山寨季姗姗来迟？四大信号或预示轮动已悄然开启

比推Publicado a 2025-09-01Actualizado a 2025-09-01

作者：BitMEX

原文标题：虽迟但到的山寨季：四大信号揭示早期轮动已启动

不是梗图，是数据在说话。我们判断一轮早期山寨季正在展开，理由很简单：

  • 市场结构： TOTAL3（剔除 BTC/ETH 的山寨总市值）相对两大主流币企稳；即便没有 BTC/ETH 的放量突破，市场宽度也在扩散。

  • 领涨方向： SOL/ETH 上行、资金费率温和、强平不多——真买盘，不是挤空。

  • 催化因素： 美国政府推进区块链应用，商务部将 GDP、PCE 等官方数据上链（经 Chainlink/Pyth），平台币阶段性重估等基本面把“场外”资金带回场内。

  • ETF 资金面： ETF 仍净流入但明显降温；ETH 相关 DAT（币股）的市值/净值比（m/NAV）偏低 → 增发吸引力下降，可能给山寨留出更多空间。

信号 1｜市场结构与 TOTAL3 的韧性

过去 5 天的走势，更像山寨季开端而不是“只涨主流”的轮动。TOTAL3 在 BTC、ETH 震荡时未创新低；衍生品侧保持有序：资金费率接近中性、被动平仓有限——指向现货主导的真实需求。对交易员而言，重点很明确：不等 BTC/ETH 创新高，广度也能扩散；在配对交易里挑选山寨，性价比更高。

信号 2｜ SOL跑赢ETH，开始轮动

SOL/ETH 上行同时资金费率平稳、没有明显挤空痕迹，说明是主动配置的真实买盘。历史上，这常常领先于高流动中盘和功能赛道的配对轮动；同时提供更低 β的表达：做多 SOL / 做空 ETH。

信号 3｜主流币“稳，但不带节奏”

来源：https://www.strategicethreserve.xyz/

主流币的基本面依旧正面，但 ETH、BTC 的边际动能在下降：回调有承接、上攻缺追涨，难以直接推高新高。

以 以太坊币股 为例，m/NAV 多在 1.0–1.1×，跑输现货 ETH，难以支撑继续“增发+被动现货买入”的链条。我们的判断是：主流抄底盘足、追高盘弱，边际风险下沉到有事件催化的山寨更合理。

信号 4｜可落地的区块链应用在推进

政策与基础设施两端都有硬催化：美国商务部宣布将实际 GDP、PCE 等官方系列上链（经 Chainlink、Pyth，覆盖 Arbitrum、Avalanche、Base 等），权威且可机读的数据为数据驱动型 DeFi、代币化风控、事件市场打开新场景。

同时，区块链为底层的应用也获得了主流机构的认可和采用，Numerai（以 $NMR 激励、AI 驱动的对冲基金）获 摩根大通资管 5 亿美元策略容量承诺。

平台币阶段性走强：OKB 受代币模型调整提振，CRO 因特朗普家族基金投资等相关消息面而受关注。以上进展都不依赖 BTC/ETH 创新高——这正是山寨季早期的典型特征。

结论｜交易框架

当前画面：主流有序、ETF 净流入降温、DAT 溢价偏薄、硬催化把资金往下游带。

策略上继续坚持配对优先、新闻优先：


原文链接:https://www.panewslab.com/zh/articles/b2dc44fb-0f8e-4501-89ba-0373749c7c1b
说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点，不构成投资建议
相关新闻

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Vs. The S&P: How The Stock Market Predicts The BTC Bottom Before the Rally

Analyst Chain Mind correlates Bitcoin's bottom with the S&P 500's performance, noting BTC has historically not bottomed before the stock market. With the S&P 500 still reaching new all-time highs without a significant retrace, Chain Mind argues Bitcoin's final low is likely not yet in. He suggests the S&P is showing classic topping signals, implying a market dump is imminent, which would precede a BTC bottom. Further analysis points to Bitcoin potentially forming a Head-and-Shoulders topping pattern on charts. Analyst Colin notes a break below the pattern's neckline could target $65,000 or lower. Chain Mind also observes a weekly Head-and-Shoulders, expecting a dump to mark a final bottom around $50,000. Currently, Bitcoin trades around $75,500, down over 24 hours.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin Vs. The S&P: How The Stock Market Predicts The BTC Bottom Before the Rally

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Mystery Bitcoin Whale Dumps $1.3B In BlackRock’s IBIT As Market Barely Blinks

An unidentified entity sold approximately $1.3 billion worth of shares in BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF, IBIT, in a large dark pool block trade on Tuesday morning. ETF analysts, including Galaxy's Alex Thorn and Bloomberg's Eric Balchunas, confirmed the unprecedented 29-million-share transaction. Notably, the market absorbed the massive sale with minimal price disruption to IBIT. This sale occurs amid a broader trend of significant outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs. Recent weeks have seen over $2.5 billion in net outflows, with IBIT itself accounting for $1.008 billion in outflows during the May 18–22 period. Analysts suggest the sustained selling pressure, despite the market's resilience, may indicate institutional skittishness in a rising inflation and interest rate environment. At the time of reporting, Bitcoin was trading around $75,730.

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

Mystery Bitcoin Whale Dumps $1.3B In BlackRock’s IBIT As Market Barely Blinks

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Nocera Rebrands as Nocera Holdings, Expands Holistically into AI, Data Centers, Robotics, Biotechnology, and Digital Assets

Nocera, Inc. (Nasdaq: NCRA) announces a major corporate transformation, rebranding as Nocera Holdings to become a diversified holding company targeting high-growth tech sectors. The company plans to aggressively pursue mergers, strategic investments, and alliances in AI and AI infrastructure, data centers, robotics, biotechnology, and blockchain/digital assets. To support this expansion, Nocera has amended a previously announced financing agreement, broadening the use of up to $300 million in capital to also include working capital and global market expansion. CEO Andy Jin stated the move positions the company at the intersection of several accelerating, infrastructure-intensive industries. Key focus areas include capitalizing on surging AI computing and cloud demands through data center opportunities in Asia and Eastern Europe, exploring biotech and AI-driven healthcare technologies, advancing into robotics and "physical AI" automation, and continuing its blockchain and digital asset initiatives. The company is undergoing a comprehensive rebranding and has engaged strategic advisors for its global positioning. Nocera will leverage its existing relationships and operational base in Asia while continuing efforts to strengthen its balance sheet and maintain Nasdaq compliance.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Nocera Rebrands as Nocera Holdings, Expands Holistically into AI, Data Centers, Robotics, Biotechnology, and Digital Assets

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片