BONK, Litecoin, SUI see ‘colorful crypto income ETF’ filings – Impact on price?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-09-16Actualizado a 2025-09-17

Key Takeaways

How is BONK ETF different from standard spot crypto ETFs?

The Bonk Income Blast ETF combines income generation with controlled exposure to BONK, using a put credit spread strategy via FLEX Options.

How did BONK react to the filing?

BONK gained 4% near $0.0000242, while SUI and LTC also rose modestly, showing optimism despite SEC delays extending into November.

Despite repeated delays from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on crypto ETF approvals, issuers continue to pile in.

The latest entrant is Tuttle Capital, a $3.6 billion asset manager, which has filed for the second-ever spot Bonk [BONK] ETF.

Bonk Income Blast ETF — Details

According to the filing on the 16th of September, the proposed “Bonk Income Blast ETF” has officially been submitted to the SEC.

It shows that appetite for meme-inspired crypto products remains undeterred by regulatory hesitation.

Tuttle Capital’s latest filing places the spot BONK ETF alongside two other proposed products. They include the Litecoin [LTC] Income Blast ETF and the Sui [SUI] Income Blast ETF.

The application, submitted under the Investment Company Act of 1940, outlined a structure that blends traditional investment vehicles with exposure to digital assets.

How is the BONK ETF different?

Each proposed fund aimed to generate current income first, with a secondary goal of tracking the daily performance of its underlying token within capped gains.

This design marked a departure from standard spot crypto ETFs. In the sense that they combine income generation with controlled exposure to a meme-driven token.

The funds are planned to use a put credit spread strategy executed with FLexible EXchange Options (FLEX Options).

These customizable derivatives allow investors to set specific terms, such as strike price, contract style, and expiration dates.

By using FLEX Options, the fund ensures more transparent price discovery while avoiding counterparty risks that typically come with over-the-counter (OTC) options.

That being said, the unconventional design has already sparked conversation among industry watchers.

Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart acknowledged the creativity behind Tuttle’s filing.

Source: James Seyffart/X

Were the tokens affected?

Market sentiment also reflected the buzz around Tuttle Capital’s filing, with several altcoins recording modest gains.

BONK rose by 4% in the past 24 hours, reaching $0.0000242 before easing slightly to $0.00002376, still up 2.36% at press time.

SUI followed suit, climbing over 3% to trade at $3.61, while LTC briefly touched $115.2 before settling at $114.71, up 0.34% on the day.

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Lecturas Relacionadas

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

Tsinghua and Wharton researchers have used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro to solve a 40-year-old open problem in optimization theory, proving a fundamental limit for gradient descent. They demonstrated that by adjusting only the step size sequence—without adding momentum or changing the algorithm's structure—the convergence rate of gradient descent cannot exceed Ω(T^{-1.9319}). This establishes a mathematical ceiling, showing that structural modifications are necessary to achieve the fastest possible convergence rates like O(1/T²). The core proof, involving a geometric construction based on "resisting oracles," was entirely generated through iterative interaction with the AI. The proof was then formally verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover, achieving zero "sorry" or "admit" statements, confirming its logical correctness without human intervention in the non-trivial mathematical steps. This result bridges the gap between the known O(T^{-1.2716}) rate achieved by the "silver stepsize" sequence and the newly proven impossibility bound. The work suggests a new paradigm where researchers can leverage general-purpose AI to explore and formally verify complex theoretical proofs.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

Anthropic publicly apologized after users discovered a hidden A/B test in Claude Code (versions 2.1.237+) that seemingly "dumbed down" the model. Developer argofowl found that selecting the "high" reasoning effort was being mapped internally to a value of "10," which previously corresponded to the "low" setting. While Anthropic engineers clarified this was only a change to the numerical mapping scale and assured it did not affect performance based on internal evaluations, the lack of communication about the test sparked widespread user backlash and self-tests on social media. Separately, significant complaints emerged about the flagship Opus 5 model, with users reporting it became "unstable," prone to lazy outputs, factual errors, and repetitive corrections. An Anthropic engineer acknowledged Opus 5's performance instability, calling its resolution a top priority. The incident highlights a growing industry-wide rift between improving benchmark scores and declining user-perceived quality and reliability. It underscores the lack of transparency in continuous model updates, where server-side changes, A/B tests, and configuration adjustments occur without clear user notification, eroding trust as AI models become critical infrastructure.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

In August 2026, OpenAI hosted a closed-door summit with approximately 40 leading mathematicians, including recent Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman and OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck. The meeting, spurred by a series of recent AI breakthroughs in mathematics, grappled with the potential existential threat AI poses to the field. The backdrop includes several high-profile AI achievements: OpenAI models disproving long-standing conjectures like the unit distance problem, generating 10 new mathematical discoveries, and Anthropic's Claude aiding in constructing complex multidimensional objects. These results often bypass traditional academic pipelines, appearing directly on social media. The mathematical community is divided. Over 3000 researchers signed the "Leiden Statement," advocating for responsible AI use and verification. Others resist AI entirely to preserve human-centric mathematics. A key concern is AI's current inability to *explain* proofs, particularly the difficult steps, which is central to mathematical understanding. At the summit, Bubeck outlined four potential futures: mathematics becoming like collaborative software engineering, a compute-driven field like physics, a curatorial exercise where humans interpret AI output, or a mass transition of mathematicians into AI safety. While emphasizing that "mathematics only makes sense when mathematicians learn from it," no consensus was reached. The event highlights a profound moment of reflection. As AI demonstrates increasing competence in solving complex problems, mathematicians are forced to question their future role and the very meaning of their discipline.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BONK

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Bonk (BONK) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Bonk (BONK) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Bonk (BONK)Después de comprar tu Bonk (BONK), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Bonk (BONK)Tradear fácilmente con Bonk (BONK) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

434 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BONK (BONK).