166 页数字资产报告来袭,BTC价格涨跌分化

深潮TechFlowPublicado a 2025-07-30Actualizado a 2025-07-31

Resumen

这份“圣经”或许为未来的加密监管搭建了框架。

综编:Felix, PANews


自唐纳德·特朗普总统今年 1 月要求成立数字资产市场工作组,并提交阐述数字资产监管框架建议的报告以来,这份报告备受期待。甚至有部分加密人士声称这份报告将成为该行业的“监管圣经”或指南。


如今这份“监管圣经”终于发布。唐纳德·特朗普总统领导的政府于周三(7 月 30 日)发布了最为详细的数字资产政策报告,据统计,这份长达 166 页的数字资产报告,391 次提及加密货币,130 次提及比特币,32 次提及 DeFi,28 次提及以太坊。


报告概述了加密货币的广泛监管路线图,提出了涉及多个加密相关领域的政策建议。其中,主要可分为五大范畴:


1. 将美国定位为数字资产市场的领导者


工作组建议,国会应在众议院两党一致投票通过《CLARITY 法案》的基础上,颁布以下立法:

  • 授权 CFTC 监管非证券型数字资产的现货市场,以消除现有的监管缺口。
  • 拥抱 DeFi 技术,并认识到将该技术融入主流金融的潜力


SEC 和 CFTC 应利用其现有权力:

  • 立即在联邦层面启动数字资产交易,并向市场参与者明确注册、托管、交易和记录保存等问题。
  • 通过使用安全港和监管沙盒等工具,使创新金融产品能不受官僚主义拖延地惠及消费者。

2.现代化数字资产银行监管


报告中称,特朗普政府已彻底终止了“扼杀点行动2.0”,致力于终止那些拒绝向数字资产行业提供银行服务的监管措施。工作组建议监管机构采取以下额外措施:

  • 重启加密货币创新工作,明确银行在托管、代币化、稳定币发行和区块链应用方面可允许的活动。
  • 提高机构获得银行执照或储备银行主账户流程的透明度。
  • 确保银行资本规则与数字资产的实际风险相一致,而不仅仅是其存在于分布式账本中。

3.强化美元地位

  • 财政部和银行机构应忠实、迅速地执行《GENIUS 法案》。
  • 国会应采取进一步行动,通过《反中央银行数字货币监控州法案》,将总统禁止美国中央银行数字货币的行政命令条款编纂成法典,以保护隐私和公民自由。

4.打击数字时代的非法金融

  • 财政部和相关监管机构应明确《银行保密法》(BSA) 的义务和报告。
  • 国会应强调自主托管的重要性,并明确 DeFi 生态系统中参与者的反洗钱/反恐怖融资义务。
  • 监管机构应努力防止滥用职权针对守法公民的合法活动,并保护公民的隐私。

5.确保数字资产税收的公平性和可预测性

  • 财政部和美国国税局应发布有关 CAMT(PANews 注:企业替代最低税)、封装交易和数字资产最低限度收入相关主题的指南,以减轻纳税人的负担。
  • 财政部和美国国税局审查此前发布的有关挖矿和质押等活动税收处理的指南。
  • 国会颁布立法,将数字资产视为一种新的资产类别,并根据联邦所得税规定,对适用于证券或商品的税收规则进行修改,并将数字资产添加到受洗售规则约束的资产清单中。

该报告发布后,业界普遍认为其是特朗普加密议程方向的积极信号。


加密创新委员会(Crypto Council for Innovation)首席执行官 Ji Kim 表示:“总统工作组数字资产报告的发布标志着政府上下齐心协力,确保美国在加密货币黄金时代保持领先地位。从 DeFi、代币化、市场结构、CIF、税收等等——该报告涵盖了所有内容。我们现在有了明确的监管指南,以确保持续增长”。


Jito Labs 法务 Rebecca Rettig 在报告发布后,也给予了肯定,其认为:“尽管还有很多工作要做,但这份出色的路线图为美国加密行业真正实现监管透明化提供了指引。”


但值得一提的是,尽管该报告对加密行业来说是一次“重大胜利”,对于密切关注这些政策的加密行业来说,该报告并没有透露出新的举措,也没有深入解释具体的政策措施,仍留下了一些悬而未决的问题,包括与联邦政府加密货币储备未来规模相关的问题。一位官员在新闻发布会上表示,该报告的重点是监管框架而非储备,并表示更多信息应该很快会公布。


此外,该报告也承认,国会尚未通过市场结构法案,这为行业带来了诸多限制。该法案将为加密货币的发行以及像 Coinbase 这样的交易所的运营建立更全面的监管机制。尽管该报告鼓励 SEC 和 CFTC 就注册、托管和交易等关键功能提供更清晰的说明,但在国会继续就立法进行辩论期间,许多市场参与者仍将处于不确定状态。


虽然这份报告可能“未达预期”,但或许正如美国官员所称的:“他们已经为这栋房子的建成打下了坚实的基础。”

Lecturas Relacionadas

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

The article "The End of Single-Factor Crypto" posits a fundamental shift in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. It argues the era where crypto asset valuations were predominantly driven by, and correlated with, Bitcoin's price is ending. The space is bifurcating into two distinct economies: endogenous and exogenous. The endogenous economy represents traditional crypto, where token and project values are directly tied to crypto market prices. The emerging exogenous economy comprises projects and businesses that may utilize blockchain technology or tokens but derive their fundamental value from external, non-crypto factors like consumer demand, subscription revenue, or real-world utility. Examples include AI inference platforms like Venice, fintech lenders using blockchain for efficiency, and stablecoin/payment infrastructure companies acquired by giants like Mastercard and Stripe. This shift means investment analysis must change. For exogenous assets, evaluating traditional business fundamentals—such as revenue streams, unit economics, and competitive moats—becomes more critical than tracking Bitcoin charts. While endogenous assets like Bitcoin remain relevant, the growth of the exogenous category is driven by measurable demand independent of crypto price cycles, paving the way for a new, more diversified market phase. Consequently, crypto is evolving from a single-factor, reflexive asset class into a multifaceted ecosystem with varied drivers and investment theses.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

ChainCatcher's Daily Crypto Brief: Key developments from the past 24 hours include significant funding moves, regulatory actions, and market predictions. Bitmine announced a $300 million preferred stock fundraising. Polymarket accused rival prediction platform Kalshi of corporate espionage, citing numerous suspicious coincidences in product launches, a claim Kalshi strongly denied. The U.S. Department of Justice, in a joint "Disruption Week" anti-fraud operation with companies like Coinbase and Meta, froze over $3.8 million in cryptocurrency linked to scams. In infrastructure news, Macau completed its integration with the multi-central bank digital currency bridge, mBridge, aiming to build efficient cross-border payment channels. Cosmos Labs acquired the block explorer Mintscan. Market-wise, Geoffrey Kendrick, Standard Chartered's Head of Digital Assets Research, stated Bitcoin is nearing a bottom around $63,000, maintaining a year-end target of $100,000. He noted stability in U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF holdings. Ahead of SpaceX's anticipated IPO, internal insiders at Rocket Lab (RKLB) sold over $18.41 million in stock. In tokenization, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apex and Archax to launch a tokenized real estate fund. The meme token tracker GMGN reported the top trending tokens: on Ethereum, HEX, SHIB, LINK, PEPE, mUSD; on Solana, TROLL, swarms, WORLDCUP, neet, Buttcoin; and on Base, PEPE, toby, ODDS, ELSA, SKI.

链捕手Hace 21 min(s)

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

链捕手Hace 21 min(s)

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

Title: 55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind the Potential Halving of Rubin's Memory. On June 4th, a report from SemiAnalysis suggested NVIDIA's next-gen Vera Rubin NVL72 AI rack may ship with roughly 28TB of SOCAMM DRAM per rack instead of the anticipated 55TB, primarily using 96GB modules. This sparked a market panic, causing Micron's stock to drop over 10% on fears of halved memory demand. However, the article argues this panic is misguided for several key reasons. First, SOCAMM modules are socketed and upgradeable, not soldered. Lower initial configuration doesn't mean permanent demand loss. Second, the primary driver is a severe 2026 LPDDR5X supply shortage, not diminished need. NVIDIA is likely prioritizing rack shipments with available components. Third, with fixed total LPDDR5X supply, using less per rack could allow NVIDIA to ship *more* racks, not necessarily reducing overall memory orders. Micron's sharp drop was also attributed to a broader semiconductor sell-off triggered by Broadcom's earnings, with the SemiAnalysis report providing a convenient narrative for profit-taking after Micron's massive rally. In summary: the report on lower default configurations is likely accurate, but interpreting it as a demand collapse is wrong. The real risk for Micron lies in its reportedly minimal HBM4 share for Rubin, not in potentially flexible SOCAMM demand. The sell-off appears more like a correction amplified by coinciding negative catalysts.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片