SWIFT Partners With Consensys to Build Blockchain Ledger

TheCryptoTimesPublicado a 2025-09-29Actualizado a 2025-09-29

SWIFT, the global financial messaging system used by banks, announced plans to build a common blockchain ledger, which will facilitate faster, always-on, and more efficient cross-border payments.

According to the official announcement, the initial variant, created in collaboration with blockchain company Consensys. More than 30 major financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Citi, Standard Chartered, BNP Paribas, Banco Santander, ANZ, MUFG, Wells Fargo, and NatWest, are working with SWIFT to design and build the system.

How the ledger will work

The ledger will function as a secure, real-time log of transactions between financial institutions. It will validate and order payments, and use smart contracts to apply rules automatically. 

It is made to operate both with current payment systems and new digital networks, following the compliance standards of global finance. The announcement also noted that the types of tokens exchanged on the ledger will be determined by commercial and central banks, with SWIFT supporting their integration into the infrastructure.

SWIFT’s CEO, Javier Pérez-Tasso, said the project is part of a wider effort to modernize financial infrastructure. “We provide powerful and effective rails today and are moving at a rapid pace with our community to create the infrastructure stack of the future,” he said.

The shared ledger builds on SWIFT’s earlier experiments with digital assets and blockchain pilots. Financial institutions from 16 countries will be providing input, and SWIFT intends to implement the system after developing the prototype and fully testing it. 

The development comes amid increasing interest among banks in applying blockchain to simplify payments, enhance efficiency, and prepare for a future where digital finance plays a central role.

Also Read: SWIFT to Test On-Chain System on Linea Blockchain

Mobile Only Image

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

**Missing the 20x Opportunity: A Simple 'Dumb' Approach to AI Investing** The AI boom, driving NVIDIA's revenue from $60B to $216B in two years, creates immense investment pressure. However, like the internet bubble of 2000, the largest AI opportunities likely lie ahead, perhaps after a correction. Instead of rushing in now or waiting paralyzed for a crash, the author proposes a third way: building a "knowledge warehouse" by systematically mapping the AI industry to be ready when opportunities arise. The core of the strategy is understanding AI's four-layer value chain: 1. **Compute Infrastructure (The "Engine"):** This foundational layer, where all money eventually flows, includes: a) **Chip Design:** NVIDIA's dominance via its CUDA ecosystem, b) **Chip Manufacturing/Packaging/Memory:** TSMC's near-monopoly in advanced manufacturing and SK Hynix's lead in High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), c) **Optical Interconnects:** Essential for large-scale AI clusters (e.g., Lumentum, Coherent), d) **Cooling & Power:** Critical for high-density AI data centers (e.g., Vertiv), e) **Servers/Data Centers & Cloud Platforms:** The physical and virtual wholesale providers. 2. **Models & Tools (The "OS"):** The competitive layer of foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI), now generating real revenue. A key shift is the center of gravity moving from **Training** models to **Inference** (running models), which demands different chip characteristics and could challenge NVIDIA's monopoly. 3. **Middleware & Platform ("The Glue"):** Connects models and applications (e.g., Scale AI, Hugging Face). This layer could explode if applications take off. 4. **Vertical Applications ("The Cash Register"):** Where AI meets end-users (e.g., enterprise AI, coding tools, medical AI, robotics). A critical cross-cutting constraint is **Energy**, as AI's massive power consumption drives investment in nuclear and other energy infrastructure. The author identifies four key questions for further research: 1) How will the shift from Training to Inference reshape the competitive landscape? 2) With tech giants spending over $600B on capex, where is the ROI from AI applications? 3) What are the under-the-radar opportunities in the "second" and "third" circles of the value chain (e.g., cooling, specialty foundries)? 4) How will geopolitics (e.g., U.S.-China chip restrictions) bifurcate the supply chain? The conclusion is that missed opportunities stem from insufficient research, not slow timing. By methodically studying each layer—its business models, competition, and valuations—investors can build the "killer intuition" needed to act decisively when the market presents its chance.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Having Raised $37 Million with a16z's Backing, Why Did Goldfinch Ultimately Fail?

The decentralized credit protocol Goldfinch, which raised $37.7 million in funding led by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), is officially entering a shutdown process. After six years of operation and issuing approximately $100 million in loans, it faces widespread borrower defaults and frozen depositor funds. Depositors report an estimated actual loss rate of around 70%, with the protocol's governance token GFI having plummeted 99.8% from its all-time high. The current proposal involves winding down operations, halting new development, and establishing a trust to manage loan recovery over an estimated two-plus years. Founded by ex-Coinbase employees, Goldfinch aimed to channel crypto capital into loans for emerging markets via local lenders. However, it suffered significant defaults from major borrowers like Tugende Kenya, Stratos, and Lend East, leading to over $18 million in losses. The failure highlights the core challenge for DeFi-based Real-World Asset (RWA) lending: while blockchain technology improves capital fluidity, it cannot replace the critical offline components of credit underwriting, collateral management, and legal enforcement, especially in high-risk jurisdictions.

Foresight NewsHace 4 min(s)

Having Raised $37 Million with a16z's Backing, Why Did Goldfinch Ultimately Fail?

Foresight NewsHace 4 min(s)

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

"Rented Conviction: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Is Real Money" The weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs are often interpreted as a gauge of institutional belief. However, a significant portion of this activity is driven by a hidden arbitrage trade, not directional conviction. The core mechanism is a cash-and-carry arbitrage: traders buy spot Bitcoin (often via ETFs) while simultaneously shorting CME futures to lock in the price difference, or "basis." This delta-neutral trade is essentially an interest rate play. In weekly data, about half the fluctuation in ETF flows can be explained by new short positions added by leveraged funds (hedge funds), with a correlation of 0.70. Bitcoin's price movement in a given week shows no statistical power in predicting these flows. While this arbitrage trade drives weekly *volatility*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows, the current net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The remainder is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week, which constitutes the vast majority of the accumulated "mountain" over two years. Thus, ETF flow data overstates the *volatility* of conviction, not its *level*. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for nearly two years. Leveraged fund short positions peaked at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and have since declined to ~$4.5 billion. When the basis compresses to unprofitable levels, ETF inflows and short positions retreat together. Recent outflows should not be mistaken for a loss of faith but rather the routine unwinding of this rate trade. For Ethereum ETFs, the pattern is weaker. Accounting for staking yield makes the basis often negative, so neither strong conviction buying nor robust arbitrage supports its flows. To interpret ETF flows correctly, monitor the CME basis versus T-bill rates and leveraged fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the next "demand" headline is real. The real, patient buy-and-hold demand is what constitutes the enduring bulk of ETF assets.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Another $75 Million Raised: Why Are Top VCs Betting on FOMO Again?

FOMO, a social crypto trading app, raises $75M in Series B led by Index Ventures, with participation from USV and follow-on from Benchmark. The round values the company at $550M. Launched in beta in mid-2025, FOMO simplifies on-chain trading by eliminating gas fees for users, supporting multiple blockchains (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Base, BNB Chain), and enabling direct crypto purchases via Apple Pay or debit cards. The app features social functions allowing users to follow traders and view their activity. Key metrics show rapid growth: over 625,000 users, $4B+ in cumulative trading volume, and more than 110M social interactions. Notably, over 68,000 users made their first crypto purchase through FOMO using Apple Pay. The platform recently expanded into perpetual contracts trading for stocks, pre-IPO assets, crypto, indices, and commodities. The founding team, with backgrounds from dYdX, Uniswap, and OpenSea, initially raised a $2M pre-seed round from 140+ angel investors across the crypto ecosystem before securing a $17M Series A from Benchmark in late 2025. FOMO's strategy focuses on removing technical friction to drive mainstream adoption, positioning itself as a potential gateway between crypto and traditional finance.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Another $75 Million Raised: Why Are Top VCs Betting on FOMO Again?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

South China Morning Post The leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix has surged over tenfold year-to-date, fueled by intense market speculation on the memory chip sector. By June 22, the value of the 'South Korea 2x Long SK Hynix ETF' listed in Hong Kong had skyrocketed by more than 1,061% since the start of the year, while its asset size exploded over twenty times from the end of last year. The rally is driven by AI-driven demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), with SK Hynix recently sampling its next-generation HBM4E product. However, industry professionals warn of significant risks. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses. During a recent market correction, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell 19.1%, its double-leveraged ETF dropped nearly 38%. Korean regulators noted that such products could theoretically lose 60% in a single day. Additionally, these ETFs face risks like time decay in volatile markets, liquidity spirals during mass redemptions, and extreme price dislocations from market-making failures, as seen in early June when an ETF moved opposite to its underlying stock. The trading is predominantly driven by retail investors, with institutional capital largely absent due to the products' high volatility. Analysts caution that with the semiconductor sector at elevated valuations and facing geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties, leveraged ETFs pose a substantial threat of amplified losses for uninformed investors.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片