How Whales Buy the Bottom of a Market Crash

ALTCOINBUZZPublicado a 2022-06-27Actualizado a 2022-06-27

Resumen

What NFTs did whales buy? How did they manage to buy at the bottom?

Key takeaways:

Whales' preferences when buying at the bottom: Bored Ape Yacht Club > other Yuga Labs' projects > other blue chips and emerging projects. The exact type and price of purchase are correlated with capital size.

Among whales with a capital size of more than $500,000, some focus on only one collection, while others adhere to a diversified combination. The majority of whales are willing to spend from $100,000 to $250,000, but their costs vary.

Whales share a number of strategies in common, such as buying in batches and buying more when prices fall. Each of them also has its own secrets to maximizing the outcome.

The crypto market went through an abrupt plunge from June 7 to June 18. This article will answer the following questions:

What NFTs did whales buy? How did they manage to buy at the bottom?

What are the combinations and average prices involved?

Determining the time frame

The crypto market has been in a downward spiral since the first half of this year. In the last two weeks (June 7-18), the BTC price has continued to fall, with a two-week drop of over 40%. On the other hand, ETH also fell below $1,000 at one point due to the impact of Celsius.

BTC Price (Source: CMC)

Similarly, the NFT market has suffered the impact of the market downturn. OpenSea trading volume has been bearish lately, but statistics from June 7 to 18 showed a brief period of heavy trading where a high turnover rate was witnessed in the NFT market. For this reason, we will focus our analysis on this time frame.

Trading Volume on OpenSea (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

What NFTs did the Whales Buy?

Having sorted through thousands of whale wallets, we first place our focus on the top 10 best-selling NFTs among whales. Otherdeed seems to be the most popular collection among whale buyers. A total of 173 Otherdeed NFTs were bought by whales during this period, with an average purchase price of 6.22 ETH, or $9410. On the other hand, Bored Ape Yacht Club is the tenth most popular collection, as 25 were purchased by whales, with an average purchase price of 135 ETH, or $179,849.

In addition to blue-chip NFTs, we also see some non-blue-chip projects on the ranking, such as tubby cats by TubbyCatsDeployer which places second. Whales bought 104 NFTs of this collection. According to on-chain data, whales are bulk-purchasing this collection, which may be because they are laying the groundwork for future plans. Most whales still adhere to their strategies despite the 40% drop in BTC.

Top 10 Best-Selling NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

By multiplying quantity purchased with transacted price (USD), we have another list of the top 10 most spent-on NFTs among whales that seems to be more in line with the market consensus. When BTC price dropped sharply from June 7-18, we found that the whales category alone had bought $4.5 million worth of Bored Ape Yacht Club, $1.88 million worth of CryptoPunks, and $1.72 million worth of Otherdeed.

It's worth noting that the top 3 on the list are Yuga Labs' projects. The amount spent on BAYC is significantly higher than the sum of the second and the third. It is clear that when the market crashes, the buying preference of whales goes like this: Bored Ape Yacht Club > other Yuga Labs' projects > other blue chips and emerging projects.

Top 10 Most Purchased NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Which Whales Exactly?

Since ETH prices were volatile during this period (June 7-18), we will compare the amount spent by whales using USD as the standard.

Whales Who Bought Over $500,000 Worth of NFTs (Source: NFTGo.io)

As seen from the chart above, 5 whales bought more than $500,000 worth of NFTs. The top 3 of them tend to buy into one single project. For example, the first place wallet, btok1024.eth, spent 1024 ETH only on BAYC, which is a rather extreme case. The second place wallet, franklinisbored.eth, bought 7 BAYC NFTs, and the third place wallet, n0b0dy.eth, bought 17 Otherdeed NFTs.

We begin to observe diversity in the combination of NFTs bought, starting with the fourth place wallet, including 2 Meebits + 6 Doodles + 9 Bored Ape Kennel Club + 3 Bored Ape Yacht Club + 5 Clone X + 2 Moonbirds + 2 Otherdeed. Moreover, the fifth whale went with 4 Murakami.Flowers + 4 Bored Ape Yacht Club + 2 Clone X.

NFTs Bought by the Top 5 Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

Among the whales that bought over $50,000 worth of NFTs, those that spent anywhere from $100,000 to $250,000 were the most common. In fact, there were 16 of them. According to the amount spent, the ranking and average costs are as follows:

Otherdeed: $152,373.80

Bored Ape Yacht Club: $82,259.15

CryptoPunks: $35,753.61

Art Blocks: $24,962.94

Clone X: $15,214.22

Whale Distribution According to Capital Size (Source: NFTGo.io)

NFTs in the $100k-$250k Category Bought by Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

The Average Amount (USD) Spent by Whales with Between $100k-$250k Plunge Capital (Source: NFTGo.io)

Probing Into the Strategies

Among the top 10 whales who bought Otherdeed within the time frame, the #1 whale bought 55 Otherdeed NFTs with 112.97 ETH ($160,000). As of June 21, Otherdeed's floor price rose to 2.4 ETH, thus making a gain of 17%, or 19.25 ETH, for the whale. Let's see how he managed to do it with $160,000.

Otherdeed Whale Ranking (6.7-6.18) (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

From June 7, when Otherdeed's floor price gradually decreased, the whale began to buy 6 from the collection with an average price of 2.596 ETH.

Then, on June 9, Otherdeeds's floor price fell below 2.5 ETH. The whale once again bought another 10 with an average price of 2.368 ETH, thus reducing the cost of his short-term position to 2.45 ETH.

The plunge accelerated on June 12 that the floor price dropped to 1.8 ETH. This is when the whale made his final purchase of 39 Otherdeed NFTs with an average price of 1.89 ETH. By this time, his average cost is 2.05 ETH.

The Purchase Interval of Otherdeed's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

Otherdeed's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Overall, the whale's strategy is to gradually increase its position: the greater the decline, the more it buys. Purchase prices are divided into 3 ranges: 2.5-2.7 ETH, 2.3-2.5 ETH, and 1.7-2 ETH, where it bought 6, 10, and 39 respectively, lowering the average price to about 2.05 ETH.

Another thing worth noting is that when Otherdeed's price rebounded from June 13 to 15, the whale continued to buy instead of realizing its gains. This indicates that the whale adheres to its valuation, therefore, if the price remains in the "bottom range," it will continue to buy.

One interesting thing is that among its 55 purchases at the bottom, 34 were bought through offers and the remaining 21 were through direct purchases. This is the little secret to its success—people tend to prefer to offer prices amid the market downturns.

Additionally, Otherdeed's price trend shows that trading volume peaked on June 13, when the floor price dropped to a low of 1.8 ETH. This proves that many others were also trying to buy at the bottom besides whales.

Otherdeed's Trading Volume and Floor Price (Source: NFTGo.io)

Next, let's have a look at the whale who made the most BAYC purchases during June 7-18 and see how it was done.

Starting from the price on June 7, he bought 1 BAYC NFT when it dropped by 10%. Then on June 13, the price dropped by 20%, so he made another purchase. After that, he bought 5 more when the price fell by 20%-30%, thus reducing his costs to 80 ETH. On June 14, the whale bought BAYC NFTs in the top 10% rarity with 120 ETH on LooksRare.

The Purchase Interval of BAYC's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

BAYC's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

The whale buys into BAYC based on the range of price drop. For every 10% slump, it would buy 1 NFT. Plus, this whale also bought NFTs of different rarities by category.

Through the analysis above, we can conclude some underlying rules whales go by when buying at the bottom:

For individual NFTs, bought in batches (3 batches) according to ranges, and buy as soon as the price enters your valuation range.

Buy according to the margin of the plunge instead of time—the more it slumps, the more you buy.

Try to make an offer.

For main blue chips, go by rarity classification; for new and emerging blue chips, diversify your combinations.

Try out multiple platforms including X2Y2 and LooksRare instead of limiting yourself to OpenSea.

Note: The above information is for informational purposes only. Investing in digital assets such as NFTs and cryptocurrency brings with it a high degree of risk. Please consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions. NFTGo does not provide financial advice and is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of investing in digital assets.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

TL;DR: The impending Bank of Japan (BOJ) interest rate hike is shifting global market focus this week, raising questions about its potential impact on the AI-driven bull market and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. For years, the yen has served as a cheap global "funding currency," enabling carry trades where investors borrowed yen at low rates to buy higher-yielding assets. This dynamic amplified liquidity and risk appetite in global markets, benefiting high-beta assets like AI tech stocks and crypto. The BOJ's expected move to raise rates from 0.75% to 1.0% signals a shift away from this era of ultra-low-cost funding. The core concern isn't the 1% rate itself, but the direction of change and its potential to reduce global leverage and risk tolerance. An unwinding of yen carry trades could force investors to sell global assets to buy back yen for repayment, potentially triggering synchronized volatility in overvalued sectors. While AI fundamentals and crypto-specific drivers remain intact, the market impact will depend on whether the BOJ signals a faster-than-expected pace of normalization. Post-decision, watch for correlations between a strengthening yen, rising Japanese bond yields, and simultaneous pressure on tech stocks and cryptocurrencies to gauge if the market is pricing in a broader tightening of cheap global liquidity.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

Contrary to the common perception of Anthropic as a PhD-heavy AI research lab, an analysis of 1,680 engineer profiles reveals its core talent is experienced "builders." The engineering team, largely assembled in the past 18 months (median tenure 10 months), hires senior engineers with a median of 12.2 years of prior experience. They primarily come from major engineering-focused companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Stripe, Databricks, Snowflake, and Palantir, not primarily from other AI labs. Their backgrounds are infrastructure-heavy (40%), focusing on backend, distributed systems, databases, and security, with skills like Python, Java, C++, and AWS being common. Only 13.7% hold PhDs. The dominant job title is "Member of Technical Staff." For early-career hires (<6 years experience), entry is not based on standard work history but on prestigious signals: top internships (e.g., at FAANG or quant trading firms), competition rankings, research publications, or AI safety fellowship experience. The key insight for applicants is to present as infrastructure builders, highlighting experience with large-scale systems, not as pure researchers, reflecting Anthropic's identity as a highly engineered infrastructure company.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros