Lido Proposes Limit On Ethereum Staking, Here's Why

CoingapePublicado a 2022-06-24Actualizado a 2022-06-24

Resumen

DeFi platform Lido on Friday proposed a limit on the platform’s share of staked Ethereum, citing a potential systematic risk from the token, among other factors.

DeFi platform Lido on Friday proposed a limit on the platform’s share of staked Ethereum, citing a potential systematic risk from the token, among other factors.
In a governance proposal put forward on Friday, the fifth-largest DeFi protocol said that multiple prominent Ethereum developers, including co-founder Vitalik Buterin, have argued that no single protocol should have a majority in staking ETH.
Voting on the proposal has not opened yet. Lido wants to first establish whether a limit on staking would be desirable, and to what extent the limit should be placed.
The proposal comes a few weeks after a sharp fall in Lido Staked Ethereum (stETH) caused mass liquidations in the market. The fall caused a divergence in stETH and ETH prices, which could complicate the upcoming merge.
Lido is by far the biggest provider of liquid staked Ethereum, which is a tradeable class of token that represents staked ETH. stETH- its main product- can be redeemed for ETH once the merge goes live.
SHIB Price Analysis: $0.00001 Breakout Could Pump SHIB by 33%
DeFi News
The argument for limiting Ethereum staking
In its proposal, Lido argues that the saturation of staked Ethereum towards one protocol poses an existential threat to the blockchain, given that it would give the protocol more voting power.
It also argued that limiting staking would be done on good faith that other liquid staking protocols would also limit their exposure. This would also allow newcomers, such as the recently launched Rocket Pool, to rise to meet the supply shortfall.
stETH, if allowed to grow, could also pose a “systemic” risk to the merge due to the divergence in value between it and ETH.
Possible risks from Lido limiting exposure
On the flipside, Lido argued in its proposal that there is a risk that a centralized exchange-led KYC standard could dominate the market if it were to choose to limit its staking exposure.
There also lies the possibility that other liquid staking providers would not be able to scale quickly enough to meet demand, causing a liquidity crunch.
Lido also argued that the staking derivatives market could be a “winner-takes-most market,” and that it should capitalize on its market dominance.
Discussion over the proposal was just opened. It is now in the community’s hands to decide where to take Lido.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar LDO

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Lido (LDO) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Lido (LDO) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Lido (LDO)Después de comprar tu Lido (LDO), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Lido (LDO)Tradear fácilmente con Lido (LDO) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

190 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar LDO

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de LDO (LDO).

活动图片