Coinbase报告:7万亿现金蓄势待发,山寨季或将于九月全面来临

coinvoicePublicado a 2025-08-17Actualizado a 2025-08-24

原文标题:Monthly Outlook: Altcoin Season Cometh

原文作者:David Duong,Coinbase

原文编译:Azuma,Odaily 星球日报

 

核心摘要

 

· 我们对 2025 年第三季度的展望仍持乐观态度,但对山寨季的看法有所演变。我们认为当前市场状况表明,随着 9 月临近,市场可能转向全面的山寨季——我们对山寨季的通常定义是,市值前 50 的山寨币中,至少 75% 在最近 90 天内表现优于比特币。

· 许多人争论美联储 9 月的降息是否导致加密货币市场局部见顶,我们并不这么认为。目前有大量散户资金闲置在货币市场基金(超过 7 万亿美元)和其他渠道,我们认为美联储的宽松政策可能在中期内释放更多的散户资金参与市场。

· 重点关注以太坊(ETH)。「CoinMarketCap 的山寨季指数的总体低迷」与「自 7 月初以来山寨币总市值增长 50%」之间的分歧,很大程度上反映了机构对 ETH 的兴趣增加。这得益于数字资产财库(DAT)的需求以及稳定币和现实世界资产的叙事增长。

· 尽管 ARB、ENA、LDO 和 OP 等代币对 ETH 的日收益率呈现更高的贝塔值,但近期 ETH 上涨行情中似乎只有 LDO 显著受益(本月迄今上涨 58%)。过去,由于流动质押的特性,Lido 提供了相对直接的 ETH 敞口。此外,我们认为 LDO 的上涨得益于美国 SEC 的表态——在某些条件下,流动质押代币不构成证券。

 

山寨季来临

 

比特币的市场主导地位已从 2025 年 5 月的 65% 下降至 2025 年 8 月的约 59%,这表明资金已开始轮动至山寨币。尽管自 7 月初以来山寨币总市值增长超 50%(截至 8 月 12 日达 1.4 万亿美元),但 CoinMarketCap 的「山寨季指数」目前仍处于 40 左右的低位,远低于历史上定义山寨季的 75 阈值。我们认为,当前市场状况已开始预示,随着 9 月临近,市场可能转向全面的山寨季。

 

Odaily 注:山寨币未平仓合约占比激增。

 

我们的乐观展望基于宏观视角以及对重大监管进展的预期。我们此前曾指出,全球 M2 货币供应指数的变化往往会领先比特币价格 110 天,并指向 2025 年三季度末/四季度初可能出现的新一轮流动性。这一点至关重要,因为对机构资金而言,叙事似乎仍围绕大型币种,而山寨币的支撑主要来自散户投资者。

值得注意的是,目前美国货币市场基金的规模达到创纪录的 7.2 万亿美元,四月现金余额则减少了 1500 亿美元,我们认为这推动了随后几个月加密资产和风险资产的强劲表现。然而有趣的是,自六月以来现金余额回升超 2000 亿美元,这与同期加密货币的上涨形成反差。通常情况下,加密货币价格上涨与现金余额往往呈现负相关。

 

Odaily 注:货币市场基金资产规模已突破 7 万亿美元。

 

我们认为,这一史无前例的现金储备规模反映了错失的机会成本,主要原因在于:

1.传统市场不确定性加剧(由贸易冲突等问题引发);

2.市场估值处于高位;

3.对经济增长的持续担忧。

然而,随着美联储即将在 9 月和 10 月实施降息,我们认为货币市场基金的吸引力将开始减弱,更多资金将流向加密货币及其他高风险资产类别。

事实上,我们的加密货币流动性加权 Z-score 指标(基于稳定币净发行量、现货与永续合约交易量、订单簿深度及自由流通量等因素)显示,在经历了六个月的下降后,近几周流动性已开始复苏。稳定币的增长部分得益于其监管环境趋于明朗。

 

Odaily 注:加密货币流动性复苏已有初步迹象。

 

ETH 的 Beta 选项

 

与此同时,「山寨季指数」与「山寨币总市值」之间的分化,主要反映出机构对以太坊(ETH)日益增长的兴趣——这一趋势得到了数字资产财库(DAT)的需求以及稳定币和现实世界资产(RWA)叙事的支撑。仅 Bitmine Immersion Technologies 一家公司就已购买了 115 万枚 ETH,该公司仍计划通过最高 200 亿美元的融资继续增持。另一家 ETH DAT 的领头羊 Sharplink Gaming 目前也持有约 59.88 万枚 ETH。

 

Odaily 注:部分数字资产财库公司持有的 ETH 数量。

 

截至 8 月 13 日的最新数据显示,头部 ETH 财库公司共持有约 295 万枚 ETH,占 ETH 总供应量(1.207 亿枚)的 2% 以上。

在相对于 ETH 收益率较高的 Beta 选项中,ARB、ENA、LDO 和 OP 名列前茅,但近期 ETH 上涨行情中似乎只有 LDO 显著受益(本月迄今上涨 58%)。由于流动质押的特性,Lido 过去一直提供相对直接的 ETH 敞口,目前 LDO 相对于 ETH 的 Beta 值为 1.5——贝塔值大于 1.0 意味着该资产理论上比基准更具波动性,可能放大收益和亏损。

 

Odaily 注:部分山寨币相较于 ETH 的 Beta 值。

 

我们认为 LDO 的价格上涨还受到美国 SEC 在 8 月 5 日关于流动质押声明的支撑。SEC 公司金融部门工作人员指出,当流动性质押实体提供的服务本质上属于「事务性」操作(ministerial)且质押奖励按协议 1:1 分配时,相关活动不构成证券发行或销售。但需要注意的是:收益担保、自主再质押或额外回报机制仍可能触发证券认定。同时当前指引仅代表工作人员观点——未来委员会立场转变或诉讼案件可能改变这一解释。

 

结论

 

我们对 2025 年第三季度仍持建设性展望,但对山寨季的判断有所演进。近期比特币主导地位下降显示资金正初步轮动至山寨币,但尚未形成全面山寨季。不过,随着山寨币总市值攀升以及「山寨季指数」显现早期积极信号,我们认为市场正在为 9 月可能到来的更成熟山寨币季创造条件。这一乐观判断既基于宏观因素,也来自对监管进展的预期。


 


声明:本内容为作者独立观点,不代表 CoinVoice 立场,且不构成投资建议,请谨慎对待,如需报道或加入交流群,请联系微信:VOICE-V。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Treasury unexpectedly announced it would at least double the size of its long-term Treasury buyback operations, starting September 9. The move triggered an immediate market reaction, with the 30-year yield falling 9 basis points. This intervention came against a backdrop of the 30-year yield hitting a 19-year high of 5.34% the previous day, driven by persistent inflation, high oil prices, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health with public debt surpassing $40 trillion, and a global "buyers' strike" for long-dated bonds. Treasury buybacks involve the government repurchasing older, less liquid bonds from the market via reverse auctions to improve market functioning, not to reduce overall debt. While the action provided tactical relief and signaled the Treasury's willingness to intervene, analysts caution it does not address core structural issues: massive fiscal deficits, high borrowing needs, and fading demand from traditional buyers like foreign central banks. For investors, the announcement offered short-term support for long-duration bond ETFs and boosted assets like gold, which rose 2.7%. However, it's unlikely to significantly lower mortgage rates or alter the challenging environment for long-term bonds. The key takeaway is the distinction between a tactical market operation and the unresolved structural pressures that continue to push yields higher, requiring close monitoring of upcoming economic data, Treasury auctions, and potential signals of more aggressive policy measures.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

Following an unscheduled announcement from the U.S. Treasury Department on August 19th, investor discussions have intensified regarding the potential for future policy interventions in long-term bond markets. The Treasury increased the maximum size of its regular buyback operations for 10-to-30 year bonds from $2 billion to $4 billion, citing a desire to improve liquidity. This move came shortly after a surge in long-term yields, with the 30-year Treasury yield briefly touching 5.34%. Market analysts, rather than focusing on the modest operational size, have interpreted the timing—outside the normal quarterly communication window—as a significant signal. The move has been dubbed the "Bessent Put," implying the market's growing expectation that Treasury officials, led by Deputy Secretary Josh Bessent, may act to prevent a disorderly rise in long-term borrowing costs. This perception represents a potential shift in the market's view of the government's "policy reaction function." The underlying pressures on long-term bonds are multifaceted, including large fiscal deficits, increased Treasury supply, a rise in corporate debt issuance for AI infrastructure (creating a "crowding out" effect), and uncertainty around foreign holdings, particularly from Japan. Geopolitical risks in the Middle East further complicate the policy landscape, potentially creating conflicting pressures between fighting inflation and managing financing costs. However, the article clarifies that this Treasury buyback program is distinct from Quantitative Easing (QE). It is a debt management operation, not a Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion. While the announcement opens the door for market speculation about more forceful tools like Yield Curve Control (YCC) or a return to QE, analysts note that conditions would need to deteriorate significantly for such measures to be implemented. For now, the "Bessent Put" reflects a change in market expectations about possible policy boundaries, not an imminent launch of new monetary stimulus.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

"Is Stablecoin Truly Necessary for Cross-Border Payments? While stablecoins are often praised as superior for cross-border transfers—especially if the recipient desires crypto—their advantage is less clear in traditional cross-currency scenarios (e.g., USD to Mexican Peso). The existing correspondent banking system is slow and costly (≈15% fees) due to multiple intermediaries. Modern fintech solutions like Wise have dramatically improved this by using a netting model: they hold local currency pools and settle payments domestically, avoiding actual cross-border fund movement. This offers near-instant transfers with low, transparent fees (averaging ~0.52%). The 'stablecoin sandwich' model (convert fiat to stablecoin, transfer on-chain, convert to local fiat) offers similar user experience but doesn't inherently provide major cost or speed advantages over fintech. Its on-chain transfer is cheap, but fiat conversion spreads remain. Stablecoin's real innovation is 'unbundling' the cross-border payment stack. Instead of requiring a proprietary global network like Wise, businesses only need reliable on- and off-ramps in specific corridors. This lowers market entry barriers, fosters competition among local providers, and can drive down costs, particularly for niche or underserved corridors (e.g., US to Africa). While vertical integration may reoccur, the open, permissionless nature of the underlying blockchain layer makes monopolistic pricing difficult. The long-term benefit is the potential redistribution of value—previously captured as intermediary rents—to consumers through lower costs."

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

Ethereum has surged above $2,300, a level not seen in over three months, marking a significant recovery and technical breakthrough by reclaiming key resistance levels, including the weekly EMA50 for the first time in the current bear market. The rally has been fueled by a combination of factors: improved market risk appetite, positive regulatory sentiment, and a major short squeeze where over 88% of recent ETH liquidations were short positions. The ETH/BTC ratio has also broken its long-term downtrend, indicating renewed strength for Ethereum relative to Bitcoin. Fundamentally, Ethereum spot ETFs have shown strong inflows, outperforming their Bitcoin counterparts in recent months. Wall Street institutions like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have notably increased their ETH exposure, while several banks have added or expanded positions in ETH ETFs. On-chain fundamentals remain robust, with the proportion of staked ETH reaching a new all-time high of nearly 33.7%. Data indicates long-term holding sentiment, as small wallet holdings increased while large outflows were often directed towards staking or contracts, not selling. However, potential headwinds include declining staking yields and community debate over proposals to adjust staking rewards at high participation levels. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, featuring improvements to validator exit efficiency, could enhance liquidity and further attract institutional stakers. While the rebound is supported by sentiment, capital flows, and fundamentals, its sustainability hinges on continued positive developments.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片