Институционалы впервые захватили 11% рынка биткоинов

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2025-01-28Actualizado a 2025-07-29

Под контролем институциональных инвесторов оказалось 11% от рыночной капитализации биткоина. Таким наблюдением в своем X поделился основатель инвестиционной платформы Capriole Investments Чарльз Эдвардс

Участников криптосообщества насторожила новость. Вот что не так с концентрацией крупного объема BTC в карманах институциональных инвесторов.

Чарльз Эдвардс обратил внимание на то, что ранее в истории криптосообщества еще никогда у институционалов не было такого количества биткоинов. По данным bitbo, под одни только торгуемые на бирже криптофонды на BTC выкуплено 1 483 500 биткоинов на $176,42 млрд, или 7,064% от эмиссии криптовалюты. На кошельках публичных компаний, властей стран и непубличных компаний еще свыше 8% от эмиссии BTC.

Количество биткоинов под контролем институционалов. Источник: Capriole Invest

Абсолютные лидеры по числу выкупленных биткоинов:

  • спотовый биткоин-ETF гиганта с Уолл-стрит BlackRock — iShares Bitcoin Trust с 738 011 BTC
  • MicroStrategy (Strategy) с 607 770 BTC

Подписчики Эдвардса обратили внимание на то, что концентрация такого объема биткоинов в руках небольшой группы крупных инвесторов противоречит идеям Сатоши Накамото, создателя BTC. Анонимный разработчик хотел дать людям независимый от банков и регуляторов финансовый инструмент. На деле же биткоин-инвесторы попали в зависимость от крупных инвесторов. Их интерес к BTC постепенно убивает децентрализацию криптовалюты.

На рынке развернулась дискуссия о том, как именно концентрация такого большого объема биткоинов в руках институционалов может повлиять на рынок. Аналитики Митчелл Аскью и Эрик Балчунас уверены в том, что интерес крупных инвесторов к крипте убьет криптозимы. Теперь, как они считают, рынок будет двигаться лишь вверх, с передышками на боковое движение.

С ними кардинально несогласен инвестор SunnyDecree. Он считает, что институционалы могут спровоцировать погружение рынка в жесткую криптозиму. Свою точку зрения он объяснил тем, что крупные инвесторы, как и ретейл, заинтересованы в фиксации профита. Веру в то, что институционалы будут бесконечно накапливать биткоины, он считает необоснованной.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

Chainlink experienced its strongest wallet growth burst of 2026, adding approximately 6,100 new addresses in just two days. This notable increase in network participation occurred despite LINK's price trading in a difficult market environment alongside other altcoins. The surge in new wallets is seen as a positive signal for user and investor interest, suggesting the ecosystem continues to attract attention even when price action is weak. Wallet growth is considered a useful metric as it measures real participation rather than just price speculation. For an infrastructure project like Chainlink, whose value is tied to oracle services, data, and real-world assets, such growth indicates ongoing engagement with its core technology. However, the article notes that this data point, while constructive, is not conclusive on its own. The nature of the new wallets—whether they belong to small holders, new users, or exchange-related entities—remains unclear. The report maintains a balanced perspective, stating that while this wallet growth is a positive adoption signal for LINK bulls, it does not guarantee a price increase. Skeptics may question whether this user growth translates into value capture for the token. The key takeaway is that this burst of activity should be monitored alongside other factors like transaction volume, price structure, and broader market trends for a more complete picture. The signal requires follow-through in price and demand to be fully validated.

bitcoinistHace 41 min(s)

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

bitcoinistHace 41 min(s)

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片