Bitcoin’s short-term price prospects slightly improved, but most traders are far from optimistic

CointelegraphPublicado a 2022-06-28Actualizado a 2022-06-28

Resumen

A mild sense of hope emerged among Bitcoin (BTC) investors after the June 18 drop to $17,600 becomes more distant and an early ascending pattern points toward $21,000 in the short-term.

Bitcoin 12-hour USD price at FTX. Source: TradingViewRecent negative remarks from lawmakers continued to curb investor optimism. In an interview with Cointelegraph, Swiss National Bank (SNB) deputy head Thomas Muser said that the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem would cease to exist if current financial regulations are implemented in the crypto industry.
An article published in "The People's Daily" on June 26 mentioned the Terra network's collapse and local blockchain expert, Yifan He referred to crypto as a Ponzi scheme. When asked by Cointelegraph to clarify the statement on June 27, Yifan He stated that "all unregulated cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin are Ponzi schemes based on my understanding."
On June 24 Sopnendu Mohanty the chief FinTech officer of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) pledged to be "brutal and unrelentingly hard" on any "bad behavior" from the cryptocurrency industry.
Ultimately, Bitcoin investors face mixed sentiment as some think the bottom is in and $20,000 is support. Meanwhile, others fear the impact that a global recession could have on risk assets. For this reason, traders should analyze derivatives markets data to understand if traders are pricing higher odds of a downturn.
Bitcoin futures show a balanced force between buyers and sellers
Retail traders usually avoid monthly futures because their price differs from regular spot markets at Coinbase, Bitstamp and Kraken. Still, those are professional traders' preferred instruments as they avoid the funding rate fluctuation of the perpetual contracts.
These fixed-month contracts usually trade at a slight premium to spot markets because investors demand more money to withhold the settlement. Consequently, futures should trade at a 5% to 10% annualized premium in healthy markets. One should note that this feature is not exclusive to crypto markets.

Bitcoin 3-month futures’ annualized premium. Source: LaevitasWhenever this indicator fades or turns negative, this is an alarming, bearish red flag signaling a situation known as backwardation. The fact that the average premium barely touched the negative area while Bitcoin traded down to $17,600 is remarkable.
Despite currently holding an extremely low futures premium (basis rate), the market has kept a balanced demand between leverage buyers and sellers.
To exclude externalities specific to the futures instrument, traders must also analyze the Bitcoin options markets. For instance, the 25% delta skew shows when Bitcoin whales and arbitrage desks are overcharging for downside or upside protection.
During bearish markets, options investors give higher odds for a price crash, causing the skew indicator to rise above 12%. On the other hand, a market's generalized FOMO induces a negative 12% skew.

Bitcoin 30-day options 25% delta skew: Source: LaevitasAfter peaking at 36% on June 18, the highest-ever record, the indicator receded to the current 15%. Options markets had shown extreme risk-aversion until June 25, when the 25% delta skew finally broke below 18%.
The current 25% skew indicator continues to display higher risks of a downside from professional traders but it no longer sits at the levels reflecting extreme risk aversion.
The bottom could be in according to on-chain data
Some metrics suggest that Bitcoin may have bottomed on June 18 after miners sold significant quantities of BTC. According to Cointelegraph, this indicates that capitulation has already occurred and Glassnode, an on-chain analysis firm, demonstrated that the Bitcoin Mayer Multiple fell below 0.5 which is extremely rare and hasn't happened since 2015.
Whales and arbitrage desks might take some time to adjust after key players like Three Arrows Capital face serious contraction and liquidation risks due to lack of liquidity or excessive leverage. Until there's enough evidence that the contagion risk is alleviated, Bitcoin price probably continue to trade below $22,000.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

TL;DR: The impending Bank of Japan (BOJ) interest rate hike is shifting global market focus this week, raising questions about its potential impact on the AI-driven bull market and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. For years, the yen has served as a cheap global "funding currency," enabling carry trades where investors borrowed yen at low rates to buy higher-yielding assets. This dynamic amplified liquidity and risk appetite in global markets, benefiting high-beta assets like AI tech stocks and crypto. The BOJ's expected move to raise rates from 0.75% to 1.0% signals a shift away from this era of ultra-low-cost funding. The core concern isn't the 1% rate itself, but the direction of change and its potential to reduce global leverage and risk tolerance. An unwinding of yen carry trades could force investors to sell global assets to buy back yen for repayment, potentially triggering synchronized volatility in overvalued sectors. While AI fundamentals and crypto-specific drivers remain intact, the market impact will depend on whether the BOJ signals a faster-than-expected pace of normalization. Post-decision, watch for correlations between a strengthening yen, rising Japanese bond yields, and simultaneous pressure on tech stocks and cryptocurrencies to gauge if the market is pricing in a broader tightening of cheap global liquidity.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

Contrary to the common perception of Anthropic as a PhD-heavy AI research lab, an analysis of 1,680 engineer profiles reveals its core talent is experienced "builders." The engineering team, largely assembled in the past 18 months (median tenure 10 months), hires senior engineers with a median of 12.2 years of prior experience. They primarily come from major engineering-focused companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Stripe, Databricks, Snowflake, and Palantir, not primarily from other AI labs. Their backgrounds are infrastructure-heavy (40%), focusing on backend, distributed systems, databases, and security, with skills like Python, Java, C++, and AWS being common. Only 13.7% hold PhDs. The dominant job title is "Member of Technical Staff." For early-career hires (<6 years experience), entry is not based on standard work history but on prestigious signals: top internships (e.g., at FAANG or quant trading firms), competition rankings, research publications, or AI safety fellowship experience. The key insight for applicants is to present as infrastructure builders, highlighting experience with large-scale systems, not as pure researchers, reflecting Anthropic's identity as a highly engineered infrastructure company.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros