After Vauld Fallout, Voices Grow Over Fund Safety On Crypto Exchanges

CoingapePublicado a 2022-07-04Actualizado a 2022-07-04

Resumen

The turbulent times in the cryptocurrency market raised doubts over safety of customer funds on exchanges.

The turbulent times in the cryptocurrency market raised doubts over safety of customer funds on exchanges. In the recent times, the crash of Terra network had a ripple effect on all players in the market. In these circumstances, doubts are being raised over Vauld fund safety.
What Caused Vauld To Suspend Withdrawals, Trading & Deposits?
Earlier on Monday, cryptocurrency exchange Vauld said it had suspended all withdrawals, trading and deposits on its platform with immediate effect. The Singapore-based company added that it was exploring restructuring options with its financial and legal advisors.
Financial challenges in the crypto market on various fronts caused this move from the Vauld management. However, this is believed to be more of a precautionary move than running out of funds.
Neel, a crypto influencer, feels this move from Vauld could be a precautionary measure to avoid ‘panic withdrawals’.
“This can be a precautionary measure to avoid bigger problems that can happen by panicked withdrawals and give them breathing room to come up with a solution.”
DOGE Price Analysis: Pullback Opportunity Eyes its Next Jump to $0.1
News
Also, the crypto exchange had recently raised funds from billionaire entrepreneur and venture capitalist Peter Theil.
The current market climate which has led to a significant amount of customer withdrawals of $197.7 million since June 12, Vauld said. In the second week of June, the cryptocurrency market was triggered by a collapse of Terraform Lab’s UST.
Doubts Over Vauld Fund Safety
Meanwhile, voices are growing rapidly around storing crypto assets on exchanges. A Bitcoin trader by name Nebraskangooner on Twitter said keeping money on exchanges only means to lose all of it.
“If all of your money is on Crypto exchanges then you’re already losing.
Johnny, another crypto enthusiast, said it essentially means to disown money if stored on cryptocurrency exchanges.
“Bunch of people keeping their money on exchanges right now are going to turn into a bunch of people getting their money kept by exchanges.”
CryptoGodJohn, another crypto trader, shared a personal experience of losing money stored on exchanges. “If you have money on sketchy exchanges, please do yourself a favor and take your money off the exchange. Happened to me with Cryptoia in 2018,” he shared.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Kraken Launches CFTC-Regulated Perpetual Futures For US Pro Traders

Kraken has launched U.S. CFTC-regulated perpetual futures contracts for eligible institutional and professional clients, making a core crypto derivatives product available on a compliant domestic platform. The contracts, for assets including BTC, ETH, and SOL, are offered via Kraken Pro with clearing through a registered Futures Commission Merchant. This move brings the popular perpetual futures format, which allows leveraged trading without an expiry date, into the stricter U.S. regulatory framework. It provides professional traders a potential alternative to offshore platforms, balancing regulatory comfort with access to key products. However, the launch is explicitly not for retail investors. Its success depends on whether Kraken can build sufficient liquidity to compete with dominant offshore venues on metrics like spreads and execution quality. While symbolically significant for U.S. market maturity, its practical impact hinges on attracting meaningful trading activity onshore.

bitcoinistHace 6 min(s)

Kraken Launches CFTC-Regulated Perpetual Futures For US Pro Traders

bitcoinistHace 6 min(s)

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Cursor's New 1.5T Model Abandons Kimi Foundation, $60 Billion Stock Swap for Cursor, Musk's First Move Targets Microsoft's GitHub

Cursor, a popular AI-powered coding tool, has been acquired by SpaceX in an all-stock deal valued at $60 billion. The announcement coincided with Cursor's unveiling of major new developments at the Compile conference: a new 1.5 trillion+ parameter AI model and a "GitHub for agents" platform called Origin. The upcoming model, trained from scratch on over 100,000 GPUs with 10-20x more computational power than before, marks a shift from Cursor's previous reliance on models like Kimi. Cursor's CEO, Michael Truell, emphasized the model will be a "generally intelligent" assistant, moving beyond just code generation to handle broader engineering tasks like planning, testing, and UI interaction. Simultaneously, Cursor introduced Origin, a "Git-native" code hosting platform designed for AI agents that perform thousands of operations daily, featuring automated conflict resolution for large-scale, AI-generated code changes. The acquisition by SpaceX provides Cursor with significant computational resources. Analysts suggest this combination—Cursor's expertise in reinforcement learning and SpaceX's computing power—could position them strongly in the AI race, potentially challenging established players like GitHub, Claude Code, and Codex.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Cursor's New 1.5T Model Abandons Kimi Foundation, $60 Billion Stock Swap for Cursor, Musk's First Move Targets Microsoft's GitHub

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros