6大加密储备查询工具对比:哪家最好用?

marsbitPublicado a 2025-08-04Actualizado a 2025-08-05

8月初,上市公司陆续公布了2025年第二季度财报,其中较为亮眼的当属Strategy(MSTR),在Michael Saylor的带领下,Strategy在2025 年第二季度营业收入创历史新高,约为 140.3 亿美元,较去年同期增长 7106%。而 Strategy 持有的加密资产浮盈为 140 亿美元。

这一切都基于Saylor选择BTC作为储备的决定,从Strategy、Metaplanet到各种转型为加密储备的公司,从储备再BTC到ETH、BNB,SOL和SUI等。正如加密热点赛道发展一样,加密代币储备的类型和公司也在短短几个月之内陆续涌现。而对于散户来说,除了投资被列入储备的代币,也可以买入储备公司的股票。为此,为大家整理并测评了常用的加密储备公司数据查询网址/工具,如下:

综合查询网址

1、Blockworks

 Blockworks

简介:Blockworks的加密储备公司数据涵盖BTC、ETH、SOL、HYPE、XRP、SUI和多代币储备,共录入26家加密储备公司,数据栏包括加密财务公司的交易量、加密净资产值 (NAV) 等关键指标。用户可以清晰查询到:

加密储备公司股票Ticker、储备代币名称、股票日交易量、NAV、持有代币数量和公司市值。Blockworks也根据持有的加密资产净值为储备公司进行排名。(其股票数据来源为Polygon.io——一个提供美国股票市场数据的API服务。)

Blockworks还对以上数据绘制了数据表,除了上述提到的数据图表外,值得关注的是Blockworks还绘制了MNAV数据表,给出M(资产净值倍数)值的数据走势,包括企业价值和公司市值的M值,M(市值)就是公司总市值除以加密资产价值,M(企业价值)就是公司市值+总债务-现金除以加密资产价值,比如Strategy的M(市值)为1.48,Strategy 的 M(企业价值)为1.68,M也是加密储备健康度的一种风险指标。

 Blockworks

此外,Blockworks还给出了公司净资产值溢价(市值减去加密储备价值)的数据表(比如Strategy的净资产值溢价为343.6亿美元)。还有每种加密储备公司的总净资产值溢价数据表(比如BTC储备公司的净资产值溢价为 262.9亿美元),因部分BTC储备公司的股票价值小于其持有的加密资产价值,也就是其M低于1。

 Blockworks

评价:综合来看,Blockworks在综合数据上较为全面,单项数据和风险指标上较为细致,录入的加密储备公司数量较多。其资产净值溢价和MNAV的数据表可以很直观的看出加密储备公司的风险指标数据,略有不足就是该网址只给出了股票Ticker而非公司全称,对于一些不太熟悉美股的用户还需要先查询股票Ticker再了解公司。

2、Delphi Digital

 Blockworks

简介:Delphi Digital的加密储备公司数据表包括BTC、ETH和SOL三种,但录入公司较少,其中录入BTC储备公司共4种(Strategy、Metaplanet、Twenty One和Semler Scientific),录入ETH储备公司4种(Sharplink Gaming、BitMine Immersion Tech、BTCS Inc和Bit Digital Inc)、录入SOL储备公司2种(DeFi Development Corp和Upexi)。Delphi Digital的数据表包括公司名称、股票Ticker、股价、市值、加密资产价值和M(上文中市值除以加密资产价值的M值)。(数据来自SEC和新闻公告。)

评价:Delphi Digital 的数据表较为简单,只能查到一些较早或知名的加密储备公司,对于一些新晋储备公司未录入数据,且对于Blockworks,Delphi Digital的MANV的数据也较为单一,只能算作一个普通的加密储备公司数据查询备选。

3、The Block

 Blockworks

简介:The Block的加密储备公司数据表分为四部分,BTC、ETH和SOL还有综合加密储备企业数据,共录入了 26 个加密储备公司。其数据涵盖主流的加密储备公司,数据表包括:加密储备公司市值、加密储备公司持有代币市值、单个主流储备公司的代币持仓、单个代币的储备公司总持有量。

评价:图表上看不如Blockworks。部分加密储备数据来源于DUNE平台,所以持仓更新较慢,数据并不算特别准确。

4、cryptotreasuries.info

 Blockworks

简介:cryptotreasuries.info共分为三类加密储备,BTC、ETH和SOL,但SOL并未录入任何公司,其中BTC储备公司录入较多,此外,平台还给出了相关代币的价格走势。

该平台数据栏包括:公司名称和股票Ticker、代币持有量和总价值、30/90天和1年的每股BTC收益和MNAV。

评价:cryptotreasuries.info为今日所有查询工具中录入BTC储备公司最多的平台,但ETH储备较少,且SOL储备公司暂无(未更新),该平台还绘制了储备公司增持代币数据和股价走势对比图。

 Blockworks

5、Crypto Stock Tracker

 Blockworks

简介:Crypto Stock Tracker数据表包括股票Ticker、股价和股价日内涨跌幅、市值和流通股、持有加密代币数量和总价值。目前涵盖BTC、ETH、SOL和XRP储备公司,每种代币的储备公司录入较多,界面右侧有近期增持的消息和即将进行增持的加密储备公司最新消息,还包括其平台近期更新信息。

评价:Crypto Stock Tracker的 X 账号创建于 7 月,属于加密储备火热时顺势建立的新数据平台,录入的加密储备公司较多,加密储备相关观点部分还不错,相比其他平台,其多出了股价和流通股数据,也就是储备公司市值数据,对考虑买入美股玩家较为友好,若未来更新及时,可列入未来加密储备数据观察列表。

6、cryptotreasuries.com

 Blockworks

简介:cryptotreasuries.com是7月份新出的加密战略储备公司数据和分析平台,目前录入的加密储备公司数量较少,包括2个BTC储备公司Strategy和Metaplanet,2个ETH储备公司Bitmine和Sharplink、2个SOL储备公司Upexi和DeFiDevelopment Corp,还有一个HYPE储备公司Hypreion DeFi。

其综合数据栏包括:公司名称、股票Ticker、持有的加密储备代币数量和总价值、股价、市值和MNAV。

 Blockworks

评价:cryptotreasuries.com界面简单直观,录入公司较少,优势在于平台列出了近期增持代币的储备公司数据和增持比例。作为新平台,未来或将增加更多加密储备公司数据,属于“潜力股”。

结语

目前上市公司转型或进阶为加密储备公司的实体的更新速度相对快,比如基本每周都会有几家新的上市公司宣布买入或即将 BTC 作为战略储备,除了直接买入外,还有包括融资或增发股票的方式来增持加密储备(新闻公布后需要一定时间来筹集资金)。还有一些部分即将合并的实体并不容易计算其市值和加密储备数量,所以很难列出特别细致的数据,现实的总加密储备公司数据上有一定偏差。此外,以上部分平台还录入了加密矿企的储备数据。

但总体来说还不错,以上提到的储备公司查询网址/工具中,Blockworks 较为领先,无论是在图表还是数据图上,此外,几个新平台的界面和数据分类上也各有优势,Crypto Stock Tracker是以上平台中唯一录入了XRP储备的平台,cryptotreasuries.com 是以上所有平台中唯一录入 HYPE 的平台,cryptotreasuries.info 为今日所有查询工具中录入 BTC 储备公司最多的平台。

值得注意的是,以上所有平台均未更新 Sharplink 的 ETH 持仓数据(昨日 Sharplink Gaming 增持 15,822 枚 ETH,其 ETH 储备升至 480,204 枚,总价值达 16.2 亿美元)。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

"Standing in the Light: Understanding the Optical Module and CPO Industry Chain" This article analyzes the critical role of optical communication technology, specifically optical modules and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), as the "nervous system" for modern AI data centers. With exponential growth in AI computational demands (e.g., NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture), traditional electrical interconnects using copper cables face severe bottlenecks in bandwidth, power consumption, and signal integrity over distance. The core function of an optical module is to act as a "translator," converting electrical signals from chips into optical signals for transmission over fiber (and vice-versa). Key internal components include lasers, modulators, photodetectors, drivers, and DSP chips. The industry is currently transitioning from 800G to 1.6T modules. However, the future lies in CPO. This next-generation technology integrates the optical engine directly with the switch ASIC/XPU on the same package substrate, drastically reducing power consumption (by ~3.5x according to NVIDIA), overcoming bandwidth density limits, and minimizing signal attenuation compared to traditional pluggable modules. Key challenges for CPO include advanced packaging capacity (dominated by TSMC), thermal management, repairability, and standardization. The article details the broader technology landscape, including Near-Packaged Optics (NPO, a pragmatic intermediate step), Linear-drive Pluggable Optics (LPO), Optical I/O (OIO for chip-level integration), and Optical Circuit Switches (OCS). A comprehensive CPO industry chain is mapped, highlighting shifting power dynamics: * **Architecture Definers:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell now hold greater influence. * **Advanced Packaging & Manufacturing:** TSMC is central; Fabrinet is a key EMS player. * **Lasers ("The Heart"):** A strategic bottleneck. EML lasers are led by Lumentum and Coherent (both receiving major NVIDIA investments). CW lasers, favored for CPO/silicon photonics, see strong Chinese players like Source Photonics and Sicoya. * **Silicon Photonics Chips:** The mainstream path for CPO engines, with key players like Broadcom, Intel, Marvell, and China's Accelink. * **Fiber Connectivity Components:** A major new, high-growth market created by CPO, including Fiber Array Units (FAU), Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF), and MPO connectors. Companies like Tianfu Communication and US Conec are leaders. * **Fiber & Cable:** Experiencing a super-cycle (e.g., Corning, Yangtze Optical Fiber). * **PCB/Substrates:** Requiring advanced materials (e.g., Shengyi Tech). * **DSP & SerDes:** Functions are integrated into switch ASICs in the CPO era (e.g., Broadcom, Astera Labs). * **Optical Module Makers:** Transitioning from standalone module suppliers to providers of optical engines and NPO/LPO solutions while riding the current pluggable boom (e.g., Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink). The investment timeline is segmented: Short-term (2026-2027) features the "last feast" for pluggable modules and CPO's initial rollout. Medium-term (2027-2029) will see CPO expand and NPO peak. Long-term (2029-2032+) involves CPO/OIO penetration into intra-rack scaling. In conclusion, optical interconnects are fundamental to AI infrastructure. The competitive landscape sees US firms leading in architecture and high-end chips, TSMC in advanced packaging, and Chinese firms holding strong positions in modules, connectivity components, CW lasers, and fiber/cable. The future belongs to companies that can navigate the technological shift from "selling shovels" (modules) to "building highways" (CPO/OIO infrastructure).

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片