火币高管面对面|火币 HTX 资产负责人 Jasper 详解优质资产捕捉法则

深潮TechFlowPublicado a 2025-08-10Actualizado a 2025-08-11

Resumen

为了尽可能捕捉潜在优质资产,火币HTX建立了一套健全的研判与评估体系。

近期,火币HTX新上线资产表现亮眼,尤其是$TREE(Treehouse)于7月29日上线后,迅速冲上平台热榜,首日涨幅更是高达6倍,引发市场关注和热议。


8月7日,火币HTX资产部门负责人Jasper受邀出席“火币高管面对面”第三期,围绕火币HTX新资产筛选机制、“长牛潜力股”的关键指标等话题,详细回应了来自X、社群及HTX DAO委员的问题。


新资产筛选机制:严谨评估,捕捉优质潜力股


为了尽可能捕捉潜在优质资产,火币HTX建立了一套健全的研判与评估体系。
据Jasper介绍,对于已上线交易所的项目,火币HTX会重点关注其后续发展情况,评估项目是否在持续推进;对于尚未发币的项目,在评估过程中会综合参考链上多项关键指标,包括持仓分布、链上活跃度、智能合约是否存在漏洞或后门风险,以及项目估值的合理性等,确保筛选出的项目具备良好的潜力和安全性。
“火币HTX会提前长达一年时间跟踪、锁定可能发币的潜力项目,并通过两到三轮的深度评估来判断是否具备上线资格。纬度包括项目团队背景、投资机构、赛道、反洗钱、KYC、合约安全性、实际运营进展、相关流量数据、产品概况、社群热度、社媒口碑、经济模型、筹码分布、链上数据是否真实等,同时借助RootData、Glassnode、CertiK等数据平台来验证链上的数据和合约安全性,确保数据的准确和全面。”


Jasper强调,判断项目“长牛”潜力的关键在于其赛道的刚需属性。例如,AAVE、UNI、LINK、TRX等与DeFi和基础设施相关的项目,真正满足行业核心需求,且具备稳定流水和盈利能力,因而被视为刚需产品,长期表现看好。相反,那些依赖包装概念、虚假数据或伪需求炒作的项目,火币HTX 会通过评估体系及时识别并筛除。


Jasper介绍称,如此严谨的筛选保证了90%以上的重点项目不会被错过。即便如此,对于一些市场热度极高但整体估值和市场反馈不理想的项目,比如“PUMP”类资产,火币HTX 也会果断拒绝上线,因为这本质上是一场赌局,宁可错过,也绝不盲目追高。“今年以来,火币HTX已成功规避了至少三个爆雷项目,充分证明了这一评估体系的可靠性。”


探索资产观察与创新区分层,助力社区参与与透明投资


为增强社区的参与感和信息透明度,火币HTX还在积极探索“资产观察名单”和“试运营区”的创新机制。


Jasper 透露,HTX DAO发起的投票荐币本质就是一个观察区,DAO社区成员可以通过投票推荐和评审潜力项目,成为官方筛选流程的重要补充。同时,火币HTX 在今年第二季度开设了创新区版块,专门用于展示确定性较低、波动较大的早期项目或 Meme 币;主区则保留给更加成熟和优质的资产,帮助用户在不同风险偏好之间进行选择。


直播中,Jasper坦言,没有任何一家交易所能保证每个上线项目都会有出色的表现,哪怕是币安、Upbit 这样的头部平台也不例外。


“交易所只是一个提供资产流通的场所,只在中间收取合理手续费,不会控制币种的涨跌。代币价格波动受项目方实力、做市策略、经济模型、市场情绪、社区热度、大盘走势、估值合理性等多重因素影响。投资者在进入市场前必须做好充分调研,理性判断,为自己的决策负责。”

Lecturas Relacionadas

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar HTX

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar HTX DAO (HTX) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar HTX DAO (HTX) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu HTX DAO (HTX)Después de comprar tu HTX DAO (HTX), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear HTX DAO (HTX)Tradear fácilmente con HTX DAO (HTX) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

3.0k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.04.30

Cómo comprar HTX

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de HTX (HTX).

活动图片