Three Arrows Capital Gets Notice Of Default On $660 Million Voyager Loan

BitcoinistPublicado a 2022-06-28Actualizado a 2022-06-28

Resumen

Multiple news outlets have reported that Three Arrows Capital is under intense pressure to meet a Monday deadline and return...

Multiple news outlets have reported that Three Arrows Capital is under intense pressure to meet a Monday deadline and return more than $670 million in loans or face default.
The likelihood of the crypto-focused hedge fund missing the deadline set by Voyager Digital for repaying a loan of 15,250 Bitcoin and $350 million in USDC could have massive repercussions for the whole digital asset market.
As of Monday’s exchange rate, the total loan amount exceeds $675 million. Voyager granted Three Arrows until the 24th of June to pay back $25 million in USDC and the remaining loan balance by June 27.
Voyager Shares Down After 3AC Exposure Revealed
This year, shares of the Toronto Stock Exchange-listed company Voyager have dropped by 94%. The share price of Voyager plummeted more than 60% last week after the company acknowledged it had exposure to 3AC.
According to reports, Voyager wants to pursue a recovery from Three Arrows and is currently involved in discussions with its counsel regarding the various legal alternatives available to it.

Image: PR Newswire Stephen Ehrlich, the chief executive officer of Voyager Digital in Toronto, stated:
“We are working diligently … to strengthen our balance sheet and pursuing options so we can continue to meet customer liquidity demands.”
Three Arrows is renowned for its highly leveraged crypto wagers and is one of the most prominent crypto hedge funds. The ostensibly insolvent crypto hedge fund, also known as 3AC, continues to execute client orders and process withdrawals while operating normally.
Alameda Ventures awarded Three Arrows a $500 million credit facility, of which the company has already utilized $75 million. Additionally, 3AC may continue to utilize the Alameda “to facilitate customer orders and withdrawals, as needed.”

Crypto total market cap at $921 billion on the daily chart | Source: TradingView.com
Three Arrows Might Sell Its Assets
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Three Arrows Capital, based in Singapore, is considering options including the sale of assets and a bailout by another company as a result of a market decline in digital assets.
3AC’s default on the $660 million loan reveals the hedge fund’s stressed liquidity. A significant decline in the value of Lido staked Ethereum (stETH), which 3AC had heavily used as collateral, exposed the company to repeated margin calls, causing it to exhaust its financial resources.
Three Arrows’ issues looked to have begun earlier this month when Zhu Su, Co-founder and CEO of Three Arrows Capital, tweeted a somewhat strange message stating that the firm is in the process of “communicating with all relevant stakeholders” and dedicated to finding a solution.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

TL;DR: The impending Bank of Japan (BOJ) interest rate hike is shifting global market focus this week, raising questions about its potential impact on the AI-driven bull market and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. For years, the yen has served as a cheap global "funding currency," enabling carry trades where investors borrowed yen at low rates to buy higher-yielding assets. This dynamic amplified liquidity and risk appetite in global markets, benefiting high-beta assets like AI tech stocks and crypto. The BOJ's expected move to raise rates from 0.75% to 1.0% signals a shift away from this era of ultra-low-cost funding. The core concern isn't the 1% rate itself, but the direction of change and its potential to reduce global leverage and risk tolerance. An unwinding of yen carry trades could force investors to sell global assets to buy back yen for repayment, potentially triggering synchronized volatility in overvalued sectors. While AI fundamentals and crypto-specific drivers remain intact, the market impact will depend on whether the BOJ signals a faster-than-expected pace of normalization. Post-decision, watch for correlations between a strengthening yen, rising Japanese bond yields, and simultaneous pressure on tech stocks and cryptocurrencies to gauge if the market is pricing in a broader tightening of cheap global liquidity.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

Contrary to the common perception of Anthropic as a PhD-heavy AI research lab, an analysis of 1,680 engineer profiles reveals its core talent is experienced "builders." The engineering team, largely assembled in the past 18 months (median tenure 10 months), hires senior engineers with a median of 12.2 years of prior experience. They primarily come from major engineering-focused companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Stripe, Databricks, Snowflake, and Palantir, not primarily from other AI labs. Their backgrounds are infrastructure-heavy (40%), focusing on backend, distributed systems, databases, and security, with skills like Python, Java, C++, and AWS being common. Only 13.7% hold PhDs. The dominant job title is "Member of Technical Staff." For early-career hires (<6 years experience), entry is not based on standard work history but on prestigious signals: top internships (e.g., at FAANG or quant trading firms), competition rankings, research publications, or AI safety fellowship experience. The key insight for applicants is to present as infrastructure builders, highlighting experience with large-scale systems, not as pure researchers, reflecting Anthropic's identity as a highly engineered infrastructure company.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros