seen as a "mini-SpaceX," but faces risk from potential Neutron rocket delays. AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) competes in the same satellite-to-phone market as Starlink. Firefly (FLY, +70%) is a strong government contractor in lunar services. Partners like EchoStar (SATS), Planet Labs (PL), and T-Mobile (TMUS) will see revaluation. Suppliers like Qualcomm (QCOM, +57%) are critical ecosystem "picks and shovels." Investment vehicles like DXYZ (+80%) hold significant SpaceX stakes but trade at high premiums, which may collapse post-IPO. Redwire (RDW) is highlighted as an under-the-radar "pick and shovel" play in space components, with growth in defense contracts and microgravity pharmaceuticals. The article warns that much of the positive news is already priced in, and a post-IPO sell-off is possible. Large IPOs often underperform initially. Key risks include Starship delays, ARPU decline, and unforeseen black swan events affecting Elon Musk or space operations. Investors are advised to focus on companies with solid fundamentals and manage overall sector exposure carefully.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: A Quick Guide to 17 Related Stocks

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Conversation with VanEck CEO: Memory Chip Stocks Are a Bubble, Bitcoin Will Stay but Token Ecosystems Will Disappear

In this podcast, VanEck CEO Jan van Eck discusses his investment outlook centered on three key long-term ("10-year macro") themes: AI-driven compute demand, India's economic rise, and excessive government debt in developed nations. Regarding AI and semiconductors, van Eck believes Nvidia has transformed into a foundational "host" for AI infrastructure, possessing deep moats in software, scale, and power efficiency, making it a core holding. However, he views the recent surge in memory chip stocks as a bubble driven by temporary supply-demand imbalances and pricing power, lacking Nvidia's competitive durability. On asset management, he emphasizes that while ETFs are scale-driven tools, the decisions on which ETFs to own and how to allocate remain highly active. He expresses greatest concern over fixed-income market illiquidity and the risk of a loss of confidence in government debt sustainability. Van Eck is bullish on gold's long-term role as a global monetary alternative and highlights the dramatic policy-driven growth in nuclear energy investment. He is strongly positive on India due to its demographic trends and pro-business reforms. Discussing crypto, he labels 2026 the "year of the corporate-controlled chain," where traditional finance adopts blockchain's best features (like 24/7 operation and programmability) but retains control. He predicts a permanent "crypto winter" for many projects, with only Bitcoin, stablecoins, and the core blockchain concept surviving long-term. He sees the U.S. stablecoin bill as marginally impactful, enabling tech firms to compete with, but not replace, banks. Finally, he views the upcoming SpaceX IPO as a significant, positive liquidity event for markets and advises investors to maintain a long-term, macro perspective when making asset allocation decisions.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Conversation with VanEck CEO: Memory Chip Stocks Are a Bubble, Bitcoin Will Stay but Token Ecosystems Will Disappear

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros