回顾2021加密大V牛顶言论：谁口出狂言？谁人间清醒？

marsbitPublicado a 2025-08-17Actualizado a 2025-08-18

我回头去看了看 2021 年牛市顶点时，大家最关注的那些加密推特账号发了些什么内容。他们那些观点大多早就站不住脚了，不过也有几条像美酒一样越品越有味道。

Ansem

原文：if this market doesnt nuke soon my trading intuition is broken.

翻译：要是这市场不赶紧暴跌，那我的交易直觉可就失灵了。

作者点评：时机绝佳，好得吓人。

CZ

原文：Don't worry about competition. It will make your industry bigger, which in turn helps you. Embrace it!

翻译：不要担心竞争。它会让你的行业更大，反过来也会帮助你。拥抱它！

作者点评：「不用担心竞争。」兄弟不小心剧透了（FTX 一年后就被淘汰了）。

Smolting

原文：observe the daily close as a cum soaked, sleep deprived sponge observes cl approaching in a sneaky - stalky manner after running out of socks.

翻译：把每日收盘看作是一块被精液浸湿、睡眠不足的海绵，在袜子都没了之后，偷偷摸摸、蹑手蹑脚地观察着靠近。

作者点评：说实话，我也不知道该怎么解读这个。

Cobie

原文：Might make some clickbait YouTube content "how I became a billionaire from $200 in just 5 years while average only 3 sober days per week" gonna record it in a seaplane with my butler and my butler's butler.

翻译：或许会做些标题党 YouTube 内容「我每周平均只有 3 天清醒，却如何在短短 5 年内用 200 美元变成亿万富翁」，而且我会和我的管家以及管家的管家一起在水上飞机里拍摄这些内容。

作者点评：「我的管家的管家」，我仍在等待这个消息。

ThreadGuy

原文：What the hell does Opensea spend all their money on?

翻译：OpenSea 到底把他们所有的钱都花在什么地方了？

作者点评：提出了真正的问题。

Beeple

原文：FUCKKKKKKKK

作者点评：他知道什么？？

Gainzy

原文：

that was a v rough btc 8% drop tbh

it made me momentarily uncomfy

i think it's fair to say we deserve a bounce to 100k for this mild inconvenience

翻译：

说实话，比特币跌了 8%，这波跌得挺猛的。

这让我一时有点不舒服。

我觉得，就冲这波下跌，咱们也该反弹到 10 万美元，这很合理。

作者点评：之后两年下跌了 70%。

ZachXBT

原文：

If there’s one thing you learn from me

people on CT can’t trade at all. It’s just snake oil salesmen larping as traders

They rely on private sales, undisclosed advertisements, insider knowledge, or pumping & dumping alts to make $

When called out they preach "positivity".

翻译：

如果你们能从我的话里学到一件事，那就是加密推特（CT）上十分之九的人根本不会交易。他们只是些装成交易员的江湖骗子。

他们靠私下销售、未披露的广告、内幕消息，或者拉高出货山寨币来赚钱。

当被指责时，他们就大谈「积极心态」。

作者点评：中肯的建议，至今仍然适用。

Kaleo

原文：

IT'S OVER... for the bears.

Clean retest. Plenty of noise around ATH breakout as expected.

I like it. Just keep stacking.

翻译：

熊市结束了……

很彻底的回测。正如预期的那样，在历史最高点突破前后有大量的（市场）噪音。

继续囤币就好。

作者点评：实际上是牛市结束了。

Udi

原文：STOP SELLING THE COINS YOU POORS

翻译：穷鬼们，别再卖币了。

作者点评：（旁白声）：事实上，他们并没停止卖币。

Michael Saylor

原文："He who works all day has no time to make money." - John D. Rockefeller on #Bitcoin

翻译：「整天工作的人没时间赚钱。」—— 约翰・D・洛克菲勒谈比特币

作者点评：他只是一直不停地发表比特币的多头言论。

Easy

原文：January 1st - ETH 6,942. It's programmed.

翻译：1 月 1 日 —— 以太坊价格 6942 美元。剧本已经写好。

作者点评：看来这并非既定走势。不过 Easy 没说是哪一年 1 月 1 日（预言说不定还能应验呢？）

Mayne

原文：Still in a bull market. I'm scoping out places to buy the dip so I can later sell the rip as we blast thru $70k.

翻译：仍然处于牛市。我正在寻找逢低买入的时机，这样之后当比特币价格冲破 7 万美元时，我就能逢高卖出。

作者点评：接刀子了。

这个帖子是 2021 年的一个提醒：

在历史最高点时的推特信息流看起来很疯狂。要是连最厉害的人都没法在顶部卖出，你也一样做不到。做好相应准备吧。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Treasury unexpectedly announced it would at least double the size of its long-term Treasury buyback operations, starting September 9. The move triggered an immediate market reaction, with the 30-year yield falling 9 basis points. This intervention came against a backdrop of the 30-year yield hitting a 19-year high of 5.34% the previous day, driven by persistent inflation, high oil prices, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health with public debt surpassing $40 trillion, and a global "buyers' strike" for long-dated bonds. Treasury buybacks involve the government repurchasing older, less liquid bonds from the market via reverse auctions to improve market functioning, not to reduce overall debt. While the action provided tactical relief and signaled the Treasury's willingness to intervene, analysts caution it does not address core structural issues: massive fiscal deficits, high borrowing needs, and fading demand from traditional buyers like foreign central banks. For investors, the announcement offered short-term support for long-duration bond ETFs and boosted assets like gold, which rose 2.7%. However, it's unlikely to significantly lower mortgage rates or alter the challenging environment for long-term bonds. The key takeaway is the distinction between a tactical market operation and the unresolved structural pressures that continue to push yields higher, requiring close monitoring of upcoming economic data, Treasury auctions, and potential signals of more aggressive policy measures.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

Following an unscheduled announcement from the U.S. Treasury Department on August 19th, investor discussions have intensified regarding the potential for future policy interventions in long-term bond markets. The Treasury increased the maximum size of its regular buyback operations for 10-to-30 year bonds from $2 billion to $4 billion, citing a desire to improve liquidity. This move came shortly after a surge in long-term yields, with the 30-year Treasury yield briefly touching 5.34%. Market analysts, rather than focusing on the modest operational size, have interpreted the timing—outside the normal quarterly communication window—as a significant signal. The move has been dubbed the "Bessent Put," implying the market's growing expectation that Treasury officials, led by Deputy Secretary Josh Bessent, may act to prevent a disorderly rise in long-term borrowing costs. This perception represents a potential shift in the market's view of the government's "policy reaction function." The underlying pressures on long-term bonds are multifaceted, including large fiscal deficits, increased Treasury supply, a rise in corporate debt issuance for AI infrastructure (creating a "crowding out" effect), and uncertainty around foreign holdings, particularly from Japan. Geopolitical risks in the Middle East further complicate the policy landscape, potentially creating conflicting pressures between fighting inflation and managing financing costs. However, the article clarifies that this Treasury buyback program is distinct from Quantitative Easing (QE). It is a debt management operation, not a Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion. While the announcement opens the door for market speculation about more forceful tools like Yield Curve Control (YCC) or a return to QE, analysts note that conditions would need to deteriorate significantly for such measures to be implemented. For now, the "Bessent Put" reflects a change in market expectations about possible policy boundaries, not an imminent launch of new monetary stimulus.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

"Is Stablecoin Truly Necessary for Cross-Border Payments? While stablecoins are often praised as superior for cross-border transfers—especially if the recipient desires crypto—their advantage is less clear in traditional cross-currency scenarios (e.g., USD to Mexican Peso). The existing correspondent banking system is slow and costly (≈15% fees) due to multiple intermediaries. Modern fintech solutions like Wise have dramatically improved this by using a netting model: they hold local currency pools and settle payments domestically, avoiding actual cross-border fund movement. This offers near-instant transfers with low, transparent fees (averaging ~0.52%). The 'stablecoin sandwich' model (convert fiat to stablecoin, transfer on-chain, convert to local fiat) offers similar user experience but doesn't inherently provide major cost or speed advantages over fintech. Its on-chain transfer is cheap, but fiat conversion spreads remain. Stablecoin's real innovation is 'unbundling' the cross-border payment stack. Instead of requiring a proprietary global network like Wise, businesses only need reliable on- and off-ramps in specific corridors. This lowers market entry barriers, fosters competition among local providers, and can drive down costs, particularly for niche or underserved corridors (e.g., US to Africa). While vertical integration may reoccur, the open, permissionless nature of the underlying blockchain layer makes monopolistic pricing difficult. The long-term benefit is the potential redistribution of value—previously captured as intermediary rents—to consumers through lower costs."

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

Ethereum has surged above $2,300, a level not seen in over three months, marking a significant recovery and technical breakthrough by reclaiming key resistance levels, including the weekly EMA50 for the first time in the current bear market. The rally has been fueled by a combination of factors: improved market risk appetite, positive regulatory sentiment, and a major short squeeze where over 88% of recent ETH liquidations were short positions. The ETH/BTC ratio has also broken its long-term downtrend, indicating renewed strength for Ethereum relative to Bitcoin. Fundamentally, Ethereum spot ETFs have shown strong inflows, outperforming their Bitcoin counterparts in recent months. Wall Street institutions like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have notably increased their ETH exposure, while several banks have added or expanded positions in ETH ETFs. On-chain fundamentals remain robust, with the proportion of staked ETH reaching a new all-time high of nearly 33.7%. Data indicates long-term holding sentiment, as small wallet holdings increased while large outflows were often directed towards staking or contracts, not selling. However, potential headwinds include declining staking yields and community debate over proposals to adjust staking rewards at high participation levels. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, featuring improvements to validator exit efficiency, could enhance liquidity and further attract institutional stakers. While the rebound is supported by sentiment, capital flows, and fundamentals, its sustainability hinges on continued positive developments.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Trading

Spot