Hedge Funds Reportedly Shorting USDT With Hudreds of Millions: Tether CTO Responds

CryptoPotatoPublicado a 2022-06-28Actualizado a 2022-06-28

Resumen

Tether's CTO has responded to reports of hedge funds spending hundreds of millions of dollars to bet against USDT.

Paolo Ardoino, the chief technology officer (CTO) of Bitfinex and its stablecoin Tether (USDT), has reacted to reports that traditional hedge funds have joined retail traders in shorting USDT.
Hedge Funds Betting Against USDT
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Monday that a growing number of hedge funds had opened USDT short positions, worth hundreds of millions” of dollars in notional value, with Genesis Global Trading Inc., a leading crypto brokerage for professional investors, in the past month.
“There has been a real spike in the interest from traditional hedge funds who are taking a look at tether and looking to short it,” Leon Marshall, Genesis’ head of institutional sales, told WSJ in an interview.
The report further noted that some investors have been shorting USDT for at least a year, but more hedge fund managers picked up interest in betting against Tether after the fall of Terra’s algorithm stablecoin (UST) last month.
TerraUSD was one of the largest stablecoins in the market, with its value algorithmically pegged at 1:1 to the US dollar. However, UST lost its dollar parity and crashed 99% in May despite the efforts from the Terra team to defend the peg, including emptying its entire crypto reserve.
The UST collapse also affected Terra’s governance token LUNA, and the cryptocurrency slumped to zero from an all-time high of $119.02. The fiasco sent massive shockwaves through the stablecoin market and the broader crypto space, with billions wiped off the industry.
The drama also affected Tether, and USDT briefly lost its peg on exchanges, falling to as low as $0.97 before recovering.
Tether Confirms Stablecoins are Fully Backed
Marshall noted that hedge funds are shorting Tether because of the controversies surrounding Tether’s assets and the Federal Reserve’s decision to hike interest rates to combat inflation.
Last month, Tether issued a report confirming that its stablecoins are fully backed with cash, liquid assets, and other investments.
According to the report, the company’s total assets were worth at least $82.4 billion, with its total liabilities, including issued stablecoins, amounting to $82.2 billion.
Tether CTO Responds
Shortly after the WSJ report surfaced, Ardoino said on Twitter that he had been “open about the attempts from some hedge funds that were trying to cause further panic on the market after TERRA/LUNA collapse.”
I have been open about the attempts from some hedge funds that were trying to cause further panic on the market after TERRA/LUNA collapse.
It really seemed from the beginning a coordinated attack, with a new wave of FUD, troll armies, clowns, etc.
According to the Tether CTO, the move seemed like a “coordinated attack” from the onset and that hedge funds are always spreading FUD about the company and its stablecoins, including arguments that USDT is not 100% backed or that the firm issues tokens from thin air.
Ardoino believes that hedge funds that borrowed billions to short USDT will eventually have to buy back the stablecoin.
“Tether is the only stablecoin that is proven with fire under extreme pressure,” he said.
Meanwhile, since the Terra fiasco, Tether has unveiled two more stablecoins pegged to the Mexican peso and the British pound sterling. This brings the company’s total stablecoins to five.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片