降息临近,币市先嗨:这次是“黄金坑”还是“温水煮多军”?

比推Publicado a 2025-08-06Actualizado a 2025-08-06

原文作者:TRACER

编译 | Odaily 星球日报

译者 | Ethan

原文标题:美联储降息倒计时,加密市场已到“黄金坑”?


编者按:8 月开局,加密市场再迎剧烈波动:比特币短线走弱,山寨币普遍回调 20%-30%,单日清算额超 15 亿美元。而这背后的主要推手,被指向特朗普。从新关税政策、地缘摩擦升级,到宏观数据反转与美联储按兵不动,市场再度被 FUD 情绪笼罩。与此同时,“特朗普秘密抛售加密资产”的传闻也加剧了市场恐慌,引发新一轮连锁反应。在本文中,作者通过拆解宏观数据与资金流向,提出一个不同于主流的判断:短期回调或是长线布局的机会,而真正的“第二波牛市”,或许已在酝酿之中。

另注,文中观点带有明确立场,并非投资建议。Odaily 星球日报提醒读者,理性参考分析内容,结合自身情况审慎决策。

原文内容

市场乐观情绪消散,调整悄然来临,比特币自历史高位回落 9%,山寨币普遍回调 20%-30%。

八月初,市场突遭猛烈抛压,单日清算规模逾 15 亿美元。核心问题在于:本轮下跌的诱因是否严峻?我们又该如何应对?

此次回调的核心触发点在于美国总统特朗普的最新动向:

  • 新关税政策提议;

  • 地缘政治不确定性升级;

  • 宏观经济数据矛盾重重。

首先,聚焦于那令人疲惫的“新关税提案”。超过 66 个国家被列入潜在加征关税名单——套路依旧。每一次都仿佛“老剧本重演”,甚至给人以“操纵市场”之感。

然而,美国政府显然不会仅仅为了这些关税而冒经济衰退之险。

这种操作引发的市场回调,我们已屡见不鲜。散户投资者常将此类消息视为重大利空,反应过度。

回想一下,类似关税威胁已宣布过多少次?而市场又在之后多少次创下新高?

因此,不必为此过度担忧,这已是老生常谈。

除了关税,近期突增的地缘政治风险也加剧了不安。导火索是:美国宣布在俄罗斯附近部署两艘核潜艇。这令人担忧吗?的确如此。

但冷静思考:真有人认为 2025 年会爆发核战争吗?这更可能是一种“施压手段”,意在推动谈判进程。

然而,真正让美国经济决策者(如美联储)头疼的,是混乱的劳动力市场宏观数据。

市场此前押注的“美联储政策转向”(降息)预期落空。

更为关键的是,5-6 月的非农就业数据(NFP)大幅下修近 10 倍,这严重动摇了市场对整体宏观数据可靠性的信心。

最终,多重因素形成一股强大的“组合拳”:

  • 利率持续高企;

  • 经济降温迹象日益增多。

这些因素叠加,导致机构投资者需求在本周显著萎缩。比特币现货 ETF更是首次录得净流出。

那么,我对后市的判断如何?

当前我的观点建立在对宏观压力持续累积的认知基础上。目前尚无主要经济体能够创造足够的信贷增长以支撑 GDP 持续扩张。

我设定的关键支撑位是:比特币 110,000 美元,以太坊 3,200 美元。

我预计至9 月,美联储将别无选择,被迫启动降息以重新刺激市场:

  • 通胀数据已显著回落;

  • 就业市场正在承压;

  • 鲍威尔似乎有意拖延降息决策。

当时间点临近时,市场有望再次开启上涨趋势。

历史规律显示,每一次类似的 FUD(恐惧、不确定性、疑虑)过后,市场都会迎来强势反弹。

参考 M 2 货币供应量与比特币价格的关联图表,结论明确:市场趋势追随流动性,而全球流动性环境整体仍趋于宽松。

因此,当前的震荡本质上仍是一场 FUD 叠加的全球市场博弈。

展望秋季,伴随降息周期开启,我预计主力资金将大规模回流,进而启动真正的“山寨币季”。

彼时,将是积极锁定利润的关键窗口期。

这正是我当前的布局方向。

在本次调整中,我专注于三类资产持续积累:BTC、SOL 以及 ETH。

我尤其看好 ETH 的技术潜力和基本面,也注意到机构对其日益浓厚的兴趣。8 月 3 日,一个与 Shraplink 相关的钱包再度加仓价值 3600 万美元的 ETH,便是一例佐证。

总结而言,策略清晰:将当前波动视为累积头寸的机遇。

市场格局正在演变,如此低位的买入窗口期恐难长久。此刻正是分步建仓、储备筹码,静待十月至十二月行情的良机。


说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Lecturas Relacionadas

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片